{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/3155615"}}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2026","description":"A search for new physics in the production of three massive gauge bosons (VVV, where V is W or Z) is presented. The event selection is most effective in the Lorentz-boosted regime in which all three bosons have a transverse momentum ($p_{\\text{T}}$) above 200 GeV.  Standard model (SM) processes contribute few events in this regime.  When a boosted W or Z boson decays hadronically, the decay products tend to form a large-radius jet with substructure that reflects the presence of two quarks from the decay; such jets are called V-tagged jets.  Special techniques to reconstruct and select V-tagged jets are applied. Events are categorized according to the number and kinematic features of charged leptons and V-tagged jets.  Event yields are obtained in bins of a suitable kinematic variable such as the scalar $p_{\\text{T}}$ sum of the reconstructed objects in the event.  No excess over SM expectations is observed. Bounds are placed on Wilson coefficients for a  set of mass dimension-6 and -8 operators in the framework of SM effective field theory. The two most stringent bounds placed by this analysis are $-0.13 < c_{\\text{W}}/\\Lambda^2 < 0.12$ TeV$^{-2}$ and $-0.24 < c_{\\text{Hq3}}/\\Lambda^2 < 0.21$ TeV$^{-2}$ at 95% confidence level, where $c_{\\text{W}}$ and $c_{\\text{Hq3}}$ are dimension-6 Wilson coefficients in the Warsaw basis and $\\Lambda$ is the mass scale of new physics.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the SM expected and observed numbers of events.The post-fit uncertainties in the expected numbers of events include allstatistical...","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the 95% CL bounds on the dim-6 Wilson coefficients. We consider the case of a single varying Wilson...","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the 95% CL bounds and measurements on the dim-8 Wilson coefficients, when considering a single varying Wilson coefficient...","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the measurements of the dim-6 Wilson coefficients. We consider the case of a single varying Wilson coefficient (\"Freeze...","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the fitted multiplicative values in the template fit. The case $c_\\text{W}/\\Lambda^2 = 1$TeV$^{-2}$ defines the reference model and...","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the $m_{\\text{SD}}$ distribution in data and simulation for events in a control region dominated by $\\text{t}\\bar{\\text{t}}$ production. $\\text{W}\\rightarrow\\text{q}\\bar{\\text{q}}$...","name":"Figure 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Tests of the ABCD method in the SR-0$\\ell$-2VTJ (left) and SR-0$\\ell$-3VTJ (right) channels. The validation regions are dominated by QCD...","name":"Figure 2a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Tests of the ABCD method in the SR-0$\\ell$-2VTJ (left) and SR-0$\\ell$-3VTJ (right) channels. The validation regions are dominated by QCD...","name":"Figure 2b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the $S_\\text{T}$ distributions for events in the zero-lepton signal regions with two V-tagged jets (left) and three V-tagged...","name":"Figure 3a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the $S_\\text{T}$ distributions for events in the zero-lepton signal regions with two V-tagged jets (left) and three V-tagged...","name":"Figure 3b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the pre-fit ${m}_{\\mathrm{JJ}\\ell\\nu}$ distributions for the one-lepton control regions for W+jets (left) and $\\text{t}\\bar{\\text{t}}$ (right) backgrounds. The shaded...","name":"Figure 4a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the pre-fit ${m}_{\\mathrm{JJ}\\ell\\nu}$ distributions for the one-lepton control regions for W+jets (left) and $\\text{t}\\bar{\\text{t}}$ (right) backgrounds. The shaded...","name":"Figure 4b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit ${m}_{\\mathrm{JJ}\\ell u}$ distributions for the one-lepton and two V-tagged jets (SR-1\\ell-2VTJ) signal region. The shaded band...","name":"Figure 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the pre-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions for the opposite-sign dilepton plus two V-tagged jets (SR-2$\\ell$-OS-2VTJ)control regions for Z+jets (left) and...","name":"Figure 6a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the pre-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions for the opposite-sign dilepton plus two V-tagged jets (SR-2$\\ell$-OS-2VTJ)control regions for Z+jets (left) and...","name":"Figure 6b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions. The upper plots and the lower left plot correspond to the opposite-sign dilepton and...","name":"Figure 7a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions. The upper plots and the lower left plot correspond to the opposite-sign dilepton and...","name":"Figure 7b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions. The upper