Correlations between flow and transverse momentum in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC with the ATLAS detector: a probe of the heavy-ion initial state and nuclear deformation

The ATLAS collaboration
Aad, G. , Abbott, B. , Abbott, D.C. , Abeling, K. , Abidi, S.H. , Aboulhorma, A. , Abramowicz, H. , Abreu, H. , Abulaiti, Y. , Abusleme Hoffman, A.C.
Phys.Rev.C 107 (2023) 054910, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.139082

Abstract
The correlations between flow harmonics $v_n$ for $n=2$, 3 and 4 and mean transverse momentum $[p_\mathrm{T}]$ in $^{129}$Xe+$^{129}$Xe and $^{208}$Pb+$^{208}$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV and 5.02 TeV, respectively, are measured using charged particles with the ATLAS detector. The correlations are sensitive to the shape and size of the initial geometry, nuclear deformation, and initial momentum anisotropy. The effects from non-flow and centrality fluctuations are minimized, respectively, via a subevent cumulant method and event activity selection based on particle production in the very forward rapidity. The results show strong dependences on centrality, harmonic number $n$, $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and pseudorapidity range. Current models describe qualitatively the overall centrality- and system-dependent trends but fail to quantitatively reproduce all the data. In the central collisions, where models generally show good agreement, the $v_2$-$[p_\mathrm{T}]$ correlations are sensitive to the triaxiality of the quadruple deformation. The comparison of model to the Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe data suggests that the $^{129}$Xe nucleus is a highly deformed triaxial ellipsoid that is neither a prolate nor an oblate shape. This provides strong evidence for a triaxial deformation of $^{129}$Xe nucleus using high-energy heavy-ion collision.

  • Table 1

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t1

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 2

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t2

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 3

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t3

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 4

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t4

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 5

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t5

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 6

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t6

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 7

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t7

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 8

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t8

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 9

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t9

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 10

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t10

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 11

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t11

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 12

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t12

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 13

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t13

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 14

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t14

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 15

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t15

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 16

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t16

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 17

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t17

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 18

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t18

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 19

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t19

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 20

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t20

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 21

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t21

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 22

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t22

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 23

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t23

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 24

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t24

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 25

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t25

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 26

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t26

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 27

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t27

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 28

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t28

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 29

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t29

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 30

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t30

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 31

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t31

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 32

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t32

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 33

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t33

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 34

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t34

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 35

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t35

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 36

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t36

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 37

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t37

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 38

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t38

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 39

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t39

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 40

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t40

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 41

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t41

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 42

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t42

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 43

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t43

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 44

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t44

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 45

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t45

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.3< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 46

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t46

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 47

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t47

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 48

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t48

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 49

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t49

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 50

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t50

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 51

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t51

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 52

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t52

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 53

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t53

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 54

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t54

    $Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 55

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t55

    $Cov_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 56

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t56

    $Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 57

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t57

    $Cov_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 58

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t58

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 59

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t59

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 60

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t60

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 61

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t61

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 62

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t62

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 63

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t63

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 64

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t64

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 65

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t65

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 66

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t66

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 67

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 5

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t67

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 68

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t68

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 69

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 6

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t69

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 70

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t70

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 71

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t71

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 72

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t72

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 73

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t73

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 74

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t74

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 75

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t75

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 76

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t76

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 77

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t77

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 78

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t78

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 79

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t79

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 80

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t80

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 81

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t81

    $\rho_{2}$ for peripheral events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 82

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t82

    $\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 83

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t83

    $\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 84

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t84

    $\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 85

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t85

    $\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 86

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t86

    $\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 87

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 3

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t87

    $\rho_{2}$, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 88

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t88

    $\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 89

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 4

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t89

    $\rho_{3}$, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 90

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t90

    $\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 91

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t91

    $\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 92

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t92

    $\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 93

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 2

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t93

    $\rho_{2}$ for central events, Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 94

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t94

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 95

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 1

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t95

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 96

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t96

    $\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV

  • Table 97

    Data from Figure 1, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t97

    $\Sigma E_{T}$ vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV

  • Table 98

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t98

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 99

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t99

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 100

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t100

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 101

    Data from Figure 2, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t101

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 102

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t102

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 103

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t103

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Three_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 104

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t104

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 105

    Data from Figure 3, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t105

    $\rho_{2}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 106

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t106

    $\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 107

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t107

    $\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 108

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t108

    $\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 109

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t109

    $\rho_{3}$ for central events, Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality,

  • Table 110

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t110

    $\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 111

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t111

    $\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Standard method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 112

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t112

    $\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 113

    Data from Figure 4, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t113

    $\rho_{3}$ ratio between Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV and Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV for central events, Combined_subevent method, for , $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$...

