Showing 10 of 14 results
Event-by-event fluctuations of the mean transverse momentum of charged particles produced in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9, 2.76 and 7 TeV, and Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV are studied as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity using the ALICE detector at the LHC. Dynamical fluctuations indicative of correlated particle emission are observed in all systems. The results in pp collisions show little dependence on collision energy. The Monte Carlo event generators PYTHIA and PHOJET are in qualitative agreement with the data. Peripheral Pb-Pb data exhibit a similar multiplicity dependence as that observed in pp. In central Pb-Pb, the results deviate from this trend, featuring a significant reduction of the fluctuation strength. The results in Pb--Pb are in qualitative agreement with previous measurements in Au-Au at lower collision energies and with expectations from models that incorporate collective phenomena.
Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9 TeV.
Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.
Inclusive relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C}/M(p_{\rm T})$ as a function of $\sqrt{s}$ in pp collisions.
Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The elliptic flow coefficient ($v_{2}$) of identified particles in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{{NN}}} = 2.76$ TeV was measured with the ALICE detector at the LHC. The results were obtained with the Scalar Product method, a two-particle correlation technique, using a pseudo-rapidity gap of $|\Delta\eta| > 0.9$ between the identified hadron under study and the reference particles. The $v_2$ is reported for $\pi^{\pm}$, $\mathrm{K}^{\pm}$, $\mathrm{K}^0_\mathrm{S}$, p+$\overline{\mathrm{p}}$, $\mathrm{\phi}$, $\Lambda$+$\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda}}$, $\Xi^-$+$\overline{\Xi}^+$ and $\Omega^-$+$\overline{\Omega}^+$ in several collision centralities. In the low transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) region, $p_{\mathrm{T}} < 2 $GeV/$c$, $v_2(p_\mathrm{T})$ exhibits a particle mass dependence consistent with elliptic flow accompanied by the transverse radial expansion of the system with a common velocity field. The experimental data for $\pi^{\pm}$ and $\mathrm{K}$ are described fairly well by hydrodynamical calculations coupled to a hadronic cascade model (VISHNU) for central collisions. However, the same calculations fail to reproduce the $v_2(p_\mathrm{T})$ for p+$\overline{\mathrm{p}}$, $\mathrm{\phi}$, $\Lambda$+$\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda}}$ and $\Xi^-$+$\overline{\Xi}^+$. For transverse momentum values larger than about 3 GeV/$c$, particles tend to group according to their type, i.e. mesons and baryons. However, the experimental data at the LHC exhibit deviations from the number of constituent quark (NCQ) scaling at the level of $\pm$20$\%$ for $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 3 $GeV/$c$.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Charged kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
Charged kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
Charged kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Charged kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Charged kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Charged kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Charged kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
K0s v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
K0s v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
K0s v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
K0s v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
K0s v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
K0s v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
K0s v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Phi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Phi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Phi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Phi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Phi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Lambda+AntiLambda v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
Lambda+AntiLambda v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
Lambda+AntiLambda v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Lambda+AntiLambda v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Lambda+AntiLambda v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Lambda+AntiLambda v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Lambda+AntiLambda v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Xi+AntiXi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
Xi+AntiXi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
Xi+AntiXi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Xi+AntiXi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Xi+AntiXi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Xi+AntiXi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Xi+AntiXi v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Omega+AntiOmega v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
Omega+AntiOmega v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
Omega+AntiOmega v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
Omega+AntiOmega v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
Omega+AntiOmega v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
Omega+AntiOmega v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 50-60%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-40%.
Charged pions v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-60%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-40%.
Average kaons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-60%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-40%.
Protons+AntiProtons v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-60%.
ATLAS measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV are shown using a dataset of approximately 7 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ collected at the LHC in 2010. The measurements are performed for charged particles with transverse momenta $0.5<p_T<20$ GeV and in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|<2.5$. The anisotropy is characterized by the Fourier coefficients, $v_n$, of the charged-particle azimuthal angle distribution for n = 2-4. The Fourier coefficients are evaluated using multi-particle cumulants calculated with the generating function method. Results on the transverse momentum, pseudorapidity and centrality dependence of the $v_n$ coefficients are presented. The elliptic flow, $v_2$, is obtained from the two-, four-, six- and eight-particle cumulants while higher-order coefficients, $v_3$ and $v_4$, are determined with two- and four-particle cumulants. Flow harmonics $v_n$ measured with four-particle cumulants are significantly reduced compared to the measurement involving two-particle cumulants. A comparison to $v_n$ measurements obtained using different analysis methods and previously reported by the LHC experiments is also shown. Results of measurements of flow fluctuations evaluated with multi-particle cumulants are shown as a function of transverse momentum and the collision centrality. Models of the initial spatial geometry and its fluctuations fail to describe the flow fluctuations measurements.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-2%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-2%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-25%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-25%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-25%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-60%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-60%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-60%.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-25%.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-25%.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-2%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-2%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 60-80%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-60%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-60%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-60%.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-25%.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-25%.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The ratio of second flow harmonics measured with the six- and four-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The ratio of second flow harmonics measured with the eight- and four-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of <Npart>.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v2), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v3), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v4), as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of <Npart>.
