• Browse all
Search for top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in $\sqrt s =$8 TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

The collaboration
JHEP 1411 (2014) 118, 2014

Abstract (data abstract)
CERN-LHC. The results of a search for top squark (stop) pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum are reported. The analysis is performed with proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2012 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20 fb$^{-1}$. The lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is taken to be the lightest neutralino which only interacts weakly and is assumed to be stable. The stop decay scenarios considered are those to a top quark and the LSP as well as to a bottom quark and the lightest chargino, where the chargino decays to the LSP by emitting a W boson. A wide range of scenarios with different mass splittings between the stop, the lightest neutralino and the lightest chargino are considered, including cases where the W bosons or the top quarks are off-shell. Decay scenarios involving the heavier charginos and neutralinos are addressed using a set of phenomenological models of supersymmetry. No significant excess over the Standard Model prediction is observed. A stop with a mass between 210 and 640 GeV decaying directly to a top quark and a massless LSP is excluded at 95% confidence level, and in models where the mass of the lightest chargino is twice that of the LSP, stops are excluded at 95% confidence level up to a mass of 500 GeV for an LSP mass in the range of 100 to 150 GeV. Stringent exclusion limits are also derived for all other considered stop decay scenarios, and generic upper limits are set on the visible cross-section for processes beyond the Standard Model.

• #### Table 1

Data from F 13a

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t1

Expected and observed $H_{T,sig}^{miss}$ distribution for tN_med SR, before applying the $H_{T,sig}^{miss}>12$ requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental...

• #### Table 2

Data from F 13b

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t2

Expected and observed large-R jet mass distribution for tN_boost SR, before applying the large-R jet mass$>75$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty...

• #### Table 3

Data from F 13c

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t3

Expected and observed b-jet multiplicity distribution for bCc_diag SR, before applying the b-jet multiplicity$=0$ requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and...

• #### Table 4

Data from F 13d

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t4

Expected and observed $am_{T2}$ distribution for bCd_high1 SR, before applying the $am_{T2}>200$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and all...

• #### Table 5

Data from F 13e

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t5

Expected and observed leading b-jet $p_T$ distribution for bCd_high2 SR, before applying the leading b-jet $p_T>170$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty...

• #### Table 6

Data from F 13f

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t6

Expected and observed $E_T^{miss}$ distribution for tNbC_mix SR, before applying the $E_T^{miss}>270$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and all...

• #### Table 7

Data from F 14a

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t7

Expected and observed lepton $p_T$ distribution for bCa_low SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last...

• #### Table 8

Data from F 14b

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t8

Expected and observed lepton $p_T$ distribution for bCa_med SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last...

• #### Table 9

Data from F 14c

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t9

Expected and observed $am_T2$ distribution for bCb_med1 SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last bin...

• #### Table 10

Data from F 14d

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t10

Expected and observed $am_T2$ distribution for bCb_high SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last bin...

• #### Table 11

Data from AUX F 03

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t11

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 12

Data from AUX F 04

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t12

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$). This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 13

Data from AUX F 05

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t13

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$). This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 14

Data from AUX F 06

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t14

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 15

Data from AUX F 07

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t15

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 16

Data from AUX F 08

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t16

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 17

Data from AUX F 09

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t17

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 18

Data from AUX F 10

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t18

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

• #### Table 19

Data from AUX F 11

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t19

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV. This mapping is used for the...

• #### Table 20

Data from AUX F 12

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t20

Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV. This mapping is used for the...

• #### Table 21

Data from AUX F 13

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t21

Upper limits on the model cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 22

Data from F 15

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t22

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 23

Data from F 15

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t23

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 24

Data from AUX F 14

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t24

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 25

Data from F 15

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t25

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 26

Data from F 15

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t26

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 27

Data from AUX F 15

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t27

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 28

Data from F 15

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t28

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 29

Data from F 15

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t29

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 30

Data from AUX F 16

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t30

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 31

Data from F 16

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t31

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 32

Data from F 16

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t32

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 33

Data from AUX F 17

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t33

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV.

