• Browse all
Search for top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in $\sqrt s =$8 TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration
JHEP 1411 (2014) 118, 2014

Abstract (data abstract)
CERN-LHC. The results of a search for top squark (stop) pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum are reported. The analysis is performed with proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2012 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20 fb$^{-1}$. The lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is taken to be the lightest neutralino which only interacts weakly and is assumed to be stable. The stop decay scenarios considered are those to a top quark and the LSP as well as to a bottom quark and the lightest chargino, where the chargino decays to the LSP by emitting a W boson. A wide range of scenarios with different mass splittings between the stop, the lightest neutralino and the lightest chargino are considered, including cases where the W bosons or the top quarks are off-shell. Decay scenarios involving the heavier charginos and neutralinos are addressed using a set of phenomenological models of supersymmetry. No significant excess over the Standard Model prediction is observed. A stop with a mass between 210 and 640 GeV decaying directly to a top quark and a massless LSP is excluded at 95% confidence level, and in models where the mass of the lightest chargino is twice that of the LSP, stops are excluded at 95% confidence level up to a mass of 500 GeV for an LSP mass in the range of 100 to 150 GeV. Stringent exclusion limits are also derived for all other considered stop decay scenarios, and generic upper limits are set on the visible cross-section for processes beyond the Standard Model.

  • Table 1

    Data from F 13a

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t1

    Expected and observed $H_{T,sig}^{miss}$ distribution for tN_med SR, before applying the $H_{T,sig}^{miss}>12$ requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental...

  • Table 2

    Data from F 13b

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t2

    Expected and observed large-R jet mass distribution for tN_boost SR, before applying the large-R jet mass$>75$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty...

  • Table 3

    Data from F 13c

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t3

    Expected and observed b-jet multiplicity distribution for bCc_diag SR, before applying the b-jet multiplicity$=0$ requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and...

  • Table 4

    Data from F 13d

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t4

    Expected and observed $am_{T2}$ distribution for bCd_high1 SR, before applying the $am_{T2}>200$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and all...

  • Table 5

    Data from F 13e

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t5

    Expected and observed leading b-jet $p_T$ distribution for bCd_high2 SR, before applying the leading b-jet $p_T>170$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty...

  • Table 6

    Data from F 13f

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t6

    Expected and observed $E_T^{miss}$ distribution for tNbC_mix SR, before applying the $E_T^{miss}>270$ GeV requirement. The uncertainty includes statistical and all...

  • Table 7

    Data from F 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t7

    Expected and observed lepton $p_T$ distribution for bCa_low SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last...

  • Table 8

    Data from F 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t8

    Expected and observed lepton $p_T$ distribution for bCa_med SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last...

  • Table 9

    Data from F 14c

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t9

    Expected and observed $am_T2$ distribution for bCb_med1 SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last bin...

  • Table 10

    Data from F 14d

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t10

    Expected and observed $am_T2$ distribution for bCb_high SR. The uncertainty includes statistical and all experimental systematic uncertainties. The last bin...

  • Table 11

    Data from AUX F 03

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t11

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 12

    Data from AUX F 04

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t12

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$). This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 13

    Data from AUX F 05

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t13

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$). This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 14

    Data from AUX F 06

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t14

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 15

    Data from AUX F 07

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t15

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 16

    Data from AUX F 08

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t16

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 17

    Data from AUX F 09

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t17

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 18

    Data from AUX F 10

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t18

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. This mapping is used for the final...

  • Table 19

    Data from AUX F 11

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t19

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV. This mapping is used for the...

  • Table 20

    Data from AUX F 12

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t20

    Best expected signal region for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV. This mapping is used for the...

  • Table 21

    Data from AUX F 13

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t21

    Upper limits on the model cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 22

    Data from F 15

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t22

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 23

    Data from F 15

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t23

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 24

    Data from AUX F 14

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t24

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 25

    Data from F 15

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t25

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 26

    Data from F 15

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t26

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ three-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bW\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 27

    Data from AUX F 15

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t27

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 28

    Data from F 15

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t28

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 29

    Data from F 15

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t29

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1$ four-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to bff'\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 30

    Data from AUX F 16

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t30

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 31

    Data from F 16

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t31

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 32

    Data from F 16

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t32

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 33

    Data from AUX F 17

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t33

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV.

  • Table 34

    Data from F 17

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t34

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV.

  • Table 35

    Data from F 17

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t35

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=150$ GeV.

  • Table 36

    Data from AUX F 18

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t36

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV.

