Showing 10 of 838 results
This paper presents measurements of $t\bar{t}$ production in association with additional $b$-jets in $pp$ collisions at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data were recorded with the ATLAS detector and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$. Fiducial cross-section measurements are performed in the dilepton and lepton-plus-jets $t\bar{t}$ decay channels. Results are presented at particle level in the form of inclusive cross-sections of $t\bar{t}$ final states with three and four $b$-jets as well as differential cross-sections as a function of global event properties and properties of $b$-jet pairs. The measured inclusive fiducial cross-sections generally exceed the $t\bar{t}b\bar{b}$ predictions from various next-to-leading-order matrix element calculations matched to a parton shower but are compatible within the total uncertainties. The experimental uncertainties are smaller than the uncertainties in the predictions. Comparisons of state-of-the-art theoretical predictions with the differential measurements are shown and good agreement with data is found for most of them.
The measured fiducial cross sections
The measured fiducial cross sections
Relative differential cross section as a function of the b-jet multiplicity in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of the b-jet multiplicity in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of fourth-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of fourth-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invarant mass of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invarant mass of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
A search for magnetic monopoles and high-electric-charge objects is presented using 34.4 fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC during 2015 and 2016. The considered signature is based upon high ionization in the transition radiation tracker of the inner detector associated with a pencil-shape energy deposit in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The data were collected by a dedicated trigger based on the tracker high-threshold hit capability. The results are interpreted in models of Drell-Yan pair production of stable particles with two spin hypotheses (0 and 1/2) and masses ranging from 200 GeV to 4000 GeV. The search improves by approximately a factor of five the constraints on the direct production of magnetic monopoles carrying one or two Dirac magnetic charges and stable objects with electric charge in the range $20\le|z|\le60$ and extends the charge range to $60<|z|\le100$.
Observed 95% confidence-level upper limits on the cross section for Drell-Yan spin-0 monopole production as a function of mass for magnetic charges $|g|=1g_D$ and $|g|=2g_D$.
Observed 95% confidence-level upper limits on the cross section for Drell-Yan spin-0 HECO production as a function of mass for various values of electric charge in the range $20\le|z|\le100$.
Observed 95% confidence-level upper limits on the cross section for Drell-Yan spin-1/2 monopole production as a function of mass for magnetic charges $|g|=1g_D$ and $|g|=2g_D$.
Observed 95% confidence-level upper limits on the cross section for Drell-Yan spin-1/2 HECO production as a function of mass for various values of electric charge in the range $20\le|z|\le100$.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 200 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 500 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1000 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1500 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2000 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2500 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 3000 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 4000 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 200 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 500 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1000 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1500 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2000 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2500 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 3000 GeV.
Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 4000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 200 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 1000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 1500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 2000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 2500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 3000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 4000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 200 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 1000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 1500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 2000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 2500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 3000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 4000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 200 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 1000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 1500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 2000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 2500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 3000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 4000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 200 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 1000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 1500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 2000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 2500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 3000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 4000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 200 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 1000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 1500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 2000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 2500 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 3000 GeV.
Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 4000 GeV.
This paper presents measurements of the $W^+ \rightarrow \mu^+\nu$ and $W^- \rightarrow \mu^-\nu$ cross-sections and the associated charge asymmetry as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the decay muon. The data were collected in proton--proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC and correspond to a total integrated luminosity of $20.2~\mbox{fb$^{-1}$}$. The precision of the cross-section measurements varies between 0.8% to 1.5% as a function of the pseudorapidity, excluding the 1.9% uncertainty on the integrated luminosity. The charge asymmetry is measured with an uncertainty between 0.002 and 0.003. The results are compared with predictions based on next-to-next-to-leading-order calculations with various parton distribution functions and have the sensitivity to discriminate between them.
The correction factors, $C_{W^±,i}$ with their associated systematic uncertainties as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$, for $W^+$ and $W^−$
The integrated global correction factor $C_{W^±}$, for $W^+$ and $W^−$
Cross-sections (differential in $\eta_{\mu}$) and asymmetry, as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$). The central values are provided along with the statistical and dominant systematic uncertainties: the data statistical uncertainty (Data Stat.), the $E_T^{\textrm{miss}}$ uncertainty, the uncertainties related to muon reconstruction (Muon Reco.), those related to the background, those from MC statistics (MC Stat.), and modelling uncertainties. The uncertainties of the cross-sections are given in percent and those of the asymmetry as an absolute difference from the nominal.
