Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.5 in the rapidity bin 1.5 < |y| < 2. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.5 in the rapidity bin 2 < |y| < 2.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.5 in the rapidity bin 2.5 < |y| < 3. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 0 < |y| < 0.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 0.5 < |y| < 1. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 1 < |y| < 1.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 1.5 < |y| < 2. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 2 < |y| < 2.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 2.5 < |y| < 3. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 0 < |y| < 0.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 0.5 < |y| < 1. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 1 < |y| < 1.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 1.5 < |y| < 2. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 2 < |y| < 2.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 2.5 < |y| < 3. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Values of D(SIG)/DABS(COS(THETA)) for the data. The error given on each value is the total uncertainty.

Differential cross section as a function of the transverse momentum PT of the third jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the transverse momentum PT of the fourth jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the leading jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the subleading jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the third jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the fourth jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle DeltaPhi between the third and the fourth jet, normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the normalized PT balance DELTARELPT between the third and the fourth jet, normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two dijet planes (first-second and third-fourth jets), normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 30-50% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.

The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 50-100% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.

The b-jet cross section as a function of pT in pp collisions.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 0-100%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of centrality for 80 < jet pT < 90 GeV/c.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function centrality for 80 < jet pT < 90 GeV/c.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 0-10%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 10-30%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 30-50%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 50-100%.

The triple-differential cross sections d3sig/(dp_T^gamma deta^gamma deta^jet) for photons located in forward region,|eta(gamma)|=2.1-2.5. A 2.2% luminosity uncertainty is included in the systematic uncertainty.

Kinematic distributions of single l + > 5-jet events in data (points), compared to MC simulation normalized to the number of events observed in data. Shown are pT spectra for muons (a) and electrons (b), and jet spectra for the channels $\mu$+jets (c) and e+jets (d). The reconstructed mtg distribution is shown for the $\mu$+jets channel in (e) and for e+jets in (f).

Kinematic distributions of single l + > 5-jet events in data (points), compared to MC simulation normalized to the number of events observed in data. Shown are pT spectra for muons (a) and electrons (b), and jet spectra for the channels $\mu$+jets (c) and e+jets (d). The reconstructed mtg distribution is shown for the $\mu$+jets channel in (e) and for e+jets in (f).

Kinematic distributions of single l + > 5-jet events in data (points), compared to MC simulation normalized to the number of events observed in data. Shown are pT spectra for muons (a) and electrons (b), and jet spectra for the channels $\mu$+jets (c) and e+jets (d). The reconstructed mtg distribution is shown for the $\mu$+jets channel in (e) and for e+jets in (f).

Reconstructed mass spectrum for the $tg$ system in data (points), along with a fit of the background $f(m)$ to the data in the $\mu$+jets channel (a) and $e$+jets channel (b). The reconstructed masses correspond to the results of kinematic fits for the jet-quark assignments that provide the best match to the $t^{*}\bar{t}^{*}$ hypothesis. Also shown are the expectations of $t^*$ signals for $m_{t^*}=750$ and 850 GeV normalized to the integrated luminosity of the data. Information about the fit: F = 501885/(1+exp((x+251.828)/112.311)) where x = $M_{tg}$.

Reconstructed mass spectrum for the $tg$ system in data (points), along with a fit of the background $f(m)$ to the data in the $\mu$+jets channel (a) and $e$+jets channel (b). The reconstructed masses correspond to the results of kinematic fits for the jet-quark assignments that provide the best match to the $t^{*}\bar{t}^{*}$ hypothesis. Also shown are the expectations of $t^*$ signals for $m_{t^*}=750$ and 850 GeV normalized to the integrated luminosity of the data. Information about the fit: F = 62101.5/(1+exp((x+6.58811)/107.886)) where x = $M_{tg}$.

The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95%CL upper limits for the product of the inclusive $t^{*}\bar{t}^{*}$ production cross section and the branching fraction $B(t^{*}{\rightarrow}tg)$, as a function of the $t^{*}$ mass, for the combined lepton data. The ranges for ${\pm}1$ and ${\pm}2$ standard deviations for the expected limits are shown by the bands.

Mean $p_T$, leading in-jet charged particle.

Mean $p_T$, charged particle jets, $p^{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.

Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.

Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 30$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 0.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 0.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 0.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.4 to 0.8. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.4 to 0.8. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.4 to 0.8. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 1.6. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 1.6. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 1.6. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.6 to 2.0. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.6 to 2.0. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.6 to 2.0. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 2.0 to 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 2.0 to 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 2.0 to 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of rapidity for PT < 50 GeV/c. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of rapidity for PT < 50 GeV/c. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of rapidity for PT < 50 GeV/c. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The ratios of the UPSI(3S) to UPSI(1S) fiducial and acceptance cross sections as a function of PT for the |rapidiy| range < 2.4.

The ratios of the UPSI(2S) to UPSI(1S) fiducial and acceptance cross sections as a function of PT for the |rapidiy| range < 2.4.

The ratios of the UPSI(3S) to UPSI(2S) fiducial and acceptance cross sections as a function of PT for the |rapidiy| range < 2.4.

The acceptance-corrected UPSI(1S) production cross section, integrated and differential in PT, times the respective dimuon branching fraction, integrated over the rapidity range |y| < 1.2. The first (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainties excluding that associated with the polarization of the UPSI(1S) which is shown separately as the second (sys) value. The latter has been obtained by calculating the acceptance with the +68 and -68% CL as given by the measured UPSI(1S) polarization [see. PRL 110 (2013) 081802].

The acceptance-corrected UPSI(2S) production cross section, integrated and differential in PT, times the respective dimuon branching fraction, integrated over the rapidity range |y| < 1.2. The first (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainties excluding that associated with the polarization of the UPSI(2S) which is shown separately as the second (sys) value. The latter has been obtained by calculating the acceptance with the +68 and -68% CL as given by the measured UPSI(2S) polarization [see. PRL 110 (2013) 081802].

The acceptance-corrected UPSI(3S) production cross section, integrated and differential in PT, times the respective dimuon branching fraction, integrated over the rapidity range |y| < 1.2. The first (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainties excluding that associated with the polarization of the UPSI(3S) which is shown separately as the second (sys) value. The latter has been obtained by calculating the acceptance with the +68 and -68% CL as given by the measured UPSI(3S) polarization [see. PRL 110 (2013) 081802].