Invariant differential cross section of ETA produced in inelastic pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV, the uncertainty of $\sigma_\mbox{MB}$ of 2.6% is not included in the systematic error.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive ETA to PI0 production in inelastic p-Pb collisions at a centre-of-mass energy per nucleon of 8.16 TeV.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive ETA to PI0 production in inelastic pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV.

The nuclear modification factor RPPB of PI0 as a function of pT in inelastic p-Pb collisions at a centre-of-mass energy per nucleon of 8.16 TeV, the overall normalization uncertainty of 3.4 % is not included.

The nuclear modification factor RPPB of ETA as a function of pT in inelastic p-Pb collisions at a centre-of-mass energy per nucleon of 8.16 TeV, the overall normalization uncertainty of 3.4 % is not included.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Single-differential production cross-sections for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainties are statistical, the second are correlated systematic uncertainties shared between intervals, and the last are uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Fraction of nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons (in \%) in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for prompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 8 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $p_\text{T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 5 TeV measurements for nonprompt $J/\psi$ mesons as a function of $y$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-0.2$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=-1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Relative changes of cross-sections (in \%), for a polarisation of $\lambda_{\theta}=+1$ rather than zero, in ($p_\text{T},y$) intervals.

Measured diferential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the lepton from the W decay.

Measured diferential cross sections ratio $R=\sigma(W^+ + \overline{c}) / \sigma(W^- + c)$ as a function of the absolute value of the pseudorapidity of the lepton from the W decay.

Measured diferential cross sections ratio $R=\sigma(W^+ + \overline{c}) / \sigma(W^- + c)$ as a function of the transverse momentum of the lepton from the W decay.

The ratios of the $Wj$, $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ cross-sections to the $Z^0 j$ cross-section, and the ratio of the $W^+j$ to $W^-j$ cross-sections.

The asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production, given by $A(Wj)\equiv (\sigma_{W^+j}-\sigma_{W^-j})/(\sigma_{W^+j}+\sigma_{W^-j})$.

The asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production, given by $A(Wj)\equiv (\sigma_{W^+j}-\sigma_{W^-j})/(\sigma_{W^+j}+\sigma_{W^-j})$.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\mu}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\mu}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in five bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in five bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in four bins of $y^Z$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in four bins of $y^Z$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in bins of $|\Delta\phi|$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in bins of $|\Delta\phi|$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 4 as a function of $y^Z$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 4 as a function of $y^Z$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 as a function of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 as a function of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 6 as a function of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 6 as a function of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 7 as a function of $|\Delta\phi|$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 7 as a function of $|\Delta\phi|$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta\mu$. The first four rows/columns correspond to the $W^+j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta\mu$ and the second four rows/columns correspond to the $W^-j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta\mu$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratio and asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production as a function of $\eta\mu$.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^\mu$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratio and asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production as a function of $\eta^\mu$.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$, $W^-j$ and $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Tables 2 and 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The first four rows/columns correspond to the $W^+j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, the middle four correspond to the $W^-j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$ and the final four correspond to the $Zj$ cross-section in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratios of $Wj$ to $Zj$ production and the charge ratio and asymmetry of $Wj$ production in the total fiducial region.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$, $W^-j$ and $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Tables 2 and 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratios of $Wj$ to $Z^0 j$ production and the charge ratio and asymmetry of $Wj$ production in the total fiducial region.

Differential cross section dsigma(Z+c)/dpTZ times branching ratio and differential cross sections ratio dsigma(Z+c)/dpTZ / dsigma(Z+b)/dpTZ for three ranges of the transverse momentum of the Z boson and combining the dielectron and dimuon Z0 decay channels

Differential cross section dsigma(Z+c)/dpTjet times branching ratio and differential cross sections ratio dsigma(Z+c)/dpTZ / dsigma(Z+b)/dpTjet for three ranges of the transverse momentum of the jet and combining the dielectron and dimuon Z0 decay channels

Transverse momentum distribution of the selected muon-inside-a-jet for events with an identified muon among the jet constituents in the dielectron channel

Transverse momentum distribution of the selected muon-inside-a-jet for events with an identified muon among the jet constituents in the dimuon channel

The invariant mass distribution of three-prong secondary vertices for events selected in the D± mode, in the dielectron channel

The invariant mass distribution of three-prong secondary vertices for events selected in the D ± mode, in the dimuon channel

The invariant mass distribution of the three-track system composed of a two-prong secondary vertex and a primary particle for events selected in the D∗(2010)± mode, in the dielectron channel

The invariant mass distribution of the three-track system composed of a two-prong secondary vertex and a primary particle for events selected in the D ∗ (2010) ± mode, in the dimuon channel

Transverse momentum distribution of the c-tagged jet normalized to unity, in simulated W+c and Z+c samples and in W+c data events.

Number of reconstructed secondary vertices normalized to unity, in simulated W+c and Z+c samples and in W+c data events.

Distribution of the corrected secondary-vertex mass normalized to unity, in simulated W + c and Z + c samples, and in W + c data events.

Distribution of the JP discriminant for the D± mode normalized to unity, in simulated W + c and Z + c samples, and in W + c data events.

Distribution of the JP discriminant for the D∗(2010) ± mode normalized to unity, in simulated W + c and Z + c samples, and in W + c data events.

