Reference multiplicity distributions obtained from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV data (black markers), Glauber model (red histogram), and unfolding approach to separate single and pileup contributions. Vertical lines represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pileup, and single+pileup collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green, and dashed pink lines, respectively. The 0–5% central events and 5–60% mid-central to peripheral events are indicated by black arrows. The ratio of the single+pileup to the measured multiplicity distribution is shown in the lower panel.

Reference multiplicity distributions obtained from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV data (black markers), Glauber model (red histogram), and unfolding approach to separate single and pileup contributions. Vertical lines represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pileup, and single+pileup collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green, and dashed pink lines, respectively. The 0–5% central events and 5–60% mid-central to peripheral events are indicated by black arrows. The ratio of the single+pileup to the measured multiplicity distribution is shown in the lower panel.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Ratios of proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Ratios of proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

UrQMD results of the proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$= 3 GeV. The black circles are without VF correction while blue squares and red triangles are results with VFC which used $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. The blue crosses are calculations using UrQMD events with b $\leq$ 3 fm. The above results are applied CBWC except for the one (blue crosses) using b $\leq$3 fm events.

UrQMD results of the proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$= 3 GeV. The black circles are without VF correction while blue squares and red triangles are results with VFC which used $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. The blue crosses are calculations using UrQMD events with b $\leq$ 3 fm. The above results are applied CBWC except for the one (blue crosses) using b $\leq$3 fm events.

Proton cumulants up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction is shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulants up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction is shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction are shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction are shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

UrQMD results of proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Experimental results on centrality dependence of cumulants (left panels) and cumulant ratios (right panels) up to sixth order of the proton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $N_{\rm part}$ = 3 GeV. The open squares are data without VF correction while red circles and blue triangles are results with VF correction with $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models, respectively.

Experimental results on centrality dependence of cumulants (left panels) and cumulant ratios (right panels) up to sixth order of the proton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $N_{\rm part}$ = 3 GeV. The open squares are data without VF correction while red circles and blue triangles are results with VF correction with $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models, respectively.

Same as Fig. 14 but for correlation function (left panels) and their normalized ratios (right panels).

Same as Fig. 14 but for correlation function (left panels) and their normalized ratios (right panels).

Cumulants and cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The transverse momentum window is $p_{\rm T}$ from $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ and the rapidity window is $−0.5<y<0$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD predictions are depicted by gold bands.

Cumulants and cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The transverse momentum window is $p_{\rm T}$ from $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ and the rapidity window is $−0.5<y<0$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD predictions are depicted by gold bands.

Same as Fig. 16 but for correlation functions and correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

Same as Fig. 16 but for correlation functions and correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

'Identified transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{-}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV'

'Identified transverse momentum spectra of $K^{-}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV'

'Identified transverse momentum spectra of $\bar{p}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV'

'Average transverse momentum as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ for $\pi^{+}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'Average transverse momentum as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ for $K^{+}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'Average transverse momentum as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ for p at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'dN/dy scaled by 0.5 × $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ for $\pi^{+}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'dN/dy scaled by 0.5 × $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ for $K^{+}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'dN/dy scaled by 0.5 × $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ for p at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'dN/dy scaled by 0.5 × $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ for $\bar{p}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'$\pi^{−}$/$\pi^{+}$ ratio as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'$K^{−}$/$K^{+}$ ratio as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'$\bar{p}$/p ratio as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'$K^{+}$/$\pi^{+}$ ratio as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'$K^{-}$/$\pi^{-}$ ratio as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'p/$\pi^{+}$ ratio as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

'$\bar{p}$/$\pi^{-}$ ratio as a function of $\langle$N$_{part}$$\rangle$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV.'

Example of combinatorial background subtracted invariant mass distributions and the extracted yields as a function of $\cos \theta^*$ for $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ mesons. \textbf{a)} example of $\phi \rightarrow K^+ + K^-$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{b)} example of $K^{*0} (\overline{K^{*0}}) \rightarrow K^{-} \pi^{+} (K^{+} \pi^{-})$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{c)} extracted yields of $\phi$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{d)} extracted yields of $K^{*0}$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$.

Example of combinatorial background subtracted invariant mass distributions and the extracted yields as a function of $\cos \theta^*$ for $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ mesons. \textbf{a)} example of $\phi \rightarrow K^+ + K^-$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{b)} example of $K^{*0} (\overline{K^{*0}}) \rightarrow K^{-} \pi^{+} (K^{+} \pi^{-})$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{c)} extracted yields of $\phi$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{d)} extracted yields of $K^{*0}$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$.

Example of combinatorial background subtracted invariant mass distributions and the extracted yields as a function of $\cos \theta^*$ for $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ mesons. \textbf{a)} example of $\phi \rightarrow K^+ + K^-$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{b)} example of $K^{*0} (\overline{K^{*0}}) \rightarrow K^{-} \pi^{+} (K^{+} \pi^{-})$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{c)} extracted yields of $\phi$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{d)} extracted yields of $K^{*0}$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$.

Efficiency corrected $\phi$-meson yields as a function of cos$\theta$* and corresponding fits with Eq.1 in the method section.

Efficiency and acceptance corrected $K^{*0}$-meson yields as a function of cos$\theta$* and corresponding fits with Eq.4 in the method section.

