{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1798528"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2020)160","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ALICE Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ALICE Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2020","description":"\"Systematic studies of charge-dependent two- and three-particle correlations in \nPb--Pb collisions at $\\sqrt{\\it{s}_\\mathrm{{NN}}} = $ 2.76~and 5.02~TeV used to \nprobe the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) are presented. These measurements \nare performed for charged particles in the pseudorapidity ($\\eta$) and transverse \nmomentum ($p_{\\rm{T}}$) ranges $\\left|\\eta \\right| &lt; 0.8$ and $0.2 &lt; p_{\\mathrm{T}} &lt; 5$~GeV/$c$. \nA significant charge-dependent signal that becomes more pronounced for peripheral \ncollisions is reported for the CME-sensitive correlators \n$\\gamma_{1,1} = \\langle \\cos (\\varphi_{\\alpha} +\\varphi_{\\beta} - 2\\Psi_{2}) \\rangle$ \nand $\\gamma_{1,-3} = \\langle \\cos (\\varphi_{\\alpha} -3\\varphi_{\\beta} + 2\\Psi_{2}) \\rangle$. \nThe results are used to estimate the contribution of background effects, associated \nwith local charge conservation coupled to anisotropic flow modulations, to measurements \nof the CME. A blast-wave parametrisation that incorporates local charge conservation \ntuned to reproduce the centrality dependent background effects is not able to fully describe \nthe measured $\\gamma_{1,1}$. Finally, the charge and centrality dependence of mixed-harmonics  \nthree-particle correlations, of the form \n$\\gamma_{1,2} = \\langle \\cos (\\varphi_{\\alpha} + 2 \\varphi_{\\beta} - 3\\Psi_{3}) \\rangle$, \nwhich are insensitive to the CME signal, verify again that background contributions \ndominate the measurement of $\\gamma_{1,1}$.\"","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"2-particle integrated correlators","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"2-particle differential correlator versus pT difference","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"2-particle differential correlator versus average pT","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"2-particle differential correlator versus eta difference","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"3-particle integrated correlators","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"3-particle differential correlator versus pT difference","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"3-particle differential correlator versus average pT","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"3-particle differential correlator versus eta difference","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"3-particle differential correlator OS - SS","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"CME fraction","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.97127.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"CME fraction","name":"Table 11"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1798528?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/97127"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Constraining the Chiral Magnetic Effect with charge-dependent azimuthal correlations in Pb-Pb collisions at $\\sqrt{\\it{s}_{\\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1798528?version=1","version":1}