  • Table 114

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t114

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 115

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t115

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 116

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t116

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 117

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t117

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 118

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t118

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 119

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t119

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 120

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t120

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 121

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t121

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 122

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t122

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 123

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t123

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 124

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t124

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 125

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t125

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 126

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t126

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 127

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t127

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 128

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t128

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 129

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t129

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 130

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t130

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 131

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t131

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 132

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t132

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 133

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t133

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 134

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t134

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 135

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t135

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 136

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t136

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 137

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t137

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 138

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t138

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 139

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t139

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 140

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t140

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 141

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t141

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 142

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t142

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 143

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t143

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 144

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t144

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 145

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t145

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 146

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t146

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 147

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t147

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 148

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t148

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 149

    Data from Figure 5, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t149

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$

  • Table 150

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t150

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 151

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t151

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 152

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t152

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 153

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t153

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 154

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t154

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 155

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t155

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 156

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t156

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 157

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t157

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 158

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t158

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 159

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t159

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 160

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t160

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 161

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t161

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 162

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t162

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 163

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t163

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 164

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t164

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 165

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t165

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 166

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t166

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 167

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t167

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 168

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t168

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 169

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t169

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 170

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t170

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 171

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t171

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 172

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t172

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 173

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t173

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 174

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t174

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 175

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t175

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 176

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t176

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 177

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t177

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 178

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t178

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 179

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t179

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 180

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t180

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 181

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t181

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 182

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t182

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 183

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t183

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 184

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t184

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 185

    Data from Figure 6, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t185

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 186

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t186

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 187

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t187

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 188

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t188

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 189

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t189

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 190

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t190

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 191

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t191

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 192

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t192

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 193

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t193

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 194

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t194

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 195

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t195

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 196

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t196

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 197

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t197

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 198

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t198

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 199

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t199

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 200

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t200

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 201

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t201

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 202

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t202

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 203

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t203

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 204

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t204

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 205

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t205

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 206

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t206

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 207

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t207

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 208

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t208

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 209

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t209

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 210

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t210

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 211

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t211

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 212

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t212

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 213

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t213

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 214

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t214

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 215

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t215

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 216

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t216

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 217

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t217

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 218

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t218

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 219

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t219

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 220

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t220

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 221

    Data from Figure 7, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t221

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$

  • Table 222

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t222

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 223

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t223

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 224

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t224

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 225

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t225

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 226

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t226

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 227

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t227

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 228

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t228

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 229

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t229

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 230

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t230

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 231

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t231

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 232

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t232

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 233

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t233

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 234

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t234

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 235

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t235

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 236

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t236

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 237

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t237

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 238

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t238

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 239

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t239

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 240

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t240

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 241

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t241

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 242

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t242

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 243

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t243

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 244

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t244

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 245

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t245

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 246

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t246

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 247

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t247

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 248

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t248

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 249

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t249

    $\rho_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 250

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t250

    $\rho_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 251

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t251

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 252

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t252

    $\rho_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 253

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t253

    $\rho_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 254

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t254

    $\rho_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 255

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t255

    $\rho_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 256

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t256

    $\rho_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 257

    Data from Figure 8, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t257

    $\rho_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 258

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t258

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 259

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t259

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 260

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t260

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 261

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t261

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 262

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t262

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 263

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t263

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 264

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t264

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 265

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t265

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 266

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t266

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 267

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t267

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 268

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t268

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 269

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t269

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 270

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t270

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 271

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t271

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 272

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t272

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 273

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t273

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 274

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t274

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 275

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t275

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 276

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t276

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 277

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t277

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 278

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t278

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 279

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t279

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 280

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t280

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 281

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t281

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 282

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t282

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 283

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t283

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 284

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t284

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 285

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t285

