K+ P --> K1(1280)+ P
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 2 of 2 results

Production Properties of Q Mesons in K+- p --> K+- pi+ pi- p at 13-GeV

Brandenburg, G.W. ; Carnegie, R.K. ; Cashmore, R.J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 36 (1976) 706, 1976.
Inspire Record 100755 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.21076

The momentum transfer (t′) dependence of the JP=1+K*π and ρK partial waves in the K±π+π− system is presented. The production of the Q1 meson (m∼1300 MeV), which has a large ρK decay mode, obeys approximate s-channel helicity conservation. In contrast the production of the Q2 meson (m∼1400 MeV), which decays predominantly to K*π, satisfies approximate t-channel helicity conservation. Furthermore the Q1 production distributions are virtually identical, whereas the Q2± distributions exhibit a distinct cross-over for |t′|∼0.18 GeV2.

1 data table
Table 1

No description provided.


Diffraction Dissociation, Resonances and Deck Mechanism in the $K \omega$ Systems of the Reactions $K^+^- p \to$ ($K^+^- \omega$) $p$

The Aachen-Berlin-CERN-London-Vienna & Birmingham-Brussels-CERN-Mons-Serpukhov collaborations Otter, G. ; Rudolph, G. ; Wieczorek, H. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 181 (1981) 1-21, 1981.
Inspire Record 153195 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.34348

A study is presented of the reactions K + p→(K + ω )p at 8.25 and 16 GeV/ c and K − p→(K − ω )p at 10 and 16 GeV/ c and comparison is made with K + results at 10 GeV/ c and K − at 7.3 GeV/ c . The (K + ω) and (K − ω) mass spectra both present a strong enhancement very near threshold, while a second peak at ∼1.7 GeV is evident only with incident K − at the lower energies. The threshold peak has very weak energy dependence and is mostly due to the 1 + S state which is produced conserving s -channel helicity. It is suggested that this is another decay mode of the resonance Q 1 (1290) known to decay mainly into Kϱ. The ratio of the Q 1 coupling constants to the Kω and Kϱ decay channels, R ω = g K ω 2 / g K ϱ 2 is determined to be 0.21±0.04. The enhancement at 1.7 GeV is predominantly, but not exclusively, due to the 2 − state. While the K + and K − induced reactions give basically similar results, small differences are observed that can be qualitatively explained in the framework of the Deck model.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.