Distribution of the corrected secondary-vertex mass normalized to unity from simulated Z + b and eμ-tt data events

Corrected secondary-vertex mass distributions, after background subtraction in the dielectron channel for events selected in the semileptonic mode.

Corrected secondary-vertex mass distributions, after background subtraction in the dimuon channel for events selected in the semileptonic mode.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dielectron channel for Z + jets events with a D± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dimuon channel for Z + jets events with a D± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dielectron channel for Z +jets events with a D∗(2010)± → D0 π± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dimuon channel for Z +jets events with a D∗(2010)± → D0 π± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

ontributions to the systematic uncertainty in the measured Z+c cross section and in the (Z+c)/(Z+b) cross section ratio.

Differential Z + c cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson

(Z +c)/(Z +b) cross section ratio as a function of the transverse momentum of teh Z boson

Differential Z + c cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the jet

(Z +c)/(Z +b) cross section ratio as a function of the transverse momentum of the jet.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The values involving cross sections are given for $\sqrt{s}$=8 TeV, assuming the SM values for $\sigma_i(7 \mathrm{TeV})/\sigma_i(8 \mathrm{TeV})$. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\kappa_{gZ}= \kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and of the ratios of coupling modifiers, as defined in the most generic parameterisation described in the context of the $\kappa$ framework, from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The uncertainties in $\lambda_{tg}$ and $\lambda_{WZ}$, for which a negative solution is allowed, are calculated around the overall best fit value. The expected total uncertainties in the measurements are also shown. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Measured global signal strength $\mu$ and its total uncertainty, together with the breakdown of the uncertainty into its four components as defined in the text. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment. The expected uncertainty, with its breakdown, is also shown.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson production processes. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson branching fractions are the same as in the SM.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson production process cross sections at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 and 8 TeV are the same as in the SM.

Results of the ten-parameter fit of $\mu_F^f = \mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}^f$ and $\mu_V^f = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Results of the six-parameter fit of the global ratio $\mu_V/\mu_F = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}/\mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$ together with $\mu_F^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that $|\kappa_{V}| \le$ 1, where $\kappa_{V}$ denotes $\kappa_{Z}$ or $\kappa_{W}$, and that $\mathrm{B_{BSM}} \ge$ 0. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that there are no additional BSM contributions to the Higgs boson width, i.e. $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}=0$. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results for the parameterisation assuming the absence of BSM particles in the loops ($\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$=0). The results with their measured and expected uncertainties are reported for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with the individual results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $|\kappa_\mu|$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for up-type versus down-type fermions. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{uu}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{du}$, for which both signs are allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vu}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for leptons versus quarks. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{qq}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{lq}$, for which there is no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vq}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

ATLAS+CMS combined best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

Invariant differential cross section of $\eta$ produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energy 8 TeV, the uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of 2.6% is not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\pi^0$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\pi^{0}$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Integrated $\eta$/$\pi^0$ ratio produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV.

Integrated $\eta$/$\pi^{0}$ ratio produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\pi^0$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\pi^{0}$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive $\eta$ to $\pi^0$ production at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive $\eta$ to $\pi^{0}$ production at a center of mass energy of 8 TeV.

Fig. 7. The 95% CL exclusion limit on $\sigma (pp \to H)\mathcal{B}(H \to \mu\mu\gamma)$, with $m_{\mu\mu}$ < 20 GeV, for a Higgs-like particle, as a function of the mass hypothesis, $m_{H}$.

Differential cross-section $\mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}p_T$ [pb/(GeV/$c$)] for $2.0 < y < 4.5$.

Differential cross-section $\mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}y$ [pb] for $p_T < 30$ GeV.

Ratio of double-differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(2S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y ) / ( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y )$.

Ratio of double-differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(3S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y ) / ( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y )$.

Ratio of double-differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(3S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y ) / ( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(2S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y )$.

The ratio of differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(iS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}p_T ) / ( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(jS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}p_T )$ for $2.0 < y < 4.5$.

The ratio of differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(iS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}y ) / ( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(jS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}y )$ for $p_T < 30$ GeV/$c$.

Double-differential cross-section $\mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d}y$ [pb/(GeV/$c$)].

Double-differential cross-section $\mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d}y$ [pb/(GeV/$c$)].

Double-differential cross-section $\mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d}y$ [pb/(GeV/$c$)].

Differential cross-section $\mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}p_T$ [pb/(GeV/$c$)] for $2.0 < y < 4.5$.

Differential cross-section $\mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}y$ [pb] for $p_T < 30$ GeV.

Ratio of double-differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(2S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y ) / ( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y )$.

Ratio of double-differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(3S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y ) / ( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y )$.

Ratio of double-differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(3S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y ) / ( \mathrm{d}^2 \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(2S) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d} p_T/\mathrm{d} y )$.

The ratio of differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(iS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}p_T ) / ( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(jS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}p_T )$ for $2.0 < y < 4.5$.

The ratio of differential cross-sections $( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(iS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}y ) / ( \mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon(jS) \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}y )$ for $p_T < 30$ GeV/$c$.

The ratio of differential cross-section $\mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}p_T$ [pb/(GeV/$c$)] for $\sqrt{s}=8$ and $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV in $2.0 < y < 4.5$.

The ratio of differential cross-section $\mathrm{d} \sigma ( pp \to ( \Upsilon \to \mu^+ \mu^- ) X ) / \mathrm{d}y$ for $\sqrt{s}=8$ and $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV and $p_T < 30$ GeV/$c$.