The measured fiducial production cross-sections times branching ratio for $W^+\rightarrow\mu^+\nu$ and $W^-\rightarrow\mu^-\bar{\nu}$, their sum, and their ratio for data
The measured fiducial production cross-sections times branching ratio for $W^+\rightarrow\mu^+ u$ and $W^-\rightarrow\mu^-\bar{\nu}$, their sum, and their ratio for the predictions from DYNNLO (CT14 NNLO PDF set)
Size of the $W^{+}$ the cross-section (differential in $\eta_{\mu}$, as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. gThe uncertainties are given in percent.
Size of the $W^{+}$ the cross-section (differential in $\eta_{\mu}$, as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. gThe uncertainties are given in percent.
Size of the asymmetry as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The uncertainties are given as an absolute difference from the nominal.
A test of CP invariance in Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion is performed in the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ decay channel. This test uses the Optimal Observable method and is carried out using 36.1 $\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV proton$-$proton collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Contributions from CP-violating interactions between the Higgs boson and electroweak gauge bosons are described by an effective field theory, in which the parameter $\tilde{d}$ governs the strength of CP violation. No sign of CP violation is observed in the distributions of the Optimal Observable, and $\tilde{d}$ is constrained to the interval $[-0.090, 0.035]$ at the 68% confidence level (CL), compared to an expected interval of $\tilde{d} \in [-0.035,0.033]$ based upon the Standard Model prediction. No constraints can be set on $\tilde{d}$ at 95% CL, while an expected 95% CL interval of $\tilde{d} \in [-0.21,0.15]$ for the Standard Model hypothesis was expected.
Post-fit BDT distributions after the VBF event selection for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF analysis channel. The VBF signal is shown for $\mu = 0.73$ and $\tilde d = -0.01$. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leptons depends on the trigger.
Post-fit BDT distributions after the VBF event selection for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ DF analysis channel. The VBF signal is shown for $\mu = 0.73$ and $\tilde d = -0.01$. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit BDT distributions after the VBF event selection for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. The VBF signal is shown for $\mu = 0.73$ and $\tilde d = -0.01$. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leading lepton depends on the trigger.
Post-fit BDT distributions after the VBF event selection for the $\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. The VBF signal is shown for $\mu = 0.73$ and $\tilde d = -0.01$. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit $m_{\tau\tau}^{\mathrm{MMC}}$ distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leptons depends on the trigger.
Post-fit $m_{\tau\tau}^{\mathrm{MMC}}$ distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ DF analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit $m_{\tau\tau}^{\mathrm{MMC}}$ distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leading lepton depends on the trigger.
Post-fit $m_{\tau\tau}^{\mathrm{MMC}}$ distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit Optimal Observable distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leptons depends on the trigger.
Post-fit Optimal Observable distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ DF analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit Optimal Observable distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leading lepton depends on the trigger.
Post-fit Optimal Observable distributions in the low BDT score CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. ''Other bkg'' denotes all background contributions not listed explicitly in the legend. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit distributions of the event yields as a function of the Optimal Observable in the SR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF analysis channel. The values of $\tilde d$, the signal strength $\mu$, the normalization of background processes, and nuisance parameters for the event yield prediction are set to those which minimize the NLL. The size of the combined statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit distributions of the event yields as a function of the Optimal Observable in the SR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ DF analysis channel. The values of $\tilde d$, the signal strength $\mu$, the normalization of background processes, and nuisance parameters for the event yield prediction are set to those which minimize the NLL. The size of the combined statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit distributions of the event yields as a function of the Optimal Observable in the SR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. The values of $\tilde d$, the signal strength $\mu$, the normalization of background processes, and nuisance parameters for the event yield prediction are set to those which minimize the NLL. The size of the combined statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leading lepton depends on the trigger.
