The structure of hadronic events fromZ0 decay is studied by measuring event shape variables, factorial moments, and the energy flow distribution. The distributions, after correction for detector effects and initial and final state radiation, are compared with the predictions of different QCD Monte Carlo programs with optimized parameter values. These Monte Carlo programs use either the second order matrix element or the parton shower evolution for the perturbative QCD calculations and use the string, the cluster, or the independent fragmentation model for hadronization. Both parton shower andO(α2s matrix element based models with string fragmentation describe the data well. The predictions of the model based on parton shower and cluster fragmentation are also in good agreement with the data. The model with independent fragmentation gives a poor description of the energy flow distribution. The predicted energy evolutions for the mean values of thrust, sphericity, aplanarity, and charge multiplicity are compared with the data measured at different center-of-mass energies. The parton shower based models with string or cluster fragmentation are found to describe the energy dependences well while the model based on theO(α2s calculation fails to reproduce the energy dependences of these mean values.
Unfolded Thrust distribution. Statistical error includes statistical uncertainties of the data as well as of the unfolding Monte Carlo Sample. The systematic error combines the uncertainties of measurements and of the unfolding procedure.
Unfolded Major distribution where Major is defined in the same way as Thrust but is maximized in a plane perpendicular to the Thrust axis.
Unfolded Minor distribution where the minor axis is defined to give an orthonormal system.
The energy and centrality dependence of local particle pseudorapidity densities as well as validity of various parametrizations of the distributions are examined. The dispersion, σ, of the rapidity density distribution of produced particles varies slowly with centrality and is 0.80, 0.98, 1.21 and 1.41 for central interactions at 3.7, 14.6, 60 and 200A GeV incident energy, respectively, σ is found to be independent of the size of the interacting system at fixed energy. A novel way of representing the window dependence of the multiplicity as normalized variance versus inverse average multiplicity is outlined.
No description provided.
NUCLEUS IS AGBR, CENTRAL EVENTS.
No description provided.
None
INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DECAYS: D*(2010)+- --> D0 PI+-, D0 --> K- PI+.
INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING DECAYS: D*(2010)+- --> D0 PI+-, D0 --> K- PI+, D0 --> K- 2PI+ PI-.
INCLUDES THE DECAYS: D+ --> K- 2PI+.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
NUCLEUS IS NUCLEAR PHOTOEMULSION. EVENT WITH A TOTAL CHARGE OF ALL SPECTATOR FRAGMENTS OF A PROJECTILE = 0.
NUCLEUS IS NUCLEAR PHOTOEMULSION. EVENT WITH A TOTAL CHARGET OF ALL SPECTATOR FRAGMENTS OF A PROJECTILE = 1.
NUCLEUS IS NUCLEAR PHOTOEMULSION.
None
No description provided.
The production of neutral pions by the interaction of 200A·GeV p and16O projectiles with a Au target has been studied in the pseudorapidity range 1.5≦η≦2.1. Transverse momentum spectra have been measured between 0.4 GeV/c and 3.6 GeV/c and their dependence on the centrality of the collision has been investigated. The peripheral-collision spectra display a marked change of slope with a hard component starting at about 1.8 GeV/c, in contrast to central-collision data. The data are discussed in comparison to p+p and α+α data from the ISR.
Data obtained with minimum bias trigger conditions.
Data obtained with minimum bias trigger conditions.
Data for central collisions.
Pseudorapidity distributions of relativistic singly charged particles in oxygen-induced emulsion interactions at 14.6, 60, and 200 GeV/nucleon are studied. Limiting fragmentation behavior is observed in both the target and projectile fragmentation regions for a central as well as for a minimum-bias sample. Comparisons with the fritiof model reveal that the picture of fragmenting strings successfully describes the observed data.
NUCLEUS IS AVERAGE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.
NUCLEUS IS AVERAGE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.