We present a measurement of the $\ttbar$ differential cross section with respect to the $\ttbar$ invariant mass, dSigma/dMttbar, in $\ppbar$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV using an integrated luminosity of $2.7\invfb$ collected by the CDF II experiment. The $\ttbar$ invariant mass spectrum is sensitive to a variety of exotic particles decaying into $\ttbar$ pairs. The result is consistent with the standard model expectation, as modeled by \texttt{PYTHIA} with \texttt{CTEQ5L} parton distribution functions.
We report a measurement of the forward-backward asymmetry, $A_{FB}$, in $b\bar{b}$ pairs produced in proton-antiproton collisions and identified by muons from semileptonic $b$-hadron decays. The event sample was collected at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV with the CDF II detector and corresponds to 6.9 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity. We obtain an integrated asymmetry of $A_{FB}(b\bar{b})=(1.2 \pm 0.7)$\% at the particle level for $b$-quark pairs with invariant mass, $m_{b\bar{b}}$, down to $40$ GeV/$c^2$ and measure the dependence of $A_{FB}(b\bar{b})$ on $m_{b\bar{b}}$. The results are compatible with expectations from the standard model.
At the Fermilab Tevatron proton-antiproton ($p\bar{p}$) collider, Drell-Yan lepton pairs are produced in the process $p \bar{p} \rightarrow e^+e^- + X$ through an intermediate $\gamma^*/Z$ boson. The forward-backward asymmetry in the polar-angle distribution of the $e^-$ as a function of the $e^+e^-$-pair mass is used to obtain $\sin^2\theta^{\rm lept}_{\rm eff}$, the effective leptonic determination of the electroweak-mixing parameter $\sin^2\theta_W$. The measurement sample, recorded by the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF), corresponds to 9.4~fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity from $p\bar{p}$ collisions at a center-of-momentum energy of 1.96 TeV, and is the full CDF Run II data set. The value of $\sin^2\theta^{\rm lept}_{\rm eff}$ is found to be $0.23248 \pm 0.00053$. The combination with the previous CDF measurement based on $\mu^+\mu^-$ pairs yields $\sin^2\theta^{\rm lept}_{\rm eff} = 0.23221 \pm 0.00046$. This result, when interpreted within the specified context of the standard model assuming $\sin^2 \theta_W = 1 - M_W^2/M_Z^2$ and that the $W$- and $Z$-boson masses are on-shell, yields $\sin^2\theta_W = 0.22400 \pm 0.00045$, or equivalently a $W$-boson mass of $80.328 \pm 0.024 \;{\rm GeV}/c^2$.
Results of a search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected in the period 2015-2018 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Compared to previous publications, in addition to an increase of almost a factor of four in the data size, the analysis implements a number of improvements in the signal selection and the background determination leading to enhanced sensitivity. Events are required to have at least one jet with transverse momentum above 150 GeV and no reconstructed leptons ($e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$) or photons. Several signal regions are considered with increasing requirements on the missing transverse momentum starting at 200 GeV. Overall agreement is observed between the number of events in data and the Standard Model predictions. Model-independent $95%$ confidence-level limits on visible cross sections for new processes are obtained in the range between 736 fb and 0.3 fb. Results are also translated into improved exclusion limits in models with pair-produced weakly interacting dark-matter candidates, large extra spatial dimensions, supersymmetric particles in several compressed scenarios, axion-like particles, and new scalar particles in dark-energy-inspired models. In addition, the data are translated into bounds on the invisible branching ratio of the Higgs boson.
