Results of a search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected in the period 2015-2018 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Compared to previous publications, in addition to an increase of almost a factor of four in the data size, the analysis implements a number of improvements in the signal selection and the background determination leading to enhanced sensitivity. Events are required to have at least one jet with transverse momentum above 150 GeV and no reconstructed leptons ($e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$) or photons. Several signal regions are considered with increasing requirements on the missing transverse momentum starting at 200 GeV. Overall agreement is observed between the number of events in data and the Standard Model predictions. Model-independent $95%$ confidence-level limits on visible cross sections for new processes are obtained in the range between 736 fb and 0.3 fb. Results are also translated into improved exclusion limits in models with pair-produced weakly interacting dark-matter candidates, large extra spatial dimensions, supersymmetric particles in several compressed scenarios, axion-like particles, and new scalar particles in dark-energy-inspired models. In addition, the data are translated into bounds on the invisible branching ratio of the Higgs boson.
This is the HEPData space for the ATLAS monojet full Run 2 analysis. The full resolution figures can be found at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/EXOT-2018-06/ The full statistical likelihood is provided for this analysis. It can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' button above and selecting the 'Common Resources' category. <br/><br/> <b>Post-fit $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distribution:</b> <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1mu0b">CR1mu0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1e0b">CR1e0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1L1b">CR1L1b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR2mu">CR2mu</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR2e">CR2e</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramSR">SR</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li>Dark Matter axial-vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMA">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMA">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMA">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMA">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_xsecDMA">observed upper limits on the cross-sections</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter pseudo-scalar mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMP">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMP">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMP">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMP">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_xsecDMP">observed upper limits on the cross-sections</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMV">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMV">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMV">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMV">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourSDneutron">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourSInucleon">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter WIMP annihilation rate: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourID">observed</a> <li>SUSY stop pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsTT_directCC">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expTT_directCC">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_directCC">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_directCC">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY stop pair production (4-body decay): <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsTT_bffN">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expTT_bffN">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_bffN">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_bffN">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY sbottom pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsBB">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1BB">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1BB">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expBB">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1BB">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1BB">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2BB">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2BB">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY squark pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsSS">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1SS">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1SS">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expSS">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1SS">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1SS">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2SS">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2SS">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark energy: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourDE">observed and expected</a> <li>ADD: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourADD">observed and expected</a> <li>Axion-like particles: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourALPs">observed and expected</a> </ul> <b>Impact of systematic uncertainties:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablesystimpacts">Table</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of exclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM0">EM0</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM1">EM1</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM2">EM2</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM3">EM3</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM4">EM4</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM5">EM5</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM6">EM6</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM7">EM7</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM8">EM8</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM9">EM9</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM10">EM10</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM11">EM11</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM12">EM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of inclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM0">IM0</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM1">IM1</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM2">IM2</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM3">IM3</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM4">IM4</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM5">IM5</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM6">IM6</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM7">IM7</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM8">IM8</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM9">IM9</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM10">IM10</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM11">IM11</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM12">IM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Cutflows:</b><br/><br/> Signals filtered with a truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ cut at: <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablecutflows150GeV">150 GeV</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablecutflows350GeV">350 GeV</a><br/><br/>
We present the results obtained with the magnetic detector DM1 at the Orsay storage ring ACO for the reaction e + e − → π + π − π 0 from 483 to 1100 MeV in the center of mass. Our data show without ambiguity an interference effect between the ω and φ mesons, which corresponds to a negative coupling constant product ratio Re( g γω g ω →3 π / g γφ g φ →3 π ) ; however our measurements above the φ, performed using kinematical analysis, can only be explained by a higher energy contribution. In addition, the parameters of the ω have been obtained with an improved accuracy compared to other experiments, and particularly the branching ratio B ω →e + e − = (6.75±0.69) × 10 −5 . We confirm that the reaction e + e − → π + π − π 0 proceeds essentially via a quasi-two-body state ϱπ , at the energy of the φ.
A dedicated sample of Large Hadron Collider proton-proton collision data at centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV is used to study inclusive single diffractive dissociation, $pp \rightarrow Xp$. The intact final-state proton is reconstructed in the ATLAS ALFA forward spectrometer, while charged particles from the dissociated system $X$ are measured in the central detector components. The fiducial range of the measurement is $-4.0 < \log_{10} \xi < -1.6$ and $0.016 < |t| < 0.43 \ {\rm GeV^2}$, where $\xi$ is the proton fractional energy loss and $t$ is the squared four-momentum transfer. The total cross section integrated across the fiducial range is $1.59 \pm 0.13 \ {\rm mb}$. Cross sections are also measured differentially as functions of $\xi$, $t$, and $\Delta \eta$, a variable that characterises the rapidity gap separating the proton and the system $X$. The data are consistent with an exponential $t$ dependence, ${\rm d} \sigma / {\rm d} t \propto \text{e}^{Bt}$ with slope parameter $B = 7.65 \pm 0.34 \ {\rm GeV^{-2}}$. Interpreted in the framework of triple Regge phenomenology, the $\xi$ dependence leads to a pomeron intercept of $\alpha(0) = 1.07 \pm 0.09$.
