{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/3006250"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2026)175","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2025","description":"Abstract: Differential top quark pair production cross sections are measured in the dilepton final states $\\mathrm{e}^{+}\\mathrm{e}^{-}$, $\\mu^{+}\\mu^{-}$, and $\\mathrm{e}^{\\pm}\\mu^{\\mp}$, as a function of kinematic variables of the system of two neutrinos: the transverse momentum $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ of the dineutrino system, the minimum distance in azimuthal angle between $\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and leptons, and in two dimensions in bins of both observables. The measurements are performed using CERN LHC proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s} = 13\\,$TeV, recorded by the CMS detector between 2016 and 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The measured cross sections are unfolded to the particle level using an unregularized least squares method. The obtained results are found to be in agreement with the latest theory predictions and Monte Carlo simulations.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Data and MC simulation yields after the event selection, combined for all data-taking periods and split by channels. The uncertainties...","name":"Table_001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed (black markers) and expected distributions of leading lepton $p_{T}$ after event selection. The hatched (grey) areas denote the systematic...","name":"Figure_002-a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed (black markers) and expected distributions of leading jet $p_{T}$ after event selection. The hatched (grey) areas denote the systematic...","name":"Figure_002-b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed (black markers) and expected distributions of number of jets after event selection. The hatched (grey) areas denote the systematic...","name":"Figure_002-c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed (black markers) and expected distributions of number of b tagged jets after event selection. The hatched (grey) areas denote...","name":"Figure_002-d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Difference between $p_{\\mathrm{T,gen.}}^\\text{miss}$ and $p_{\\mathrm{T,rec.}}^\\text{miss}$ as a function of the $p_{\\mathrm{T,gen.}}^\\text{miss}$ for signal events. The mean difference between the generated...","name":"Figure_003-a-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Difference between $p_{\\mathrm{T,gen.}}^\\text{miss}$ and $p_{\\mathrm{T,rec.}}^\\text{miss}$ as a function of the $p_{\\mathrm{T,gen.}}^\\text{miss}$ for signal events. The dashed line shows the standard...","name":"Figure_003-a-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Difference between $p_{\\mathrm{T,gen.}}^\\text{miss}$ and $p_{\\mathrm{T,rec.}}^\\text{miss}$ as a function of the number of primary vertices for signal events. The mean difference...","name":"Figure_003-b-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Difference between $p_{\\mathrm{T,gen.}}^\\text{miss}$ and $p_{\\mathrm{T,rec.}}^\\text{miss}$ as a function of the $p_{\\mathrm{T,gen.}}^\\text{miss}$ for signal events. The dashed line shows the standard...","name":"Figure_003-b-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Results of the $\\chi^{2}$ tests for the absolute and normalized differential cross section measurements for each of the predictions. The...","name":"Table_003"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"The p-value of the $\\chi^{2}$ tests for the absolute and normalized cross section measurements for each of the predictions. The...","name":"Table_004"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from experimental uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$. The...","name":"Figure_004-a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from theory uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$. The...","name":"Figure_004-b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from experimental uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$. The...","name":"Figure_004-c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from theory uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$. The...","name":"Figure_004-d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from experimental uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and...","name":"Figure_004-e-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from experimental uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and...","name":"Figure_004-e-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from experimental uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and...","name":"Figure_004-e-003"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from theory uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and...","name":"Figure_004-f-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from theory uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and...","name":"Figure_004-f-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Breakdown of the relative contribution from theory uncertainties in the differential cross section measurement as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and...","name":"Figure_004-f-003"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated distributions of $p_{\\mathrm{T,DNN}}^\\text{miss}$ is shown. Events from all data-taking periods and all channels are...","name":"Figure_005-a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated distributions of $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T, DNN}}^{\\text{miss}},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ is shown. Events from all data-taking periods and all channels...","name":"Figure_005-b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated two-dimensional distribution of $p_{\\mathrm{T,DNN}}^\\text{miss}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T, DNN}}^{\\text{miss}},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle range 0<$\\phi$<0.28 is...","name":"Figure_005-c-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated two-dimensional distribution of $p_{\\mathrm{T,DNN}}^\\text{miss}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T, DNN}}^{\\text{miss}},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle range 0.28<$\\phi$<0.56 is...","name":"Figure_005-c-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated two-dimensional distribution of $p_{\\mathrm{T,DNN}}^\\text{miss}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T, DNN}}^{\\text{miss}},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle range 0.56<$\\phi$<0.82 is...","name":"Figure_005-c-003"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated two-dimensional distribution of $p_{\\mathrm{T,DNN}}^\\text{miss}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T, DNN}}^{\\text{miss}},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle range 0.82<$\\phi$<1.08 is...","name":"Figure_005-c-004"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated two-dimensional distribution of $p_{\\mathrm{T,DNN}}^\\text{miss}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T, DNN}}^{\\text{miss}},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle range 1.08<$\\phi$<2.14 is...","name":"Figure_005-c-005"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed (black markers) and simulated two-dimensional distribution of $p_{\\mathrm{T,DNN}}^\\text{miss}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T, DNN}}^{\\text{miss}},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle range 2.14<$\\phi$<3.2 is...","name":"Figure_005-c-006"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Result of the closure test based on simulation accounting for potential BSM contributions based on a top squark pair production...","name":"Figure_006-a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Result of the closure test based on simulation. The potential BSM contribution is scaled by a factor of ten. The...","name":"Figure_006-b-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Result of the closure test based on simulation. The potential BSM contribution is scaled by a factor of ten. The...","name":"Figure_006-b-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Result of the closure test based on simulation. The potential BSM contribution is scaled by a factor of ten. The...","name":"Figure_006-b-003"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ is shown. The theoretical predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA...","name":"Figure_007-a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ is shown. The theoretical predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA...","name":"Figure_007-b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured two-dimensional differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle...","name":"Figure_007-c-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured two-dimensional differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle...","name":"Figure_007-c-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured two-dimensional differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal angle...","name":"Figure_007-c-003"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized measured differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ is shown. The theoretical predictions from...","name":"Figure_008-a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized measured differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ is shown. The theoretical predictions from...","name":"Figure_008-b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized measured two-dimensional differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal...","name":"Figure_008-c-001"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized measured two-dimensional differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal...","name":"Figure_008-c-002"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.153302.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized measured two-dimensional differential signal cross section (black markers) as a function of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu}$ and $\\text{min}[\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\nu\\nu},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\ell})]$ for the azimuthal...","name":"Figure_008-c-003"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins3006250?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/153302"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Measurement of the dineutrino system kinematic variables in dileptonic top quark pair production in proton-proton collisions at$\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins3006250?version=1","version":1}