Post-fit distributions of the event yields as a function of the Optimal Observable in the SR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}}$ analysis channel. The values of $\tilde d$, the signal strength $\mu$, the normalization of background processes, and nuisance parameters for the event yield prediction are set to those which minimize the NLL. The size of the combined statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties is given.
The observed $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ curve as a function of $\tilde d$ values. For comparison, expected $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ curves are also shown. The constraints on the nuisance parameters and normalization factors are first determined in a CR-only fit, and then a fit to pseudo-data corresponding to these nuisance parameters, normalization factors, and to $\tilde d=0, \mu = 1$ or $\tilde d =0, \mu = 0.73$ is performed to obtain these $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ curves. Moreover, a pre-fit expected $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ is shown, using pseudo-data corresponding to $\tilde d =0$ and $\mu = 1$ in the signal and control regions.
The expected $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ curves comparing the sensitivity of the fit with and without systematic uncertainties. For comparison, other curves are shown which remove the effect of jet-based systematic uncertainties, $\tau$-based systematic uncertainties, and MC statistical uncertainties.
The observed $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ curves for each analysis channel as a function of $\tilde d$, compared to the combined result. For the individual analysis channel $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ curves, only event yield information in the other SRs is used, ensuring that the Optimal Observable distributions in the other SRs do not influence the preferred value of $\tilde d$. The signal strength is constrained to be positive in these individual channel $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}$ curves. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leading lepton depends on the trigger.
Post-fit BDT distributions in the top-quark CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF channel. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leptons depends on the trigger.
Post-fit BDT distributions in the top-quark CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ DF channel. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit BDT distributions in the $Z\to \ell\ell$ CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF analysis channel. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leptons depends on the trigger.
Post-fit Optimal Observable distributions in the top-quark CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF channel. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leptons depends on the trigger.
Post-fit Optimal Observable distributions in the top-quark CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ DF channel. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
Post-fit Optimal Observable distributions in the $Z\to \ell\ell$ CR for the $\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}$ SF analysis channel. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given. The exact value of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ cut on the leptons depends on the trigger.
Post-fit distribution of weighted event yields as a function of the Optimal Observable for all four SRs combined. The contributions of the different SRs are weighted by a factor of ln(1 + S/B), where S and B are the post-fit expected numbers of signal and background events in that region, respectively. The size of the combined statistical, experimental, and theoretical uncertainties is given.
This paper presents measurements of charged-particle distributions sensitive to the properties of the underlying event in events containing a $Z$ boson decaying into a muon pair. The data were obtained using the ATLAS detector at the LHC in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb$^{-1}$. Distributions of the charged-particle multiplicity and of the charged-particle transverse momentum are measured in regions of the azimuth defined relative to the $Z$ boson direction. The measured distributions are compared with the predictions of various Monte Carlo generators which implement different underlying-event models. The Monte Carlo model predictions qualitatively describe the data well, but with some significant discrepancies.
Figure 09d, mean sumPt toward, toward region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transverse region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 09c, mean sumPt transmin, transmin region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transmax region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
away region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 09b, mean nTracks toward, toward region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
transverse region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
Figure 09a, mean nTracks transmin, transmin region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
transmax region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
away region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
Figure 10b, mean meanPt toward, toward region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transverse region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 10a, mean meanPt transmin, transmin region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transmax region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
away region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 04c from auxiliary figures, mean sumPt toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 11c, mean sumPt transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 04a from auxiliary figures, mean nTracks toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
Figure 11a, mean nTracks transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
Figure 06a from auxiliary figures, mean meanPt toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 12a, mean meanPt transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 04d from auxiliary figures, mean sumPt toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 11d, mean sumPt transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 04b from auxiliary figures, mean nTracks toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
Figure 11b, mean nTracks transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)
Figure 06b from auxiliary figures, mean meanPt toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
