Inclusive muon cross section from W+->mu+nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from W-->mu-nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from Z->mu+mu- simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV (the Z is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll > 60 GeV): the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from backgrounds: Z->tau tau, ttbar, Drell-Yan->mu+mu- (Drell-Yan is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll < 60 GeV) simulated with Pythia with MRSTLO* pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar production and decays simulated with FONLL with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is the uncertainty due to scale variation, alpha_s+pdf using CTEQ6.6 error set and the heavy quark masses.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar simulated with FONLL removing the resummation term with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.5 and pT > 4 GeV?.

Inclusive muon cross section for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: (stat) statistical error, (sys) systematic error. The first systematic error is the intrinsic error of the measurement, the second is the error due to the luminosity.

Inclusive muon cross section after subtraction of W,Z, Drell-Yan and top background for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: (stat): statistical error, (sys): systematic error. The first systematic error is the intrinsic error of the measurement, the second the error due to the luminosity, the third is due to the subtraction of the background and is dominated by the error on the W, Z inclusive cross sections.

Inclusive muon cross section from W+->mu+nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from W-->mu-nu simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from Z->mu+mu- simulated with MC with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV (the Z is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll > 60 GeV): the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from backgrounds: Z->tau tau, ttbar, Drell-Yan->mu+mu- (Drell-Yan is defined as Z/gamma* with m_ll < 60 GeV) simulated with Pythia with MRSTLO* pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is due to the MC statistics.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar production and decays simulated with FONLL with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV: the error shown is the uncertainty due to scale variation, alpha_s+pdf using CTEQ6.6 error set and the heavy quark masses.

Inclusive muon cross section from bbar+ccbar simulated with FONLL removing the resummation term with CTEQ6.6 pdf set for |eta| < 2.0 excluding 1.37 < |eta| < 1.52 and pT > 4 GeV.

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 2. (Color online) Fit decomposition of the $46 \%-56 \%$ centrality data for 62 -GeV Au-Au collisions. The top panels show from left to right the corrected data, model fit, fit residuals (data - model), and same-side 2D Gaussian. The bottom panels similarly show the away-side azimuth dipole, the nonjet azimuth quadrupole, the 1D $\eta_{\Delta}$ Gaussian, and the 2D exponential. This centrality is just below the sharp transition at $v_{\text {trans }}=3$. Fit residuals (c) are scaled up eightfold relative to the data.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) 2D data histogram from $0 \%-5 \%$ central 200 GeV Au-Au collisions $[(0,0)$ bin suppressed]. (b) Additional model component fitted to the $2 \mathrm{D}$ histogram and consisting of an AS azimuth dipole modulated by function $F\left(\eta_{\Delta}\right)$ described in the text. (c) Fit residuals including the new model component. (d) Data histogram in the first panel minus the additional model component and fitted offset. Remaining structure is described accurately by an AS dipole and SS 2D Gaussian.

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 11. (Color online) (Left) Uncorrected angular correlations from 62-GeV $37 \%-46 \%$ central Au-Au collisions showing pileup distortions, especially evident as the W-shaped nonuniformity of the AS ridge on $\eta_{\Delta}$. (Right) The same data with pileup correction applied.

Elliptic flow versus $p_{T}$ for charged hadrons from Cu+Cu collisions at 0–60% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV measured with the subevent method with a pseudorapidity gap of 0.3 units compared with previously published STAR results for 200 and 62.4 GeV Cu+Cu [27] measured with full TPC event plane method $v_{2}${TPC} and full FTPC event plane method $v_{2}${FTPC}. The error bars are statistical. Results are also compared to $v_{2}$($p_{T}$) model calculations.

Elliptic flow $v_{2}(\eta)$ for charged hadrons fromCu+Cu collisions at 0–60% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV. The present STAR results are compared to the measurement from the PHOBOS [29] collaboration for Cu+Cu at 22.4 GeV. The PHOBOS results include statistical and systematic errors whereas the STAR results are plotted with statistical uncertainties only, and systematic errors are discussed in Section III C. Results are also compared to $v_{2}(\eta)$ calculations from the indicated models.

Elliptic flow $v_{2}${TPC} and $v_{2}${4} as a function of centrality for charged hadrons from Cu+Cu collisions at 0 − 60% centrality at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV, compared with previously published results from the STAR collaboration at 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV.

The distribution in Meff for the higher jet Pt cut (> 80 GeV) (scalar sum of the missing transverse momentum and the transverse momenta of all jets with pT > 40 GeV) for events with at least 4 jets after the application of all selection criteria (other than the Meff cut itself). The table shows the number of observed data points per 100 GeV bin plus the background prediction of the Standard-Model Monte-Carlo and its upper and lower 1-sigma error limits uncertainty band.

95% CL exclusion limit in the (Mgluino,Msquark) plane for the simplified model described in the paper. The gluino mass and the masses of the squarks of the first two generations are set to the values shown. The lightest neutralino is assigned mass of zero. All other supersymmetric particles, including the squarks of the third generation, are decoupled by being given masses of 5 TeV.

95% CL exclusion limit in the Squark-Gluino model, as in the previous table, but for a lightest neutralino assigned mass of 195 GeV.

95% CL exclusion limit in the Squark-Gluino model, as in the previous table, but for a lightest neutralino assigned mass of 395 GeV.

95% CL exclusion limit in M(0) and M(1/2) in the tan(beta)=10, A0=0, MU>0 slice of MSUGRA/CMSSM.

95% CL exclusion limit in the Universal Extra Dimensions model in 1/R v Lambda*R space.

95% CL exclusion limit in the Universal Extra Dimensions model in m_{g_KK} vs (m_{g_KK}-m_{gamma_KK}) space.

Correlated Systematic Uncertainties for W- production.

Cross sections for W+ production from the combined electron and muon data sets in the defined fiducial regions. The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

Correlated Systematic Uncertainties for W+ production.

Combined lepton charge asymmetry from W boson decays.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of Z0 versus W+- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Fiducial cross sections of W- versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in W- W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of Z0 versus W+- from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in Z0 W+- space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Total cross sections of W- versus W+ from fitting the combined electron and muon decay data sets. The table shows the fitted ellipse centre in W- W+ space plus the ellipse radii and angle using the total uncertainties and only the experimental uncertainties.

Factors to correct the measured cross-sections for different treatments of photon final-state radiation (QED FSR) to: - dressed leptons, recombined with FSR photons in a cone of DeltaR < 0.1 and - bare leptons, defined after FSR. These correction factors are found to be (pseudo)-rapidity independent.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for fiducial Z0 production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for total Z0 production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for fiducial W+ + W- production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Theory prediction from FEWZ program at NNLO QCD for total W+ + W- production cross section times leptonic branching using different PDF sets. The first error (stat) is the numerical statistical uncertainty of the calculation, while second and third give the asymmetric uncertainty from the PDF set.

Transverse mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Missing transverse energy after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Missing transverse energy after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Transverse mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Transverse mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass in the electron plus three jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus three jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus three jets top control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus three jets top control region.

Number of b-tagged jets in the combined electron plus three jets W+jets and top control region.

Number of b-tagged jets in the combined muon plus three jets W+jets and top control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus four jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus four jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus four jets top control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus four jets top control region.

Effective mass in the 3-jet loose signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet loose signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet tight signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet tight signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet loose signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet loose signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet tight signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet tight signal region (muon channel).

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits in the MSUGRA/CMSSM framework with the combined electron and muon channels.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the MSUGRA/CMSSM framework with the combined electron and muon channels.

The measured prompt photon cross section as a function of transverse energy for the |pseudorapidity| range 1.81 TO 2.37.