The ratio of second flow harmonics measured with the six- and four-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The ratio of second flow harmonics measured with the eight- and four-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v2), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v3), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v4), as a function of <Npart>.
We report on two-particle charge-dependent correlations in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions as a function of the pseudorapidity and azimuthal angle difference, $\mathrm{\Delta}\eta$ and $\mathrm{\Delta}\varphi$ respectively. These correlations are studied using the balance function that probes the charge creation time and the development of collectivity in the produced system. The dependence of the balance function on the event multiplicity as well as on the trigger and associated particle transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 7$, 5.02, and 2.76 TeV, respectively, are presented. In the low transverse momentum region, for $0.2 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$, the balance function becomes narrower in both $\mathrm{\Delta}\eta$ and $\mathrm{\Delta}\varphi$ directions in all three systems for events with higher multiplicity. The experimental findings favor models that either incorporate some collective behavior (e.g. AMPT) or different mechanisms that lead to effects that resemble collective behavior (e.g. PYTHIA8 with color reconnection). For higher values of transverse momenta the balance function becomes even narrower but exhibits no multiplicity dependence, indicating that the observed narrowing with increasing multiplicity at low $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ is a feature of bulk particle production.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70_80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70_80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70_80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.
$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 60_80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 60_80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 50_60%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 50_60%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.
Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.
The elliptic, triangular, quadrangular and pentagonal anisotropic flow coefficients for $\pi^{\pm}$, $\mathrm{K}^{\pm}$ and p+$\overline{\mathrm{p}}$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{{NN}}} = 2.76$ TeV were measured with the ALICE detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The results were obtained with the Scalar Product method, correlating the identified hadrons with reference particles from a different pseudorapidity region. Effects not related to the common event symmetry planes (non-flow) were estimated using correlations in pp collisions and were subtracted from the measurement. The obtained flow coefficients exhibit a clear mass ordering for transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) values below $\approx$ 3 GeV/$c$. In the intermediate $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ region ($3 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 6$ GeV/$c$), particles group at an approximate level according to the number of constituent quarks, suggesting that coalescence might be the relevant particle production mechanism in this region. The results for $p_{\mathrm{T}} < 3$ GeV/$c$ are described fairly well by a hydrodynamical model (iEBE-VISHNU) that uses initial conditions generated by A Multi-Phase Transport model (AMPT) and describes the expansion of the fireball using a value of 0.08 for the ratio of shear viscosity to entropy density ($\eta/s$), coupled to a hadronic cascade model (UrQMD). Finally, expectations from AMPT alone fail to quantitatively describe the measurements for all harmonics throughout the measured transverse momentum region. However, the comparison to the AMPT model highlights the importance of the late hadronic rescattering stage to the development of the observed mass ordering at low values of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and of coalescence as a particle production mechanism for the particle type grouping at intermediate values of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for all harmonics.
pion <uQ>2 as a function of pT in pp collision.
kaon <uQ>2 as a function of pT in pp collision.
proton <uQ>2 as a function of pT in pp collision.
pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT in pp collision.
kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT in pp collision.
proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT in pp collision.
pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT in pp collision.
kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT in pp collision.
proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT in pp collision.
pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT in pp collision.
kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT in pp collision.
proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT in pp collision.
pion <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton <uQ>2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton <uQ>3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton <uQ>4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton <uQ>5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton v2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton v3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton v4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton v5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton delta2 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton delta3 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton delta4 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
pion delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
kaon delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-1%.
proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 0-5%.
proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 5-10%.
proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 10-20%.
proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 20-30%.
proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 30-40%.
proton delta5 as a function of pT for centrality: 40-50%.
pion Integrated v2 as a function of centrality percentile:.
kaon Integrated v2 as a function of centrality percentile:.
proton Integrated v2 as a function of centrality percentile:.
pion Integrated v3 as a function of centrality percentile:.
kaon Integrated v3 as a function of centrality percentile:.
proton Integrated v3 as a function of centrality percentile:.
pion Integrated v4 as a function of centrality percentile:.
kaon Integrated v4 as a function of centrality percentile:.
proton Integrated v4 as a function of centrality percentile:.
pion Integrated v5 as a function of centrality percentile:.
kaon Integrated v5 as a function of centrality percentile:.
proton Integrated v5 as a function of centrality percentile:.
