Abstract (data abstract)

In the physics program of the CMS experiment during the CERN LHC Run 3, which started in 2022, the long-lived particle triggers have been improved and extended to expand the scope of the corresponding searches. These dedicated triggers and their performance are described in this paper, using several theoretical benchmark models that extend the standard model of particle physics. The results are based on proton-proton collision data collected with the CMS detector during 2022--2024 at a center-of-mass energy of 13.6 TeV, corresponding to integrated luminosities of up to 123 ${\mathrm{fb}}^{-1}$.

2.a. Offline Tracking efficiency vs simulated radial position

Data from Fig. 2 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t1

Offline standard tracking efficiency during Run~3 for different tracking iterations, as a function of simulated radial position of the track...
2.b. HLT Tracking efficiency vs simulated radial position

Data from Fig. 2 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t2

Overall standard tracking efficiency at the HLT during Run~3, as a function of the simulated radial position of the track...
10.a. MET+IsoTrk efficiency vs Tracker layers with measurement

Data from Fig. 10 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t3

L1T+HLT efficiency of the MET+IsoTrk trigger as a function of the number of tracker layers with valid measurements of the...
10.b. MET+IsoTrk efficiency vs PF missing transverse momentum

Data from Fig. 10 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t4

Comparison of L1T+HLT efficiencies of the MET+IsoTrk trigger calculated with 2022 data (black), 2023 data (blue), and $W \rightarrow l...
11.a. MET filter efficiency vs PF missing transverse momentum

Data from Fig. 11 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t5

Efficiency of the L1T+HLT $p_{T}^{miss}$ leg as a function of offline reconstructed PF $p_{T}^{miss, \mu \hspace{-0.15cm} /}$ in 2022 data...
11.b. IsoTrk filter efficiency vs PF missing transverse momentum

Data from Fig. 11 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t6

Efficiency of the full HLT path, taking into account only events that already passed through the $p_{T}^{miss}$ leg, as a...
13.a. Disp. tau trigger eff. vs $d_{0}$

Data from Fig. 13 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t7

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the displaced $\tau_\mathrm{h}$ trigger, for simulated $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to \tilde{\tau}\tilde{\tau},(\tilde{\tau} \to \tau\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ events, where the $\tilde{\tau}$ has...
13.b. Disp. tau trigger eff. vs $\mathrm{p_{T}^{miss}}$

Data from Fig. 13 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t8

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the displaced $\tau_\mathrm{h}$ trigger, for simulated $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to \tilde{\tau}\tilde{\tau},(\tilde{\tau} \to \tau\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ events, where the $\tilde{\tau}$ has...
14.a. Displaced tau trigger rate vs pileup in 2022

Data from Fig. 14 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t9

Total rate of the displaced $\tau_\mathrm{h}$ trigger for a few representative runs in 2022 data, as a function of PU.
14.b. Displaced tau trigger rate vs pileup in 2023

Data from Fig. 14 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t10

Total rate of the displaced $\tau_\mathrm{h}$ trigger for a few representative runs in 2023 data, as a function of PU.
16.a. Displaced jet HLT $H_{T}$ > 430 GeV efficiency

Data from Fig. 16 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t11

The HLT efficiency for a given event passing the main displaced-jet trigger to satisfy HLT calorimeter $H_{\mathrm{T}}>430~\mathrm{GeV}$ as a function...
16.b. Displaced jet HLT $H_{T}$ > 390 GeV efficiency

Data from Fig. 16 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t12

The HLT efficiency for a given event passing the main displaced-jet trigger to satisfy HLT calorimeter $H_{\mathrm{T}}>390~\mathrm{GeV}$ as a function...
17.a. Displaced jet HLT $p_{T}$ > 40 GeV efficiency

Data from Fig. 17 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t13

The HLT efficiency of the main displaced-jet trigger: Efficiency of an offline calorimeter jet to pass the online $\mathrm{p_T}$ requirement...
17.b. Displaced jet HLT tracking requirement efficiency

Data from Fig. 17 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t14

The HLT efficiency of the main displaced-jet trigger: Efficiency of an offline calorimeter jet to have at most one HLT...
18. Displaced jet HLT tagging efficiency

