{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2852160"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2025)114","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2024","description":"A standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) analysis with dimension-six operators probing nonresonant new physics effects is performed in the Higgs-strahlung process, where the Higgs boson is produced in association with a W or Z boson, in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The final states in which the W or Z boson decays leptonically and the Higgs boson decays to a pair of bottom quarks are considered. The analyzed data were collected by the CMS experiment between 2016 and 2018 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. An approach designed to simultaneously optimize the sensitivity to Wilson coefficients of multiple SMEFT operators is employed. Likelihood scans as functions of the Wilson coefficients that carry SMEFT sensitivity in this final state are performed for different expansions in SMEFT. The results are consistent with the predictions of the standard model.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of results in terms of best fit value of the Wilson coefficients and the intervals where the test statistic...","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Profiled limits on the energy scale $\\Lambda$ for three different assumptions for each Wilson coefficient while fixing the other Wilson...","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 9a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 9b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $c_{Hu}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 9c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $c_{Hu}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 9d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $c_{Hd}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 9e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $c_{Hd}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 9f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $c_{Hu}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 10a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $c_{Hu}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 10b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $c_{Hd}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 10c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $c_{Hd}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 10d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hu}$ vs. $c_{Hd}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 10e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hu}$ vs. $c_{Hd}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 10f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 11a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 11b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 11c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 11d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hu}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 11e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hu}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 11f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 12a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(1)}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 12b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 12c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hq}^{(3)}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 12d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hu}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 112e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hu}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 12f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hd}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 13a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hd}$ vs. $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 13b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hd}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 13c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $c_{Hd}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 13d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while allowing the other coefficients to float freely at each point of...","name":"Table 13e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155497.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed two-dimensional likelihood scans for $g^{(2)}_{ZZ}$ vs. $g^{(4)}_{ZZ}$ while other coefficients are fixed at their SM values.","name":"Table 13f"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2852160?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/155497"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Constraints on standard model effective field theory for a Higgs boson produced in association with W or Z bosons in the H$\\to\\mathrm{b\\bar{b}}$ decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2852160?version=1","version":1}