Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the FCNC top-quark candidate in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the SM top-quark candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the third lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Bayesian upper exclusion limits on the ratio $g_{W'}/g_{W}$ for an SSM-like W$\prime$ boson are shown. The unity coupling ratio (blue dotted curve) corresponds to the SSM common benchmark. The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Bayesian lower exclusion limits on the NUGIM G(221) mixing angle $\cot(\theta_{E})$ are shown as a function of the W$\prime$ boson mass. The theoretically excluded region is shaded in grey. The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Bayesian upper exclusion limits at 95% CL on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction of a QBH in an associated $ au$ lepton and neutrino final state. Minimum threshold masses $m_{th}$ of up to 6.6 TeV are excluded at 95% CL. The observed limit (solid line) is obtained from the intersection with the LO QBH cross section (blue dotted curve). The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Bayesian upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section of the process $pp\rightarrow\tau\nu$ mediated via LQ exchange in the t-channel. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The predicted LQ cross section at LO in the three coupling benchmark scenarios is depicted in different colors for $g_{U}=1$. The uncertainty bandy correspond to the sum in quadrature of PDF and scale variations. The first benchmark scenario considers only couplings to left-handed SM fermions (i.e. $\beta_{\text{R}}^{ij}=0$) and is referred to as "best fit LH". The second benchmark, referred to as "best fit LH+RH", considers $|\beta_{\text{R}}^{\text{b}\tau}|=1$ and all other $\beta_{\text{R}}^{ij}=0$. In the third "democratic" benchmark, equal couplings only to LH fermions are assumed, i.e. $\beta_{\text{L}}^{ij}=1$ and $\beta_{\text{R}}^{ij}=0$ for all $i$ and $j$.

Expected and observed lower limits of the LQ mass as a function of the coupling $g_{U}$ in the LH scenario. The blue band shows the 68% and 95% regions of $g_{U}$ preferred by the fit to the b anomalies data.

Expected and observed lower limits of the LQ mass as a function of the coupling $g_{U}$ in the LH+RH scenario. The blue band shows the 68% and 95% regions of $g_{U}$ preferred by the fit to the b anomalies data.

Expected and observed lower limits of the LQ mass as a function of the coupling $g_{U}$ in the democratic scenario. The blue band shows the 68% and 95% regions of $g_{U}$ preferred by the fit to the b anomalies data.

Bayesian upper exclusion limits at 95% CL on each of the Wilson coefficients described by the EFT model based on 2016-2018 data. The three different coupling types represent a left-handed vector coupling ($\epsilon^{cb}_{L}$), tensor-like coupling ($\epsilon^{cb}_{T}$), and scalar-tensor-like coupling ($\epsilon^{cb}_{S_{L}}$). The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Summary of exclusion limits (expected and observed) calculated at 95% CL for full Run-2 CMS data.

Background prediction and observed data yields in the signal region bins. The background yields are obtained from the background-only fit and serve as input to the simplified likelihood reinterpretation scheme. The naming of the bins is "year_binnumber", following the binning from Figure 4.

Matrix of covariance coefficients between signal region bins. The coefficients are obtained from the background-only fit and serve as input to the simplified likelihood reinterpretation scheme. The naming of the bins is "year_binnumber", following the binning used in Figure 4.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to 41.3 fb$^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement (cumulative) for various signal hypothesis. The requirements listed are presented as total efficiencies w.r.t. the previous selection step.

Probability of finding at least one TAR jet, where the p_T-leading TAR jet passes the m_Wcand and D₂^β=1 requirements, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=2100 GeV, with the preselections applied.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=500 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=1000 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=1700 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=2100 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected+1σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected-1σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected+2σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected-2σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=0.5 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=0.5 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=1 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=1 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=1.7 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=1.7 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=2.1 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=2.1 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Data overlaid on SM background yields stacked in each SR and CR category after the fit to data ('Post-fit'). The yields in the SR are broken down into their contributions to the individual bins. The maximum-likelihood estimators are set to the conditional values of the CR-only fit, and propagated to SR and CRs.