Data from Fig. 18

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t15

The HLT efficiency of the main displaced-jet trigger for 2022 conditions, for $\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{S}\mathrm{S}$ signal events where $m_{H}=125$ GeV...
19. Displaced jet trigger efficiency Run 3 v.s. Run 2 ratio

Data from Fig. 19

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t16

The ratio between the Run 3 displaced-jet trigger efficiency and the Run 2 displaced jet trigger efficiency as a function...
21. L1T HCAL delayed tower efficiency vs Timing shift [ns]

Data from Fig. 21

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t17

The L1T HCAL trigger tower efficiency of the delayed timing towers in 2023 HCAL timing-scan data, with efficiencies split by...
22. L1T efficiency of LLP-flagged jets vs L1 jet ET [GeV]

Data from Fig. 22

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t18

The L1T efficiency of the LLP jet trigger in 2023 HCAL timing-scan data. The HCAL LLP-flagged L1T trigger delayed jet...
23.a. L1T efficiency of HCAL based-LLP triggers vs. event $H_T$

Data from Fig. 23 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t19

The L1T efficiency of the HCAL-based LLP jet triggers, as a function of event $H_T$, for $H \to SS \to...
23.b. L1T efficiency of HCAL based-LLP triggers vs. jet $p_T$

Data from Fig. 23 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t20

The L1T efficiency of the HCAL-based LLP jet triggers, as a function of jet $p_T$, for $H \to SS \to...
24. L1T efficiency of HCAL bsaed-LLP triggers vs. LLP decay R

Data from Fig. 24

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t21

The L1T efficiency of the HCAL-based LLP jet triggers as a function of LLP decay radial position $R$ for $H...
25.a. HLT efficiency of CalRatio trigger vs. leading jet NHEF

Data from Fig. 25 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t22

The HLT efficiency of the CalRatio trigger as a function of the leading PF jet NHEF in 2024 data, measured...
25.b. Distribution of leading jet neutral hadron energy fraction

Data from Fig. 25 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t23

Distribution of the leading PF jet NHEF (right) in 2024 data (black circles), W$\to l\nu$ background simulation for 2024 conditions...
27. L1T+HLT eff vs HT (mH = 1000, mX = 450 GeV, ctau=10m)

Figure 27

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t24

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the inclusive and trackless delayed-jet triggers introduced in Run 3, shown as red squares and blue...
28.a. Delayed jet trigger efficiency vs HT, (4b final state)

Data from Figure 28 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t25

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the $H_T$-seeded delayed jet trigger, the $H_T$-seeded delayed trackless jet trigger, the tau-seeded delayed jet trigger,...
28.b. Delayed jet trigger efficiency vs HT, (4tau final state)

Data from Figure 28 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t26

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the $H_T$-seeded delayed jet trigger, the $H_T$-seeded delayed trackless jet trigger, the tau-seeded delayed jet trigger,...
29.a. $H_{T}$-seeded delayed jet trigger eff vs jet time

Data from Figure 29 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t27

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the delayed-jet triggers as a function of jet timing for 2022 and 2023 data-taking periods. A...
29.b. L1Tau-seeded delayed jet trigger eff vs jet time

Data from Figure 29 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t28

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the delayed-jet triggers as a function of jet timing for 2022 and 2023 data-taking periods. A...
31.a. ECAL crystal seed time delay for LLP signature in barrel

Data from Fig. 31 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t29

The ECAL time delay of the $\mathrm{e/\gamma}$ L1 seeds in the barrel. The distributions are shown for $\mathrm{Z\ \rightarrow\ ee}$...
31.b. ECAL crystal seed time delay for LLP signature in endcap

Data from Fig. 31 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t30

The ECAL time delay of the $\mathrm{e/\gamma}$ L1 seeds in the endcap. The distributions are shown for $\mathrm{Z\ \rightarrow\ ee}$...
32.a. Delayed Di-Photon HLT rate. with intergated luminosity

Data from Fig. 32 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t31

The HLT rate (blue points) of the delayed-diphoton trigger for a few representative runs in the first data collected in...
32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9573

Data from Fig. 32 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t32

The delayed-diphoton trigger rate is shown as a function of PU for fill 9573 in 2024 data, at an instantaneous...
32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9574

