Rapidity dependence of directed flow, v1(y), for positive pions with transverse momentum pT > 0.2 GeV/c and total momentum magnitude |p| < 1.6 GeV/c from events within 10-30% centrality. Here, the BBC-based Event Plane method is used. Plotted error bars are statistical only, and systematic errors are of comparable size.

The rapidity dependence of the directed flow for the Lambda using the TPC event plane for 10-30% centrality. Plotted error bars are statistical only, while systematic errors are +/- 0.007.

The rapidity dependence of the directed flow for the K0s using the TPC event plane for 10-30% centrality. Plotted error bars are statistical only, while systematic errors are +/- 0.017.

Beam energy dependence of the directed flow slope dv1=dy at midrapidity for baryons and mesons measured by STAR.

v2 scaled by the number of constituent quarks (nq) for charged pions and protons for 0-30% central collisions. The values of v2 scaled with nq for pions and protons are consistent with each other within errors. For comparison, points from E895 are also shown.

The excitation function v2 for all charged particles or separately for protons and pions, measured by several experiments. The STAR FXT points for protons and for pions are near the region where a change in slope occurs.

Excitation function of Rout, Rside, and Rlong.

Transverse mass dependence of Rout, Rside, and Rlong for three experiments: E895, STAR, and E866. The corresponding center-of-mass collision energies are 4.3 GeV, 4.5 GeV, and 4.9 GeV, respectively. Pairs for the STAR points are created from negative pion tracks in the momentum range 0.15 < pT < 0.8 GeV/c from events in the 0-15% centrality range.

The centrality dependence of Rout, Rside, and Rlong. Errors are statistical only. Here positive and negative pion pairs in the momentum range 0.15 < pT < 0.8 GeV/c are used.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using tof-dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 19A GeV/c (collision energy 6.27 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 30A GeV/c (collision energy 7.62 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 40A GeV/c (collision energy 8.87 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions. Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 75A GeV/c (collision energy 11.95 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions. Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions at beam momentum 150A GeV/c (collision energy 16.83 GeV). Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

Transverse momentum spectra in rapidity slices of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions. Rapidity values given in the legends correspond to the middle of the corresponding interval. Results presented in this table were obtained using dE/dx analysis method.

The beam momentum dependence of the inverse slope parameter of transverse momentum spectra at mid-rapidity (0<y< 0.2 for 40A GeV/c, 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c; -0.2<y<0.0 for 30A GeV/c) of positively charged K mesons for central 20% Be+Be collisions. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 30A GeV/c (7.62 GeV), 40AGeV/c (8.87 GeV), 75A GeV/c (11.95 GeV), 150A GeV/c (16.83 GeV).

The beam momentum dependence of the inverse slope parameter of transverse momentum spectra at mid-rapidity (0<y< 0.2 for 40A GeV/c, 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c; -0.2<y<0.0 for 30A GeV/c) of positively charged K mesons for central 20% Be+Be collisions. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 30A GeV/c (7.62 GeV), 40AGeV/c (8.87 GeV), 75A GeV/c (11.95 GeV), 150A GeV/c (16.83 GeV).

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter of transverse momentum spectra at mid-rapidity (0<y< 0.2 for 40A GeV/c, 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c; -0.2<y<0.0 for 30A GeV/c) of negatively charged K mesons for 20% central Be+Be collisions. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 30A GeV/c (7.62 GeV), 40AGeV/c (8.87 GeV), 75A GeV/c (11.95 GeV), 150A GeV/c (16.83 GeV).

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter of transverse momentum spectra at mid-rapidity (0<y< 0.2 for 40A GeV/c, 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c; -0.2<y<0.0 for 30A GeV/c) of negatively charged K mesons for 20% central Be+Be collisions. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 30A GeV/c (7.62 GeV), 40AGeV/c (8.87 GeV), 75A GeV/c (11.95 GeV), 150A GeV/c (16.83 GeV).

Rapidity spectra of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of protons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be at beam momentum of 19A GeV/c, 30A GeV/c, 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 19A GeV/c -> 6.27 GeV, 30A GeV/c -> 7.62 GeV, 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Beat beam momentum of 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Rapidity spectra of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Beat beam momentum of 40A GeV/c 75A GeV/c and 150A GeV/c. Incoming beam momentum translates to collision energy (SQRT(SNN)) as following 40A GeV/c -> 8.87 GeV, 75A GeV/c -> 11.95 GeV, 150A GeV/c -> 16.83 GeV.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of K+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of K- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of PI+ produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of PI- produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Collision energy dependence of mean multiplicities of antiprotons produced in the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

The energy dependence of the K+/PI+ particle yields ratio at mid-rapidity for the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

The energy dependence of the K+/PI+ particle yields ratio at mid-rapidity for the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

The energy dependence of the K+/PI+ particle yields ratio at full acceptance for the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

The energy dependence of the K+/PI+ particle yields ratio at full acceptance for the 20% most central Be+Be collisions.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by &#9001;TPPB&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by &#9001;TAA&#9002;. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.