Dominant sources of uncertainty for three dark Higgs scenarios after the fit to data. The uncertainties are quantified in terms of their contribution to the fitted signal uncertainty that is expressed relative to the theory prediction. Three representative dark Higgs signal scenarios with g_q=0.25, g_χ=1.0, sinθ=0.01 and m_χ=200 GeV are considered, which are indicated using the (m_Z', m_s) format in units of GeV in the table columns.

Cumulative efficiencies in the merged category for three representative dark Higgs signal scenarios with g_q=0.25, g_χ=1.0, sinθ=0.01, m_Z' = 1 TeV, and m_χ=200 GeV considering s→W(ℓν)W(qq) decays only.

Cumulative efficiencies in the resolved category for three representative dark Higgs signal scenarios with g_q=0.25, g_χ=1.0, sinθ=0.01, m_Z' = 1 TeV, and m_χ=200 GeV considering s→W(ℓν)W(qq) decays only.

Theoretical cross section for &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) for each of the dark Higgs signal points at m_Z′ ={300, 350, 400, 500, 750} GeV, with g_q = 0.25, g<sub>&chi; = 1.0, sin&theta; = 0.01, m_Z′ = 1 TeV , and m_&chi; = 200 GeV. Also shown are experimentally excluded cross sections of &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) (Obs.) together with the expectations (Exp.) varied up and down by one standard deviation (&plusmn;1&sigma;).

Theoretical cross section for &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) for each of the dark Higgs signal points at m_Z′ ={1000, 1700} GeV, with g_q = 0.25, g<sub>&chi; = 1.0, sin&theta; = 0.01, m_Z′ = 1 TeV , and m_&chi; = 200 GeV. Also shown are experimentally excluded cross sections of &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) (Obs.) together with the expectations (Exp.) varied up and down by one standard deviation (&plusmn;1&sigma;).

Theoretical cross section for &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) for each of the dark Higgs signal points at m_Z′ ={2100, 2500, 2900, 3300} GeV, with g_q = 0.25, g<sub>&chi; = 1.0, sin&theta; = 0.01, m_Z′ = 1 TeV , and m_&chi; = 200 GeV. Also shown are experimentally excluded cross sections of &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) (Obs.) together with the expectations (Exp.) varied up and down by one standard deviation (&plusmn;1&sigma;).

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Data selection efficiency as a function of nuclear recoil energy

Data points used in analysis in log_10(S2)-S1 space

Differential excess $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $m_{\rm ee}$ for $p_{\rm T,ee} < 0.1$ GeV/$c$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$.

Differential $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T,ee}$ for 0.4 $< m_{\rm ee} < 0.7$ GeV/$c^{\rm 2}$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$.

Differential $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T,ee}$ for 0.7 $< m_{\rm ee} < 1.1$ GeV/$c^{\rm 2}$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$. The quoted upper limits correspond to a 90% confidence level.

Differential $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T,ee}$ for 1.1 $< m_{\rm ee} < 2.7$ GeV/$c^{\rm 2}$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$. The quoted upper limits correspond to a 90% confidence level.

Differential excess $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $p^{2}_{\rm T,ee}$ for 0.4 $< m_{\rm ee} < 0.7$ GeV/$c^{\rm 2}$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$. The quoted upper limits correspond to a 90% confidence level.

Differential excess $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $p^{2}_{\rm T,ee}$ for 0.7 $< m_{\rm ee} < 1.1$ GeV/$c^{\rm 2}$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$. The quoted upper limits correspond to a 90% confidence level.

Differential excess $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $p^{2}_{\rm T,ee}$ for 1.1 $< m_{\rm ee} < 2.7$ GeV/$c^{\rm 2}$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$.

Dependence of $\overline{p}$-$\overline{d}$ correlation on pseudorapidity acceptance of $\overline{p}$ and $\overline{d}$ selection in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Results are for 20.0--30.0$\%$ collision centrality.

Dependence of $\overline{p}$-$\overline{d}$ correlation on pseudorapidity acceptance of $\overline{p}$ and $\overline{d}$ selection in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Results are for 50.0--60.0$\%$ collision centrality.

