The total coherent $\mathrm{J}/\psi$ photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$, measured in PbPb ultra-peripheral collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$ values used correspond to the center of each rapidity range. The theoretical uncertainties is due to the uncertainties in the photon flux.

The nuclear gluon suppression factor $R_{\mathrm{g}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$ as a function of Bjorken $x$ extracted from the CMS measurement of the coherent $\mathrm{J}/\psi$ photoproduction in PbPb ultra-peripheral collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The $x$ values are evaluated at the centers of their corresponding rapidity ranges. The theoretical uncertainties are due to the uncertainties in the photon flux and the impulse approximation model.

The nuclear gluon suppression factor $R_{\mathrm{g}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$ as a function of Bjorken $x$ extracted from the CMS measurement of the coherent $\mathrm{J}/\psi$ photoproduction in PbPb ultra-peripheral collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The $x$ values are evaluated at the centers of their corresponding rapidity ranges. The theoretical uncertainties are due to the uncertainties in the photon flux and the impulse approximation model.

The total covariance matrix of the total coherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The covariance matrix includes both the experimental and theoretical (photon flux) uncertainties. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

The photon flux values from STARLight as a function of rapidity, in different neutron multiplicity classes: 0n0n, 0nXn, and XnXn.

The experimental covariance matrix of the total coherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

The covariance matrix for the flux in the 0n0n neutron multiplicity class.

The theoretical (photon flux) covariance matrix of the total coherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

The covariance matrix for the flux in the 0nXn neutron multiplicity class.

The covariance matrix for the flux in the XnXn neutron multiplicity class.

The total covariance matrix of the total coherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The covariance matrix includes both the experimental and theoretical (photon flux) uncertainties. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

The experimental covariance matrix of the total coherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

The theoretical (photon flux) covariance matrix of the total coherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

Fragmentation modification ratios for charged jets for high pT for the different toy modifications.

Fragmentation modification ratios for charged jets for low pT for the different toy modifications.

Jet production spectra in 0--10% collisions with R = 0.2

Jet production spectra in 0--10% collisions with R = 0.4

Jet production spectra in 0--10% collisions with R = 0.6

Jet production spectra in 30--50% collisions with R = 0.2

Jet production spectra in 30--50% collisions with R = 0.4

Jet production spectra in 30--50% collisions with R = 0.6

Jet production spectra in 60--80% collisions

Jet production spectra in pp collisions

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.2 in central collisions with ML-based subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.2 in central collisions with AB subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.4 in central collisions with AB subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.4 in central collisions with ML subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.6 in central collisions with ML subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.2 in semicentral collisions with ML-based subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.2 in semicentral collisions with AB subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.4 in semicentral collisions with ML-based subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.4 in semicentral collisions with AB subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.6 in semicentral collisions with AB subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.2 in peripheral collisions with AB subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.4 in peripheral collisions with AB subtraction

Nuclear modification factor for jets with R = 0.6 in peripheral collisions with AB subtraction

Cross Section ratios for pp

Cross Section ratios for PbPb (central)

Cross Section ratios for PbPb (semi central)

Cross Section ratios for pp

Cross Section ratios for PbPb (central)

Cross Section ratios for PbPb (semi central)

Raa Ratio for R = 0.4/R = 0.2, PbPb, Central

Raa Ratio for R = 0.6/R = 0.2, PbPb, Central

Raa Ratio for R = 0.4/R = 0.2, PbPb, SemiCentral

Raa Ratio for R = 0.6/R = 0.2, PbPb, SemiCentral

Electron $p_{T}$ distribution using 2016-2018 data sets. The complete set of selection criteria were applied. Two examples of SSM WPRIME boson signal samples with masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV are shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to SM prediction, and the shaded band represents the systematic uncertainties.

$p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the electron channel using 2016-2018 data sets. The complete set of selection criteria were applied. Two examples of SSM WPRIME boson signal samples with masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV are shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to SM prediction, and the shaded band represents the systematic uncertainties.

Muon $p_T$ distribution using 2016-2018 data sets. The complete set of selection criteria were applied. Two examples of SSM WPRIME boson signal samples with masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV are shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to SM prediction, and the shaded band represents the systematic uncertainties.

