Favier, B.
SIG/SIG
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 7 of 187 results

FRAGMENTATION INTO STRANGE PARTICLES IN HIGH-ENERGY NEUTRINO P, neutrino N, ANTI-NEUTRINO P AND ANTI-NEUTRINO N INTERACTIONS

The AMSTERDAM-BERGEN-BOLOGNA-PADUA-PISA-SACLAY-TURIN collaboration Allasia, D. ; Angelini, C. ; Baldini, A. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 154 (1985) 231-235, 1985.
Inspire Record 218756 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30415

The fragmentation of the hadronic system into Λ, Σ(1385), K ) and K ∗ (892) in deep-inelastic charged-current interactions of high energy neutrinos and antineutrinos with proton and neutron is analyzed. The results obtained for the production of these particles from the various initial states are compared with each other and with the predictions of the Lund fragmentation model. This comparison shows that a spectator diquark does not fragment as a whole in a fraction of the interactions. The role of the sea quarks in the baryon formation process is underlined. Strange vector and pseudoscalar mesons are likely to be produced at similar rates.

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

SIG(C=LAMBDA) denotes the inclusive LAMBDA production in the same reaction.

Table 3

SIG(C=KS) denotes the inclusive KS production in the same reaction.


Search for Spinless Bosons in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation

The TASSO collaboration Althoff, M. ; Braunschweig, W. ; Kirschfink, F.J. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 154 (1985) 236-242, 1985.
Inspire Record 212873 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45223

We have measured the cross sections for e + e − → e + e − , e + e − → μ + μ − , e + e − → γγ and e + e − → hadrons in an energy scan at center of mass energies between 39.79 and 46.72 GeV in 30 MeV steps. New spinless bosons, whose existence has been postulated as a possible means to explain the anomalously large radiative width of the Z 0 found at the CERN SPS p p collider, are ruled out in the scan region. The data are used to set limits on the couplings to lepton, photon and quark pairs of bosons with masses above 46.72 GeV.

1 data table
Table 1

SIG(C=SM) is the Standard Model predicted cross section.


High Statistics Study of ($\sim$ 10$^6$ events) of $J/\psi$ Production and $\Upsilon$ Production in the energy range 150 to 280 GeV by $\pi^\pm$, $p^\pm$ incident particle

The Saclay-CERN-College de France-Ecole Poly-Orsay collaboration Badier, J. ; Boucrot, J. ; Bourotte, J. ; et al.
AIP Conf.Proc. 68 (1981) 201-204, 1981.
Inspire Record 154782 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.49656

We have performed in the NA3 experiment the study of high mass dimuon production by a hadronic unseparated beam on hydrogen and platinum targets. The comparison of the production cross‐section for proton and antiproton together with the differential cross‐section dσ/dx allows us to compare the data with a production mechanism involving quark‐antiquark and gluon‐gluon interactions. The cosΘ* distribution of the same J/ψ data have also been analysed and results will be presented. Finally we have observed T production from 150 GeV/c incident pions.

4 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Test of {QED} in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at Energies Between 12-{GeV} and 31.6-{GeV}

The TASSO collaboration Brandelik, R. ; Braunschweig, W. ; Gather, K. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 94 (1980) 259-265, 1980.
Inspire Record 153127 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45228

We have measured the reactions e + e − → e + e − → μ + μ − and e + e − → γγ at c.m. energies between 12 and 31.6 GeV. Excellent agreement with the predictions of QED has been found, resulting in cut off parameters Λ + > 112 GeV and Λ − > 139 GeV for the first process and Λ + > 34 GeV and Λ − > 42 GeV (95% c.1.) for the last one. A limit on the Weinberg angle of sin 2 θ W < 0.55 (95% c.1.) has been obtained.

3 data tables
Table 1

SIG(C=QED) QED predictions for the cross sections. Only statistical errors are given.

Table 2

SIG(C=QED) QED predictions for the cross sections. Only statistical errors are given.

Table 3

SIG(C=QED) QED predictions for the cross sections. Only statistical errors are given.


Inclusive $\rho^0$ Production in Anti-neutrino $p$ Charged Current Interactions

Derrick, M. ; Gregory, P. ; Lopinto, F. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 91 (1980) 307-310, 1980.
Inspire Record 8534 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6495

Using data from the Fermilab 15 ft hydrogen bubble chamber, we have studied inclusive ϱ 0 production in antineutrino-proton charged-current interactions. We measure (0.21 ± 0.03) ϱ 0 /event, corresponding to ϱ 0 / π − =0.12 ± 0.02. As a function of Q 2 and for hadronic masses above a threshold region, the ϱ 0 / π − ratio shows little variation. At least 50% of the ϱ 0 's are consistent with coming from the current fragmentation region. The results agree reasonably well with the predictions of the quark fragmentation model of Feynman and field.

4 data tables
Table 1

AVERAGE BEAM ENERGY 31 GEV.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Electroproduction of rho0 mesons at 1.5 > q-squared > 0.3 gev-squared and 2.8 > w > 1.7 gev

Eckardt, V. ; Gebauer, H.J. ; Joos, P. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 43 (1973) 240-244, 1973.
Inspire Record 84944 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.28153

Production and decay characteristics of electroproduced rho mesons were studied in the final state epπ + π − .

1 data table
Table 1

No description provided.


Dependence of nu nucleus cross-sections on the mass number

Borer, K. ; Hahn, B. ; Hofer, H. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 30 (1969) 572-575, 1969.
Inspire Record 63243 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.50061

High energy v -nucleus cross sections have been compared for Pb, Fe, Al and C as target nuclei, exposed to the CERN v -beam. The events with θ vμ < 29 0 and p μ ⪆ 1 GeV /c have rates in the ratio of the mass number of the nuclei. Also a restricted sample with q 2 ⪅ 0.1 (GeV/ c ) 2 and θ vμ < 5 0 does not reveal a theoretically predicted deviation from A -proportionality, although due to the limited statistical accuracy in this restricted sample an “ A 2 3 - contribution ” of several tenths cannot be excluded either.

4 data tables
Table 1

Only statistical error is presented.

Table 2

Only statistical error is presented.

Table 3

Only statistical error is presented.

More…