Measurements of anisotropic flow coefficients with two- and multi-particle cumulants for inclusive charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{\textit s}_\text{NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV are reported in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 0.8$ and transverse momentum $0.2 < p_\text{T} < 50$ GeV/$c$. The full data sample collected by the ALICE detector in 2015 (2010), corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 12.7 (2.0) $\mu$b$^{-1}$ in the centrality range 0-80%, is analysed. Flow coefficients up to the sixth flow harmonic ($v_6$) are reported and a detailed comparison among results at the two energies is carried out. The $p_\text{T}$ dependence of anisotropic flow coefficients and its evolution with respect to centrality and harmonic number $n$ are investigated. An approximate power-law scaling of the form $v_n(p_\text{T}) \sim p_\text{T}^{n/3}$ is observed for all flow harmonics at low $p_\text{T}$ ($0.2 < p_\text{T} < 3$ GeV/$c$). At the same time, the ratios $v_n/v_m^{n/m}$ are observed to be essentially independent of $p_\text{T}$ for most centralities up to about $p_\text{T} = 10$ GeV/$c$. Analysing the differences among higher-order cumulants of elliptic flow ($v_2$), which have different sensitivities to flow fluctuations, a measurement of the standardised skewness of the event-by-event $v_2$ distribution $P(v_2)$ is reported and constraints on its higher moments are provided. The Elliptic Power distribution is used to parametrise $P(v_2)$, extracting its parameters from fits to cumulants. The measurements are compared to different model predictions in order to discriminate among initial-state models and to constrain the temperature dependence of the shear viscosity to entropy-density ratio.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_6\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ as a function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.
ratio of $v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.
ratio of $v_2\{4\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.
ratio of $v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.
ratio of $v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and 2.76 TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_6\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_6\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_6\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_6\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_6\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_6\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_5\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
ratio of $v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 1.\}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ and 2.76 TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}_{\text{ratio to 20-30}\%}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/3}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_4\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{4/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-20$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-30$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-40$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-50$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-60$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_3\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta\eta| > 2.\}^{3/2}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 60-70$\%$ as a function of $p_\text{T}$.
$v_2\{2\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{6\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{8\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{2\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{6\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{8\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{2\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{6\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{8\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{2\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{6\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$c_2\{8\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{4\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$(v_2\{4\}-v_2\{6\})/11$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$v_2\{6\}-v_2\{8\}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
$\gamma_{1}^{exp}$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
Elliptic Power parameter $k_2$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
Elliptic Power parameter $\alpha$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
Elliptic Power parameter $\varepsilon_0$ for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV as a function of centrality.
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 5-10$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 25-30$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 45-50$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 0-5$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 10-15$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 15-20$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 20-25$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 30-35$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 35-40$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 40-45$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 50-55$\%$
Elliptic Power distribution P(v2), rescaled by <v2>, for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and centrality 55-60$\%$
Multi-particle cumulants and corresponding Fourier harmonics are measured for azimuthal angle distributions of charged particles in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 and 13 TeV and in $p$+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, and compared to the results obtained for low-multiplicity Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV. These measurements aim to assess the collective nature of particle production. The measurements of multi-particle cumulants confirm the evidence for collective phenomena in $p$+Pb and low-multiplicity Pb+Pb collisions. On the other hand, the $pp$ results for four-particle cumulants do not demonstrate collective behaviour, indicating that they may be biased by contributions from non-flow correlations. A comparison of multi-particle cumulants and derived Fourier harmonics across different collision systems is presented as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity. For a given multiplicity, the measured Fourier harmonics are largest in Pb+Pb, smaller in $p$+Pb and smallest in $pp$ collisions. The $pp$ results show no dependence on the collision energy, nor on the multiplicity.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $N_{ch}(p_T < 0.4 GeV)$ (EvSel_$N_{ch}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$=2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ ratio for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$c_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ cumulants for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_3\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.3 $< p_T <$ 3.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$= 13 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2\}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for pPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 5.02 TeV.
$v_4\{2, | \Delta \eta > 2 \}$ harmonics for reference particles with 0.5 $< p_T <$ 5.0 GeV selected according to $M_{ref}$ (EvSel_$M_{ref}$) for PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{ s_{NN} }$= 2.76 TeV.
$ v_2\{4\} $ harmonics for reference particles with 0.2 $ < p_{T} < $ 3.0 GeV as a function of $ < N_{ch}(|\eta|<1) > $ for p+Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{ s_{NN} } $= 5.02 TeV.
$ v_2\{4\} $ harmonics for reference particles with 0.2 $ < p_{T}< $ 3.0 GeV as a function of $ < N_{ch}(|\eta|<1) > $ for Pb+Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{ s_{NN} } $= 2.76 TeV.