Particle-level TEEC results for the third HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC results for the fourth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC results for the fifth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC results for the sixth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC results for the seventh HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC results for the eighth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC results for the ninth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC results for the tenth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results

Particle-level ATEEC results for the first HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the second HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the third HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the fourth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the fifth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the sixth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the seventh HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the eighth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the ninth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC results for the tenth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the first HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the second HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the third HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the fourth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the fifth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the sixth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the seventh HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the eighth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the ninth HT2 bin

Particle-level TEEC predictions for the tenth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the first HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the second HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the third HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the fourth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the fifth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the sixth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the seventh HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the eighth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the ninth HT2 bin

Particle-level ATEEC predictions for the tenth HT2 bin

Fitted values for the strong coupling constant extracted from TEEC with MMHT 2014 PDF

Fitted values for the strong coupling constant extracted from TEEC with NNPDF 3.0

Fitted values for the strong coupling constant extracted from TEEC with CT14 PDF

Fitted values for the strong coupling constant extracted from ATEEC with MMHT 2014 PDF

Fitted values for the strong coupling constant extracted from ATEEC with NNPDF 3.0

Fitted values for the strong coupling constant extracted from ATEEC with CT14 PDF

Measured and predicted fiducial cross-sections in both the lllljj and ll$\nu\nu$jj channels for the inclusive ZZjj processes. Uncertainties due to different sources are presented.

Measured and predicted fiducial cross-sections in both the lllljj and ll$\nu\nu$jj channels for the inclusive ZZjj processes. Uncertainties due to different sources are presented.

Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ QCD CR.

Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ QCD CR.

Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ SR.

Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\ell\ell jj$ SR.

Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\nu\nu jj$ SR.

Observed and expected multivariate discriminant distribution in the $\ell\ell\nu\nu jj$ SR.

Observed 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for scalar up-type LQs decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and an electron.

Expected 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for scalar up-type LQs decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and an electron.

Observed 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for scalar down-type LQs decaying into a bottom quark and a neutrino or a top quark and a muon.

Expected 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for scalar down-type LQs decaying into a bottom quark and a neutrino or a top quark and a muon.

Observed 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for scalar down-type LQs decaying into a bottom quark and a neutrino or a top quark and an electron.

Expected 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for scalar down-type LQs decaying into a bottom quark and a neutrino or a top quark and an electron.

Observed 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and a muon.

Expected 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and a muon.

Observed 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and an electron.

Expected 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and an electron.

Observed 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the minimal coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and a muon.

Expected 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the minimal coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and a muon.

Observed 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the minimal coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and an electron.

Expected 95% CL limits on the production cross-section for vector up-type LQs in the minimal coupling scenario decaying into a top quark and a neutrino or a bottom quark and an electron.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for scalar up-type LQs decaying into top quarks and neutrinos or bottom quarks and muons depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(LQ_{mix}^u\rightarrow b\mu)$.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for scalar up-type LQs decaying into top quarks and neutrinos or bottom quarks and electrons depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(LQ_{mix}^u\rightarrow be)$.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for scalar down-type LQs decaying into top quarks and muons or bottom quarks and neutrinos depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(LQ_{mix}^d\rightarrow t\mu)$.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for scalar down-type LQs decaying into top quarks and electrons or bottom quarks and neutrinos depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(LQ_{mix}^d\rightarrow te)$.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for vector LQs in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario decaying into top quarks and neutrinos or bottom quarks and muons depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(vLQ_{mix}^{YM}\rightarrow b\mu)$.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for vector LQs in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario decaying into top quarks and neutrinos or bottom quarks and electrons depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(vLQ_{mix}^{YM}\rightarrow be)$.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for vector LQs in the minimal coupling scenario decaying into top quarks and neutrinos or bottom quarks and muons depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(vLQ_{mix}^{min}\rightarrow b\mu)$.

Product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the training region for vector LQs in the minimal coupling scenario decaying into top quarks and neutrinos or bottom quarks and electrons depending on the signal mass, $m_{LQ}$, and $\mathcal{B}(vLQ_{mix}^{min}\rightarrow be)$.

Cut-flow for the four models containing scalar LQs at a mass of $m_{LQ}=1300$ GeV and $\mathcal{B}(LQ_{mix}\rightarrow q_3\ell)=0.5$.

Cut-flow for the four models containing vector LQs at a mass of $m_{LQ}=1300$ GeV and $\mathcal{B}(LQ_{mix}\rightarrow q_3\ell)=0.5$.