• #### Table 34

Data from F 17

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t34

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV.

• #### Table 35

Data from F 17

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t35

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV.

• #### Table 36

Data from AUX F 18

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t36

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV.

• #### Table 37

Data from F 18

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t37

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV.

• #### Table 38

Data from F 18

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t38

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV.

• #### Table 39

Data from AUX F 19

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t39

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV.

• #### Table 40

Data from F 19

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t40

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV.

• #### Table 41

Data from F 19

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t41

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV.

• #### Table 42

Data from AUX F 20

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t42

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 43

Data from F 20

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t43

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 44

Data from F 20

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t44

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 45

Data from AUX F 21

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t45

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV.

• #### Table 46

Data from F 21

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t46

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV.

• #### Table 47

Data from F 21

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t47

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV.

• #### Table 48

Data from AUX F 22

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t48

Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV.

• #### Table 49

Data from F 22

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t49

Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV.

• #### Table 50

Data from F 22

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t50

Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV.

• #### Table 51

Data from AUX F 23

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t51

Acceptance of tN_diag SR ($E_T^{miss}>150$ GeV, $m_T>140$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is...

• #### Table 52

Data from AUX F 24

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t52

Acceptance of tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

• #### Table 53

Data from AUX F 25

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t53

Acceptance of tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

• #### Table 54

Data from AUX F 26

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t54

Acceptance of bCb_med2 SR ($am_{T2}>250$ GeV, $m_T>60$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is...

• #### Table 55

Data from AUX F 27

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t55

Acceptance of bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

• #### Table 56

Data from AUX F 28

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t56

Acceptance of bCd_bulk SR ($am_{T2}>175$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is...

• #### Table 57

Data from AUX F 29

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t57

Acceptance of bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

• #### Table 58

Data from AUX F 30

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t58

Acceptance of bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

• #### Table 59

Data from AUX F 31

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t59

Acceptance of bCa_med for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

• #### Table 60

Data from AUX F 32

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t60

Acceptance of bCa_low for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

• #### Table 61

Data from AUX F 33

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t61

Acceptance of bCb_med1 for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

• #### Table 62

Data from AUX F 34

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t62

Acceptance of bCb_high for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

• #### Table 63

Data from AUX F 35

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t63

Acceptance of 3-body SR ($80<am_{T2}<90$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$). The acceptance is defined...

• #### Table 64

Data from AUX F 36

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t64

Acceptance of tNbC_mix SR for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance...

• #### Table 65

Data from AUX F 37

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t65

Efficiency of tN_diag SR ($E_T^{miss}>150$ GeV, $m_T>140$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is...

• #### Table 66

Data from AUX F 38

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t66

Efficiency of tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

• #### Table 67

Data from AUX F 39

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t67

Efficiency of tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

• #### Table 68

Data from AUX F 40

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t68

Efficiency of bCb_med2 SR ($am_{T2}>250$ GeV, $m_T>60$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is...

• #### Table 69

Data from AUX F 41

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t69

Efficiency of bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

• #### Table 70

Data from AUX F 42

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t70

Efficiency of bCd_bulk SR ($am_{T2}>175$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is...

• #### Table 71

Data from AUX F 43

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t71

Efficiency of bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

• #### Table 72

Data from AUX F 44

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t72

Efficiency of bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

• #### Table 73

Data from AUX F 45

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t73

Efficiency of bCa_med for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

• #### Table 74

Data from AUX F 46

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t74

Efficiency of bCa_low for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

• #### Table 75

Data from AUX F 47

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t75

Efficiency of bCb_med1 for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

• #### Table 76

Data from AUX F 48

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t76

Efficiency of bCb_high for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

• #### Table 77

Data from AUX F 49

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t77

Efficiency of 3-body SR ($80<am_{T2}<90$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$). The efficiency is the...

• #### Table 78

Data from AUX F 50

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t78

Efficiency of tNbC_mix SR for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency...