This is the HEPData space for the ATLAS monojet full Run 2 analysis. The full resolution figures can be found at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/EXOT-2018-06/ The full statistical likelihood is provided for this analysis. It can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' button above and selecting the 'Common Resources' category. <br/><br/> <b>Post-fit $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distribution:</b> <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1mu0b">CR1mu0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1e0b">CR1e0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1L1b">CR1L1b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR2mu">CR2mu</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR2e">CR2e</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramSR">SR</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li>Dark Matter axial-vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMA">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMA">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMA">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMA">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_xsecDMA">observed upper limits on the cross-sections</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter pseudo-scalar mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMP">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMP">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMP">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMP">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_xsecDMP">observed upper limits on the cross-sections</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMV">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMV">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMV">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMV">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourSDneutron">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourSInucleon">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter WIMP annihilation rate: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourID">observed</a> <li>SUSY stop pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsTT_directCC">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expTT_directCC">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_directCC">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_directCC">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY stop pair production (4-body decay): <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsTT_bffN">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expTT_bffN">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_bffN">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_bffN">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY sbottom pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsBB">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1BB">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1BB">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expBB">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1BB">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1BB">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2BB">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2BB">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY squark pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsSS">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1SS">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1SS">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expSS">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1SS">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1SS">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2SS">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2SS">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark energy: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourDE">observed and expected</a> <li>ADD: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourADD">observed and expected</a> <li>Axion-like particles: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourALPs">observed and expected</a> </ul> <b>Impact of systematic uncertainties:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablesystimpacts">Table</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of exclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM0">EM0</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM1">EM1</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM2">EM2</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM3">EM3</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM4">EM4</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM5">EM5</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM6">EM6</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM7">EM7</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM8">EM8</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM9">EM9</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM10">EM10</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM11">EM11</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM12">EM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of inclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM0">IM0</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM1">IM1</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM2">IM2</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM3">IM3</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM4">IM4</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM5">IM5</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM6">IM6</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM7">IM7</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM8">IM8</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM9">IM9</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM10">IM10</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM11">IM11</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM12">IM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Cutflows:</b><br/><br/> Signals filtered with a truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ cut at: <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablecutflows150GeV">150 GeV</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablecutflows350GeV">350 GeV</a><br/><br/>
We measure the ratio of cross section times branching fraction, $R_p \equiv \sigma_{\chi_{c2}} {\cal B}(\chi_{c2} \to J/\psi \gamma)/ \sigma_{\chi_{c1}} {\cal B}(\chi_{c1} \to J/\psi \gamma)$, in 1.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $p\bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 1.96 TeV. This measurement covers the kinematic range $p_T(J/\psi)>4.0$ GeV/$c$, $|\eta(J/\psi)| < 1.0$, and $p_T(\gamma)>1.0$ GeV/$c$. For events due to prompt processes, we find $R_p = 0.395\pm0.016(stat.)\pm0.015(sys.)$. This result represents a significant improvement in precision over previous measurements of prompt $\chi_{c1,2}$ hadroproduction.
This paper reports a measurement of the cross section for the pair production of top quarks in ppbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV at the Fermilab Tevatron. The data was collected from the CDF II detector in a set of runs with a total integrated luminosity of 1.1 fb^{-1}. The cross section is measured in the dilepton channel, the subset of ttbar events in which both top quarks decay through t -> Wb -> l nu b where l = e, mu, or tau. The lepton pair is reconstructed as one identified electron or muon and one isolated track. The use of an isolated track to identify the second lepton increases the ttbar acceptance, particularly for the case in which one W decays as W -> tau nu. The purity of the sample may be further improved at the cost of a reduction in the number of signal events, by requiring an identified b-jet. We present the results of measurements performed with and without the request of an identified b-jet. The former is the first published CDF result for which a b-jet requirement is added to the dilepton selection. In the CDF data there are 129 pretag lepton + track candidate events, of which 69 are tagged. With the tagging information, the sample is divided into tagged and untagged sub-samples, and a combined cross section is calculated by maximizing a likelihood. The result is sigma_{ttbar} = 9.6 +/- 1.2 (stat.) -0.5 +0.6 (sys.) +/- 0.6 (lum.) pb, assuming a branching ratio of BR(W -> ell nu) = 10.8% and a top mass of m_t = 175 GeV/c^2.
A search for the Higgs boson decaying into a photon and a pair of electrons or muons with an invariant mass $m_{\ell\ell} < 30$ GeV is presented. The analysis is performed using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data, produced by the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and collected by the ATLAS experiment. Evidence for the $H \rightarrow \ell \ell \gamma$ process is found with a significance of 3.2$\sigma$ over the background-only hypothesis, compared to an expected significance of 2.1$\sigma$. The best-fit value of the signal strength parameter, defined as the ratio of the observed signal yield to the one expected in the Standard Model, is $\mu = 1.5 \pm 0.5$. The Higgs boson production cross-section times the $H \rightarrow\ell\ell\gamma$ branching ratio for $m_{\ell\ell} <$ 30 GeV is determined to be 8.7 $^{+2.8}_{-2.7}$ fb.