Fig. 6b: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Away and Toward regions after the subtraction of Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ distributions in the transverse region for p-Pb collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. 7a: $<p_{\rm T}>$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Toward (left) and Away (right) regions after the subtraction of transverse region for pp collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. 7b: $<p_{\rm T}>$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Toward (left) and Away (right) regions after the subtraction of transverse region for p-Pb collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A1: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.15 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A2: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 1.0 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A3: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.15 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A4: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 1.0 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction of the b* RH hypothesis at a 95% CL. Dashed colored lines show the expected limits from the l+jets and all-hadronic channels, where the latter start at resonance masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% confidence intervals on the combined expected limits.

Upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction of the b* VL hypothesis at a 95% CL. Dashed colored lines show the expected limits from the l+jets and all-hadronic channels, where the latter start at resonance masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% confidence intervals on the combined expected limits.

Upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction of the B+b hypothesis at a 95% CL. Dashed colored lines show the expected limits from the l+jets and all-hadronic channels, where the latter start at resonance masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% confidence intervals on the combined expected limits.

Upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction of the B+t hypothesis at a 95% CL. Dashed colored lines show the expected limits from the l+jets and all-hadronic channels, where the latter start at resonance masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% confidence intervals on the combined expected limits.

Exclusion limit for BrHZX_BrXee

Exclusion limit for BrHZX_BrXmumu

Exclusion limit for BrHZX_BrXll

Exclusion limit for cah

Exclusion limit for cZh

Exclusion limit for kappa

Dijet signal efficiencies as a function of the signal mass and lifetime for events satisfying all event and vertex requirements, with corrections based on systematic differences in the vertex reconstruction efficiency between data and simulation.

The distribution of $d_{\mathrm{BV}}$ for $\geq$5-track one-vertex events in data and three simulated multijet signal samples each with a mass of 1600 GeV. The production cross section for each signal model is assumed to be the lower limit excluded by CMS-EXO-17-018, corresponding to values of 0.8, 0.25, and 0.15 fb for the samples with $c\tau =$ 0.3, 1.0, and 10 mm, respectively. The last bin includes the overflow events. This bin includes one event in data with a vertex with large $d_{\mathrm{BV}}$ that appears to arise from tracks originating from separate pp interaction vertices, consistent with background.

Distribution of the $x$-$y$ distances between vertices, $d_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution $d_{\mathrm{VV}}^{\kern 0.15em\mathrm{C}}$ (blue continuous line) is constructed from one-vertex events in data, and is normalized to the number of two-vertex events in data with two 3-track vertices. The two vertical red dashed lines separate the regions used in the fit.

Distribution of the $x$-$y$ distances between vertices, $d_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution $d_{\mathrm{VV}}^{\kern 0.15em\mathrm{C}}$ (blue continuous line) is constructed from one-vertex events in data, and is normalized to the number of two-vertex events in data which have exactly one 4-track vertex and one 3-track vertex. The two vertical red dashed lines separate the regions used in the fit.

Distribution of the $x$-$y$ distances between vertices, $d_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution $d_{\mathrm{VV}}^{\kern 0.15em\mathrm{C}}$ (blue continuous line) is constructed from one-vertex events in data, and is normalized to the number of two-vertex events in data with two 4-track vertices. The two vertical red dashed lines separate the regions used in the fit.

Distribution of the $x$-$y$ distances between vertices, $d_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution $d_{\mathrm{VV}}^{\kern 0.15em\mathrm{C}}$ (blue continuous line) is constructed from one-vertex events in data, and is normalized using $\geq$5-track one-vertex event information. The two vertical red dashed lines separate the regions used in the fit.

