{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2964453"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15218-2","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2025","description":"A model-agnostic search for Beyond the Standard Model physics is presented, targeting final states with at least four light leptons (electrons or muons). The search regions are separated by event topology and unsupervised machine learning is used to identify anomalous events in the full 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector during Run 2. No significant excess above the Standard Model background expectation is observed. Model-agnostic limits are presented in each topology, along with limits on several benchmark models including vector-like leptons, wino-like charginos and neutralinos, or smuons. Limits are set on the flavourful vector-like lepton model for the first time.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) mT(4ℓ, ETmiss), (b) mhigh(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) ETmiss, (e) pT(Z),...","name":"Figure 4a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) mT(4ℓ, ETmiss), (b) mhigh(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) ETmiss, (e) pT(Z),...","name":"Figure 4b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) mT(4ℓ, ETmiss), (b) mhigh(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) ETmiss, (e) pT(Z),...","name":"Figure 4c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) mT(4ℓ, ETmiss), (b) mhigh(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) ETmiss, (e) pT(Z),...","name":"Figure 4d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) mT(4ℓ, ETmiss), (b) mhigh(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) ETmiss, (e) pT(Z),...","name":"Figure 4e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) mT(4ℓ, ETmiss), (b) mhigh(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) ETmiss, (e) pT(Z),...","name":"Figure 4f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) Njets, (b) ETmiss, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) HTlep distribution in...","name":"Figure 5a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) Njets, (b) ETmiss, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) HTlep distribution in...","name":"Figure 5b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) Njets, (b) ETmiss, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) HTlep distribution in...","name":"Figure 5c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) Njets, (b) ETmiss, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) HTlep distribution in...","name":"Figure 5d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the discovery regions included in the model-independent fit, after a background-only fit...","name":"Figure 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed and expected excluded visible cross section limits, σvis for the model-independent regions. The various requirements on the anomaly score...","name":"Figure 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only...","name":"Figure 9a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only...","name":"Figure 9b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only...","name":"Figure 9c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only...","name":"Figure 9d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only...","name":"Figure 9e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only...","name":"Figure 9f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10e (2 sigma band)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10e (1 sigma band)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10e (Expected)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10e (Observed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10f (2 sigma band)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10f (1 sigma band)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10f (Expected)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for...","name":"Figure 10f (Observed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11a (2 sigma band)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11a (1 sigma band)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11a (Expected)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11a (Observed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11b (2 sigma contour)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11b (1 sigma contour)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11b (Expected)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as...","name":"Figure 11b (Observed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the distribution of the b-jet multiplicity in the WZ/ttZ CR after the...","name":"Figure 1 from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the event yields in the HFe CR, HFμ, Conversions, and LFe CRs,...","name":"Figure 2 from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background prediction for the discovery regions included in the model-independent fit, before any fit to...","name":"Figure 4 from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit...","name":"Figure 5a from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit...","name":"Figure 5b from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit...","name":"Figure 5c from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit...","name":"Figure 5d from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit...","name":"Figure 5e from Auxiliary material"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.167089.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit...","name":"Figure 5f from Auxiliary material"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2964453?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/167089"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for Beyond the Standard Model physics with anomaly detection in multilepton final states in $pp$ collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2964453?version=1","version":1}