• Browse all
Search for new phenomena in events with two opposite-charge leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{\mathrm{s}} $ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration
JHEP 04 (2021) 165, 2021.

Abstract (data abstract)
The results of a search for direct pair production of top squarks and for dark matter in events with two opposite-charge leptons (electrons or muons), jets and missing transverse momentum are reported, using 139~\mbox{fb\(^{-1}\)} of integrated luminosity from proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV, collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider during Run~2 (2015--2018). This search considers the pair production of top squarks and is sensitive across a wide range of mass differences between the top squark and the lightest neutralino. Additionally, spin-0 mediator dark-matter models are considered, in which the mediator is produced in association with a pair of top quarks. The mediator subsequently decays to a pair of dark-matter particles. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background, and limits are set at $95\%$\ confidence level. The results exclude top squark masses up to about $1$ TeV, and masses of the lightest neutralino up to about $500$ GeV. Limits on dark-matter production are set for scalar (pseudoscalar) mediator masses up to about $250~(300)$ GeV.

  • Figure 11a

    Data from Figure 11a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t1

    Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the...

  • Figure 11b

    Data from Figure 11b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t2

    Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the...

  • Figure 12a

    Data from Figure 12a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t3

    Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the...

  • Figure 12b

    Data from Figure 12b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t4

    Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the...

  • Figure 12c

    Data from Figure 12c

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t5

    Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the...

  • Figure 12d

    Data from Figure 12d

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t6

    Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the...

  • Figure 13a

    Data from Figure 13a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t7

    Four-body selection. (a) distributions of $E_{T}^{miss}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Small\,\Delta m}$ and (b) distribution of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Large\,\Delta m}$ for events...

  • Figure 13b

    Data from Figure 13b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t8

    Four-body selection. (a) distributions of $E_{T}^{miss}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Small\,\Delta m}$ and (b) distribution of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Large\,\Delta m}$ for events...

  • Figure 14a - Expected limits

    Data from Figure 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t9

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100%...

  • Figure 14a - Expected limits Up 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t10

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100%...

  • Figure 14a - Expected limits Down 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t11

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100%...

  • Figure 14a - Observed limits

    Data from Figure 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t12

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100%...

  • Figure 14a - Observed limits Down 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t13

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100%...

  • Figure 14a - Observed limits Up 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t14

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100%...

  • Figure 14b - Expected limits

    Data from Figure 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t15

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\%...

  • Figure 14b - Expected limits Down 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t16

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\%...

  • Figure 14b - Expected limits Up 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t17

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\%...

  • Figure 14b - Observed limits

    Data from Figure 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t18

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\%...

  • Figure 14b - Observed limits Down 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t19

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\%...

  • Figure 14b - Observed limits Up 1 sigma

    Data from Figure 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t20

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\%...

  • Figure 15a - Expected limits

    Data from Figure 15a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t21

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Figure 15a - Observed limits

    Data from Figure 15a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t22

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Figure 15b - Expected limits

    Data from Figure 15b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t23

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Figure 15b - Observed limits

    Data from Figure 15b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t24

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Table 7

    Data from Table 7

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t25

    Two-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}Z}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}, DF}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}, SF}$ and $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t} Z}$. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$,...

  • Table 9

    Data from Table 9

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t26

    Three-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}Z}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{VR(1)}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$ and $\mathrm{VR(2)}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$,...

  • Table 11

    Data from Table 11

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t27

    Four-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$,$\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $VR^{4-body}_{VV}$ and $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{VV,lll}$. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t}...

  • Table 15

    Data from Table 15

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t28

    Two-body selection. Background fit results for the different-flavour leptons binned SRs. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t}...

  • Table 16

    Data from Table 16

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t29

    Two-body selection. Background fit results for the same-flavour leptons binned SRs. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t}...

  • Table 17

    Data from Table 17

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t30

    Three-body selection. Observed event yields and background fit results for the three-body selection SRs. The ''Others'' category contains contributions from...

  • Table 18

    Data from Table 18

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t31

    Four-body selection. Observed event yields and background fit results for SR$^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{\mathrm{Small}\,\Delta m}$ and SR$^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{\mathrm{Large}\,\Delta m}$. The ''Others'' category contains the...

