{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2000853"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2022)169","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2022","description":"A search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark (t) and the Higgs boson (H) is presented. The search is based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. Events containing exactly one lepton (muon or electron) and at least three jets, among which at least two are identified as originating from the hadronization of a bottom quark, are analyzed. A set of deep neural networks is used for kinematic event reconstruction, while boosted decision trees distinguish the signal from the background events. No significant excess over the background predictions is observed, and upper limits on the signal production cross sections are extracted. These limits are interpreted in terms of top quark decay branching fractions ($\\mathcal{B}$) to the Higgs boson and an up (u) or a charm quark (c). Assuming one nonvanishing extra coupling at a time, the observed (expected) upper limits at 95% confidence level are $\\mathcal{B}$(t $\\to$ Hu) $\\lt$ 0.079 (0.11)% and $\\mathcal{B}$(t $\\to$ Hc) $\\lt$ 0.094 (0.086)%.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Number of events in the combined 2017+2018 data and simulated backgrounds, shown separately for each jet category, with uncertainties obtained...","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (expected) $95\\%$ CL exclusion limits on the branching fractions $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hu})$ and $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hc})$.","name":"Upper limits on branching fractions"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (expected) $95\\%$ CL exclusion limits on the anomalous couplings $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ and $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hct}}$.","name":"Upper limits on FCNC couplings"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Excluded signal cross section at $95\\%$ CL for Hut coupling. Each jet category and their combination are shown separately.","name":"Figure 5 (Hut)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Excluded signal cross section at $95\\%$ CL for Hut coupling. Each jet category and their combination are shown separately.","name":"Figure 5 (Hct)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper limits on the branching fractions $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hu})$ and $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hc})$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Branching fraction) - Observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limits on the branching fractions $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hu})$ and $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hc})$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Branching fraction) - Expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected +1 standard deviation upper limits on the branching fractions $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hu})$ and $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hc})$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Branching fraction) - Expected +1 std. dev"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected -1 standard deviation upper limits on the branching fractions $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hu})$ and $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hc})$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Branching fraction) - Expected -1 std. dev"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected +2 standard deviation upper limits on the branching fractions $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hu})$ and $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hc})$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Branching fraction) - Expected +2 std. dev"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected -2 standard deviation upper limits on the branching fractions $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hu})$ and $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathrm{t}\\to\\mathrm{Hc})$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Branching fraction) - Expected -2 std. dev"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper limits on the anomalous couplings $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ and $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Coupling) - Observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limits on the anomalous couplings $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ and $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Coupling) - Expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected +1 standard deviation upper limits on the anomalous couplings $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ and $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Coupling) - Expected +1 std. dev"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected -1 standard deviation upper limits on the anomalous couplings $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ and $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Coupling) - Expected -1 std. dev"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected +2 standard deviation upper limits on the anomalous couplings $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ and $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Coupling) - Expected +2 std. dev"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.110248.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected -2 standard deviation upper limits on the anomalous couplings $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ and $\\kappa_{\\mathrm{Hut}}$ at $95\\%$ CL.","name":"Figure 6 (Coupling) - Expected -2 std. dev"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2000853?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/110248"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and the Higgs boson decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2000853?version=1","version":1}