Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet pT-spectra with radius parameter R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV, for two centrality classes 0-10% and 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Gaussian fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Gaussian fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Gaussian fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Exponential-Gaussian-Exponential fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Exponential-Gaussian-Exponential fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Exponential-Gaussian-Exponential fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Exponential-Gaussian-Exponential fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Exponential-Gaussian-Exponential fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Parameters of the three-dimensional Exponential-Gaussian-Exponential fits to the complete set of the correlation functions in 8 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in $k_{\rm T}$ for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 4 ranges in multiplicity and 6 in kT for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 TeV.

Multiplicity selection for the analyzed sample. Uncorrected $N_{\rm ch}$ in $|\eta|$ < 1.2, $<dN_{\rm ch}/d\eta>|_{N_{\rm ch} >=1}$, number of events, and number of identical pion pairs in each range.

Multiplicity selection for the analyzed sample. Uncorrected $N_{\rm ch}$ in $|\eta|$ < 1.2, $<dN_{\rm ch}/d\eta>|_{N_{\rm ch} >=1}$, number of events, and number of identical pion pairs in each range.

Measured cross section for combined fit to all data.

Measured differential cross section as a function of the W- production angle.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.975 and azimuthal angle PHI = 105 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.975 and azimuthal angle PHI = 135 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.975 and azimuthal angle PHI = 165 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.875 and azimuthal angle PHI = 15 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.875 and azimuthal angle PHI = 45 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.875 and azimuthal angle PHI = 75 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.875 and azimuthal angle PHI = 105 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.875 and azimuthal angle PHI = 135 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.875 and azimuthal angle PHI = 165 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.650 and azimuthal angle PHI = 15 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.650 and azimuthal angle PHI = 45 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.650 and azimuthal angle PHI = 75 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.650 and azimuthal angle PHI = 105 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.650 and azimuthal angle PHI = 135 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

Cross section for the reaction E P --> E P GAMMA at a polar angle given by COS(THETA) = -0.650 and azimuthal angle PHI = 165 degrees both in the centre-of-mass frame of the GAMMA* P --> GAMMA* P reaction.

The luminosity weighted average polarized differential cross sections. The data are averaged over the eight centre of mass energies and over the COS(THETA(W)) bin width.

The luminosity weighted average CP-odd and CPThat-odd observables. For definition of SIG(C=+-) etc. see the text of the paper.

The luminosity weighted average CP-odd and CPThat-odd observables. For definition of SIG(C=+0) etc. see the text of the paper.

The luminosity weighted average CP-odd and CPThat-odd observables. For definition of SIG(C=-0) etc. see the text of the paper.

The mean, $\langle n_{\rm gluon}^{\rm ch.} \rangle$, and first two non-trivial normalized factorial moments, $F_{\rm 2,\,gluon}$ and $F_{\rm 3,\,gluon}$, of the charged particle multiplicity distribution of gluon jets. The data have been corrected for detector acceptance and resolution, for event selection, and for gluon jet impurity.

The charged particle fragmentation function of gluon jets, ${1/N \,({\rm d}n_{\rm gluon}^{\rm ch.}/{\rm d}}x_E^*)$, for $E_{\rm g}^*$$\,=\,$14.24 and 17.72 GeV. The data have been corrected for detector acceptance and resolution, for event selection, and for gluon jet impurity.

Cross section for the production of two muons as a function of the hadronictransverse momentum .

Cross section for electroweak, elastic and inelastic muon pair production. In this data sample di-muons from UPSILON, TAU-PAIR and QUARK-QUARKBAR decays are subtracted.

Cross section SIG(T) + EPSILON*SIG(L) for COS(THETA*) = -0.825.

Cross section SIG(TL) for COS(THETA*) = -0.975.

Cross section SIG(TL) for COS(THETA*) = -0.925.

Cross section SIG(TL) for COS(THETA*) = -0.875.

Cross section SIG(TL) for COS(THETA*) = -0.825.

Cross section SIG(TT) for COS(THETA*) = -0.975.

Cross section SIG(TT) for COS(THETA*) = -0.925.

Cross section SIG(TT) for COS(THETA*) = -0.875.

Cross section SIG(TT) for COS(THETA*) = -0.825.