Di Liberto, S.
WA78
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 3 of 3 results

Experimental Study of $B \bar{B}$ Production in $\pi^-$ U Interactions at 320-{GeV} Energy

The WA78 collaboration Catanesi, M.G. ; Muciaccia, M.T. ; Natali, S. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 202 (1988) 453-457, 1988.
Inspire Record 252002 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.49588

A sample of 29 gu + υ + 35 υ − υ − coming from B B decay have been observed in π -U interactions at 320 GeV energy. The experimental distributions and the total cross section are found to be in good agreement with QCD predictions. The effect of B 0 B 0 mixing is discussed.

2 data tables
Table 1

BEAUTY INCLUSIVE SPECTRA WAS ASSUMED MN FORM : E*D(SIG)/D(X)/D(PT**2) = EXP(-0.9*PT**2)*(1-ABS(X))**A. THE BEST FIT FOR A IS A = 2.5.

Table 2

No description provided.


A-dependence of the Charm Production Cross-section in 320-{GeV}/$c \pi^-$ Interactions

The WA78 collaboration Cobbaert, H. ; Roosen, R. ; Catanesi, M.G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 191 (1987) 456-461, 1987.
Inspire Record 236083 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30162

Using a 320 GeV c π − beam incident on three different target materials Al, Fe, and U, the A -dependence of charm production is studied by measuring the yield of prompt single muons. Parametrizing the charm cross section as σ cc ( π − A) = σ 0 Aα the measured α values are α ( μ + ) = 0.76 ± 0.08 and α ( μ − ) = 0.83 ± 0.06.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

Numbers of events per 10**6 incident PI-.


The Production of Beauty Particles in $\pi^-$ U Interactions at 320-{GeV} Energy

The WA78 collaboration Catanesi, M.G. ; Muciaccia, M.T. ; Natali, S. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 187 (1987) 431-436, 1987.
Inspire Record 235069 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6522

B B production in π − -uranium interactions has been observed at 320 GeV beam energy looking at events with three muons in the final state. The cross section is found to be σ B B = 4.5±1.4±1.4 nb per nucleon (for a linear A -dependence) or σ B B = 17.6±5.5±5.5 nb per nucleon (assuming A 0.75 dependence). An estimate of x F distribution is given.

3 data tables
Table 1

BEAUTY INCLUSIVE SPECTRA WAS ASSUMED TO BE E*D(SIG)/D(X)/D(PT**2) = EXP(-0.9*PT**2)*(1-ABS(X))**A. THE BEST FIT FOR A IS A = 2.5.

Table 2

ASSUME A**.75 DEPENDENCE.

Table 3

No description provided.