The observed 95% CL upper limit on $\sigma( p p \rightarrow H) \cdot (H\rightarrow Z \gamma)$

Observed likelihood scan in the ($\kappa_\tau$, $\tilde{\kappa}_\tau$) plane.

Observed likelihood scan in the ($\alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}$, $\mu_{\text{ggH}}$) plane. The $\mu_{\text{qqH}}$ signal strength modifier is profiled.

Observed likelihood scan in the ($\alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}$, $\mu_{\text{qqH}}$) plane. The $\mu_{\text{ggH}}$ signal strength modifier is profiled.

Observed likelihood scan in the ($\mu_{\text{qqH}}$, $\mu_{\text{ggH}}$) plane. The value of $\alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}$ is profiled.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{\Lambda1}$ using Approach 1. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}$ using Approach 1. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}$ using Approach 1. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{\Lambda1}^{Z\gamma}$ using Approach 1. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{\Lambda1}^{Z\gamma}$ using Approach 1. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{a2}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are fixed to zero. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{a2}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are fixed to zero. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{\Lambda1}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are fixed to zero. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{\Lambda1}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are fixed to zero. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are fixed to zero. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are fixed to zero. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{a2}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are left floating in the fit. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{a2}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are left floating in the fit. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{\Lambda1}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are left floating in the fit. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{\Lambda1}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are left floating in the fit. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters. Axis scales are varied to improve the visibility of important features.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are left floating in the fit. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}$ using Approach 2. The other two anomalous coupling cross section fractions are left floating in the fit. The signal strength modifiers are treated as free parameters.

Expected profiled likelihood on the $\delta c_{Z}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Observed profiled likelihood on the $\delta c_{Z}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Expected profiled likelihood on the $c_{Z\Box}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Observed profiled likelihood on the $c_{Z\Box}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Expected profiled likelihood on the $c_{ZZ}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Observed profiled likelihood on the $c_{ZZ}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Expected profiled likelihood on the $\tilde{c}_{ZZ}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Observed profiled likelihood on the $\tilde{c}_{ZZ}$ coupling of the SMEFT Higgs basis.

Expected profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}^{ggH}$. The signal strength modifiers and the CP-odd HVV anomalous coupling cross section fraction are treated as free parameters.

Observed profiled likelihood on $f_{a3}^{ggH}$. The signal strength modifiers and the CP-odd HVV anomalous coupling cross section fraction are treated as free parameters.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a3}^{\mathrm{ggH}}$ ($\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{jj}}$ method).

Observed likelihood scan of $\alpha_{\mathrm{Hff}}$ (MELA method).

Expected likelihood scan of $\alpha_{\mathrm{Hff}}$ (MELA method).

Observed likelihood scan of $\alpha_{\mathrm{Hff}}$ ($\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{jj}}$ method).

Expected likelihood scan of $\alpha_{\mathrm{Hff}}$ ($\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{jj}}$ method).

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 1).

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 1).

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{a2}$.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a2}$.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}$.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}$.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}^{\mathrm{Z}\gamma}$.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}^{\mathrm{Z}\gamma}$.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 2).

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 2).

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 1). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 1). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{a2}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a2}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}^{\mathrm{Z}\gamma}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{\Lambda 1}^{\mathrm{Z}\gamma}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 2). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a3}$ (Approach 2). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{a3}^{\mathrm{ggH}}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{a3}^{\mathrm{ggH}}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$ and $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $f_{\textit{CP}}^{\mathrm{Htt}}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $f_{\textit{CP}}^{\mathrm{Htt}}$. $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $c_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t}$ profiled). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $c_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t}$ profiled). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $\widetilde{c}_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t}$ profiled)

Expected likelihood scan of $\widetilde{c}_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t}$ profiled). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $c_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa = 1$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t} = 0$). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $c_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa = 1$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t} = 0$). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Observed likelihood scan of $\widetilde{c}_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa = 1$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t} = 0$). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Expected likelihood scan of $\widetilde{c}_{\mathrm{gg}}$ ($\kappa = 1$ and $\widetilde{\kappa}_\mathrm{t} = 0$). $\mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau$, $\mathrm{H}\to4\ell$, and $\mathrm{H}\to\gamma\gamma$ channel results are combined.

