{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1740108"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134876","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2019","description":"A search for long-lived particles decaying to displaced, nonprompt jets and missing transverse momentum is presented. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 137 $\\textrm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in 2016--2018. Candidate signal events containing nonprompt jets are identified using the timing capabilities of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter. The results of the search are consistent with the background prediction and are interpreted using a gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking reference model with a gluino next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle. In this model, gluino masses up to 2100, 2500, and 1900 GeV are excluded at $95\\%$ confidence level for proper decay lengths of 0.3, 1, and 100 m, respectively. These are the best limits to date for such massive gluinos with proper decay lengths greater than $\\sim$0.5 m.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the estimated number of background events.","name":"Table 2 (predictions)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"The timing distribution of the background sources predicted to contribute to the signal region, compared to those for a representative...","name":"Figure 2 (Jet time distributions)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of the acceptance and efficiency in the $c\\tau_{0}$ vs. $m_{\\tilde{g}}$ plane for the GMSB model, after all requirements.","name":"Figure 3 (2D effs)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in...","name":"Figure 4 (2D obs limits)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in...","name":"Figure 4 (Contours)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed and expected upper limits at $95\\%$ CL on the gluino pair production cross section for a gluino GMSB...","name":"Figure 5 (limits for $m_\\tilde{g} = 2400$ GeV)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of number of ECAL cells hit in the jet for jets in a background enriched...","name":"Additional Figure 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\\mathrm{HEF}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo and noise jets (satisfying $|\\eta|...","name":"Additional Figure 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $E_{\\mathrm{HCAL}}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo and noise jets (satisfying $|\\eta|...","name":"Additional Figure 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $t^{\\mathrm{RMS}}_\\mathrm{jet}/t_{\\mathrm{jet}}$ for data sample enriched in jets from noise (satisfying $|\\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\\mathrm{T}...","name":"Additional Figure 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $t^{\\mathrm{RMS}}_\\mathrm{jet}$ for data sample enriched in jets from noise (satisfying $|\\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\\mathrm{T}...","name":"Additional Figure 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $p_\\mathrm{T}tf$ for a data sample enriched in main bunch backgrounds (satisfying $p_\\mathrm{T} > 30\\,\\mathrm{GeV}$,...","name":"Additional Figure 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $E^{\\mathrm{CSC}}_\\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\\mathrm{ECAL}}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo (satisfying $p_\\mathrm{T} > 30\\,\\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\\eta|...","name":"Additional Figure 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\\mathrm{max}(\\Delta \\phi_{\\mathrm{DT}})$ for a data sample enriched in cosmic muons (satisfying $E^{\\mathrm{CSC}}_\\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$,...","name":"Additional Figure 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\\mathrm{max}(\\Delta \\phi_{\\mathrm{RPC}})$ for a data sample enriched in cosmic muons (satisfying $E^{\\mathrm{CSC}}_\\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$,...","name":"Additional Figure 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $t_{\\mathrm{jet}}$ for jets with the full Run 2 dataset with no cleaning selection applied (a) and after all...","name":"Additional Figure 13 (Jet time distributions)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $t_{\\mathrm{jet}}$ for jets with the full Run 2 dataset in events satisfying the trigger requirements and satisfying $p_T^\\mathrm{miss}...","name":"Additional Figure 14 (Jet time distributions)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Contribution to the delayed time of jets from the $\\beta$ of the gluino is plotted against the delay contribution from...","name":"Additional Figure 23 (2D timing)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\\tilde{g}}=1000$ and various proper decay lengths","name":"Additional Table 1 (cutflow $m_{\\tilde{g}}=1000$)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\\tilde{g}}=2400$ and various proper decay lengths","name":"Additional Table 2 (cutflow $m_{\\tilde{g}}=2400$)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\\tilde{g}}=3000$ and various proper decay lengths","name":"Additional Table 3 (cutflow $m_{\\tilde{g}}=3000$)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section...","name":"Additional Figure 24 (2D limits)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section...","name":"Additional Figure 25 (2D limits)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected plus 1 $\\sigma_{\\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the...","name":"Additional Figure 26 (2D limits)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected minus 1 $\\sigma_{\\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the...","name":"Additional Figure 27 (2D limits)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in...","name":"Additional Figure 28 (2D limits)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected plus 1 $\\sigma_{\\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB...","name":"Additional Figure 29 (2D limits)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.90583.v2/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected minus 1 $\\sigma_{\\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB...","name":"Additional Figure 30 (2D limits)"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1740108?version=2"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/90583"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for long-lived particles using nonprompt jets and missing transverse momentum with proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1740108?version=2","version":2}