Sample correlations in $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78) for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$ and reflected in the plot.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\eta$ ($|\Delta\phi|<$ 0.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\eta$.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu and 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu, 0-12% Au+Au and 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The jet-like yield in $\mid\Delta\eta\mid<$0.78 as a function of $p_T^{trigger}$ for $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in minimum bias $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Statistical errors listed in table. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

The jet-like yield in $\mid\Delta\eta\mid<$0.78 as a function of $p_T^{trigger}$ for $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in 0-60% Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Statistical errors listed in table. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

The jet-like yield in $\mid\Delta\eta\mid<$0.78 as a function of $p_T^{trigger}$ for $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Statistical errors listed in table. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

The jet-like yield in $\mid\Delta\eta\mid<$0.78 as a function of $p_T^{trigger}$ for $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in 0-12% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Statistical errors listed in table. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

Centrality dependence of the jet-like yield of $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 3 < $p_T^{trigger}$ < 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

Centrality dependence of the jet-like yield of $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 3 < $p_T^{trigger}$ < 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

Centrality dependence of the jet-like yield of $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 3 < $p_T^{trigger}$ < 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

Centrality dependence of the jet-like yield of $K_S^0$-h and $\Lambda$-h correlations for 3 < $p_T^{trigger}$ < 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ < $p_T^{associated}$ < $p_T^{trigger}$ in minimum bias $d$+Au and 0-60% central Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5.4% systematic error on all points.

The dihadron correlated yield normalized per radian per unit of pseudorapidity as function of $\Delta\eta$ in d+Au collisions on the away side (|$\Delta\phi$ - $\pi$| < $\pi$/3). Shown is the high FTPC-Au activity data. Trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c and |$\eta$| < 1.

The dihadron correlated yield normalized per radian per unit of pseudorapidity as function of $\Delta\eta$ in d+Au collisions on the away side (|$\Delta\phi$ - $\pi$| < $\pi$/3). Shown is the high-activity data after subtracting the unscaled low-activity data. Trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c and |$\eta$| < 1.

The dihadron correlated yield normalized per radian per unit of pseudorapidity as function of $\Delta\eta$ in d+Au collisions on the away side (|$\Delta\phi$ - $\pi$| < $\pi$/3). Shown is the high-activity data after subtracting the unscaled low-activity data. Trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c and |$\eta$| < 1.

The dihadron correlated yield normalized per radian per unit of pseudorapidity as function of $\Delta\eta$ in d+Au collisions on the near (|$\Delta\phi$| < $\pi$/3) side. Shown is the high-activity data after subtracting the unscaled low-activity data. Trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c and |$\eta$| < 1.

The dihadron correlated yield normalized per radian per unit of pseudorapidity as function of $\Delta\eta$ in d+Au collisions on the near (|$\Delta\phi$| < $\pi$/3, solid circles) and away side (|$\Delta\phi$ - $\pi$| < $\pi$/3, open circles). Shown are the (a) low and (b) high FTPC-Au activity data, and the high-activity data after subtracting the (c) unscaled. Trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c and |$\eta$| < 1.

(a) The near-side jetlike correlated yield obtained from Gaussian fit as in Fig. 1 as function of the uncorrected dN/d$\eta$ at midrapidity measured in the TPC. Two event selections are used: FTPC-Au multiplicity and ZDC-Au energy. The curve is the result from a HIJING calculation.

(a) The near-side jetlike correlated yield obtained from Gaussian fit as in Fig. 1 as function of the uncorrected dN/d$\eta$ at midrapidity measured in the TPC. Two event selections are used: FTPC-Au multiplicity and ZDC-Au energy. The curve is the result from a HIJING calculation.

$p_T^{(a)}$ dependence. The ratio of the correlated yields in high over low FTPC-Au multiplicity events as a function of $p_T^{(a)}$ $p_T^{(t)}$ where $p_T^{(a)}$ $p_T^{(t)}$ is fixed.