Open heavy flavor hadrons provide unique probes of the medium produced in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Due to their increased mass relative to light-flavor hadrons, long lifetime, and early production in hard-scattering interactions, they provide access to the full evolution of the partonic medium formed in heavy-ion collisions. This paper reports two-dimensional (2D) angular correlations between neutral $D$-mesons and unidentified charged particles produced in minimum-bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 200 GeV. $D^0$ and $\bar{D}^0$ mesons are reconstructed via their weak decay to $K^{\mp} \pi^{\pm}$ using the Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT) in the Solenoidal Tracker at RHIC (STAR) experiment. Correlations on relative pseudorapidity and azimuth $(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)$ are presented for peripheral, mid-central and central collisions with $D^0$ transverse momentum from 2 to 10 GeV/$c$. Attention is focused on the 2D peaked correlation structure near the triggered $D^0$-meson, the {\em near-side} (NS) peak, which serves as a proxy for a charm-quark containing jet. The correlated NS yield of charged particles per $D^0$-meson and the 2D widths of the NS peak increase significantly from peripheral to central collisions. These results are compared with similar correlations using unidentified charged particles, consisting primarily of light-flavor hadrons, at similar trigger particle momenta. Similar per-trigger yields and widths of the NS correlation peak are observed. The present results provide additional evidence that $D^0$-mesons undergo significant interactions with the medium formed in heavy-ion collision and show, for the first time, significant centrality evolution of the NS 2D peak in the correlations of particles associated with a heavy-flavor hadron produced in these collisions.
We report precision measurements of hypernuclei ${}^3_\Lambda \rm{H}$ and ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$ lifetimes obtained from Au+Au collisions at \snn = 3.0 GeV and 7.2 GeV collected by the STAR experiment at RHIC, and the first measurement of ${}^3_\Lambda \rm{H}$ and ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$ mid-rapidity yields in Au+Au collisions at \snn = 3.0 GeV. ${}^3_\Lambda \rm{H}$ and ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$, being the two simplest bound states composed of hyperons and nucleons, are cornerstones in the field of hypernuclear physics. Their lifetimes are measured to be $221\pm15(\rm stat.)\pm19(\rm syst.)$ ps for ${}^3_\Lambda \rm{H}$ and $218\pm6(\rm stat.)\pm13(\rm syst.)$ ps for ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$. The $p_T$-integrated yields of ${}^3_\Lambda \rm{H}$ and ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$ are presented in different centrality and rapidity intervals. It is observed that the shape of the rapidity distribution of ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$ is different for 0--10% and 10--50% centrality collisions. Thermal model calculations, using the canonical ensemble for strangeness, describes the ${}^3_\Lambda \rm{H}$ yield well, while underestimating the ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$ yield. Transport models, combining baryonic mean-field and coalescence (JAM) or utilizing dynamical cluster formation via baryonic interactions (PHQMD) for light nuclei and hypernuclei production, approximately describe the measured ${}^3_\Lambda \rm{H}$ and ${}^4_\Lambda \rm{H}$ yields. Our measurements provide means to precisely assess our understanding of the fundamental baryonic interactions with strange quarks, which can impact our understanding of more complicated systems involving hyperons, such as the interior of neutron stars or exotic hypernuclei.
The transversity distribution, which describes transversely polarized quarks in transversely polarized nucleons, is a fundamental component of the spin structure of the nucleon, and is only loosely constrained by global fits to existing semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering (SIDIS) data. In transversely polarized $p^\uparrow+p$ collisions it can be accessed using transverse polarization dependent fragmentation functions which give rise to azimuthal correlations between the polarization of the struck parton and the final state scalar mesons. This letter reports on spin dependent di-hadron correlations measured by the STAR experiment. The new dataset corresponds to 25 pb$^{-1}$ integrated luminosity of $p^\uparrow+p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV, an increase of more than a factor of ten compared to our previous measurement at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV. Non-zero asymmetries sensitive to transversity are observed at a $Q^2$ of several hundred GeV and are found to be consistent with the former measurement and a model calculation. %we observe consistent with the former measurement are observed.} We expect that these data will enable an extraction of transversity with comparable precision to current SIDIS datasets but at much higher momentum transfers where subleading effects are suppressed.
Forum