plots and the lower left plot correspond to the opposite-sign dilepton and...","name":"Figure 7c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions. The upper plots and the lower left plot correspond to the opposite-sign dilepton and...","name":"Figure 7d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of pre-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions for the $\\text{t}\\bar{\\text{t}}$ (left) and WZ (right) control regions in the SR-2$\\ell$-SS-1VTJ channel. The shaded...","name":"Figure 8a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of pre-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions for the $\\text{t}\\bar{\\text{t}}$ (left) and WZ (right) control regions in the SR-2$\\ell$-SS-1VTJ channel. The shaded...","name":"Figure 8b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit $S_\\text{T}$ distributions for the same-sign dilepton plus one V-tagged jets (SR-2$\\ell$-SS-1VTJ) signal region. The shaded band...","name":"Figure 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit distributions binned in the BDT score and $S_\\text{T}$ for the SR-1$\\ell$-1$\\uptau_\\mathrm{h}$-1VTJ (left) and SR-2$\\ell$-1$\\uptau_\\mathrm{h}$-0VTJ (right) signal...","name":"Figure 10a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the post-fit distributions binned in the BDT score and $S_\\text{T}$ for the SR-1$\\ell$-1$\\uptau_\\mathrm{h}$-1VTJ (left) and SR-2$\\ell$-1$\\uptau_\\mathrm{h}$-0VTJ (right) signal...","name":"Figure 10b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the bin-by-bin yields in all signal regions and associated limits on $c_\\text{W}/\\Lambda^2$. The channels are listed from left...","name":"Figure 11 top panel"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of the bin-by-bin yields in all signal regions and associated limits on $c_\\text{W}/\\Lambda^2$. The channels are listed from left...","name":"Figure 11 bottom panel"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Bounds on pairs of Wilson coefficients.The black (blue) curves show the 68% (95%) CL bounds.The red plus sign indicates the...","name":"Figure 12a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Bounds on pairs of Wilson coefficients.The black (blue) curves show the 68% (95%) CL bounds.The red plus sign indicates the...","name":"Figure 12b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Bounds on pairs of Wilson coefficients.The black (blue) curves show the 68% (95%) CL bounds.The red plus sign indicates the...","name":"Figure 12c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Bounds on pairs of Wilson coefficients.The black (blue) curves show the 68% (95%) CL bounds.The red plus sign indicates the...","name":"Figure 12d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Bounds on pairs of Wilson coefficients.The black (blue) curves show the 68% (95%) CL bounds.The red plus sign indicates the...","name":"Figure 12e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Bounds on pairs of Wilson coefficients.The black (blue) curves show the 68% (95%) CL bounds.The red plus sign indicates the...","name":"Figure 12f"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Illustration of the impact of the clipping procedure. The horizontal axis indicates the threshold values placed in $m_\\text{VVV}$ (see text)....","name":"Figure 13a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Illustration of the impact of the clipping procedure. The horizontal axis indicates the threshold values placed in $m_\\text{VVV}$ (see text)....","name":"Figure 13b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Visual summary of fitted multiplicative values obtained from the template fit. In essence, this plot shows the $m_\\text{VVV}$ distribution inferred...","name":"Figure 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 Full_analysis_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 Full_analysis_data"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 2Lepton_SS1VTJ_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 1Lepton_1T1VTJ_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 2Lepton_1T0VTJ_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 2Lepton_OS_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 2Lepton_OS_2VTJ_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 1Lepton_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 0Lepton_3VTJ_Asimov"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.172651.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Sensitivity to the SM VVV production process. The curves show the variation of $2{\\Delta}{\\text{NLL}}$with the SM signal strength, $\\mu_{\\text{SM}}$.The Asimov...","name":"Figure 15 0Lepton_2VTJ_Asimov"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins3155615?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/172651"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for new physics in triple boson production in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV using the effective field theory approach","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins3155615?version=1","version":1}