Data from Fig. 32 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t33

The delayed-diphoton trigger rate is shown as a function of PU for fill 9574 in 2024 data, at an instantaneous...
32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9575

Data from Fig. 32 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t34

The delayed-diphoton trigger rate is shown as a function of PU for fill 9575 in 2024 data, at an instantaneous...
32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9579

Data from Fig. 32 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t35

The delayed-diphoton trigger rate is shown as a function of PU for fill 9579 in 2024 data, at an instantaneous...
33. Delayed Di-Photon eff. with seed time ($\mathrm{e_{2}}$)

Data from Fig. 33

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t36

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the delayed-diphoton trigger as a function of the subleading probe electron ($\mathrm{e_2}$) supercluster seed time, measured...
34.a. Delayed Di-Photon eff. with $p_{T}$ ($\mathrm{e_{2}}$)

Data from Fig. 34 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t37

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the delayed-diphoton trigger as a function of subleading probe electron ($\mathrm{e_2}$) $\mathrm{p_T}$, measured with data collected...
34.b. Delayed Di-Photon eff. with $\eta$ ($\mathrm{e_{2}}$)

Data from Fig. 34 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t38

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the delayed-diphoton trigger as a function of subleading probe electron ($\mathrm{e_2}$) $\eta$, measured with data collected...
37.a. Displaced photon plus HT trigger rate vs pileup in 2022

Data from Fig. 37 (left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t39

Total rate of the displaced-photon + $H_\mathrm{T}$ HLT path for a few representative runs in 2022 data, at an instantaneous...
37.b. Displaced photon plus HT trigger rate vs pileup in 2023

Data from Fig. 37 (right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t40

Total rate of the displaced-photon + $H_\mathrm{T}$ HLT path for a few representative runs in 2023 data, at an instantaneous...
39.a. L1T efficiency vs displaced muon $\mathrm{d_{0}}$ in BMTF

Data from Fig. 39 upper left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t41

The BMTF L1T efficiencies for beamspot-constrained and beamspot-unconstrained $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ assignment algorithms for L1T $\mathrm{p_{T}} > 10\mathrm{GeV}$ with respect to generator-level...
39.b. L1T efficiency vs displaced muon $\mathrm{d_{0}}$ in OMTF

Data from Fig. 39 upper right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t42

The OMTF L1T efficiencies for beamspot-constrained and beamspot-unconstrained $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ assignment algorithms for L1T $\mathrm{p_{T}} > 10\mathrm{GeV}$ with respect to generator-level...
39.c. L1T efficiency vs displaced muon $\mathrm{d_{0}}$ in EMTF

Data from Fig. 39 lower

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t43

The EMTF L1T efficiencies for beamspot-constrained and beamspot-unconstrained $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ assignment algorithms for L1T $\mathrm{p_{T}} > 10\mathrm{GeV}$ with respect to generator-level...
Figure40

Data from Figure 40.

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t44

The L1T+HLT efficiencies of the various displaced-dimuon triggers and their logical OR as a function of $c\tau$ for the HAHM...
Figure41a

Data from Figure 41 (left).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t45

The HLT efficiency, defined as the fraction of events recorded by the Run 2 (2018) triggers that also satisfied the...
Figure41b

Data from Figure 41 (right).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t46

The invariant mass distribution for TMS-TMS dimuons in events recorded by the Run 2 (2018) triggers in the combined 2022...
Figure42a

Data from Figure 42 (upper left).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t47

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the Run 3 (2022, L3) triggers in 2022 data (black), 2023 data (red), and simulation (green)...
Figure42b

Data from Figure 42 (upper right).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t48

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the Run 3 (2022, L3) triggers in 2022 data (black), 2023 data (red), and simulation (green)...
Figure42c

Data from Figure 42 (lower).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t49

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the Run 3 (2022, L3) triggers in 2022 data (black), 2023 data (red), and simulation (green)...
Figure43a

Data from Figure 43 (upper left).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t50

The HLT efficiency, defined as the fraction of events recorded by the Run 2 (2018) triggers that also satisfied the...
Figure43b

Data from Figure 43 (upper right).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t51

The HLT efficiency of the Run 3 (2022, L3) triggers and the Run 3 (2022, L3 dTks) triggers for J/ψ...
Figure43c

Data from Figure 43 (lower).