A search for Higgs boson decays into a $Z$ boson and a light resonance in two-lepton plus jet events is performed, using a $pp$ collision dataset with an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ collected at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV by the ATLAS experiment at the CERN LHC. The resonance considered is a light boson with a mass below 4 GeV from a possible extended scalar sector, or a charmonium state. Multivariate discriminants are used for the event selection and for evaluating the mass of the light resonance. No excess of events above the expected background is found. Observed (expected) 95$\% $ confidence-level upper limits are set on the Higgs boson production cross section times branching fraction to a $Z$ boson and the signal resonance, with values in the range 17 pb to 340 pb ($16^{+6}_{-5}$ pb to $320^{+130}_{-90}$ pb) for the different light spin-0 boson mass and branching fraction hypotheses, and with values of 110 pb and 100 pb ($100^{+40}_{-30}$ pb and $100^{+40}_{-30}$ pb) for the $\eta_c$ and $J/\psi$ hypotheses, respectively.
A search is conducted for a new scalar boson $S$, with a mass distinct from that of the Higgs boson, decaying into four leptons ($\ell =$$e$, $\mu$) via an intermediate state containing two on-shell, promptly decaying new spin-1 bosons $Z_\text{d}$: $S \rightarrow Z_\text{d}Z_\text{d} \rightarrow 4\ell$, where the $Z_\text{d}$ boson has a mass between 15 and 300 GeV, and the $S$ boson has a mass between either 30 and 115 GeV or 130 and 800 GeV. The search uses proton-proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider with an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. No significant excess above the Standard Model background expectation is observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the production cross-section times branching ratio, $\sigma(gg \to S) \times \mathcal{B}(S\rightarrow Z_\text{d}Z_\text{d} \rightarrow 4\ell)$, as a function of the mass of both particles, $m_S$ and $m_{Z\text{d}}$.
The pion form factor is measured in the reaction e + e − → π + π − for center of mass energies in the range 480–1100 MeV. Our results are first analysed in terms of the conventional Vector Meson Dominance formalism, and then taking into account the ωπ inelastic channel. The result of this later formalism is a pion form factor ( F π ) which fits quite well all the existing data on F π both in the timelike and spacelike regions, and pion mean square radius of 〈 r π 2 〉 = 0.460 ± 0.011 fm 2 or 〈r π 2 〉 1 2 = 0.678 ± 0.008 fm .
A search for the Higgs boson decaying into a photon and a pair of electrons or muons with an invariant mass $m_{\ell\ell} < 30$ GeV is presented. The analysis is performed using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data, produced by the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and collected by the ATLAS experiment. Evidence for the $H \rightarrow \ell \ell \gamma$ process is found with a significance of 3.2$\sigma$ over the background-only hypothesis, compared to an expected significance of 2.1$\sigma$. The best-fit value of the signal strength parameter, defined as the ratio of the observed signal yield to the one expected in the Standard Model, is $\mu = 1.5 \pm 0.5$. The Higgs boson production cross-section times the $H \rightarrow\ell\ell\gamma$ branching ratio for $m_{\ell\ell} <$ 30 GeV is determined to be 8.7 $^{+2.8}_{-2.7}$ fb.
This search, a type not previously performed at ATLAS, uses a comparison of the production cross sections for $e^+ \mu^-$ and $e^- \mu^+$ pairs to constrain physics processes beyond the Standard Model. It uses $139 \text{fb}^{-1}$ of proton$-$proton collision data recorded at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV at the LHC. Targeting sources of new physics which prefer final states containing $e^{+}\mu^{-}$ to $e^{-}\mu^{+}$, the search contains two broad signal regions which are used to provide model-independent constraints on the ratio of cross sections at the 2% level. The search also has two special selections targeting supersymmetric models and leptoquark signatures. Observations using one of these selections are able to exclude, at 95% confidence level, singly produced smuons with masses up to 640 GeV in a model in which the only other light sparticle is a neutralino when the $R$-parity-violating coupling $\lambda'_{231}$ is close to unity. Observations using the other selection exclude scalar leptoquarks with masses below 1880 GeV when $g_{\text{1R}}^{eu}=g_{\text{1R}}^{\mu c}=1$, at 95% confidence level. The limit on the coupling reduces to $g_{\text{1R}}^{eu}=g_{\text{1R}}^{\mu c}=0.46$ for a mass of 1420 GeV.
We present the results of a measurement of the cross section oof the reaction e + e − → π + π − π + π − from 890 to 1100 MeV in the center of mass, obtained with a magnetic detector at the Orsay Storage Ring ACO. With respect to previous experiments, the present one offers the possibility of reconstructing events with at least one constraint and his improved statistics. We find that our measurement of the cross section for e + e − → π + π − π + π − is compatible with quasi two-body production of π A 1 ( m A1 = 1.1 GeV, Γ A1 ∼ 0.2−0.3 GeV), through the ϱ and ϱ′(1600) intermediate states. We were able to states. We were able to determine the cross section of this reaction at the energy of the φ meson and consequently an upper limit on the branching ratio of φ → π + π − π + π − .
A search for supersymmetric partners of gluons and quarks is presented, involving signatures with jets and either two isolated leptons (electrons or muons) with the same electric charge, or at least three isolated leptons. A data sample of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider between 2015 and 2018, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$, is used for the search. No significant excess over the Standard Model expectation is observed. The results are interpreted in simplified supersymmetric models featuring both R-parity conservation and R-parity violation, raising the exclusion limits beyond those of previous ATLAS searches to 1600 GeV for gluino masses and 750 GeV for bottom and top squark masses in these scenarios.
Signal acceptance for Rpc2L0b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Signal acceptance for Rpc2L1b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Signal acceptance for Rpc2L2b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Forum