$p_T^{(a)}$ dependence. The ratio of the correlated yields in high over low FTPC-Au multiplicity events as a function of $p_T^{(a)}$ $p_T^{(t)}$ where $p_T^{(a)}$ $p_T^{(t)}$ is fixed.

(a) The dihadron correlated yield normalized per radian per unit of pseudorapidity as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in d+Au collisions at high (0-20%) FTPC-Au multiplicities. Trigger and associated particles are 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c within 0.5 < |$\Delta\eta$| < 0.7. ZYAM positions are indicated with arrows.

(a) The dihadron correlated yield normalized per radian per unit of pseudorapidity as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in d+Au collisions at low (40-100%) FTPC-Au multiplicities. Trigger and associated particles are 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c within 0.5 < |$\Delta\eta$| < 0.7. ZYAM positions are indicated with arrows.multiplicity versus $\Delta\phi$.

The raw associated yield at high FTPC-Au multiplicity minus the unscaled ZYAM-subtracted correlated yields at low FTPC-Au multiplicity versus $\Delta\phi$.

The raw associated yield at high FTPC-Au multiplicity minus the scaled ZYAM-subtracted correlated yields at low FTPC-Au multiplicity versus $\Delta\phi$.

Correlated dihadron yield, per radian per unit of pseudorapidity, as a function of $\Delta\phi$ for -4.5 < $\Delta\eta$ < -2 in d+Au collisions, for high ZDC-Au activity data. Both the trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c.

Correlated dihadron yield, per radian per unit of pseudorapidity, as a function of $\Delta\phi$ for 2 < $\Delta\eta$ < 4.5 in d+Au collisions, for low ZDC-Au activity data. Both the trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c.

Correlated dihadron yield, per radian per unit of pseudorapidity, as a function of $\Delta\phi$ for 2 < $\Delta\eta$ < 4.5 in d+Au collisions, for high ZDC-Au activity data. Both the trigger and associated particles have 1 < $p_T$ < 3 GeV/c.

The $\Delta\eta$ dependence of the near-side (|$\Delta\phi$| < $\pi/3$) correlated yield. Positive(negative) $\eta$ corresponds to d(Au)-going direction. Only high ZDC-Au activity data are shown.

The $\Delta\eta$ dependence of the away-side (|$\Delta\phi - \pi$| < $\pi/3$) correlated yield. Positive(negative) $\eta$ corresponds to d(Au)-going direction. Only high ZDC-Au activity data are shown.

The $\Delta\eta$ dependence of the ratio of the near- to away-side correlated yields in d+Au collisions. Positive(negative) $\eta$ corresponds to d(Au)-going direction. Only high ZDC-Au activity data are shown.

The $\Delta\eta$ dependence of the second harmonic Fourier coefficient, V2, in low ZDC-Au activity d+Au collisions.

The $\Delta\eta$ dependence of the second harmonic Fourier coefficient, V2, in high ZDC-Au activity d+Au collisions.

Fourier coefficient V1 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by FTPC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from TPC. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V1. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V1 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from FTPC-Au. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V1. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V1 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from FTPC-d. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V1. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V1 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from TPC. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V1. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V2 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by FTPC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from TPC. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V2. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V2 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from FTPC-Au. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V2. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V2 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from FTPC-d. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V2. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V2 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from TPC. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be 10% on V2. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V3 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selections is by FTPC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from TPC. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be smaller than statistical errors for V3. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V3 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from FTPC-Au. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be smaller than statistical errors for V3. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V3 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from FTPC-d. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be smaller than statistical errors for V3. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Fourier coefficient V3 versus the measured mid-rapidity charged particle $dN_{ch}/d\eta$. Event activity selection is by ZDC-Au. Trigger particles are from TPC, and associated particles from TPC. Systematic uncertainties are estimated to be smaller than statistical errors for V3. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors.