Figure 12b, mean meanPt transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 01a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 02a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 04a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 05a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 01b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 02b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 04b, nTracks transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 05b, nTracks transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 01c from auxiliary figures, sumPt toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 02c from auxiliary figures, sumPt toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 04c, sumPt transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 05c, sumPt transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 01d from auxiliary figures, meanPt toward_zptregion2, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 02d from auxiliary figures, meanPt toward_zptregion7, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 04d, meanPt transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 05d, meanPt transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 03a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 03c from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 06a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 06c, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 05a from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 07a, nTracks transmin_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 03b from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 03d from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 06b, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
Figure 06d, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 05b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
Figure 07b, nTracks transmin_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$
$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$
This paper presents a measurement of jet fragmentation functions in 0.49 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collisions and 25 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV collected in 2015 with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. These measurements provide insight into the jet quenching process in the quark-gluon plasma created in the aftermath of ultra-relativistic collisions between two nuclei. The modifications to the jet fragmentation functions are quantified by dividing the measurements in Pb+Pb collisions by baseline measurements in $pp$ collisions. This ratio is studied as a function of the transverse momentum of the jet, the jet rapidity, and the centrality of the collision. In both collision systems, the jet fragmentation functions are measured for jets with transverse momentum between 126 GeV and 398 GeV and with an absolute value of jet rapidity less than 2.1. An enhancement of particles carrying a small fraction of the jet momentum is observed, which increases with centrality and with increasing jet transverse momentum. Yields of particles carrying a very large fraction of the jet momentum are also observed to be enhanced. Between these two enhancements of the fragmentation functions a suppression of particles carrying an intermediate fraction of the jet momentum is observed in Pb+Pb collisions. A small dependence of the modifications on jet rapidity is observed.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.
Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.
Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.
The differential cross section for isolated-photon production in $pp$ collisions is measured at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC using an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$. The differential cross section is presented as a function of the photon transverse energy in different regions of photon pseudorapidity. The differential cross section as a function of the absolute value of the photon pseudorapidity is also presented in different regions of photon transverse energy. Next-to-leading-order QCD calculations from JETPHOX and SHERPA as well as next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD calculations from NNLOJET are compared with the measurement, using several parameterisations of the proton parton distribution functions. The predictions provide a good description of the data within the experimental and theoretical uncertainties.
Measured cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.6$.
Measured cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.
Measured cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.
Measured cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.
Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.6$.
Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.
Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.
Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.
A search for flavour-changing neutral current (FCNC) events via the coupling of a top quark, a photon, and an up or charm quark is presented using 81 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data taken at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Events with a photon, an electron or muon, a $b$-tagged jet, and missing transverse momentum are selected. A neural network based on kinematic variables differentiates between events from signal and background processes. The data are consistent with the background-only hypothesis, and limits are set on the strength of the $tq\gamma$ coupling in an effective field theory. These are also interpreted as 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for FCNC $t\gamma$ production via a left-handed (right-handed) $tu\gamma$ coupling of 36 fb (78 fb) and on the branching ratio for $t\rightarrow \gamma u$ of $2.8\times 10^{-5}$ ($6.1\times 10^{-5}$). In addition, they are interpreted as 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for FCNC $t\gamma$ production via a left-handed (right-handed) $tc\gamma$ coupling of 40 fb (33 fb) and on the branching ratio for $t\rightarrow \gamma c$ of $22\times 10^{-5}$ ($18\times 10^{-5}$).
Post-fit distributions of a background-only fit to the signal region (SR) and the control regions (CRs) of the NN output in the SR. In addition, the expected signal is overlaid for an effective coupling strength corresponding to the observed limit multiplied by a factor of ten.
Observed (expected) 95 % CL limits on the effective coupling strengths for different vertices and couplings, the production cross section, and the branching ratio. For the former, the energy scale is assumed to be $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV.
Post-fit distributions of a background-only fit to the SR and the CRs of the NN output in the SR for the $tu\gamma$ right-handed coupling. In addition, the expected signal is overlaid for an effective coupling strength corresponding to the observed limit multiplied by a factor of ten.
Post-fit distributions of a background-only fit to the SR and the CRs of the NN output in the SR for the $tc\gamma$ left-handed coupling. In addition, the expected signal is overlaid for an effective coupling strength corresponding to the observed limit multiplied by a factor of ten.
Post-fit distributions of a background-only fit to the SR and the CRs of the NN output in the SR for the $tc\gamma$ right-handed coupling. In addition, the expected signal is overlaid for an effective coupling strength corresponding to the observed limit multiplied by a factor of ten.