Predicted yields for the background-only normalized template, predicted yields for three simulated multijet signals each with a mass of 1600 GeV, and the observed yield in each $d_{\mathrm{VV}}$ bin. The production cross section for each signal model is assumed to be the lower limit excluded by CMS-EXO-17-018, corresponding to values of 0.8, 0.25, and 0.15 fb for samples with $c\tau =$ 0.3, 1.0, and 10 mm, respectively. The uncertainties in the signal yields and the systematic uncertainties in the background prediction reflect the systematic uncertainties given in the text.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared for the multijet signals, as a function of mass and $c\tau$. The overlaid mass-lifetime exclusion curves assume pair-production cross sections for the neutralino (red) and gluino (purple) with 100% branching fraction to each model's respective decay mode specified. The solid black (dashed colored) lines represent the observed (median expected) limits at 95% CL. The thin black lines represent the variation of the observed limit within theoretical uncertainties of the signal cross section. The thin dashed colored lines represent the region containing 68% of the expected limit distribution under the background-only hypothesis. The observed limits from the CMS displaced jets search (CMS-EXO-19-021) are also shown in teal for comparison.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared for the multijet signals, as a function of mass and $c\tau$. The overlaid mass-lifetime exclusion curves assume pair-production cross sections for the neutralino (red) and gluino (purple) with 100% branching fraction to each model's respective decay mode specified. The solid black (dashed colored) lines represent the observed (median expected) limits at 95% CL. The thin black lines represent the variation of the observed limit within theoretical uncertainties of the signal cross section. The thin dashed colored lines represent the region containing 68% of the expected limit distribution under the background-only hypothesis. The observed limits from the CMS displaced jets search (CMS-EXO-19-021) are also shown in teal for comparison.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared for the multijet signals, as a function of mass and $c\tau$. The overlaid mass-lifetime exclusion curves assume pair-production cross sections for the neutralino (red) and gluino (purple) with 100% branching fraction to each model's respective decay mode specified. The solid black (dashed colored) lines represent the observed (median expected) limits at 95% CL. The thin black lines represent the variation of the observed limit within theoretical uncertainties of the signal cross section. The thin dashed colored lines represent the region containing 68% of the expected limit distribution under the background-only hypothesis. The observed limits from the CMS displaced jets search (CMS-EXO-19-021) are also shown in teal for comparison.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared for the dijet signals, as a function of mass and $c\tau$. The overlaid mass-lifetime exclusion curves assume pair-production cross sections for the top squark with 100% branching fraction to each model's respective decay mode specified. The solid black (dashed colored) lines represent the observed (median expected) limits at 95% CL. The thin black lines represent the variation of the observed limit within theoretical uncertainties of the signal cross section. The thin dashed colored lines represent the region containing 68% of the expected limit distribution under the background-only hypothesis. The observed limits from the CMS displaced jets search (CMS-EXO-19-021) are also shown in teal for comparison.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared for the dijet signals, as a function of mass and $c\tau$. The overlaid mass-lifetime exclusion curves assume pair-production cross sections for the top squark with 100% branching fraction to each model's respective decay mode specified. The solid black (dashed colored) lines represent the observed (median expected) limits at 95% CL. The thin black lines represent the variation of the observed limit within theoretical uncertainties of the signal cross section. The thin dashed colored lines represent the region containing 68% of the expected limit distribution under the background-only hypothesis. The observed limits from the CMS displaced jets search (CMS-EXO-19-021) are also shown in teal for comparison.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of mass for multijet signals, for a fixed $c\tau$ of 300um in the full Run-2 data set. The neutralino and gluino pair production cross sections are shown for the multijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of mass for dijet signals, for a fixed $c\tau$ of 300um in the full Run-2 data set. The top squark pair-production cross section is shown for the dijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of mass for multijet signals, for a fixed $c\tau$ of 1 mm in the full Run-2 data set. The neutralino and gluino pair production cross sections are shown for the multijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of mass for dijet signals, for a fixed $c\tau$ of 1 mm in the full Run-2 data set. The top squark pair-production cross section is shown for the dijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of mass for multijet signals, for a fixed $c\tau$ of 10 mm in the full Run-2 data set. The neutralino and gluino pair production cross sections are shown for the multijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of mass for dijet signals, for a fixed $c\tau$ of 10 mm in the full Run-2 data set. The top squark pair-production cross section is shown for the dijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of $c\tau$ for multijet signals, for a fixed mass of 800 GeV in the full Run-2 data set. The neutralino and gluino pair production cross sections are shown for the multijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of $c\tau$ for dijet signals, for a fixed mass of 800 GeV in the full Run-2 data set. The top squark pair-production cross section is shown for the dijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of $c\tau$ for multijet signals, for a fixed mass of 1600 GeV in the full Run-2 data set. The neutralino and gluino pair production cross sections are shown for the multijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of $c\tau$ for dijet signals, for a fixed mass of 1600 GeV in the full Run-2 data set. The top squark pair-production cross section is shown for the dijet signals.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of $c\tau$ for multijet signals, for a fixed mass of 2400 GeV in the full Run-2 data set. The neutralino and gluino pair production cross sections are shown for the multijet signals. For $m$ = 2400 GeV, the expected neutralino cross section is $\approx 8\times 10^{-5}$ fb and is not shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared, as a function of $c\tau$ for dijet signals, for a fixed mass of 2400 GeV in the full Run-2 data set. The top squark pair-production cross section is shown for the dijet signals.