$p_T^{miss}$ distribution in the muon channel using 2016-2018 data sets. The complete set of selection criteria were applied. Two examples of SSM WPRIME boson signal samples with masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV are shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to SM prediction, and the shaded band represents the systematic uncertainties.

$M_T$ distribution for the E+INVISIBLE system using 2016-2018 data sets. The complete set of selection criteria were applied. Two examples of SSM WPRIME boson signal samples with masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV are shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to SM prediction, and the shaded band represents the systematic uncertainties.

$M_T$ distribution for the MU+INVISIBLE system using 2016-2018 data sets. The complete set of selection criteria were applied. Two examples of SSM WPRIME boson signal samples with masses of 3.8 and 5.6 TeV are shown. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to SM prediction, and the shaded band represents the systematic uncertainties.

Theoretical prediction for the production and decay cross-section of SSM WPRIME bosons (W --> LEPTON + NU) as a function of the WPRIME mass, for the range 200-6400 GeV and inclusive in phase-space (no cuts). The uncertainty shown covers PDF and ALPHAS uncertainties. These theoretical predictions are obtained with PYTHIA (LO) and corrected to NNLO in QCD using FEWZ program.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the product of WPRIME cross-section production and BF(WPRIME --> LEPTON + NU) for an SSM WPRIME boson, as a function of the boson mass, for the electron decay channel. The shaded bands represent the one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits. The theoretical predictions for the SSM at NNLO precision in QCD are shown with narrow gray bands corresponding to the PDF and ALPHAS uncertainties.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the product of WPRIME cross-section production and BF(WPRIME --> LEPTON + NU) for an SSM WPRIME boson, as a function of the boson mass, for the muon decay channel. The shaded bands represent the one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits. The theoretical predictions for the SSM at NNLO precision in QCD are shown with narrow gray bands corresponding to the PDF and ALPHAS uncertainties.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the product of WPRIME cross-section production and BF(WPRIME --> LEPTON + NU) for an SSM WPRIME boson, as a function of the boson mass, for the combined electron and muon decay channels. The shaded bands represent the one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits. The theoretical predictions for the SSM at NNLO precision in QCD are shown with narrow gray bands corresponding to the PDF and ALPHAS uncertainties.

The 95% CL observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) model independent cross section upper limits as function of the $MT_{min}$ threshold, for the electron decay channel. The shaded bands represent the one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits.

The 95% CL observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) model independent cross section upper limits as function of the $MT_{min}$ threshold, for the muon decay channel. The shaded bands represent the one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits.

The 95% CL observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) model independent cross section upper limits as function of the $MT_{min}$ threshold, for the combined electron and muon decay channels. The shaded bands represent the one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the coupling strength ratio, gWprime/gW as a function of the mass of the WPRIME boson, for the electron channel. The one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The area above the limit curve is excluded. The dotted line represents the case of SSM coupling, gWprime, being equal to gW, the SM coupling.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the coupling strength ratio, gWprime/gW, as a function of the mass of the WPRIME boson, for the muon channel. The one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The area above the limit curve is excluded. The dotted line represents the case of SSM coupling, gWprime , being equal to gW, the SM coupling.

Exclusion limits in the 2D plane (1/R, $\mu$) for the split-UED interpretation for the n = 2 case, for the electron channel for the 2016-2018 data sets. R is the radius of the additional spatial dimension and $\mu$ the bulk mass for the fermion field in five dimensions. The expected limit is depicted as a black dashed line. The one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The experimentally excluded region is the entire area to the left of the solid black line.

Exclusion limits in the 2D plane (1/R, $\mu$) for the split-UED interpretation for the n = 2 case, for the muon channel for the 2016-2018 data sets. R is the radius of the additional spatial dimension and $\mu$ the bulk mass for the fermion field in five dimensions. The expected limit is depicted as a black dashed line. The one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The experimentally excluded region is the entire area to the left of the solid black line.

