Investigation of Elastic Electron - Deuteron Scattering in the Region of the Squared Transfer Momentum 0.36-f**-2 - 0.9-f**-2

Akimov, Yu.K. ; Arvanov, A.N. ; Badalian, G.V. ; et al.
Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 29 (1979) 335, 1979.
Inspire Record 133089 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.18482

None

1 data table

No description provided.


Measurement of tensor polarization elastic electron deuteron scattering at large momentum transfer.

The JLAB t(20) collaboration Abbott, D. ; Ahmidouch, A. ; Anklin, H. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000) 5053-5057, 2000.
Inspire Record 523086 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.40433

Tensor polarization observables (t20, t21 and t22) have been measured in elastic electron-deuteron scattering for six values of momentum transfer between 0.66 and 1.7 (GeV/c)^2. The experiment was performed at the Jefferson Laboratory in Hall C using the electron HMS Spectrometer, a specially designed deuteron magnetic channel and the recoil deuteron polarimeter POLDER. The new data determine to much larger Q^2 the deuteron charge form factors G_C and G_Q. They are in good agreement with relativistic calculations and disagree with pQCD predictions.

5 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Measurements of the Deuteron and Proton Magnetic Form-factors at Large Momentum Transfers

Bosted, Peter E. ; Katramatou, A.T. ; Arnold, R.G. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 42 (1990) 38-64, 1990.
Inspire Record 283632 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26165

Measurements of the deuteron elastic magnetic structure function B(Q2) are reported at squared four-momentum transfer values 1.20≤Q2≤2.77 (GeV/c)2. Also reported are values for the proton magnetic form factor GMp(Q2) at 11 Q2 values between 0.49 and 1.75 (GeV/c)2. The data were obtained using an electron beam of 0.5 to 1.3 GeV. Electrons backscattered near 180° were detected in coincidence with deuterons or protons recoiling near 0° in a large solid-angle double-arm spectrometer system. The data for B(Q2) are found to decrease rapidly from Q2=1.2 to 2 (GeV/c)2, and then rise to a secondary maximum around Q2=2.5 (GeV/c)2. Reasonable agreement is found with several different models, including those in the relativistic impulse approximation, nonrelativistic calculations that include meson-exchange currents, isobar configurations, and six-quark configurations, and one calculation based on the Skyrme model. All calculations are very sensitive to the choice of deuteron wave function and nucleon form factor parametrization. The data for GMp(Q2) are in good agreement with the empirical dipole fit.

2 data tables

The measured cross section have been devided by those obtained using the dipole form for the proton form factors: G_E=1/(1+Q2/0.71)**2, G_E(Q2)=G_M(Q2)/mu,where Q2 in GeV2, mu=2.79.

Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (?////Errors given are the statistical errors and systematic uncertainties add ed in quadreture).


DEUTERON A(Q**2) STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND THE NEUTRON ELECTRIC FORM-FACTOR

Platchkov, S. ; Amroun, A. ; Auffret, S. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 510 (1990) 740-758, 1990.
Inspire Record 292515 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.36877

We have measured the deuteron A ( Q 2 ) structure function in the momentum transfer region between 1 and 18 fm −2 . The accuracy of the data ranges from 2 to 6%. These measurements allow a sensitive test of theoretical predictions. We find that meson-exchange currents and relativistic corrections significantly improve the agreement between experiment and theory. We investigate the sensitivity of A ( Q 2 ) to the nucleon-nucleon interaction and to the neutron electric form factor G E n ( Q 2 ). Our analysis shows that G E n ( Q 2 ) can be extracted from these data with a significantly improved accuracy. The model dependence of this analysis is discussed.

4 data tables

Axis error includes +- 15/15 contribution.

Axis error includes +- 15/15 contribution.

Axis error includes +- 15/15 contribution.

More…

Magnetic Form Factor of the Deuteron

Auffret, S. ; Cavedon, J.M. ; Clemens, J.C. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 54 (1985) 649-652, 1985.
Inspire Record 214266 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20337

We have measured the deuteron magnetic form factor B(q2) for values of the momentum transfer squared between 7 and 28 fm−2. The data are compared with relativistic and nonrelativistic predictions including meson-exchange-current contributions. Significant disagreement is found for large momentum transfers.

2 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.


Backward electron-deuteron scattering below 280 mev

Ganichot, D. ; Grossetete, B. ; Isabelle, D.B. ;
Nucl.Phys.A 178 (1972) 545-562, 1972.
Inspire Record 75366 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.8775

We measured the elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons on deuterium at 180° for four incident energies (70, 140, 210 and 280 MeV). The data were analysed with a technique allowing an accurate comparison between experiment and theory. We observed a good agreement for the inelastic data with the expected cross section, using the presently available models and nucleon form factors. The experimental elastic cross section is systematically larger than the predicted cross sections.

16 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Deuteron Electromagnetic Form Factors for F-3-2 < q2 < F-6-2

Benaksas, D. ; Drickey, D. ; Frerejacque, D. ;
Phys.Rev. 148 (1966) 1327-1331, 1966.
Inspire Record 944953 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26653

Two groups of measurements have been made on the elastic scattering of electrons by deuterium; in each case we observed the recoil deuteron instead of the scattered electron. In the first case the spectrometer was set at 45° so that magnetic scattering was unimportant (about 10%) and we deduced the electric form factors of the deuteron. In the second case deuterons were observed at 0°, allowing us to measure directly the magnetic form factor of the deuteron. Form factors of the neutron were deduced from these measurements for the transfer values q2=3, 4, and 5 (F−2). Preliminary results were given in a first paper. Here we also include a description of the experimental setup and discuss relativistic and exchange-current corrections.

3 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.