  • Table 37

    Data from F 18

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t37

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV.

  • Table 38

    Data from F 18

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t38

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=106$ GeV.

  • Table 39

    Data from AUX F 19

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t39

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV.

  • Table 40

    Data from F 19

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t40

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV.

  • Table 41

    Data from F 19

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t41

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+5$ GeV.

  • Table 42

    Data from AUX F 20

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t42

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 43

    Data from F 20

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t43

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 44

    Data from F 20

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t44

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 45

    Data from AUX F 21

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t45

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV.

  • Table 46

    Data from F 21

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t46

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV.

  • Table 47

    Data from F 21

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t47

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\tilde t_1}-10$ GeV.

  • Table 48

    Data from AUX F 22

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t48

    Upper limit on signal events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV.

  • Table 49

    Data from F 22

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t49

    Observed exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV.

  • Table 50

    Data from F 22

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t50

    Expected exclusion contour for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}=300$ GeV.

  • Table 51

    Data from AUX F 23

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t51

    Acceptance of tN_diag SR ($E_T^{miss}>150$ GeV, $m_T>140$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is...

  • Table 52

    Data from AUX F 24

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t52

    Acceptance of tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

  • Table 53

    Data from AUX F 25

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t53

    Acceptance of tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

  • Table 54

    Data from AUX F 26

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t54

    Acceptance of bCb_med2 SR ($am_{T2}>250$ GeV, $m_T>60$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is...

  • Table 55

    Data from AUX F 27

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t55

    Acceptance of bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

  • Table 56

    Data from AUX F 28

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t56

    Acceptance of bCd_bulk SR ($am_{T2}>175$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is...

  • Table 57

    Data from AUX F 29

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t57

    Acceptance of bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

  • Table 58

    Data from AUX F 30

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t58

    Acceptance of bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance is defined as the fraction...

  • Table 59

    Data from AUX F 31

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t59

    Acceptance of bCa_med for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

  • Table 60

    Data from AUX F 32

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t60

    Acceptance of bCa_low for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

  • Table 61

    Data from AUX F 33

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t61

    Acceptance of bCb_med1 for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

  • Table 62

    Data from AUX F 34

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t62

    Acceptance of bCb_high for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of...

  • Table 63

    Data from AUX F 35

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t63

    Acceptance of 3-body SR ($80<am_{T2}<90$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$). The acceptance is defined...

  • Table 64

    Data from AUX F 36

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t64

    Acceptance of tNbC_mix SR for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The acceptance...

  • Table 65

    Data from AUX F 37

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t65

    Efficiency of tN_diag SR ($E_T^{miss}>150$ GeV, $m_T>140$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is...

  • Table 66

    Data from AUX F 38

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t66

    Efficiency of tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

  • Table 67

    Data from AUX F 39

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t67

    Efficiency of tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

  • Table 68

    Data from AUX F 40

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t68

    Efficiency of bCb_med2 SR ($am_{T2}>250$ GeV, $m_T>60$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is...

  • Table 69

    Data from AUX F 41

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t69

    Efficiency of bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

  • Table 70

    Data from AUX F 42

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t70

    Efficiency of bCd_bulk SR ($am_{T2}>175$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is...

  • Table 71

    Data from AUX F 43

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t71

    Efficiency of bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

  • Table 72

    Data from AUX F 44

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t72

    Efficiency of bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency is the ratio between the...

  • Table 73

    Data from AUX F 45

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t73

    Efficiency of bCa_med for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

  • Table 74

    Data from AUX F 46

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t74

    Efficiency of bCa_low for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

  • Table 75

    Data from AUX F 47

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t75

    Efficiency of bCb_med1 for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

  • Table 76

    Data from AUX F 48

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t76

    Efficiency of bCb_high for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV. The efficiency is the ratio between the expected...

  • Table 77

    Data from AUX F 49

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t77

    Efficiency of 3-body SR ($80<am_{T2}<90$ GeV, $m_T>120$ GeV) for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$). The efficiency is the...

  • Table 78

    Data from AUX F 50

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t78

    Efficiency of tNbC_mix SR for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$. The efficiency...

  • Table 79

    Data from AUX F 51

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t79

    Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 80

    Data from AUX F 52

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t80

    Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 81

    Data from AUX F 53

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t81

    Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV; $E_T^{miss}$(gen)$>60$ GeV.

  • Table 82

    Data from AUX F 53

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t82

    Number of generated events for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV; $E_T^{miss}$(gen)$>250$ GeV.

