A next-to-leading order QCD analysis of the spin structure function g1.

The Spin Muon collaboration Adeva, B. ; Akdogan, T. ; Arik, E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 58 (1998) 112002, 1998.
Inspire Record 471982 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.49415

We present a next-to-leading order QCD analysis of the presently available data on the spin structure function g1 including the final data from the Spin Muon Collaboration. We present results for the first moments of the proton, deuteron, and neutron structure functions, and determine singlet and nonsinglet parton distributions in two factorization schemes. We also test the Bjorken sum rule and find agreement with the theoretical prediction at the level of 10%.

7 data tables

The second systematic (DSYS) error is due to QCD evolution.

First moments of the fitted function G1 evaluated on unmeasured X regions. Total uncertainties due to experimental systematics and theoretical sourc es in the QCD evolution.

First moment of fitted G1 evaluated on the whole X region.

More…

Comparisons of Deep Inelastic e p and e n Cross-Sections

Bodek, A. ; Breidenbach, M. ; Dubin, D.L. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 30 (1973) 1087, 1973.
Inspire Record 83716 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.21415

Cross sections for inelastic scattering of electrons from hydrogen and deuterium were measured for incident energies from 4.5 to 18 GeV, at scattering angles of 18°, 26°, and 34°, and covering a range of squared four-momentum transfers up to 20 (GeVc)2. Neutron cross sections were extracted from the deuterium data using an impulse approximation. Comparisons with the proton measurements show significant differences between the neutron and proton cross sections.

1 data table

Axis error includes +- 1/1 contribution (DUE TO ERRORS IN ABOVE CORRECTIONSFOR DEAD-TIME LOSSES, INEFFICIENCIES IN E- IDENTIFICATION).


High-Energy Single-Arm Inelastic e - p and e - d Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees

Poucher, J.S. ; Breidenbach, Martin ; Ditzler, W.R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 32 (1974) 118, 1974.
Inspire Record 81157 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3374

Differential cross sections for electron scattering from hydrogen and deuterium in the deep-inelastic region show that the neutron cross section is significantly smaller than the proton cross section over a large part of the kinematic region studied. Although νW2d differs in magnitude from νW2p, it exhibits a similar scaling behavior.

3 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.


Experimental Studies of the Neutron and Proton Electromagnetic Structure Functions

Bodek, A. ; Breidenbach, Martin ; Dubin, D.L. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 20 (1979) 1471-1552, 1979.
Inspire Record 140185 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.4325

We have carried out an experimental study of the neutron and proton deep-inelastic electromagnetic structure functions. The structure functions were extracted from electron-proton and electron-deuteron differential cross sections measured in three experiments spanning the angles 6°, 10°, 15°, 18°, 19°, 26°, and 34°. We report primarily on the large-angle (15°-34°) measurements. Neutron cross sections were extracted from the deuteron data using an impulse approximation. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the nucleon is composed of pointlike constituents. The variation of the cross section with angle suggests that the hypothetical constituents have spin ½. The data for σnσp, the ratio of the neutron and proton differential cross sections, are in the range 0.25 to 1.0, and are within the limits imposed by the quark model. Detailed studies of the structure functions were made for a range of the scaling variable ω from ω=1.3 to ω=10.0, and for a range of invariant four-momentum transfer Q2 from 1.0 to 20.0 GeV2. These studies indicate that the structure functions approximately scale in the variable ω, although significant deviations from scaling in ω are apparent in the region 1.3<ω<3.3. These deviations from scaling are in the same direction and of similar magnitude for both neutron and proton. The interpretation of the data in terms of various theoretical models is discussed.

100 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…