  • Aux. Fig. 01 Expected contour - 4-body region

    Data from Aux. Fig. 01 Expected contour - 4-body region

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t32

    Exclusion limits contours (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100%...

  • Aux. Fig. 01 Observed contour - 4-body region

    Data from Aux. Fig. 01 Observed contour - 4-body region

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t33

    Exclusion limits contours (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100%...

  • Aux. Fig. 02 Expected contour

    Data from Aux. Fig. 02 Expected contour

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t34

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with...

  • Aux. Fig. 02 Observed contour

    Data from Aux. Fig. 02 Observed contour

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t35

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with...

  • Aux. Fig. 02 Expected CLs

    Data from Aux. Fig. 02 Expected CLs

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t36

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with...

  • Aux. Fig. 02 Observed CLs

    Data from Aux. Fig. 02 Observed CLs

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t37

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with...

  • Aux. Fig. 03 Expected contour

    Data from Aux. Fig. 03 Expected contour

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t38

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$...

  • Aux. Fig. 03 Observed contour

    Data from Aux. Fig. 03 Observed contour

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t39

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$...

  • Aux. Fig. 03 Expected CLs

    Data from Aux. Fig. 03 Expected CLs

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t40

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$...

  • Aux. Fig. 03 Observed CLs

    Data from Aux. Fig. 03 Observed CLs

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t41

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$...

  • Aux. Fig. 04 Expected contour

    Data from Aux. Fig. 04 Expected contour

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t42

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu...

  • Aux. Fig. 04 Observed contour

    Data from Aux. Fig. 04 Observed contour

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t43

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu...

  • Aux. Fig. 04 Expected CLs

    Data from Aux. Fig. 04 Expected CLs

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t44

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu...

  • Aux. Fig. 04 Observed CLs

    Data from Aux. Fig. 04 Observed CLs

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t45

    Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu...

  • Auxialiary Figure 05a - Expected limits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 05a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t46

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Auxialiary Figure 05a - Observed limits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 05a

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t47

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Auxialiary Figure 05b - Expected limits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 05b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t48

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Auxialiary Figure 05b - Observed limits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 05b

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t49

    Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function...

  • Aux. Fig. 10(a): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRDF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 10(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t50

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 10(b): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRDF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 10(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t51

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 10(c): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRDF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 10(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t52

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 10(d): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRDF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 10(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t53

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 10(e): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRDF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 10(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t54

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 10(f): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRDF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 10(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t55

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 11(a): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRSF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 11(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t56

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 11(b): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRSF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 11(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t57

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 11(c): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRSF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 11(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t58

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 11(d): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRSF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 11(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t59

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 11(e): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRSF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 11(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t60

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 11(f): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SRSF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 11(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t61

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 12(a): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SR-2b-110-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 12(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t62

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 12(b): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SR-2b-120-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 12(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t63

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 12(c): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SR-2b-140-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 12(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t64

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 12(d): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SR-2b-160-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 12(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t65

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 12(e): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SR-2b-180-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 12(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t66

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 12(f): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SR-2b-200-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 12(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t67

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 12(g): Efficiency SUSY 2-body SR-2b-220-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 12(g)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t68

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 13(a): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRDF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 13(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t69

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 13(b): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRDF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 13(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t70

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 13(c): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRDF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 13(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t71

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 13(d): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRDF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 13(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t72

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 13(e): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRDF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 13(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t73

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 13(f): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRDF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 13(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t74

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 14(a): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRSF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 14(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t75

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 14(b): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRSF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 14(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t76

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 14(c): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRSF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 14(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t77

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 14(d): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRSF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 14(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t78

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 14(e): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRSF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 14(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t79

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 14(f): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SRSF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 14(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t80

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 15(a): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SR-2b-110-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 15(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t81

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 15(b): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SR-2b-120-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 15(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t82

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 15(c): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SR-2b-140-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 15(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t83

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 15(d): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SR-2b-160-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 15(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t84

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 15(e): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SR-2b-180-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 15(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t85

