E+ E- --> 3JET
Angular Dependence
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 3 of 3 results

Measurement of three jet distributions sensitive to the gluon spin in e+ e- annihilations at S**(1/2) = 91-GeV

The OPAL collaboration Alexander, G. ; Allison, John ; Allport, P.P. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 52 (1991) 543-550, 1991.
Inspire Record 317142 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.14852

None

4 data tables
Table 1

Data at Parton level.

Table 2

Ratio data/(Monte Carlo) at Parton level.

Table 3

Data at Parton level.. Distribution of Ellis-Karliner angle.

More…

Experimental Study of the Orientation of Three Jet Events in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at {PETRA}

The TASSO collaboration Braunschweig, W. ; Gerhards, R. ; Kirschfink, F.J. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 47 (1990) 181-186, 1990.
Inspire Record 282845 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.15158

The full TASSO data have been used to study the orientation of three-jet events ine+e− annihilation. The polar angle distributions of the normal to the three-jet plane as well as the polar angle distribution of the most energetic jet have been measured as a function of the thrust cut-off used to select the three-jet sample. The data corrected for radiation and detector effects are compared to QCD predictions and fair agreement is found. As a consistency check we also present measurements of the azimuthal correlations between the lepton and hadron planes. A significant azimuthal dependence is found, consistent again with the QCD predictions.

1 data table
Table 1

No description provided.


The Influence of Fragmentation Models on the Determination of the Strong Coupling Constant in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation Into Hadrons

The CELLO collaboration Behrend, H.J. ; Chen, C. ; Fenner, H. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 218 (1983) 269-288, 1983.
Inspire Record 179447 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.8172

Hadronic events obtained with the CELLO detector at PETRA were compared with first-order QCD predictions using two different models for the fragmentation of quarks and gluons, the Hoyer model and the Lund model. Both models are in reasonable agreement with the data, although they do not completely reproduce the details of many distributions. Several methods have been applied to determine the strong coupling constant α S . Although within one model the value of α S varies by 20% among the different methods, the values determined using the Lund model are 30% or more larger (depending on the method used) than the values determined with the Hoyer model. Our results using the Hoyer model are in agreement with previous results based on this approach.

3 data tables
Table 1

DATA CORRECTED WITH HOYER MODEL (ALPHA-S=0.15).

Table 2

DATA CORRECTED WITH LUND MODEL (ALPHA-S=0.25).

Table 3

No description provided.