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t52

Invariant mass distribution for TMS-TMS dimuons in events recorded by the Run 2 (2018) triggers in the combined 2022 and...
45. Double displaced L3 muon signal eff vs min($\mathrm{p_{T}}$)

Data from Fig. 45

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t53

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the double displaced L3 muon trigger as a function of min($\mathrm{p_{T}}$) of the two global or...
46.a. Double disp. L3mu data&bkg eff vs min($\mathrm{d_{0}}$)

Data from Fig. 46 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t54

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the double displaced L3 muon trigger in 2022, as a function of min($\mathrm{d_{0}}$) of the two...
46.b. Double disp. L3mu data&bkg eff vs min($\mathrm{p_{T}}$)

Data from Fig. 46 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t55

The L1T+HLT efficiency of the double displaced L3 muon trigger in 2022, as a function of min($\mathrm{p_{T}}$) of the two...
48. Scouting dimuon trigger eff vs pt in data

Data from Fig. 48

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t56

L1T+HLT efficiency of the dimuon scouting trigger as a function of the subleading muon $p_{T}$, for 2024 data. The efficiency...
49. Scouting dimuon trigger eff vs Lxy

Data from Fig. 49

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t57

L1T+HLT efficiency of the dimuon scouting trigger as a function of the generator-level $L_{xy}$, for HAHM signal events, for 2024...
50.a. Scouting dimuon trig eff vs $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ for m = 2.5

Data from Fig. 50 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t58

L1T+HLT efficiency of the dimuon scouting trigger as a function of the generator-level subleading muon $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, for HAHM signal events...
50.b. Scouting dimuon trig eff vs $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ for m = 14

Data from Fig. 50 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t59

L1T+HLT efficiency of the dimuon scouting trigger as a function of the generator-level subleading muon $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, for HAHM signal events...
51.a. Scouting reconstruction eff vs Lxy for m = 2.5

Data from Fig. 51 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t60

Scouting muon reconstruction efficiency of the vertex-constrained (pink circles) and vertex-unconstrained (blue triangles) algorithms as a function of the generator-level...
51.b. Scouting reconstruction eff vs Lxy for m = 14

Data from Fig. 51 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t61

Scouting muon reconstruction efficiency of the vertex-constrained (pink circles) and vertex-unconstrained (blue triangles) algorithms as a function of the generator-level...
52. Scouting resolution vs pt

Data from Fig. 52

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t62

The $p_{T}$ resolution of scouting muons with respect to offline muons, as a function of the scouting muon $p_{T}$, for...
56.a. HLT efficiency of DT MDS vs ptmiss

Data from Fig. 56 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t63

The HLT efficiency of the DT MDS triggers as a function of $p_T^{miss}$, for simulated $H \to S S \to...
56.b. HLT efficiency of DT MDS vs cluser size

Data from Fig. 56 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t64

The HLT efficiency of the DT MDS triggers as a function of cluster size, for simulated $H \to S S...
58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2016)

Data from Fig. 58

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t65

Rate of the main muon No-BPTX HLT path as a function of the number of colliding bunches, for 2016.
58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2017)

Data from Fig. 58

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t66

Rate of the main muon No-BPTX HLT path as a function of the number of colliding bunches, for 2017.
58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2018)

Data from Fig. 58

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t67

Rate of the main muon No-BPTX HLT path as a function of the number of colliding bunches, for 2018.
58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2022)

Data from Fig. 58

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t68

Rate of the main muon No-BPTX HLT path as a function of the number of colliding bunches, for 2022.
58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2023)

Data from Fig. 58

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t69

Rate of the main muon No-BPTX HLT path as a function of the number of colliding bunches, for 2023.
58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2024)

Data from Fig. 58

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t70

Rate of the main muon No-BPTX HLT path as a function of the number of colliding bunches, for 2024.
61.a. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t71

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.a. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t72

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.a. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t73

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.a. DT MDS acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t74

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.a. CSC MDS acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t75

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.b. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t76

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.b. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t77

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.b. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t78