A search for strongly produced supersymmetric particles using signatures involving multiple energetic jets and either two isolated same-sign leptons ($e$ or $\mu$), or at least three isolated leptons, is presented. The analysis relies on the identification of $b$-jets and high missing transverse momentum to achieve good sensitivity. A data sample of proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= 13$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in 2015 and 2016, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$, is used for the search. No significant excess over the Standard Model prediction is observed. The results are interpreted in several simplified supersymmetric models featuring $R$-parity conservation or $R$-parity violation, extending the exclusion limits from previous searches. In models considering gluino pair production, gluino masses are excluded up to 1.87 TeV at 95% confidence level. When bottom squarks are pair-produced and decay to a chargino and a top quark, models with bottom squark masses below 700 GeV and light neutralinos are excluded at 95% confidence level. In addition, model-independent limits are set on a possible contribution of new phenomena to the signal region yields.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the lightest bottom squark and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the lightest bottom squark and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the lightest bottom squark and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the lightest bottom squark and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$.
Observed 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$.
Expected 95% CL exclusion contours on the gluino and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{t}^{}_\mathrm{1}\tilde{t}^{*}_\mathrm{1}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{t}^{}_\mathrm{1}\tilde{t}^{*}_\mathrm{1}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario with non-universal Higgs masses (NUHM2, see the publication Refs. [31-32]). The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario with non-universal Higgs masses (NUHM2, see the publication Refs. [31-32]). The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\tilde{d}^{*}_\mathrm{R}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\tilde{d}^{*}_\mathrm{R}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{323}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar b\bar d / \bar b \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\tilde{d}^{*}_\mathrm{R}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $pp\to \tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\tilde{d}^{*}_\mathrm{R}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$. The table also shows the signal acceptance and reconstruction efficiency for the signal region(s) with sensitivity to this scenario.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L2bS, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1500 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 800 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L2bS, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1500 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 800 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L2bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1700 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 200 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L2bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via an offshell top squark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1700 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 200 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2Lsoft1b, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via offshell top squark and top quark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{b}W^{-}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1200 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 940 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2Lsoft1b, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via offshell top squark and top quark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{b}W^{-}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1200 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 940 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2Lsoft2b, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via offshell top squark and top quark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{b}W^{-}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1200 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 900 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2Lsoft2b, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino via offshell top squark and top quark, $\tilde g\to t\bar{b}W^{-}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1200 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 900 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L0bS, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1200 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 1050 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 975 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 900 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L0bS, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1200 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 1050 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 975 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 900 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L0bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1600 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 850 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 475 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L0bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1600 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 850 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 475 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc3L0bS, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 1250 GeV, $m(\tilde\ell)=m(\tilde\nu)$ = 1175 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 1100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc3L0bS, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 1250 GeV, $m(\tilde\ell)=m(\tilde\nu)$ = 1175 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 1100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc3L0bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1800 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 950 GeV, $m(\tilde\ell)=m(\tilde\nu)$ = 475 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc3L0bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade involving sleptons, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu$ and $\tilde\ell/\tilde\nu\to \ell/\nu\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1800 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 950 GeV, $m(\tilde\ell)=m(\tilde\nu)$ = 475 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L1bS, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{b}^{}_1)$ = 600 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 350 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 250 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L1bS, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{b}^{}_1)$ = 600 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 350 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 250 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L1bH, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{b}^{}_1)$ = 750 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 200 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L1bH, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{b}^{}_1)$ = 750 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 200 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc3LSS1b, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{t}^{}_1)$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 525 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)\approx m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 425 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc3LSS1b, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{t}^{}_1)$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 