Bogdanov, V.G.
NUCLEUS NUCLEUS --> SHOWER X
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 5 of 5 results

Local particle densities and global multiplicities in central heavy ion interactions at 3.7-A/GeV, 14.6-A/GeV, 60-A/GeV and 200-A/GeV

The EMU01 collaboration Adamovich, M.I. ; Aggarwal, M.M. ; Alexandrov, Y.A. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 56 (1992) 509-520, 1992.
Inspire Record 334794 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.9290

The energy and centrality dependence of local particle pseudorapidity densities as well as validity of various parametrizations of the distributions are examined. The dispersion, σ, of the rapidity density distribution of produced particles varies slowly with centrality and is 0.80, 0.98, 1.21 and 1.41 for central interactions at 3.7, 14.6, 60 and 200A GeV incident energy, respectively, σ is found to be independent of the size of the interacting system at fixed energy. A novel way of representing the window dependence of the multiplicity as normalized variance versus inverse average multiplicity is outlined.

4 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

NUCLEUS IS AGBR, CENTRAL EVENTS.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Rescattering probed by the emission of slow target associated particles in high-energy heavy ion interactions

The EMU01 collaboration Adamovich, M.I ; Aggarwal, M.M ; Alexandrov, Y.A ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 363 (1995) 230-236, 1995.
Inspire Record 406952 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.28438

In this letter the distribution of slow target associated particles emitted in Au + Emulsion interactions at 11.6 A GeV/ c is studied. The three models RQMD, FRITIOF and VENUS are used for comparisons and especially their treatment of rescattering is investigated.

6 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

PROJECTILE ASSOCIATED HE-FRAGMENTS.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

CENTRAL INTERACTIONS OF Ne-22 NUCLEI WITH HEAVY PHOTOEMULSION NUCLEI AT P(0) = 4.1/A-GeV/c

The Alma Ata-Bucharest-Gatchina:Dubna-Dushanbe-Yerevan-Zernograd- Kosice-Cracow-Leningrad-Moscow-Tashkent-Tbilisi-Ulan Bator collaboration Andreeva, N.P. ; Anzon, Z.V. ; Ameeva, B.U. ; et al.
JINR-P1-89-213, 1989.
Inspire Record 281512 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.38837

None

5 data tables
Table 1

NUCLEUS IS NUCLEAR PHOTOEMULSION. EVENT WITH A TOTAL CHARGE OF ALL SPECTATOR FRAGMENTS OF A PROJECTILE = 0.

Table 2

NUCLEUS IS NUCLEAR PHOTOEMULSION. EVENT WITH A TOTAL CHARGET OF ALL SPECTATOR FRAGMENTS OF A PROJECTILE = 1.

Table 3

NUCLEUS IS NUCLEAR PHOTOEMULSION.

More…

Multiplicities of secondaries in interactions of 1.8-GeV/nucleon Fe-56 nuclei with photoemulsion and the cascade evaporation model

Dudkin, V.E. ; Kovalev, E.E. ; Nefedov, N.A. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 509 (1990) 783-799, 1990.
Inspire Record 302290 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.36888

A nuclear photographic emulsion method was used to study the charge-state, ionization, and angular characteristics of secondaries produced in inelastic interactions of 56 Fe nuclei at 1.8 GeV/nucleon with H, CNO, and AgBr nuclei. The data obtained are compared with the results of calculations made in terms of the Dubna version of the cascade evaporation model (DCM). The DCM has been shown to satisfactorily describe most of the interaction characteristics for two nuclei in the studied reactions. At the same time, quantitative differences are observed in some cases.

16 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

NUCLECS IS CNO.

More…

Limiting Fragmentation in Oxygen Induced Emulsion Interactions at 14.6-a/{GeV}, 60-a/{GeV} and 200-a/{GeV}

The EMU01 collaboration Adamovich, M.I. ; Aggarwal, M.M. ; Arora, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 62 (1989) 2801, 1989.
Inspire Record 268021 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20041

Pseudorapidity distributions of relativistic singly charged particles in oxygen-induced emulsion interactions at 14.6, 60, and 200 GeV/nucleon are studied. Limiting fragmentation behavior is observed in both the target and projectile fragmentation regions for a central as well as for a minimum-bias sample. Comparisons with the fritiof model reveal that the picture of fragmenting strings successfully describes the observed data.

2 data tables
Table 1

NUCLEUS IS AVERAGE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.

Table 2

NUCLEUS IS AVERAGE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.