$\phi$-meson $\rho_{00}$ obtained from 1st- and 2nd-order event planes. The red stars (gray squares) show the $\phi$-meson $\rho_{00}$ as a function of beam energy, obtained with the 2nd-order (1st-order) EP.

$\phi$-meson $\rho_{00}$ with respect to different quantization axes. $\phi$-meson $\rho_{00}$ as a function of beam energy, for the out-of-plane direction (stars) and the in-plane direction (diamonds). Curves are fits based on theoretical calculations with a $\phi$-meson field. The corresponding $G_s^{(y)}$ values obtained from the fits are shown in the legend.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $\phi$ for different collision energies. The gray squares and red stars are results obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $K^{*0}$ for different collision energies.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $K^{*0}$ for different collision energies.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $K^{*0}$ for different collision energies.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $K^{*0}$ for different collision energies.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $K^{*0}$ for different collision energies.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $K^{*0}$ for different collision energies.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of transverse momentum for $K^{*0}$ for different collision energies.

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of centrality for $\phi$ (upper panels) and $K^{*0}$ (lower panels). The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for the $K^{*0}$ meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.}

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of centrality for $\phi$ (upper panels) and $K^{*0}$ (lower panels). The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for the $K^{*0}$ meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.}

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of centrality for $\phi$ (upper panels) and $K^{*0}$ (lower panels). The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for the $K^{*0}$ meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.}

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of centrality for $\phi$ (upper panels) and $K^{*0}$ (lower panels). The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for the $K^{*0}$ meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.}

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of centrality for $\phi$ (upper panels) and $K^{*0}$ (lower panels). The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for the $K^{*0}$ meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.}

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of centrality for $\phi$ (upper panels) and $K^{*0}$ (lower panels). The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for the $K^{*0}$ meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.}

$\rho_{00}$ as a function of centrality for $\phi$ (upper panels) and $K^{*0}$ (lower panels). The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for the $K^{*0}$ meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.}

Global spin alignment measurement of $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ vector mesons in Au+Au collisions at 0-20\% centrality. The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for $K^{*0}$-meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.

Global spin alignment measurement of $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ vector mesons in Au+Au collisions at 0-20\% centrality. The solid squares and stars are results for the $\phi$ meson, obtained with the 1st- and 2nd-order EP, respectively. The solid circles are results for $K^{*0}$-meson, obtained with the 2nd-order EP.

The centrality dependencies of the $\Delta\gamma\{\psi_\mathrm{ZDC}\}$ for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the A for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the a for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the A/a using full-event method for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the A/a using sub-event method for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the $f_\mathrm{CME}$ using full-event method for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the $f_\mathrm{CME}$ using sub-event method for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the $\Delta\gamma_\mathrm{CME}$ using full-event method for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The centrality dependencies of the $\Delta\gamma_\mathrm{CME}$ using sub-event method for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The $f_\mathrm{CME}$ from different methods for 20-50% centrality Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The $f_\mathrm{CME}$ from different methods for 50-80% centrality Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The $\Delta\gamma_\mathrm{CME}$ from different methods for 20-50% centrality Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The $\Delta\gamma_\mathrm{CME}$ from different methods for 50-80% centrality Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.

The $\gamma_{SS}$ correlators in du+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV at RHIC as a function of multiplicity.

The correlation difference variable $\Delta \gamma = \gamma_{OS}-\gamma_{SS}$ in p+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV at RHIC as a function of multiplicity.

The correlation difference variable $\Delta \gamma = \gamma_{OS}-\gamma_{SS}$ in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV at RHIC as a function of multiplicity.

The measured two-particle cumulant $v_2\{2\}$ in p+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV at RHIC as a function of multiplicity.

The measured two-particle cumulant $v_2\{2\}$ in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV at RHIC as a function of multiplicity.

The scaled observable $\Delta{\gamma}_{scaled} = \Delta{\gamma} \times dN_{ch}/d\eta/v_{2}$ in p+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV at RHIC as a function of multiplicity.

The scaled observable $\Delta{\gamma}_{scaled} = \Delta{\gamma} \times dN_{ch}/d\eta/v_{2}$ in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV at RHIC as a function of multiplicity.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 718.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 723.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 727.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 731.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 735.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 739.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 743.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 748.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 752.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 756.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 760.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 768.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 772.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 777.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 781.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 785.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 789.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 793.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 797.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 801.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 805.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 809.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 814.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 818.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 822.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 826.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 830.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 834.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 838.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 842.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 846.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 850.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 854.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 858.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 862.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 866.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 870.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 874.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 878.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 882.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 886.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 890.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 894.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 898.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 902.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 906.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 910.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 914.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 918.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 922.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 926.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 930.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 933.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 937.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 941.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 945.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 949.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 953.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 957.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 960.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 964.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 968.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 972.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 976.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 980.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 983.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 987.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 991.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 995.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 998.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1002.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1006.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1011.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1019.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1026.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1034.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1041.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1048.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1055.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1063.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1070.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1077.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1084.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1091.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1098.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1105.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1112.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1119.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1125.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1132.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1139.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1146.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1152.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1159.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1165.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1172.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1178.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1185.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1191.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1198.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1204.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1210.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1216.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1222.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1229.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1235.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1242.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1251.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1260.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1268.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1277.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1287.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1300.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.9 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1315.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1335.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1355.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1376.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.9 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1394.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 5.0 PCT.