  • Table 83

    Data from AUX F 54

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t83

    Number of generated events for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 84

    Data from AUX F 55

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t84

    Number of generated events for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 85

    Data from AUX F 56

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t85

    Cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 86

    Data from AUX F 57

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t86

    Cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 87

    Data from AUX F 58

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t87

    Cross-section for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 88

    Data from AUX F 59

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t88

    Cross-section for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 89

    Data from AUX F 60

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t89

    Cross-section for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$) with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 90

    Data from AUX F 61

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t90

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tN_diag SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$, using the...

  • Table 91

    Data from AUX F 62

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t91

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tN_med SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 92

    Data from AUX F 63

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t92

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tN_boost SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 93

    Data from AUX F 64

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t93

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCb_med2 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$, using the...

  • Table 94

    Data from AUX F 65

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t94

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCc_diag SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 95

    Data from AUX F 66

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t95

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCd_bulk SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$, using the...

  • Table 96

    Data from AUX F 67

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t96

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCd_high1 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 97

    Data from AUX F 68

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t97

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCd_high2 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 98

    Data from AUX F 69

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t98

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCa_med SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 99

    Data from AUX F 70

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t99

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCa_low SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 100

    Data from AUX F 71

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t100

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCb_med1 SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 101

    Data from AUX F 72

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t101

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected bCb_high SR yields for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 102

    Data from AUX F 73

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t102

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected 3-body SR yields for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$), using the 2...

  • Table 103

    Data from AUX F 74

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t103

    Combined experimental systematic uncertainty of expected tNbC_mix SR yields for the asymmetric scenario ($\tilde t_1$, $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, b $\chi^\pm_1$)...

  • Table 104

    Data from AUX F 75

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t104

    Observed CLs in tN_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 105

    Data from AUX F 76

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t105

    Observed CLs in tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 106

    Data from AUX F 77

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t106

    Observed CLs in tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 107

    Data from AUX F 78

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t107

    Observed CLs in bCb_med2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 108

    Data from AUX F 79

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t108

    Observed CLs in bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 109

    Data from AUX F 80

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t109

    Observed CLs in bCd_bulk SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 110

    Data from AUX F 81

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t110

    Observed CLs in bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 111

    Data from AUX F 82

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t111

    Observed CLs in bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 112

    Data from AUX F 83

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t112

    Observed CLs in bCa_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 113

    Data from AUX F 84

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t113

    Observed CLs in bCa_low SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 114

    Data from AUX F 85

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t114

    Observed CLs in bCb_med1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 115

    Data from AUX F 86

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t115

    Observed CLs in bCb_high SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 116

    Data from AUX F 87

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t116

    Observed CLs in 3-body SR for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 117

    Data from AUX F 88

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t117

    Observed CLs in tNbC_mix SR for the mixed scenario (50% $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, 50% $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 118

    Data from AUX F 89

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t118

    Expected CLs in tN_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 119

    Data from AUX F 90

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t119

    Expected CLs in tN_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 120

    Data from AUX F 91

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t120

    Expected CLs in tN_boost SR for the $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$ scenario with $m_{\tilde t_1}>m_t+m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 121

    Data from AUX F 92

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t121

    Expected CLs in bCb_med2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 122

    Data from AUX F 93

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t122

    Expected CLs in bCc_diag SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 123

    Data from AUX F 94

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t123

    Expected CLs in bCd_bulk SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 124

    Data from AUX F 95

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t124

    Expected CLs in bCd_high1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 125

    Data from AUX F 96

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t125

    Expected CLs in bCd_high2 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=2\times m_{\chi^0_1}$.

  • Table 126

    Data from AUX F 97

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t126

    Expected CLs in bCa_med SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 127

    Data from AUX F 98

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t127

    Expected CLs in bCa_low SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 128

    Data from AUX F 99

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t128

    Expected CLs in bCb_med1 SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 129

    Data from AUX F 100

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t129

    Expected CLs in bCb_high SR for the $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$ scenario with $m_{\chi^\pm_1}=m_{\chi^0_1}+20$ GeV.

  • Table 130

    Data from AUX F 101

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t130

    Expected CLs in 3-body SR for the 3-body scenario ($\tilde t_1\to b W\chi^0_1$).

  • Table 131

    Data from AUX F 102

    10.17182/hepdata.68163.v1/t131

    Expected CLs in tNbC_mix SR for the mixed scenario (50% $\tilde t_1\to t\chi^0_1$, 50% $\tilde t_1\to b\chi^\pm_1$).

Loading Data...