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.b. DT MDS acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t79

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.b. CSC MDS acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 61 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t80

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.c. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t81

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.c. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t82

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.c. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t83

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.c. DT MDS acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t84

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.c. CSC MDS acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t85

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.d. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t86

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.d. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs R (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t87

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.d. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t88

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.d. DT MDS acceptance vs R (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t89

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
61.d. CSC MDS acceptance vs R (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 61 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t90

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay radial position, for $H...
62.a. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t91

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.a. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t92

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.a. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t93

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.a. DT MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t94

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.a. CSC MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=1000, mX=200)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t95

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.b. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t96

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.b. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t97

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.b. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t98

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.b. DT MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t99

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.b. CSC MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=80)

Data from Fig. 62 (upper right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t100

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.c. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t101

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.c. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t102

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.c. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t103

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.c. DT MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t104

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.c. CSC MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=350, mX=160)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower left)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t105

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.d. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t106

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.d. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t107

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.d. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs Z (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t108

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.d. DT MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t109

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
62.d. CSC MDS acceptance vs Z (mH=125, mX=25)

Data from Fig. 62 (lower right)

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t110

The L1T+HLT acceptances for various LLP triggers using different subdetectors, as functions of the LLP decay position along the beam...
63. MDS Run 2, Run 3 acceptance comparison

Data from Fig. 63

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t111

Comparison of the acceptances in Run 2 and Run 3 for the CSC (left) and DT (right) MDS triggers at...
64. L1T and L1T+HLT acceptance for CSC MDS

Data from Fig. 64

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t112

The L1T (blue circles) and L1T+HLT (orange squares) acceptances for the CSC MDS trigger as functions of the LLP decay...
65. HLT and L1T+HLT aceptance for DT MDS

Data from Fig. 65

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t113

The HLT (blue circles) and L1T+HLT (orange squares) acceptances for the DT MDS trigger as functions of the LLP decay...
66.a. 2D L1T acceptance for CSC MDS

Data from Fig. 66 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t114

The L1T acceptance for the CSC MDS trigger as functions of the LLP decay position, for $H \to S S...
66.b. 2D L1T+HLT acceptance for CSC MDS

Data from Fig. 66 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t115

The L1T+HLT acceptance for the CSC MDS trigger as functions of the LLP decay position, for $H \to S S...
67. 2D HLT acceptance for DT MDS

Data from Fig. 67

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t116

The HLT acceptance for the DT MDS trigger as a function of the LLP decay position, for $H \to S...
68. Disp. tau trigger acceptance vs decay vtx radial pos

Data from Fig. 68

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t117

The L1T+HLT acceptance of the displaced $\tau_\mathrm{h}$ trigger, for simulated $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to \tilde{\tau}\tilde{\tau},(\tilde{\tau} \to \tau\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ events,where each $\tau$ decays hadronically...
70.a. HLT muon pt resolution vs pt

Data from Figure 70 left

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t118

Inverse HLT muon $p_\text{T}$ resolution ($(1/p_\text{T}^\text{HLT}-1/p_\text{T}^\text{gen})/(1/p_\text{T}^\text{gen})$) as a function of the generator-level muon $p_\text{T}$, for simulated HAHM signal events, where...
70.b. HLT muon pt resolution vs Lxy

Data from Figure 70 right

10.17182/hepdata.165445.v1/t119

Inverse HLT muon $p_\text{T}$ resolution ($(1/p_\text{T}^\text{HLT}-1/p_\text{T}^\text{gen})/(1/p_\text{T}^\text{gen})$) as a function of the generator-level $L_{xy}$, for simulated HAHM signal events, where the...