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 286

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t286

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 287

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t287

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 288

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t288

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 289

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t289

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 290

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t290

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 291

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t291

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 292

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t292

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 293

    Data from Figure 9, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t293

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 294

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t294

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 295

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t295

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 296

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t296

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 297

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t297

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 298

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t298

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 299

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t299

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 300

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t300

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 301

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t301

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 302

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t302

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 303

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t303

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 304

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t304

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 305

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t305

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 306

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t306

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 307

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t307

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 308

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t308

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 309

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t309

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 310

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t310

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 311

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t311

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 312

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t312

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 313

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t313

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 314

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t314

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 315

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t315

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 316

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t316

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 317

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t317

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 318

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t318

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 319

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t319

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 320

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t320

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 321

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t321

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 322

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t322

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 323

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t323

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 324

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t324

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 325

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t325

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 326

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t326

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 327

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t327

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 328

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t328

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 329

    Data from Figure 10, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t329

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 330

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t330

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 331

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t331

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 332

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t332

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 333

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t333

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 334

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t334

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 335

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t335

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 336

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t336

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 337

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t337

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 338

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t338

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 339

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t339

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 340

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t340

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 341

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t341

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 342

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t342

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 343

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t343

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 344

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t344

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 345

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t345

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 346

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t346

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 347

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t347

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 348

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t348

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 349

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t349

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 350

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t350

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 351

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t351

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 352

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t352

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 353

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t353

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 354

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t354

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 355

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t355

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 356

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t356

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 357

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t357

    $Cov_{2}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 358

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t358

    $Cov_{2}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 359

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t359

    $Cov_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 360

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t360

    $Cov_{3}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 361

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t361

    $Cov_{3}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 362

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t362

    $Cov_{3}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 363

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t363

    $Cov_{4}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 364

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t364

    $Cov_{4}$ Two_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 365

    Data from Figure 11, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t365

    $Cov_{4}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$ based Centrality.

  • Table 366

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t366

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 367

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t367

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 368

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t368

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 369

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t369

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 370

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t370

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 371

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t371

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 372

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t372

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 373

    Data from Figure 12, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t373

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 374

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t374

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 375

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t375

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 376

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t376

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 377

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t377

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 378

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t378

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 379

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t379

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 380

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t380

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 381

    Data from Figure 13, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t381

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 382

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t382

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 383

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t383

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 384

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t384

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 385

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t385

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 386

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t386

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 387

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t387

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 388

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t388

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 389

    Data from Figure 14, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t389

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$.

  • Table 390

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t390

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 391

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t391

    $c_{k}$ Standard method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 392

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t392

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 393

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t393

    $var(v^{2}_{2})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 394

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t394

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 395

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t395

    $var(v^{2}_{3})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 396

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t396

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 397

    Data from Figure 15, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t397

    $var(v^{2}_{4})$ Combined subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N^{rec}_{ch}$.

  • Table 398

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t398

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 399

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t399

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 400

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t400

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 401

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t401

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 402

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t402

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 403

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t403

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 404

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t404

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 405

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t405

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 406

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t406

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 407

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t407

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 408

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t408

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 409

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t409

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 410

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t410

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 411

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t411

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 412

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t412

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 413

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t413

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 414

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t414

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 415

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t415

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 416

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t416

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 417

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t417

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 418

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t418

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 419

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t419

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 420

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t420

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 421

    Data from Figure 16, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t421

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Pb+Pb 5.02 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 422

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t422

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 423

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 1 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t423

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 424

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t424

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 425

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 2 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t425

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 426

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t426

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 427

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 3 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t427

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 428

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t428

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 429

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 4 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t429

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 430

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t430

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 431

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 5 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t431

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 432

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t432

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 433

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 6 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t433

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<2.5, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 434

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t434

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 435

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 7 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t435

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 436

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t436

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 437

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 8 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t437

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 438

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t438

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 439

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 9 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t439

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <2.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 440

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t440

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 441

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 10 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t441

    $\rho_{2}$ Three_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 442

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t442

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 443

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 11 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t443

    $\rho_{3}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

  • Table 444

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t444

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $\Sigma E_{T}$ based Centrality

  • Table 445

    Data from Figure 17, Panel 12 in the auxilliary material

    10.17182/hepdata.139082.v1/t445

    $\rho_{4}$ Combined_subevent method, for Xe+Xe 5.44 TeV, $|\eta|$<1.0, 0.5< $p_{T}$ <5.0 GeV vs $N_{ch}^{rec}$ based Centrality

Loading Data...