$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 20--40\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 40--60\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV in multiplicity interval 60--100\%. The uncertainty 'sys,$p_{\rm T}$-correlated' indicates the systematic uncertainty after removing the contributions of $p_{\rm T}$-uncorrelated uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to charged $\pi$ ($\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$) at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to charged $\pi$ ($\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$) as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to K$^{-}$ at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to K$^{-}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to its ground state particle $\Lambda$ ($\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$) at midrapidity as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 7 TeV.

Ratio of $p_{\rm T}$-integrated yields of $\Lambda$(1520) (sum of particle and anti-particle states) to its ground state particle $\Lambda$ ($\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$) as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d} \eta_{\rm lab} \rangle$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\mathrm{=}$ 5.02 TeV. The uncertainty 'sys,uncorrelated' indicates the multiplicity uncorrelated systematic uncertainty.

Nuclear modicifation factor vs. N_coll $J\psi$ with|y|<1 and pT < 3 GeV/c in d Au collisions.

The invariant cross section versus transverse momentum for J/$\psi$ with $|y|\lt 1$ in $p+p$ collisions.

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for $J/\Psi$ with |y| < 1 in 0 - 100 percent central d+Au collisions.

No description provided.

No description provided.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{+}$ for NC $e^{+}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 225$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{+}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{-}$ for NC $e^{-}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{-}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{+}$ for CC $e^{+}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{+}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{-}$ for CC $e^{-}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{-}$.

Structure function $xF_3^{\gamma Z}$ for different values of $Q^2$ and $x_{\rm Bj}$.

Structure function $xF_3^{\gamma Z}$ averaged over $Q^2 \ge 1000$ GeV$^2$ at the scale 1000 GeV$^2$.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2^{1/2}$ difference between quadruplets at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$).

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The difference in two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

No description provided.

V3{2} as a function of $\eta$.

<$V_3^2$> as a function of $\eta$.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the second harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the third harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuation $\sigma_2/<v_2>$ centrality dependence in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of ETARAP(JET) for -1.6 < ETARAP(JET) < 2.2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of Q**2 for 5 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of Q**2 for 5 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 5 < Q**2 < 20 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 20 < Q**2 < 60 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 60 < Q**2 < 120 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 120 < Q**2 < 400 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 400 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 5 < Q**2 < 20 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 20 < Q**2 < 60 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 60 < Q**2 < 120 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 120 < Q**2 < 400 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 400 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=9 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=12 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=17 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=24 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=32 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=45 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=60 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=80 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=110 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and R at nine Q^2 points.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet pT-spectra with radius parameter R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV, for two centrality classes 0-10% and 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.