{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/731668"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.172301","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"PHENIX Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"PHENIX Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2011","description":"Measurements at the PHENIX experiment of electrons with 0.3&lt;PT&lt;9GeV at midrapidity (-0.35&lt;y&lt;0.35) from heavy flavor (charmm and bottom) decays in Au+Au collisions atcenter-of-mass energy of 200 GeV     The contribution of heavy flavor decay electrons and other sources (other hadronic decay, photonic events, ...) are estimated with two independant methods : a \"cocktail\"subtraction, where sources of electrons other than heavy flavor decay are calculatied from monte carlo simulations, and a \"converter\" method, where a thin converter, which multiplies the photonic contribution to the yield by a certain factor, is installed, and allows to determine and subtract the photonic electrons from the spectra.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Invariant yield of electrons from heavy-flavor decays for 0-10% central collisions, versus PT.","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Invariant yield of electrons from heavy-flavor decays for 10-20% central collisions, versus PT.","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Invariant yield of electrons from heavy-flavor decays for 20-40% central collisions, versus PT.","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Invariant yield of electrons from heavy-flavor decays for 40-60% central collisions, versus PT.","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Invariant yield of electrons from heavy-flavor decays for 60-92% central collisions, versus PT.","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Invariant yield of electrons from heavy-flavor decays for minimum bias collisions, versus PT.","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Nuclear modification factor of heavy-flavor electrons for PT&gt;0.3 Gev/c as a function of Centrality (represented by the number of participants)...","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Nuclear modification factor of heavy-flavor electrons for PT&gt;3.0 Gev/c as a function of Centrality (represented by the number of participants)...","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Nuclear modification factor of heavy-flavor electrons versus PT for 0-10% central collisions An additional systematic error of +8%,-6% due to...","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.57287.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Azimuthal amisotropy (v2) versus PT for minimum bias collisions.","name":"Table 10"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins731668?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/57287"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Energy Loss and Flow of Heavy Quarks in Au+Au Collisions at \\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins731668?version=1","version":1}