The second- and third-order azimuthal anisotropy Fourier harmonics of charged particles produced in pPb collisions, at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 8.16 TeV, are studied over a wide range of event multiplicities. Multiparticle correlations are used to isolate global properties stemming from the collision overlap geometry. The second-order "elliptic" harmonic moment is obtained with high precision through four-, six-, and eight-particle correlations and, for the first time, the third-order "triangular" harmonic moment is studied using four-particle correlations. A sample of peripheral PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV that covers a similar range of event multiplicities as the pPb results is also analyzed. Model calculations of initial-state fluctuations in pPb and PbPb collisions can be directly compared to the high precision experimental results. This work provides new insight into the fluctuation-driven origin of the $v_3$ coefficients in pPb and PbPb collisions, and into the dominating overall collision geometry in PbPb collisions at the earliest stages of heavy ion interactions.
$v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_3\{4\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
$v_3\{4\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_3\{4\}/v_3\{2\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
$v_3\{4\}/v_3\{2\}$ as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
$v_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 8.16$ TeV.
The second and the third order anisotropic flow, $V_{2}$ and $V_3$, are mostly determined by the corresponding initial spatial anisotropy coefficients, $\varepsilon_{2}$ and $\varepsilon_{3}$, in the initial density distribution. In addition to their dependence on the same order initial anisotropy coefficient, higher order anisotropic flow, $V_n$ ($n > 3$), can also have a significant contribution from lower order initial anisotropy coefficients, which leads to mode-coupling effects. In this Letter we investigate the linear and non-linear modes in higher order anisotropic flow $V_n$ for $n=4$, $5$, $6$ with the ALICE detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurements are done for particles in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 0.8$ and the transverse momentum range $0.2 < p_{\rm T} < 5.0$ GeV/$c$ as a function of collision centrality. The results are compared with theoretical calculations and provide important constraints on the initial conditions, including initial spatial geometry and its fluctuations, as well as the ratio of the shear viscosity to entropy density of the produced system.
Study of relationship between linear and non-linear modes in higher order anisotropic flow in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Study of relationship between linear and non-linear modes in higher order anisotropic flow in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Study of relationship between linear and non-linear modes in higher order anisotropic flow in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Study of relationship between linear and non-linear modes in higher order anisotropic flow in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of v4 (left), v5 (middle) and v6 (right) in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. Contributions from linear and non-linear modes are presented with open and solid markers, respectively.
Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Centrality dependence of rho_mn in Pb–Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Measurements of anisotropic flow coefficients ($v_n$) and their cross-correlations using two- and multi-particle cumulant methods are reported in collisions of pp at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, p-Pb at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV, Xe-Xe at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}} = 5.44$ TeV, and Pb-Pb at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV recorded with the ALICE detector. The multiplicity dependence of $v_n$ is studied in a very wide range from 20 to 3000 particles produced in the mid-rapidity region $|\eta|<0.8$ for the transverse momentum range $0.2 < p_{\rm T} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. An ordering of the coefficients $v_2 > v_3 > v_4$ is found in pp and p-Pb collisions, similar to that seen in large collision systems, while a weak $v_2$ multiplicity dependence is observed relative to nucleus-nucleus collisions in the same multiplicity range. Using a novel subevent method, $v_{2}$ measured with four-particle cumulants is found to be compatible with that from six-particle cumulants in pp and p-Pb collisions. The magnitude of the correlation between $v_n^2$ and $v_m^2$, evaluated with the symmetric cumulants SC$(m,n)$ is observed to be positive at all multiplicities for $v_2$ and $v_4$, while for $v_2$ and $v_3$ it is negative and changes sign for multiplicities below 100, which may indicate a different $v_n$ fluctuation pattern in this multiplicity range. The observed long-range multi-particle azimuthal correlations in high multiplicity pp and p-Pb collisions can neither be described by PYTHIA 8 nor by IP-Glasma+MUSIC+UrQMD model calculations, and hence provide new insights into the understanding of collective effects in small collision systems.
$v_2\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.4$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
$v_3\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
$v_4\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ with 3-subevent method in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_4\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_3\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV.
$v_2\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.4$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_3\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_4\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ with 3-subevent method in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_4\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_3\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.4$ in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
$v_3\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
$v_4\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ with 3-subevent method in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_4\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_3\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44$ TeV.
$v_2\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.4$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_3\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_4\{2\}$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{4\}$ with 3-subevent method in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{6\}$ with 2-subevent method in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
$v_2\{8\}$ with 2-subevent method in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(4,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_4\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
SC$(3,2)$ with 3-subevent method divided with $\langle v_3\{2\}^2\rangle\langle v_2\{2\}^2\rangle$ with $|\Delta \eta| > 1.0$ and 1.4 in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.