{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1876579"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2021)180","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2021","description":"The production cross section of a top quark pair in association with a photon is measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data set, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, was recorded by the CMS experiment during the 2016-2018 data taking of the LHC. The measurements are performed in a fiducial volume defined at the particle level. Events with an isolated, highly energetic lepton, at least three jets from the hadronization of quarks, among which at least one is b tagged, and one isolated photon are selected. The inclusive fiducial $\\mathrm{t\\overline{t}}\\gamma$ cross section, for a photon with transverse momentum greater than 20 GeV and pseudorapidity $\\lvert \\eta\\rvert$$\\lt$ 1.4442, is measured to be 798 $\\pm$ 7 (stat) $\\pm$ 48 (syst) fb, in good agreement with the prediction from the standard model at next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics. The differential cross sections are also measured as a function of several kinematic observables and interpreted in the framework of the standard model effective field theory (EFT), leading to the most stringent direct limits to date on anomalous electromagnetic dipole moment interactions of the top quark and the photon.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $p_{T}(\\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$ signal region.","name":"Figure 2a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $m_{T}(W)$ in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$ signal region.","name":"Figure 2b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $M_{3}$ in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$ signal region.","name":"Figure 2c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $m(l,\\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$ signal region.","name":"Figure 2d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$ signal region.","name":"Figure 2e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $\\Delta R(j,\\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$ signal region.","name":"Figure 2f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution...","name":"Figure 3a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution...","name":"Figure 3b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for...","name":"Figure 4a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for...","name":"Figure 4b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Extracted scale factors for the contribution from misidentified electrons for the three data-taking periods, and the Z$\\gamma$, W$\\gamma$ simulations.","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Predicted and observed yields in the control regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values...","name":"Figure 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Predicted and observed yields in the signal regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values...","name":"Figure 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured inclusive ttgamma cross section in the fiducial phase space compared to the prediction from simulation using Madgraph_aMC@NLO at...","name":"Equation 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the measured cross section ratios with respect to the NLO cross section prediction for signal regions binned in...","name":"Figure 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential cross sections for $p_{T}(\\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.","name":"Figure 9a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential cross sections for $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$ and the comparison to simulations.","name":"Figure 9b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential cross sections for $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.","name":"Figure 9c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\\gamma)$.","name":"Syst. covariance matrix $p_{T}(\\gamma)$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$.","name":"Syst. covariance matrix $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"The covariance matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$.","name":"Syst. covariance matrix $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\\gamma)$.","name":"Stat. covariance matrix $p_{T}(\\gamma)$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$.","name":"Stat. covariance matrix $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The covariance matrix of statistic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$.","name":"Stat. covariance matrix $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\\gamma)$.","name":"Stat. correlation matrix $p_{T}(\\gamma)$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$.","name":"Stat. correlation matrix $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$.","name":"Stat. correlation matrix $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $p_{T}(\\gamma)$.","name":"Figure 10a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $|\\eta(\\gamma)|$.","name":"Figure 10b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for the unfolded differential measurement for $\\Delta R(l,\\gamma)$.","name":"Figure 10c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the one-dimensional intervals at 68 and 95% CL.","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the...","name":"Figure 11a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the...","name":"Figure 11b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the...","name":"Figure 11c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the...","name":"Figure 11d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional profiled scan for the Wilson coefficient...","name":"Figure 12a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional profiled scan for the Wilson coefficient...","name":"Figure 12b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$.","name":"Figure 12c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$.","name":"Figure 12d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.102876.v2/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the two-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$...","name":"Figure 13"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1876579?version=2"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/102876"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Measurement of the inclusive and differential $\\mathrm{t\\overline{t}}\\gamma$ cross sections in the single-lepton channel and EFT interpretation at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1876579?version=2","version":2}