2.a. Offline Tracking efficiency vs simulated radial position

2.b. HLT Tracking efficiency vs simulated radial position

10.a. MET+IsoTrk efficiency vs Tracker layers with measurement

10.b. MET+IsoTrk efficiency vs PF missing transverse momentum

11.a. MET filter efficiency vs PF missing transverse momentum

11.b. IsoTrk filter efficiency vs PF missing transverse momentum

13.a. Disp. tau trigger eff. vs $d_{0}$

13.b. Disp. tau trigger eff. vs $\mathrm{p_{T}^{miss}}$

14.a. Displaced tau trigger rate vs pileup in 2022

14.b. Displaced tau trigger rate vs pileup in 2023

16.a. Displaced jet HLT $H_{T}$ > 430 GeV efficiency

16.b. Displaced jet HLT $H_{T}$ > 390 GeV efficiency

17.a. Displaced jet HLT $p_{T}$ > 40 GeV efficiency

17.b. Displaced jet HLT tracking requirement efficiency

18. Displaced jet HLT tagging efficiency

19. Displaced jet trigger efficiency Run 3 v.s. Run 2 ratio

21. L1T HCAL delayed tower efficiency vs Timing shift [ns]

22. L1T efficiency of LLP-flagged jets vs L1 jet ET [GeV]

23.a. L1T efficiency of HCAL based-LLP triggers vs. event $H_T$

23.b. L1T efficiency of HCAL based-LLP triggers vs. jet $p_T$

24. L1T efficiency of HCAL bsaed-LLP triggers vs. LLP decay R

25.a. HLT efficiency of CalRatio trigger vs. leading jet NHEF

25.b. Distribution of leading jet neutral hadron energy fraction

27. L1T+HLT eff vs HT (mH = 1000, mX = 450 GeV, ctau=10m)

28.a. Delayed jet trigger efficiency vs HT, (4b final state)

28.b. Delayed jet trigger efficiency vs HT, (4tau final state)

29.a. $H_{T}$-seeded delayed jet trigger eff vs jet time

29.b. L1Tau-seeded delayed jet trigger eff vs jet time

31.a. ECAL crystal seed time delay for LLP signature in barrel

31.b. ECAL crystal seed time delay for LLP signature in endcap

32.a. Delayed Di-Photon HLT rate. with intergated luminosity

32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9573

32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9574

32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9575

32.b. Delayed-diphoton trigger rate vs pileup in 2024, fill 9579

33. Delayed Di-Photon eff. with seed time ($\mathrm{e_{2}}$)

34.a. Delayed Di-Photon eff. with $p_{T}$ ($\mathrm{e_{2}}$)

34.b. Delayed Di-Photon eff. with $\eta$ ($\mathrm{e_{2}}$)

37.a. Displaced photon plus HT trigger rate vs pileup in 2022

37.b. Displaced photon plus HT trigger rate vs pileup in 2023

39.a. L1T efficiency vs displaced muon $\mathrm{d_{0}}$ in BMTF

39.b. L1T efficiency vs displaced muon $\mathrm{d_{0}}$ in OMTF

39.c. L1T efficiency vs displaced muon $\mathrm{d_{0}}$ in EMTF

Figure40

Figure41a

Figure41b

Figure42a

Figure42b

Figure42c

Figure43a

Figure43b

Figure43c

45. Double displaced L3 muon signal eff vs min($\mathrm{p_{T}}$)

46.a. Double disp. L3mu data&bkg eff vs min($\mathrm{d_{0}}$)

46.b. Double disp. L3mu data&bkg eff vs min($\mathrm{p_{T}}$)

48. Scouting dimuon trigger eff vs pt in data

49. Scouting dimuon trigger eff vs Lxy

50.a. Scouting dimuon trig eff vs $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ for m = 2.5

50.b. Scouting dimuon trig eff vs $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ for m = 14

51.a. Scouting reconstruction eff vs Lxy for m = 2.5

51.b. Scouting reconstruction eff vs Lxy for m = 14

52. Scouting resolution vs pt

56.a. HLT efficiency of DT MDS vs ptmiss

56.b. HLT efficiency of DT MDS vs cluser size

58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2016)

58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2017)

58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2018)

58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2022)

58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2023)

58. Muon NoBPTX HLT rate vs number of colliding bunches (2024)

61.a. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

61.a. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

61.a. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

61.a. DT MDS acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

61.a. CSC MDS acceptance vs R (mH=1000, mX=200)

61.b. Tracker displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

61.b. ECAL delayed-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

61.b. HCAL displaced-jet acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

61.b. DT MDS acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

61.b. CSC MDS acceptance vs R (mH=350, mX=80)

JSON

YAML

YODA

YODA1

ROOT

CSV