Differential cross-section D(SIG)/DETARAP(JET) for photons in the given X(GAMMA) range accompanied by a jet. The corresponding hadronisation corrections are also given.

Differential cross-section D(SIG)/DXOBS(P) for photons in the given X(GAMMA) range accompanied by a jet. The corresponding hadronisation corrections are also given.

Differential cross-section D(SIG)/D(ETARAP(GAMMA) - ETARAP(JET)) for photons in the given X(GAMMA) range accompanied by a jet. The corresponding hadronisation corrections are also given.

Differential cross-section D(SIG)/DDELTA(PHI) for photons in the given X(GAMMA) range accompanied by a jet. The corresponding hadronisation corrections are also given.

Per trigger normalized yields of charged jets in the recoil region associated to a trigger hadron with pT (20,50) GeV/c in pp at 2.76 TeV calculated by PYTHIA Perugia 10 . Recoil jets were reconstructed using the anti-kt algorithm with R=0.4 and track constituent cutoff pT>150 MeV/c. Jet pT was corrected for the underlying event activity using background density estimated in cones that were perpendicular in azimuth w.r.t. leading jet axis. Statistical errors are given only.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {20,50} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.2 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {20,50} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.2 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Raw ratio of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {20,50} relative to the same quantity for a hadron trigger bin of {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.2 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {20,50} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Raw ratio of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {20,50} relative to the same quantity for a hadron trigger bin of {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {20,50} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.5 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Per trigger normalized raw recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of [20,50] GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.5 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Raw ratio of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in hadron trigger bin of {20,50} relative to the same quantity for a hadron trigger bin of {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at.

Raw difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.2 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Raw difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.2 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Raw difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Raw difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Raw difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at.

Raw difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.5 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Azimuthal correlation between a trigger hadron (TT[8,9]) and recoil jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}=2.76$ TeV.

Azimuthal correlation between a trigger hadron (TT[20,50]) and recoil jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of azimuthal correlations between a trigger hadron (TT[20,50]-[8,9]) and recoil jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Integrated yield for jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) recoiling from a trigger hadron (TT[8,9]) above a certain threshold of the relative azimuthal angle in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Integrated yield for jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) recoiling from a trigger hadron (TT[20,50]) above a certain threshold of the relative azimuthal angle in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of the integrated yield for jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) recoiling from a trigger hadron (TT[20,50]-[8,9]) above a certain threshold of the relative azimuthal angle in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of per trigger normalized yields of charged jets in the recoil region associated to a trigger hadron with pT (20,50) GeV and (8,9) GeV. Recoil jets were reconstructed with antikt algorithm with R=0.5 and track constituent pT>150 MeV/c.

Ratio of Delta_{recoil} distributions corresponding to recoil jets with R=0.2 and R=0.5.

Difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron and with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron using Anti-kT algorithm with R=0.5 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV divided by the same quantity calculated with Pythia Perugia Tune 10. The recoil jet yield are measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron using Anti-kT algorithm with R=0.2 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The data 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV divided by the same quantity calculated with Pythia Perugia Tune 10. The recoil jet yield are measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron using Anti-kT algorithm with R=0.4 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The data 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV divided by the same quantity calculated with Pythia Perugia Tune 10. The recoil jet yield is measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron usign Anti-kT algorithm with R=0.5 and with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The measurement is performed in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV measured with jet resolution R=0.2 divided by the same quantity measured with jet resolution R=0.4. The recoil jet yield are measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron using Anti-kT algorithm with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The data 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of the per trigger normalized recoil jet yield in two exclusive hadron trigger bins of {20,50} and {8,9} GeV measured with jet resolution R=0.2 divided by the same quantity measured with jet resolution R=0.5. The recoil jet yield are measured at delta phi=pi \pm 0.6 with respect to the trigger hadron using Anti-kT algorithm with minimum constituent cutoff of 0.15 GeV. The data 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Difference of azimuthal correlations between a trigger hadron (TT[20,50]-[8,9]) and recoil jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) in PYTHIA events embedded into 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Ratio of the difference of the integrated yield for jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) recoiling from a trigger hadron (TT[20,50]-[8,9]) above a certain threshold of the relative azimuthal angle in Pb-Pb data to that in PYTHIA events embedded into 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Ratio of the difference of the integrated yield for jets ($R$ = 0.4, 40 < $p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch}$ < 60 GeV/$c$) recoiling from a trigger hadron (TT[20,50]-[8,9]) above a certain threshold of the relative azimuthal angle in Pb-Pb data to that in PYTHIA events embedded into 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.042 GeV**2 and W = 2.63 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.320 GeV**2 and W = 2.70 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 1.785 GeV**2 and W = 2.21 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.050 GeV**2 and W = 2.33 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.47 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.639 GeV**2 and W = 2.58 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.914 GeV**2 and W = 2.62 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.050 GeV**2 and W = 2.09 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.21 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.650 GeV**2 and W = 2.32 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.950 GeV**2 and W = 2.43 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.295 GeV**2 and W = 2.51 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.055 GeV**2 and W = 1.90 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.00 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.650 GeV**2 and W = 2.10 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.950 GeV**2 and W = 2.19 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.31 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.807 GeV**2 and W = 2.41 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.371 GeV**2 and W = 1.85 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.651 GeV**2 and W = 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.950 GeV**2 and W = 1.99 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.09 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.850 GeV**2 and W = 2.21 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 4.307 GeV**2 and W = 2.30 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 2.968 GeV**2 and W = 1.85 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.357 GeV**2 and W = 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.850 GeV**2 and W = 2.01 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 4.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.11 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 4.765 GeV**2 and W = 2.16 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 3.882 GeV**2 and W = 1.86 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 4.352 GeV**2 and W = 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 4.850 GeV**2 and W = 2.00 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 1.725 GeV**2 and W = 2.77 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 1.752 GeV**2 and W = 2.48 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.042 GeV**2 and W = 2.63 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.320 GeV**2 and W = 2.70 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 1.785 GeV**2 and W = 2.21 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.050 GeV**2 and W = 2.33 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.47 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.639 GeV**2 and W = 2.58 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.914 GeV**2 and W = 2.62 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.050 GeV**2 and W = 2.09 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.21 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.650 GeV**2 and W = 2.32 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.950 GeV**2 and W = 2.43 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.295 GeV**2 and W = 2.51 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.055 GeV**2 and W = 1.90 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.00 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.650 GeV**2 and W = 2.10 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.950 GeV**2 and W = 2.19 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.31 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.807 GeV**2 and W = 2.41 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.371 GeV**2 and W = 1.85 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.651 GeV**2 and W = 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.950 GeV**2 and W = 1.99 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.09 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.850 GeV**2 and W = 2.21 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 4.307 GeV**2 and W = 2.30 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 2.968 GeV**2 and W = 1.85 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.357 GeV**2 and W = 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.850 GeV**2 and W = 2.01 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 4.350 GeV**2 and W = 2.11 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 4.765 GeV**2 and W = 2.16 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 3.882 GeV**2 and W = 1.86 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 4.352 GeV**2 and W = 1.91 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DPHI for Q**2 = 4.850 GeV**2 and W = 2.00 GeV.

Spin density matrix elements R^04_0 and R^04_1-1 from the 1D projection method.

Spin density matrix element R^04_00 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element RE(R^04_10) using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element R^04_1-1 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element R^01_00 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element R^01_11 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element RE(R^01_10) using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element R^01_1-1 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element IM(R^02_10) using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element IM(R^02_1-1) using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element R^05_00 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element R^05_11 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element RE(R^05_10) using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element R^05_1-1 using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element IM(R^06_10) using the moments method.

Spin density matrix element IM(R^06_1-1) using the moments method.