K+K- correlation function for 0.3<kT<0.4 GeV/c and centrality class 10-30%

K+K- correlation function for 0.5<kT<0.6 GeV/c and centrality class 10-30%

K+K- correlation function for 0.8<kT<1.0 GeV/c and centrality class 10-30%

K+K- correlation function for 0.3<kT<0.4 GeV/c and centrality class 30-50%

K+K- correlation function for 0.5<kT<0.6 GeV/c and centrality class 30-50%

K+K- correlation function for 0.8<kT<1.0 GeV/c and centrality class 30-50%

R (left panel) parameters of K+K- as a function of pair transverse momentum kT for centrality class 0-10%

R (left panel) parameters of K+K- as a function of pair transverse momentum kT for centrality class 10-30%

R (left panel) parameters of K+K- as a function of pair transverse momentum kT for centrality class 30-50%

lambda (right panel) parameters of K+K- as a function of pair transverse momentum kT for centrality class 0-10%

lambda (right panel) parameters of K+K- as a function of pair transverse momentum kT for centrality class 10-30%

lambda (right panel) parameters of K+K- as a function of pair transverse momentum kT for centrality class 30-50%

Height of phi(1020) meson peak ( Cf ) as a function of source radius R for centrality class 0-10%

Height of phi(1020) meson peak ( Cf ) as a function of source radius R for centrality class 10-30%

Height of phi(1020) meson peak ( Cf ) as a function of source radius R for centrality class 30-50%

Fit results of the simultaneous measurements of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals (2POI) showing best-fit values of the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $\hat{B}$($H\to e\tau$). The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the simultaneous measurements of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals (2POI) showing upper limits at 95% C.L. on the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $H\to \mu\tau$. The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the simultaneous measurements of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals (2POI) showing upper limits at 95% C.L. on the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $H\to \mu\tau$. The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the simultaneous measurements of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals (2POI) showing best-fit values of the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $\hat{B}$($H\to \mu\tau$). The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the simultaneous measurements of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals (2POI) showing best-fit values of the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $\hat{B}$($H\to \mu\tau$). The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing upper limits at 95% C.L. on the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $H\to e\tau$. The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing upper limits at 95% C.L. on the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $H\to e\tau$. The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing best-fit values of the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $\hat{B}$($H\to e\tau$). The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing best-fit values of the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $\hat{B}$($H\to e\tau$). The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing upper limits at 95% C.L. on the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $H\to \mu\tau$. The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing upper limits at 95% C.L. on the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $H\to \mu\tau$. The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing best-fit values of the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $\hat{B}$($H\to \mu\tau$). The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

Fit results of the independent searches (1 POI) showing best-fit values of the LFV branching ratios of the Higgs boson $\hat{B}$($H\to \mu\tau$). The results from standalone channel/categories fits are compared with the results of the combined fit.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $e\tau_{\mu}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $e\tau_{\mu}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $e\tau_{\mu}$ final state in the VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $e\tau_{\mu}$ final state in the VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $e\tau_{had}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $e\tau_{had}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{had}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{had}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $e\tau_{had}$ final state in the VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $e\tau_{had}$ final state in the VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{had}$ final state in the VBF category.

BDT score distribution, after the simultaneous fit of the $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals, obtained by fitting the data of the MC-template $\ell\tau_{had}$ channel for $\mu\tau_{had}$ final state in the VBF category.

NN score distribution, after an independent fit of the $H\to \mu\tau$ signal, obtained by fitting the data of the Symmetry $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel, for the $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

NN score distribution, after an independent fit of the $H\to \mu\tau$ signal, obtained by fitting the data of the Symmetry $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel, for the $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the non-VBF category.

NN score distribution, after an independent fit of the $H\to \mu\tau$ signal, obtained by fitting the data of the Symmetry $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel, for the $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the VBF category.

NN score distribution, after an independent fit of the $H\to \mu\tau$ signal, obtained by fitting the data of the Symmetry $\ell\tau_{\ell'}$ channel, for the $\mu\tau_{e}$ final state in the VBF category.

Best-fit $\mathcal{B}(H\to \mu\tau)- \mathcal{B}(H\to e\tau)$ values, given in %, obtained from the standalone fits of the $\ell\tau_\ell'$ final state with either background estimation method. For the MC-template method, the correlated uncertainties are fixed to their best-fit values and the uncertainties are re-derived considering only the uncorrelated sources. For the Symmetry method, the full uncertainty is considered.

Best-fit $\mathcal{B}(H\to \mu\tau)- \mathcal{B}(H\to e\tau)$ values, given in %, obtained from the standalone fits of the $\ell\tau_\ell'$ final state with either background estimation method. For the MC-template method, the correlated uncertainties are fixed to their best-fit values and the uncertainties are re-derived considering only the uncorrelated sources. For the Symmetry method, the full uncertainty is considered.