Data-to-simulation efficiency correction factors, shown for multijet and dijet signal topologies in several ranges of $c\tau$. Note that these correction factors account for the two long-lived particles in the simulated events, and are therefore the total correction factors used to scale event yields rather than the correction factors one would apply to individual vertices.

Distribution of the azimuthal angle between vertices, $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution (blue continuous line) is constructed from 3-track one-vertex events in data, and is normalized to the number of 3-track two-vertex events in data.

Distribution of the azimuthal angle between vertices, $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution (blue continuous line) is constructed from 4-track and 3-track one-vertex events in data, and is normalized to the number of two-vertex events in data which have exactly one 4-track vertex and one 3-track vertex.

Distribution of the azimuthal angle between vertices, $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution (blue continuous line) is constructed from 4-track one-vertex events in data, and is normalized to the number of 4-track two-vertex events in data.

Distribution of the azimuthal angle between vertices, $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for 2017 and 2018 data. The background distribution (blue continuous line) is constructed from $\geq$5-track one-vertex events in data, and is normalized using one-vertex event information. No $\geq$5-track two-vertex data events pass the selection.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 20--40\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 40--60\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 60--100\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to charged $\pi$ ($\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$) at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to charged $\pi$ ($\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$) as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to K$^{-}$ at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to K$^{-}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to its ground state particle $\Lambda$ ($\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$) at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to its ground state particle $\Lambda$ ($\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$) as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (?////).

Table of results for the dimuon channel for $1<|y|<2$ region $30 < M_{\ell\ell} < 60$ GeV. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is the total experimental systematic uncertainty.

Table of results for the dimuon channel for $160 < M_{\ell\ell} < 300$ GeV region. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is the total experimental systematic uncertainty.