Exclusion limits in the 2D plane (1/R, $\mu$) for the split-UED interpretation for the n = 2 case, for the combined electron and muon channels for the 2016-2018 data sets. R is the radius of the additional spatial dimension and $\mu$ the bulk mass for the fermion field in five dimensions. The expected limit is depicted as a black dashed line. The one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The experimentally excluded region is the entire area to the left of the solid black line.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the ${\lambda}_{231}$ coupling in the RPV SUSY model with a STAU mediator, as a function of the mass of STAU, for the electron channel and for the production coupling, ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$=0.5 . The couplings ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$, ${\lambda}_{231}$, and ${\lambda}_{132}$ are defined in Fig. 1. The one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The area above the limit curve is excluded. Limits for other values of ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$ are obtained multiplying the ones shown by the ratio ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$/0.5

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) upper limits at 95% CL on the ${\lambda}_{132}$ coupling in the RPV SUSY model with a stau mediator, as a function of the mass of the stau, for the muon channel and for the production coupling, ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$ = 0.5 . The couplings ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$, ${\lambda}_{231}$, and ${\lambda}_{132}$ are defined in Fig. 1. The one (green) and two (yellow) standard deviation uncertainty bands for the expected limits are shown. The area above the limit curve is excluded. Limits for other values of ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$ are obtained multiplying these ones by the ratio ${\lambda}^{'}_{3ij}$/0.5

Region in the oblique (W,Y) parameter phase space allowed by the current analysis at 95% CL. The combination of the electron and muon channel distributions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV is used, having 101 fb-1 of luminosity.

Negative Log-Likelihood for the determination of the oblique W parameter, for the combination of the electron and muon channel and for 2017 and 2018 data sets (L=101 fb-1) at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV.

Total background estimate and observed data in all bins used in the limit calculation for the SSM WPRIME limits. The total event sample is split into the three years of data taking and the two lepton flavors.The distributions being shown are $M_T$ ones. The associated integrated luminosities for each year are of 35.9, 41.5, and 59.4 fb$̣^{-1}. The mass bins are numbered in ascending order.

$z_{||}^{\rm ch}$-differential cross section of D$^0$-meson tagged track-based jets in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV, with $p_{\rm T,D}$ > 6 GeV/$c$ and 15 < $p_{\rm T,jet}^{\rm ch}$ < 30 GeV/$c$.

Rate of D$^0$-meson tagged track-based jets as a function of the jet momentum fraction carried by the D$^0$ mesons in the direction of the jet axisin pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV, with $p_{\rm T,D}$ > 2 GeV/$c$ and 5 < $p_{\rm T,jet}^{\rm ch}$ < 15 GeV/$c$.

Rate of D$^0$-meson tagged track-based jets as a function of the jet momentum fraction carried by the D$^0$ mesons in the direction of the jet axisin pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV, with $p_{\rm T,D}$ > 6 GeV/$c$ and 15 < $p_{\rm T,jet}^{\rm ch}$ < 30 GeV/$c$.

Femtoscopic radii as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

One-dimensional femtoscopic radius $R_{\mathrm inv}$ as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

Same charge C3 and c3 in Pb Pb collisions projected against Q3.

Mixed charge C3 and c3 in pp collisions projected against Q3.

Mixed charge C3 and c3 in p Pb collisions projected against Q3.

Mixed charge C3 and c3 in Pb Pb collisions projected against Q3.

Gaussian radii and intercept parameters in pp collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Gaussian radii and intercept parameters in pPb collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Gaussian radii and intercept parameters in PbPb collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Gaussian radii and intercept parameters in pp collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Gaussian radii and intercept parameters in pPb collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Gaussian radii and intercept parameters in PbPb collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Edgeworth radii and intercept parameters in pp collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Edgeworth radii and intercept parameters in pPb collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Edgeworth radii and intercept parameters in PbPb collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Edgeworth radii and intercept parameters in pp collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Edgeworth radii and intercept parameters in pPb collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Edgeworth radii and intercept parameters in PbPb collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Exponential radii scaled down by sqrt(pi) and intercept parameters in pp collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Exponential radii scaled down by sqrt(pi) and intercept parameters in pPb collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Exponential radii scaled down by sqrt(pi) and intercept parameters in PbPb collisions versus Nch at low KT3.

Exponential radii scaled down by sqrt(pi) and intercept parameters in pp collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Exponential radii scaled down by sqrt(pi) and intercept parameters in pPb collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

Exponential radii scaled down by sqrt(pi) and intercept parameters in PbPb collisions versus Nch at high KT3.

c3 comparison between pp and pPb collisions at similar multiplicity.

c3 comparison between pB and PbPb collisions at similar multiplicity.