525 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)\approx m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 425 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L1bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde{t}^{}_{1})$ = 800 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L1bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an antitop squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$, $\lambda^{''}_{311}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde g\to \bar{t}\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to \bar s\bar d /\bar d \bar d/\bar s \bar s$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde{t}^{}_{1})$ = 800 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L0b, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 500 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L0b, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon- and lepton-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{'}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to q\bar{q}^{'}\ell$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 500 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L2bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1800 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 200 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L2bH, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay directly into a pair of top-antitop quarks and the lightest neutralino, which in turn decays into light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{ijk}$, $\tilde g\to t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to qqq$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1800 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 200 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L2bS, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of down-down squark-rights are produced and decay into a pair of top and bottom quarks via a non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV coupling $\lambda^{''}_{331}$, $\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\to \bar t\bar b$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R})$ = 600 GeV, $m(\tilde g)$ = 2000 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L2bS, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of down-down squark-rights are produced and decay into a pair of top and bottom quarks via a non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV coupling $\lambda^{''}_{331}$, $\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\to \bar t\bar b$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R})$ = 600 GeV, $m(\tilde g)$ = 2000 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L1bS, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of down-down squarks are produced and decay into a pair of top and a light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\to \bar t\bar s/\bar t\bar d$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R})$ = 600 GeV, $m(\tilde g)$ = 2000 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L1bS, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of down-down squarks are produced and decay into a pair of top and a light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\to \bar t\bar s/\bar t\bar d$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R})$ = 600 GeV, $m(\tilde g)$ = 2000 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L1bM, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of down-down squarks are produced and decay into a pair of top and a light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\to \bar t\bar s/\bar t\bar d$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R})$ = 1000 GeV, $m(\tilde g)$ = 2000 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Number of signal events expected for 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L1bM, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of down-down squarks are produced and decay into a pair of top and a light quarks via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{321}$ or $\lambda^{''}_{322}$, $\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R}\to \bar t\bar s/\bar t\bar d$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{d}^{}_\mathrm{R})$ = 1000 GeV, $m(\tilde g)$ = 2000 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
A search for a heavy charged-boson resonance decaying into a charged lepton (electron or muon) and a neutrino is reported. A data sample of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC during 2015-2018 is used in the search. The observed transverse mass distribution computed from the lepton and missing transverse momenta is consistent with the distribution expected from the Standard Model, and upper limits on the cross section for $pp \to W^\prime \to \ell\nu$ are extracted ($\ell = e$ or $\mu$). These vary between 1.3 pb and 0.05 fb depending on the resonance mass in the range between 0.15 and 7.0 TeV at 95% confidence level for the electron and muon channels combined. Gauge bosons with a mass below 6.0 TeV and 5.1 TeV are excluded in the electron and muon channels, respectively, in a model with a resonance that has couplings to fermions identical to those of the Standard Model $W$ boson. Cross-section limits are also provided for resonances with several fixed $\Gamma / m$ values in the range between 1% and 15%. Model-independent limits are derived in single-bin signal regions defined by a varying minimum transverse mass threshold. The resulting visible cross-section upper limits range between 4.6 (15) pb and 22 (22) ab as the threshold increases from 130 (110) GeV to 5.1 (5.1) TeV in the electron (muon) channel.
Transverse mass distribution for events satisfying all selection criteria in the electron channel.
Transverse mass distribution for events satisfying all selection criteria in the muon channel.
Upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for SSM $W^\prime$ production and decay to the electron+neutrino channel as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for SSM $W^\prime$ production and decay to the muon+neutrino channel as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Combined (electron and muon channels) upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for SSM $W^\prime$ production and decay to a single lepton generation as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Observed upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for generic $W^\prime$ production and decay to the electron+neutrino channel as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Observed upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for generic $W^\prime$ production and decay to the muon+neutrino channel as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Combined (electron and muon channels) observed upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for generic $W^\prime$ production and decay to a single lepton generation as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Observed upper limits at the 95% CL on the visible cross section in the electron+neutrino channel as a function of the transverse mass threshold.
Observed upper limits at the 95% CL on the visible cross section in the muon+neutrino channel as a function of the transverse mass threshold.
Product of acceptance and efficiency for the electron and muon selections as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Expected upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for generic $W^\prime$ production and decay to the electron+neutrino channel as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Expected upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for generic $W^\prime$ production and decay to the muon+neutrino channel as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
Combined (electron and muon channels) expected upper limits at the 95% CL on the cross section for generic $W^\prime$ production and decay to a single lepton generation as a function of the $W^\prime$ pole mass.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status Email Forum Twitter GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.