Best-fit value of the branching ratios $\mathcal{B}(H\to e\tau)$ and $\mathcal{B}(H\to \mu\tau)$, given in %, and likelihood contours at 68% and 95% C.L. Obtained from the simultaneous fit of $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals based on the MC-template method, compared to the SM expectation.

Best-fit value of the branching ratios $\mathcal{B}(H\to e\tau)$ and $\mathcal{B}(H\to \mu\tau)$, given in %, and likelihood contours at 68% and 95% C.L. Obtained from the simultaneous fit of $H\to e\tau$ and $H\to \mu\tau$ signals based on the MC-template method, compared to the SM expectation.

$N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{\mathrm{tot}}$, $p_{\mathrm{T}}/m$, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{LB}}^{\cap}\tau$, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{LB}}^{\cup}\tau$, $N_{\mathrm{part}}$, $S_{\mathrm{T}}^{\cup}$, $S_{\mathrm{T}}^{\cap}$, $\sigma_{\mathrm{d}N/{\mathrm{d}y}}$ versus $\mathrm{Centrality}$ for $x^{\pm}$, $x_{\mathrm{primary}}$, $\mathrm{participant}$ in $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}$ at $\sqrt{s}=5.023\,\mathrm{Te\!V}$

$N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{\mathrm{tot}}$, $p_{\mathrm{T}}/m$, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{LB}}^{\cap}\tau$, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{LB}}^{\cup}\tau$, $N_{\mathrm{part}}$, $S_{\mathrm{T}}^{\cup}$, $S_{\mathrm{T}}^{\cap}$, $\sigma_{\mathrm{d}N/{\mathrm{d}y}}$ versus $\mathrm{Centrality}$ for $x^{\pm}$, $x_{\mathrm{primary}}$, $\mathrm{participant}$ in $\mathrm{p}-\mathrm{Pb}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.023\,\mathrm{Te\!V}$

$N_{\mathrm{ch}}^{\mathrm{tot}}$, $p_{\mathrm{T}}/m$, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{LB}}^{\cap}\tau$, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{LB}}^{\cup}\tau$, $N_{\mathrm{part}}$, $S_{\mathrm{T}}^{\cup}$, $S_{\mathrm{T}}^{\cap}$, $\sigma_{\mathrm{d}N/{\mathrm{d}y}}$ versus $\mathrm{Centrality}$ for $x^{\pm}$, $x_{\mathrm{primary}}$, $\mathrm{participant}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.023\,\mathrm{Te\!V}$

$p_\mathrm{T}$-differential production yield of prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$. Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D_s^+\to \phi\pi^+\to K^-K^+\pi^+}$: 0.0224

$p_\mathrm{T}$-differential nuclear modification factor $R_\mathrm{AA}$ of prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons in the 0-10% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.

$p_\mathrm{T}$-differential nuclear modification factor $R_\mathrm{AA}$ of prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons in the 0-10% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.

$p_\mathrm{T}$-differential nuclear modification factor $R_\mathrm{AA}$ of prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.

$p_\mathrm{T}$-differential nuclear modification factor $R_\mathrm{AA}$ of prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production ratios of prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ mesons in the 0-10% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$. Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D_s^+\to \phi\pi^+\to K^-K^+\pi^+}$: 0.0224 Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D^0 \to K^-\pi^+}$: 0.0395

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production ratios of prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ mesons in the 0-10% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$. Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D_s^+\to \phi\pi^+\to K^-K^+\pi^+}$: 0.0224 Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D^0 \to K^-\pi^+}$: 0.0395

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production ratios of prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$. Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D_s^+\to \phi\pi^+\to K^-K^+\pi^+}$: 0.0224 Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D^0 \to K^-\pi^+}$: 0.0395

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production ratios of prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$. Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D_s^+\to \phi\pi^+\to K^-K^+\pi^+}$: 0.0224 Branching ratio of $\mathrm{D^0 \to K^-\pi^+}$: 0.0395

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ ratios in Pb-Pb collisions in the 0-10% centrality class at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$ divided by those in pp collisions at the same energy.

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ ratios in Pb-Pb collisions in the 0-10% centrality class at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$ divided by those in pp collisions at the same energy.

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ ratios in Pb-Pb collisions in the 30-50% centrality class at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$ divided by those in pp collisions at the same energy.

$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential prompt $\mathrm{D}_s^+/\mathrm{D}^0$ ratios in Pb-Pb collisions in the 30-50% centrality class at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$ divided by those in pp collisions at the same energy.

$p_\mathrm{T}$-differential elliptic flow coefficient $v_2$ of prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$.

$p_\mathrm{T}$-differential elliptic flow coefficient $v_2$ of prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$.