Table of results for the dimuon channel for $300 < M_{\ell\ell} < 500$ GeV region. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical and the second is the total experimental systematic uncertainty.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 810.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 814.54 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 818.13 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 822.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 825.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 829.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 833.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 837.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 841.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 845.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 848.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 852.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 856.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 859.96 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 863.71 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 867.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 871.42 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 874.88 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 878.79 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 882.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 886.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 890.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 894.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 897.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 901.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 905.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 909.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 912.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 916.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 919.04 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 923.38 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 927.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 931.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 936.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 940.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 948.08 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 952.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 957.42 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 963.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 968.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 972.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 978.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 983.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 987.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 993.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P= 998.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1002.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1008.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1013.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1017.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1023.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1028.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1032.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1038.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1043.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1047.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1053.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1058.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1062.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1068.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1073.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1077.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1083.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1088.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1092.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1097.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1102.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1107.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1111.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1116.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1121.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1125.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1130.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1135.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1139.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1144.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1149.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1154.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1159.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1164.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1170.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1175.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1180.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1186.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1191.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1195.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1201.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1206.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1210.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1216.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1221.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1225.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1231.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1236.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1240.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1247.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1252.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1257.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1262.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1267.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1272.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1276.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1281.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1286.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1291.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1296.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1301.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1306.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1311.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1316.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1320.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1325.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^+$p-scattering at P=1330.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 800.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 803.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 807.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 810.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 814.54 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 818.13 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 822.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 825.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 829.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 833.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 837.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 841.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 845.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 848.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 852.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 856.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 859.96 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 863.71 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 867.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 871.42 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 874.88 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 878.79 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 882.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 886.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 890.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 894.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 897.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 901.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 905.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 909.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 912.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 916.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 919.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 923.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 927.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 931.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 934.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 938.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 940.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 943.21 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 946.79 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 950.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 953.44 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 956.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 960.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 964.17 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 968.08 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 971.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 975.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 979.29 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 983.19 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 986.85 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 990.63 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 993.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P= 998.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1001.54 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1005.71 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1008.25 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1010.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1014.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1017.79 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1022.13 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1026.21 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1029.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1032.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1035.96 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1039.54 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1043.77 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1047.48 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1052.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1056.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1060.42 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1063.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1066.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1070.42 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1074.35 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1078.23 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1082.29 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1086.21 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1090.04 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1093.96 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1098.04 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1102.29 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1104.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1108.21 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1112.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1116.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1120.83 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1124.08 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1127.77 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1132.23 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1134.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1137.44 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1140.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1143.60 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1147.81 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1152.02 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1157.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1162.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1167.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1172.29 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1177.38 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1182.46 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1187.33 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1192.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1197.67 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1202.58 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1207.75 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1212.92 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1217.02 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1222.31 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1227.60 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1232.38 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1237.63 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1242.88 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1247.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1252.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1257.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1262.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1267.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1272.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1276.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1281.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1286.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1291.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1296.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1301.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1306.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1311.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1316.00 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1320.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1325.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Differential cross section of elastic $\pi^-$p-scattering at P=1330.50 MeV/c. Errors shown are statistical only.

Process: DM DM --> NUE NUEBAR. Half-cone angle GAMMA, 90% upper limit N(SIGNAL) on the number of signal events, the muon flux PHI(MU), the dark matter annihilation rate in the Sun GAMMA(ANN), the dark matter-proton spin-dependent SIG(SD) and spin-independent SIG(SI) scattering cross sections and neutrino flux PHI(NU).

Process: DM DM --> NUMU NUMUBAR. Half-cone angle GAMMA, 90% upper limit N(SIGNAL) on the number of signal events, the muon flux PHI(MU), the dark matter annihilation rate in the Sun GAMMA(ANN), the dark matter-proton spin-dependent SIG(SD) and spin-independent SIG(SI) scattering cross sections and neutrino flux PHI(NU).

Process: DM DM --> NUTAU NUTAUBAR. Half-cone angle GAMMA, 90% upper limit N(SIGNAL) on the number of signal events, the muon flux PHI(MU), the dark matter annihilation rate in the Sun GAMMA(ANN), the dark matter-proton spin-dependent SIG(SD) and spin-independent SIG(SI) scattering cross sections and neutrino flux PHI(NU).

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at reconstruction level for the "lepton + 3 jets, 1 b-tag" channel.

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at reconstruction level for the "lepton + 3 jets, >= 2 b-tags" channel.

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at reconstruction level for the "lepton + >= 4 jets, 1 b-tag" channel.

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at reconstruction level for the "lepton + >= 4 jets, >= 2 b-tags" channel.

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at production level for the "lepton + 3 jets, 1 b-tag" channel.

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at production level for the "lepton + 3 jets, >= 2 b-tags" channel.

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at production level for the "lepton + >= 4 jets, 1 b-tag" channel.

Observed ASYMFB(LEPTON) at production level for the "lepton + >= 4 jets, >= 2 b-tags" channel.

The total value of ASYMFB(LEPTON) at reconstruction level measured from the combined channels.

The total value of ASYMFB(LEPTON) at production level measured from the combined channels.

The total value of ASYMFB(LEPTON) at production level calculated from the measurements using the combined single lepton channels and a previous measurement in the dilepton channel.

The differential cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the top quark/antiquark, PT(TOP/TOPBAR).