• #### Table 79

Data from AUX F 51

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t79

Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 80

Data from AUX F 52

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t80

Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 81

Data from AUX F 53

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t81

Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV; $E_T^{miss}$(gen)$>60$ GeV.

• #### Table 82

Data from AUX F 53

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t82

Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV; $E_T^{miss}$(gen)$>250$ GeV.

• #### Table 83

Data from AUX F 54

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t83

Number of generated events for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 84

Data from AUX F 55

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t84

Number of generated events for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 85

Data from AUX F 56

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t85

Cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 86

Data from AUX F 57

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t86

Cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 87

Data from AUX F 58

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t87

Cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 88

Data from AUX F 59

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t88

Cross-section for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 89

Data from AUX F 60

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t89

Cross-section for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 90

Data from AUX F 61

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t90

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tN_diag SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$, using the...

• #### Table 91

Data from AUX F 62

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t91

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tN_med SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 92

Data from AUX F 63

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t92

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tN_boost SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 93

Data from AUX F 64

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t93

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCb_med2 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$, using the...

• #### Table 94

Data from AUX F 65

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t94

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCc_diag SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 95

Data from AUX F 66

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t95

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCd_bulk SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$, using the...

• #### Table 96

Data from AUX F 67

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t96

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCd_high1 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 97

Data from AUX F 68

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t97

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCd_high2 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 98

Data from AUX F 69

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t98

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCa_med SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 99

Data from AUX F 70

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t99

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCa_low SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 100

Data from AUX F 71

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t100

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCb_med1 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 101

Data from AUX F 72

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t101

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCb_high SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 102

Data from AUX F 73

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t102

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected 3-body SR yields for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$), using the 2...

• #### Table 103

Data from AUX F 74

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t103

Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tNbC_mix SR yields for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$)...

• #### Table 104

Data from AUX F 75

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t104

Observed CLs in tN_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 105

Data from AUX F 76

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t105

Observed CLs in tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 106

Data from AUX F 77

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t106

Observed CLs in tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 107

Data from AUX F 78

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t107

Observed CLs in bCb_med2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 108

Data from AUX F 79

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t108

Observed CLs in bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 109

Data from AUX F 80

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t109

Observed CLs in bCd_bulk SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 110

Data from AUX F 81

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t110

Observed CLs in bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 111

Data from AUX F 82

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t111

Observed CLs in bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 112

Data from AUX F 83

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t112

Observed CLs in bCa_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 113

Data from AUX F 84

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t113

Observed CLs in bCa_low SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 114

Data from AUX F 85

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t114

Observed CLs in bCb_med1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 115

Data from AUX F 86

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t115

Observed CLs in bCb_high SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 116

Data from AUX F 87

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t116

Observed CLs in 3-body SR for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 117

Data from AUX F 88

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t117

Observed CLs in tNbC_mix SR for the mixed scenario (50% $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, 50% $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 118

Data from AUX F 89

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t118

Expected CLs in tN_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 119

Data from AUX F 90

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t119

Expected CLs in tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 120

Data from AUX F 91

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t120

Expected CLs in tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 121

Data from AUX F 92

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t121

Expected CLs in bCb_med2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 122

Data from AUX F 93

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t122

Expected CLs in bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 123

Data from AUX F 94

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t123

Expected CLs in bCd_bulk SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 124

Data from AUX F 95

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t124

Expected CLs in bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 125

Data from AUX F 96

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t125

Expected CLs in bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

• #### Table 126

Data from AUX F 97

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t126

Expected CLs in bCa_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 127

Data from AUX F 98

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t127

Expected CLs in bCa_low SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 128

Data from AUX F 99

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t128

Expected CLs in bCb_med1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 129

Data from AUX F 100

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t129

Expected CLs in bCb_high SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

• #### Table 130

Data from AUX F 101

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t130

Expected CLs in 3-body SR for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

• #### Table 131

Data from AUX F 102

10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t131

Expected CLs in tNbC_mix SR for the mixed scenario (50% $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, 50% $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$).

Loading Data...