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 15(f): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SR-2b-200-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 15(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t86

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 15(g): Efficiency DM scalar 2-body SR-2b-220-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 15(g)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t87

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 16(a): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRDF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 16(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t88

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 16(b): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRDF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 16(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t89

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 16(c): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRDF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 16(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t90

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 16(d): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRDF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 16(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t91

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 16(e): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRDF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 16(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t92

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 16(f): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRDF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 16(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t93

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 17(a): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRSF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 17(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t94

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 17(b): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRSF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 17(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t95

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 17(c): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRSF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 17(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t96

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 17(d): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRSF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 17(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t97

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 17(e): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRSF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 17(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t98

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 17(f): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SRSF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 17(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t99

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 18(a): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SR-2b-110-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 18(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t100

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 18(b): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SR-2b-120-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 18(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t101

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 18(c): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SR-2b-140-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 18(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t102

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 18(d): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SR-2b-160-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 18(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t103

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 18(e): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SR-2b-180-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 18(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t104

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 18(f): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SR-2b-200-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 18(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t105

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 18(g): Efficiency DM pseudo 2-body SR-2b-220-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 18(g)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t106

    Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 19(a): Efficiency SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 19(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t107

    Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 19(b): Efficiency SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 19(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t108

    Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 19(c): Efficiency SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 19(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t109

    Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 19(d): Efficiency SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 19(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t110

    Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 20(a): Efficiency SUSY 4-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 20(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t111

    Four-body selection Efficiency (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 20(b): Efficiency SUSY 4-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 20(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t112

    Four-body selection Efficiency (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta\ m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 21(a): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRDF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 21(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t113

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 21(b): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRDF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 21(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t114

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 21(c): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRDF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 21(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t115

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 21(d): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRDF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 21(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t116

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 21(e): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRDF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 21(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t117

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 21(f): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRDF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 21(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t118

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 22(a): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRSF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 22(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t119

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 22(b): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRSF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 22(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t120

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 22(c): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRSF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 22(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t121

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 22(d): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRSF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 22(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t122

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 22(e): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRSF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 22(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t123

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 22(f): acceptance SUSY 2-body SRSF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 22(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t124

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 23(a): Acceptance SUSY 2-body SR-2b-110-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 23(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t125

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 23(b): Acceptance SUSY 2-body SR-2b-120-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 23(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t126

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 23(c): Acceptance SUSY 2-body SR-2b-140-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 23(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t127

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 23(d): Acceptance SUSY 2-body SR-2b-160-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 23(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t128

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 23(e): Acceptance SUSY 2-body SR-2b-180-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 23(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t129

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 23(f): Acceptance SUSY 2-body SR-2b-200-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 23(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t130

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 23(g): Acceptance SUSY 2-body SR-2b-220-inf

    Data from Aux. Fig. 23(g)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t131

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 24(a): Acceptance DM 2-body SRDF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 24(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t132

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 24(b): Acceptance DM 2-body SRDF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 24(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t133

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 24(c): Acceptance DM 2-body SRDF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 24(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t134

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 24(d): Acceptance DM 2-body SRDF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 24(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t135

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 24(e): Acceptance DM 2-body SRDF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 24(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t136

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 24(f): Acceptance DM 2-body SRDF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 24(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t137

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 25(a): Acceptance DM 2-body SRSF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 25(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t138

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 25(b): Acceptance DM 2-body SRSF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 25(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t139

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 25(c): Acceptance DM 2-body SRSF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 25(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t140

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 25(d): Acceptance DM 2-body SRSF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 25(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t141

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 25(e): Acceptance DM 2-body SRSF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 25(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t142

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 25(f): Acceptance DM 2-body SRSF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 25(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t143

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 26(a): Acceptance DM scalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t144

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 26(b): Acceptance DM scalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t145

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 26(c): Acceptance DM scalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t146

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 26(d): Acceptance DM scalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t147

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 26(e): Acceptance DM scalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t148

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 26(f): Acceptance DM scalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t149

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 26(g): Acceptance DM scalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(g)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t150

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 27(a): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRDF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 27(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t151

