The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

ASYMUU(COS(PHI(HADRON))) asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons as a function of XB. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(PHI(HADRON))) asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons as a function of Z. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(PHI(HADRON))) asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons as a function of PT(HADRON). The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(2*PHI(HADRON))) asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons as a function of XB. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(2*PHI(HADRON))) asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons as a function of Z. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(2*PHI(HADRON))) asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons as a function of PT(HADRON). The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the first XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the second XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the third XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the last XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(2*PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the first XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(2*PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the second XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(2*PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the third XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

ASYMUU(COS(2*PHI(HADRON))) 3d asymmetries for positive and negative hadrons in the last XB bin. The errors are statistical and systematic.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, VM subtracted, Not VM subtracted.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, VM subtracted, Not VM subtracted.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, VM subtracted, Not VM subtracted.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, VM subtracted, Not VM subtracted.

pi+ target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted.

pi- target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted.

K+ target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted.

K- target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted.

pi+ target asymmetries from HERMES, pi- target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

pi+ target asymmetries from HERMES, pi- target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

pi+ target asymmetries from HERMES, pi- target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

pi+ target asymmetries from HERMES, pi- target asymmetries from HERMES, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

pi+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

pi- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

K+ multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.2-0.3.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.3-0.4.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.4-0.6.

K- multiplicities from HERMES, Target: H, Target: D, VM subtracted, Z in the range 0.6-0.8.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

Integrals of G1 over different X ranges for DEUT target at various Q*2 values. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD).. The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2. Axis error includes +- 5.0/5.0 contribution.

Integrals of G1 over different X ranges for N target at various Q*2 values. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD).. The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2.

Integral of G1 for the Non-Singet contribution. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD).. The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2. Axis error includes +- 5.2/5.2 contribution.

The measured and Born asymmetries for the proton target at the average values of the average values of X, Y,and Q**2 in 45 bins. DSYS includes the 5.2 PCT normalization uncertainty.

The measured and Born asymmetries for the deuterium target at the average values of the average values of X, Y,and Q**2 in 45 bins. DSYS includes the 5 PCT normalization uncertainty.

Virtual photon asymmetries A1 for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 45 bins. The first DSYS is the experimental uncertainty and includes the 5.2 (5.0) PCT normalization uncertainty for the proton (deuteron) data. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD).

Structure functions G1 for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 45 bins. The first DSYS is the experimental uncertainty and includes the 5.2 (5.0) PCT normalization uncertainty for the proton (deuteron) data. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD).

Virtual photon asymmetries A1 for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 19 bins. The first DSYS is the experimental uncertainty and includes the 5.2 (5.0) PCT normalization uncertainty for the proton (deuteron) data. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD). The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2.

Structure functions G1 for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 19 bins. The first DSYS is the experimental uncertainty and includes the 5.2 (5.0) PCT normalization uncertainty for the proton (deuteron) data. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD). The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2.

Structure functions G1 for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 15 bins. The first DSYS is the experimental uncertainty and includes the 5.2 (5.0) PCT normalization uncertainty for the proton (deuteron) data. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD). The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2.

Virtual photon asymmetries A1 for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 15 bins. The first DSYS is the experimental uncertainty and includes the 5.2 (5.0) PCT normalization uncertainty for the proton (deuteron) data. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD). The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2.

Structure functions G1(n) and G1(NS)for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 45 bins. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD).

Structure functions G1(n) and G1(NS)for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 19 bins. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD). The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2.

Structure functions G1(n) and G1(NS)for the proton and deuterium targets at the average values of X,and Q**2 in 15 bins. The second DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in the parameterizations (R, F2, A2, Azz, omegaD). The third DSYS systematic error is due to the uncertainty in evolving to a common Q**2.

Correlation matrix for the Asymmetry, A1 and G1 for the P target at the average values of X and Q**2 in 45 bins.

Correlation matrix for the Asymmetry, A1 and G1 for the DEUT target at the average values of X and Q**2 in 45 bins.

Correlation matrix for G1 for the P target in 19 X bins (averaged over Q**2).

Correlation matrix for G1 for the DEUT target in 19 X bins (averaged over Q**2).

Correlation matrix for G1 for the P target in 15 X bins (Q**2 > 1 GeV**2), averaged over Q**2.

Correlation matrix for G1 for the DEUT target in 15 X bins (Q**2 > 1 GeV**2), averaged over Q**2.

LAMBDA production asymmetries versus PT**2 for the negativs beams.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.