Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

$v_{2,2}^{unsub}$ and $v_{2,2}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.

$v_{3,3}^{unsub}$ and $v_{3,3}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.

$v_{4,4}^{unsub}$ and $v_{4,4}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.

The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.

The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.

The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.

The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.

The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.

The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.

The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.

The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.

The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.

The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.

The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.

The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.

$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.

$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.

$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.

$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.

$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.

$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.

The centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.

The centrality dependence of $v_{3}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.

The centrality dependence of $v_{4}$ as a function of $N_{ch}^{rec}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.

The centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.

The centrality dependence of $v_{3}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.

The centrality dependence of $v_{4}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$. Values from before and after the recoil subtraction are included.

The $v_{2}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ obtained indirectly by mapping from the $N_{ch}^{rec}-dependence of $v_{2}$ using the correlation data shown in Fig. 2(b).

The $v_{3}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ obtained indirectly by mapping from the $N_{ch}^{rec}-dependence of $v_{3}$ using the correlation data shown in Fig. 2(b).

The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC before recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}^{unsub}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic of 2PC after recoil subtraction, $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

The first-order harmonic $v_1$ obtained using factorization from $v_{1,1}$, as a function of $p_T^a$ for different $p_T^b$ ranges for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220.

$v_{2}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.

$v_{2}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.

$v_{3}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.

$v_{3}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.

$v_{4}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method.

$v_{4}$ for Pb+Pb collisions in 55-60% centrality interval obtained using an EP method, after the scaling.

Correlation between $E_{T}^{FCal}$ and $N_{ch}^{rec}$ for MB events (without weighting) and MB+HMT events (with weighting), errors are statistical.

The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of >80 GeV.

The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 25-40 GeV.

The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 40-55 GeV.

The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of 55-80 GeV.

The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in the event activity bin of >80 GeV.

The second-order harmonic, v2, integrated over pT and eta, calculated with two-particle cumulants as a function of Sum ET^Pb.

The second-order harmonic, v2, integrated over pT and eta, calculated with four-particle cumulants as a function of Sum ET^Pb.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 2 < pT(a) < 3 GeV and 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 3 < pT(a) < 4 GeV and 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 4 < pT(a) < 5 GeV and 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class, on the near-side, |Delta(phi)| < PI/3.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class, on the near-side, |Delta(phi)| < PI/3.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class, on the near-side, |Delta(phi)| < PI/3.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the near-side, |Delta(phi)| < PI/3.

Difference of the yield in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class from that in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the near-side, |Delta(phi)| < PI/3.

Difference of the yield in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class from that in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the near-side, |Delta(phi)| < PI/3.

Difference of the yield in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class from that in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the near-side, |Delta(phi)| < PI/3.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class, on the away-side, |Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class, on the away-side, |Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class, on the away-side, |Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3.

Integrated per-trigger yields, Yint, versus pT(a) for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4 GeV, in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the away-side, |Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3.

Difference of the yield in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class from that in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the away-side, |Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3.

Difference of the yield in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class from that in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the away-side, |Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3.

Difference of the yield in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class from that in the SUM(ET(PB)) < 20 GeV event class, on the away-side, |Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1.5 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of c3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

Integrated per-trigger yield, Yint, for 0.5 < pT(a,b) < 4 GeV, measured in intervals of SUM(ET(PB)), for the near-side (|Delta(phi)| < PI/3), away-side (|Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3) and the difference between them, DELTA(Yint).

Integrated per-trigger yield, Yint, for 1 < pT(a,b) < 4 GeV, measured in intervals of SUM(ET(PB)), for the near-side (|Delta(phi)| < PI/3), away-side (|Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3) and the difference between them, DELTA(Yint).

Integrated per-trigger yield, Yint, for 0.5 < pT(a,b) < 4 GeV, measured in intervals of Nch, where Nch represents the charged-particle multiplicity measured over |eta| < 2.5 with pT > 0.4 GeV, for the near-side (|Delta(phi)| < PI/3), away-side (|Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3) and the difference between them, DELTA(Yint).

Integrated per-trigger yield, Yint, for 1 < pT(a,b) < 4 GeV, measured in intervals of Nch, where Nch represents the charged-particle multiplicity measured over |eta| < 2.5 with pT > 0.4 GeV, for the near-side (|Delta(phi)| < PI/3), away-side (|Delta(phi)| > 2*PI/3) and the difference between them, DELTA(Yint).

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s2 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) > 80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 55-80 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 0.5 < pT(b) < 1, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 1 < pT(b) < 2, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

The pT(a) dependence of s3 for 2 < pT(b) < 4, in the SUM(ET(PB)) = 25-55 GeV event class.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 3 < pT(a) < 4 GeV and 0.3 < pT(b) < 0.5 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 3 < pT(a) < 4 GeV and 0.5 < pT(b) < 1 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 3 < pT(a) < 4 GeV and 1 < pT(b) < 2 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 3 < pT(a) < 4 GeV and 2 < pT(b) < 3 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 2 < pT(a) < 3 GeV and 0.3 < pT(b) < 0.5 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 2 < pT(a) < 3 GeV and 0.5 < pT(b) < 1 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 2 < pT(a) < 3 GeV and 1 < pT(b) < 2 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 2 < pT(a) < 3 GeV and 2 < pT(b) < 3 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 1 < pT(a) < 2 GeV and 0.3 < pT(b) < 0.5 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 1 < pT(a) < 2 GeV and 0.5 < pT(b) < 1 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 1 < pT(a) < 2 GeV and 1 < pT(b) < 2 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 0.5 < pT(a) < 1 GeV and 0.3 < pT(b) < 0.5 GeV.

Distribution of per-trigger yield, Y(DELTA(PHI)), in the peripheral and the central event activity classes and their differences, for 0.5 < pT(a) < 1 GeV and 0.5 < pT(b) < 1 GeV.