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 27(b): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRDF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 27(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t152

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 27(c): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRDF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 27(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t153

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 27(d): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRDF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 27(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t154

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 27(e): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRDF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 27(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t155

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 27(f): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRDF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 27(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t156

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 28(a): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRSF0

    Data from Aux. Fig. 28(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t157

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 28(b): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRSF1

    Data from Aux. Fig. 28(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t158

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 28(c): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRSF2

    Data from Aux. Fig. 28(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t159

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 28(d): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRSF3

    Data from Aux. Fig. 28(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t160

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 28(e): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRSF4

    Data from Aux. Fig. 28(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t161

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 28(f): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body SRSF5

    Data from Aux. Fig. 28(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t162

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming...

  • Aux. Fig. 29(a): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t163

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 29(b): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t164

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 29(c): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t165

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 29(d): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t166

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 29(e): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(e)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t167

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 29(f): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(f)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t168

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 29(g): Acceptance DM pseudoscalar 2-body

    Data from Auxiliary Figure 29(g)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t169

    Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$...

  • Aux. Fig. 30(a): Acceptance SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 30(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t170

    Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 30(b): Acceptance SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 30(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t171

    Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 30(c): Acceptance SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 30(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t172

    Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 30(d): Acceptance SUSY 3-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 30(d)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t173

    Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 31(a): Acceptance SUSY 4-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 31(a)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t174

    Four-body selection acceptance (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 31(b): Acceptance SUSY 4-body

    Data from Aux. Fig. 31(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t175

    Four-body selection acceptance (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.

  • Aux. Fig. 32(a) Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 31(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t176

    Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$...

  • Aux. Fig. 32(b) Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 32(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t177

    Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$...

  • Aux. Fig. 32(c) Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 32(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t178

    Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$...

  • Aux. Fig. 33 Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 33

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t179

    Three-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal strenght for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production....

  • Aux. Fig. 34 Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 34

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t180

    Four-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal strenght for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production....

  • Aux. Fig. 35(a) Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 35(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t181

    Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair...

  • Aux. Fig. 35(b) Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 35(b)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t182

    Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair...

  • Aux. Fig. 35(c) Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 35(c)

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t183

    Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair...

  • Aux. Fig. 36 Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 36

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t184

    Three-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production....

  • Aux. Fig. 37 Obs upperlimits

    Data from Aux. Fig. 37

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t185

    Four-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production....

  • Aux. Table 01

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t186

    Two-body selection. Background fit results for the $inclusive$ SRs. The Others category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$,...

  • Aux. Table 02

    Data from Aux. Table 02

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t187

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=600~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=400~ GeV$ in the SRs for...

  • Aux. Table 03

    Data from Aux. Table 03

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t188

    Cut flow for the scalar signal model $t\bar{t} + \phi $ with $m(\phi)=150~ GeV$ and $m(\chi)=1~ GeV$ in the SRs...

  • Aux. Table 04

    Data from Aux. Table 04

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t189

    Cut flow for the pseudoscalar signal model $t\bar{t} + a $ with $m(a)=150~ GeV$ and $m(\chi)=1~ GeV$ in the SRs...

  • Aux. Table 05

    Data from Aux. Table 05

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t190

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=385~ GeV$ in the SRs for...

  • Aux. Table 06

    Data from Aux. Table 06

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t191

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=400~ GeV$ in the SRs for...

  • Aux. Table 07

    Data from Aux. Table 07

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t192

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=430~ GeV$ in the SRs for...

  • Aux. Table 08

    Data from Aux. Table 08

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t193

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=460~ GeV$ in the SRs for...

  • Aux. Table 09

    Data from Aux. Table 09

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t194

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=400~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=380~ GeV$ in...

  • Aux. Table 10

    Data from Aux. Table 10

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t195

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=460~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=415~ GeV$ in...

  • Aux. Table 11

    Data from Aux. Table 11

    10.17182/hepdata.98627.v1/t196

    Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=400~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=320~ GeV$ in...

Loading Data...

Ask a Question


Your question will be emailed to those involved with the submission. Please mention the relevant table.


Please log in to HEPData to send a question.