Higgs boson transverse momentum spectrum, $H\rightarrow b\overline{b}$

Combined Higgs boson transverse momentum spectrum, ggH only

Combined Higgs boson jet multiplicity spectrum

Higgs boson jet multiplicity spectrum, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$

Higgs boson jet multiplicity spectrum, $H\rightarrow ZZ$

Combined Higgs boson rapidity spectrum

Higgs boson rapidity spectrum, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$

Higgs boson rapidity spectrum, $H\rightarrow ZZ$

Combined leading jet transverse momentum spectrum

Leading jet transverse momentum spectrum, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$

Leading jet transverse momentum spectrum, $H\rightarrow ZZ$

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma\gamma}$ as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of ||$y^{\gamma\gamma}$|| as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of $N_\rm{jets}$ as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of $p_\rm{T}^\rm{j1}$ as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of |$y^{\gamma\gamma}-y^{\rm{j1}}$| as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of $m_\rm{jj}$ as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of $\Delta \eta^{\rm{jj}}$ as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma\gamma,\rm{jj}}$ as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of $\Delta \phi^{\rm{jj}}$ as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Values of the pp $\to$ H $\to \gamma\gamma$ differential cross sections as a function of |$\eta^{\gamma\gamma}-(\eta^{\rm{j1}}+\eta^{\rm{j2}})/2$| as measured in data. For each observable the fit to $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ is performed simultaneously in all the bins. Since the signal mass is profiled for each observable, the best fit $\hat{m}_{\rm{H}}$ varies from observable to observable.

Measured fiducial cross section in fb as a function of Yll.

Measured fiducial cross section in fb/GeV as a function of the leading jet pT, PT(JET1).

Measured normalised fiducial cross section as a function of Njet. Jet PT>25 GeV for |eta|<2.4 and PT>30 GeV for 2.4<|eta|<4.5.

Measured normalised fiducial cross section in 1/GeV as a function of pTH.

Measured normalised fiducial cross section as a function of Yll.

Measured normalised fiducial cross section in 1/GeV as a function of the leading jet pT, PT(JET1).

Jet veto efficiency as a function of PT(JET1) pT threshold.

Full correlation matrix for the measured differential cross section as a function of Njet, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Full correlation matrix for the measured differential cross section as a function of pTH, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Full correlation matrix for the measured differential cross section as a function of Yll, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Full correlation matrix for the measured differential cross section as a function of the leading jet pT, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Full correlation matrix for the measured normalised differential cross section as a function of Njet, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Full correlation matrix for the measured normalised differential cross section as a function of pTH, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Full correlation matrix for the measured normalised differential cross section as a function of Yll, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Full correlation matrix for the measured normalised differential cross section as a function of the leading jet pT, taking into account statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Fiducial cross section of H+0-jet events in femtobarn for different values of PT(JET1) pT threshold with the uncertainties for each bin given in absolute values and in percent. The asterisk for the 25 GeV column header indicates that the results are for a mixed jet pT threshold, which is raised from 25 GeV to 30 GeV for jets with 2.5 < |eta| < 4.5.

Correction factors from inclusive parton level to fiducial particle level for bins of Njet derived with POWHEG NNLOPS+Pythia8. Uncertainties due to the non-perturbative correction are dominant for the correction factors.

Correction factors from inclusive parton level to fiducial particle level for bins of the leading jet pT derived with POWHEG NNLOPS+Pythia8. Uncertainties due to the non-perturbative correction are dominant for the correction factors.

Correction factors from inclusive parton level to fiducial particle level for the jet-veto efficiency with different jet pT thresholds derived with POWHEG NNLOPS+Pythia8. The asterisk on the 25 GeV bin label indicates that the results are for a mixed pT threshold, which is raised from 25 GeV to 30 GeV for jets with 2.5 < |eta| < 4.5, corresponding to the selection used to define the signal regions for the analysis.