{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2085373"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137460","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2024","description":"Results showing the search for direct production of charginos and neutralinos via electroweak interactions.The results are based on data from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $13~\\mathrm{TeV}$ collected with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $137~\\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$.The search considers final states with large missing transverse momentum and pairs of hadronically decaying bosons WW, WZ, and WH, where H is the Higgs boson.These bosons are identified using novel algorithms.No significant excess of events is observed relative to the expectations from the standard model.Limits at the 95\\% confidence level are placed on the cross section for production of mass-degenerate wino-like supersymmetric particles $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{1}^{\\pm}$ and $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{2}^{0}$, and mass-degenerate higgsino-like supersymmetric particles $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{1}^{\\pm}$, $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{2}^{0}$, and $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{3}^{0}$.In the limit of a nearly-massless lightest supersymmetric particle $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$, wino-like particles with masses up to 870 and $960~\\mathrm{GeV}$ are excluded in the cases of $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{2}^{0}\\to\\mathrm{Z}\\widetilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ and $\\widetilde{\\chi}_{2}^{0}\\to\\mathrm{H}\\widetilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$, respectively, and higgsino-like particles are excluded between 300 and $650~\\mathrm{GeV}$.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background prediction vs. observation in the b-veto signal region","name":"Figure 3a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background observation/prediction in the bVeto signal region","name":"Figure 3a ratios"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background prediction vs. observation in the WH signal region","name":"Figure 3b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background observation/prediction in the WH signal region","name":"Figure 3b ratios"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background prediction vs. observation in the W signal region","name":"Figure 3c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background observation/prediction in the W signal region","name":"Figure 3c ratios"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background prediction vs. observation in the H signal region","name":"Figure 3d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"SM background observation/prediction in the H signal region","name":"Figure 3d ratios"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 4a Observed Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 4a Expected Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the production cross sections for $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\mp_1$ assuming that each $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ decays to...","name":"Figure 4a Observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 4b Observed Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 4b Expected Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the production cross sections for $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ $\\widetilde{\\chi}^0_2$ assuming that each $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ decays to...","name":"Figure 4b Observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 4c Observed Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 4c Expected Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the production cross sections for $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ $\\widetilde{\\chi}^0_2$ assuming that each $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ decays to...","name":"Figure 4c Observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 5a WW WZ Observed Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 5a WW WZ Expected Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 5a WW WH Observed Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 5a WW WH Expected Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 5b Observed Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NLO+NLL cross sections","name":"Figure 5b Expected Lines"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the production cross sections for mass-degenerate higgsino-like$\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\mp_1$, $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ $\\widetilde{\\chi}^0_2$, $\\widetilde{\\chi}^\\pm_1$ $\\widetilde{\\chi}^0_3$ and...","name":"Figure 5b Observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency of bb-tagger for H(bb), Z(bb) and Z(cc) decays.","name":"Efficiency of bb-tagger"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency of W- and V-tagger for W(qq) and Z(qq) decays.","name":"Efficiency of W- and V-taggers"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWW in the b-Veto region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWW in b-Veto"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWZ in the b-Veto region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWZ in b-Veto"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWH in the b-Veto region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWH in b-Veto"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiHZ in the b-Veto region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiHZ in b-Veto"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWW in the WHSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWW in WHSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWW in the WSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWW in WSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWW in the HSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWW in HSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWZ in the WHSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWZ in WHSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWZ in the WSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWZ in WSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWZ in the HSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWZ in HSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWH in the WHSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWH in WHSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWH in the WSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWH in WSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiWH in the HSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiWH in HSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with uncertainties for TChiHZ in the WHSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiHZ in WHSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with uncertainties for TChiHZ in the WSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiHZ in WSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainties for TChiHZ in the HSR region.","name":"Acc X Eff for TChiHZ in HSR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Covariance matrix for the signal regions, derived from a fit to the control regions only under the background-only hypothesis.","name":"Covariance matrix"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127766.v2/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Correlation matrix for the signal regions, derived from a fit to the control regions only under the background-only hypothesis.","name":"Correlation matrix"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2085373?version=2"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/127766"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos at $\\sqrt{s}$ =13 TeV in final states containing hadronic decays of WW, WZ, or WH and missing transverse momentum","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2085373?version=2","version":2}