{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1932467"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10366-1","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2022","description":"CERN-LHC.  This article presents the results of two studies of Higgs boson properties using the WW* -> e nu e mu jj final state, based on a dataset corresponding\nto 36/fb of $\\sqrt(s)$ = 13 TeV proton--proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.\nThe first study targets Higgs boson production via gluon fusion and constrains the CP properties of the effective Higgs-gluon interaction.\nThis study complements existing coupling parameter measurements in the e nu mu nu jj final state.\nUsing both angular distributions and the overall rate,\u00a0the\u00a0mixing angle for CP-even and CP-odd contributions\nto the effective Higgs-gluon interaction is constrained\u00a0to\u00a0tan(alpha) = 0.0 $\\pm$ 0.4 (stat) $\\pm$ 0.3 (syst.).\nThe second study exploits the vector boson fusion production mechanism to probe the  Higgs boson couplings to longitudinally and transversely polarised W and Z bosons\nin both the production and the decay of the Higgs boson; these couplings have not been previously constrained.\nThe polarisation-dependent  coupling-strength scale factors are defined as the ratios of the measured polarisation-dependent coupling strengths\nto that predicted by the Standard Model, and are constrained using rate and kinematic information to be\na_(L)=0.91$^{+0.10}_{-0.18}$(stat.)$^{+0.09}_{-0.18}$(syst.) and  a(T)=1.2 $\\pm$ 0.4 (stat.)$^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$(syst.).\nThese coupling strengths are translated into pseudo-observables, resulting in\nkappa(VV)= 0.90$^{+0.10}_{-0.18}$(stat.)$^{+0.09}_{-0.16}$(syst.) and epsilon(VV) = 0.13$^{+0.28}_{-0.20}$(stat.)$^{+0.08}_{-0.10}$(syst.).\nAll results are consistent with the Standard Model predictions.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-fit NFs and their uncertainties for the Z+jets, top and WW backgrounds. Both sets of normalisation factors differ slightly depending...","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-fit event yields in the signal and control regions obtained from the study of the signal strength parameter $\\mu^{\\text{ggF+2jets}}$. The...","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the main contributions to the total uncertainty on $\\tan \\alpha$ based on the fit that exploits both shape...","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-fit event yields in the signal and control regions obtained from a scan over $\\epsilon_{VV}$ exploiting both shape and rate...","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit values and their uncertainties as obtained from the shape-only and shape-plus-rate likelihood fits to the Asimov dataset and to...","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit values and their uncertainties as obtained from the shape-only and shape-plus-rate likelihood fits to the Asimov dataset and to...","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"The contributions of the leading individual systematic uncertainties together with the data statistical uncertainties, in the one dimensional fit for...","name":"Table 11a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"The contributions of the leading individual systematic uncertainties together with the data statistical uncertainties, in the one dimensional fit for...","name":"Table 11b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-fit distribution of the BDT response observable presented in the four $|\\Delta \\eta jj|$ categories of the ggF +2 jets...","name":"Figure 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"The weighted $\\Delta \\Phi_{jj}$ post-fit distribution in the ggF +2 jets signal region, with signal and background yields fixed from...","name":"Figure 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected and observed likelihood curves for scans over $\\tan \\alpha$ where only the shape is taken into account in the...","name":"Figure 5a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected and observed likelihood curves for scans over $\\tan \\alpha$ where both shape and normalisation are taken into account in...","name":"Figure 5b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"68% and 95% CL two-dimensional likelihood contours of the CP-even and CP-odd coupling parameters $K_{gg} \\cos(\\alpha)$ and $K_{gg} \\sin(\\alpha)$. The...","name":"Figure 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"The weighted $\\Delta \\Phi jj$ distribution in the VBF signal region, with signal and background yields fixed from the fit...","name":"Figure 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood scans over the transversally polarised couplings. The fit is using shape-only information. All relevant experimental and modelling systematic uncertainties...","name":"Figure 8a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood scans over the transversally polarised couplings. The fit is using shape + rate information. All relevant experimental and modelling...","name":"Figure 8b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood scans over the longitudinally polarised couplings. The fit is using shape + rate information. All relevant experimental and modelling...","name":"Figure 8c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood scans over $\\kappa_{VV}$ with the $\\epsilon_{VV}$ profiled. The fit is performed using both shape and rate information. All relevant...","name":"Figure 9a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood scans over $\\epsilon_{VV}$ with the $\\kappa_{VV}$ profiled. The fit is performed using both shape and rate information. All relevant...","name":"Figure 9b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"The contributions of the leading individual systematic uncertainties together with the data statistical uncertainties, in the one dimensional fit for...","name":"Table a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.130779.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"The contributions of the leading individual systematic uncertainties together with the data statistical uncertainties, in the one dimensional fit for...","name":"Table b"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1932467?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/130779"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Constraints on Higgs boson properties using $WW^{*}(\\rightarrow e\\nu\\mu\\nu) jj$ production in 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $\\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1932467?version=1","version":1}