Expected 95% CL exclusion limit in the sbottom-neutralino mass plane.

Expected +1 sigma exclusion limit in the sbottom-neutralino mass plane.

Expected -1 sigma exclusion limit in the sbottom-neutralino mass plane.

Figure 2-a. Expected limit +1sigma.

Figure 2-a. Expected limit.

Figure 2-a. Expected limit -1sigma.

Figure 2-b. Observed limit +1sigma-th.

Figure 2-b. Observed limit.

Figure 2-b. Observed limit -1sigma-th.

Figure 2-b. Expected limit +1sigma.

Figure 2. Auxiliary material. Cross section for the Gbb and Gtt model.

Figure 3a. Auxiliary material. Theoretical uncertainty for the Gbb model.

Figure 3b. Auxiliary material. Theoretical uncertainty for the Gtt model.

Figure 4a. Auxiliary material. Number of MC events for the Gbb model.

Figure 4b. Auxiliary material. Number of MC events for the Gtt model.

Figure 5a. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 5b. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 5c. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 6a. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 6b. Auxiliary material. Acceptance for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 7a. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 7b. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 7c. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 8a. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 8b. Auxiliary material. Efficiency for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 9a. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 9b. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 9c. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 10a. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 10b. Auxiliary material. Experimental uncertainty for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 11a. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 11b. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 11c. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 12a. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 12b. Auxiliary material. Observed CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 13a. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-L.

Figure 13b. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-M.

Figure 13c. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gbb model in the signal region SR4-T.

Figure 14a. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-L.

Figure 14b. Auxiliary material. Expected CLs for the Gtt model in the signal region SR6-T.

Figure 15a. Auxiliary material. Upper Limit for the Gbb model.

Figure 15b. Auxiliary material. Upper Limit for the Gtt model.

Figure 16a. Auxiliary material. Best Signal Region for the Gbb model.

Figure 16b. Auxiliary material. Best Signal Region for the Gtt model.

Cross section x BR limit for the UED model.

95% CL observed and expected upper limits on M_* for spin-independent (D5) WIMP models. The impact of the +-1sigma theoretical uncertainty on the observed limits and the expected +-1sigma range of limits in the absence of a signal are also given.

95% CL observed and expected upper limits on M_* for spin-dependent (D8) WIMP models. The impact of the +-1sigma theoretical uncertainty on the observed limits and the expected +-1sigma range of limits in the absence of a signal are also given.

95% CL observed and expected upper limits on M_* for spin-dependent (D9) WIMP models. The impact of the +-1sigma theoretical uncertainty on the observed limits and the expected +-1sigma range of limits in the absence of a signal are also given.

95% CL observed and expected limits on the nucleon-WIMP scattering cross-section for spin-independent (D1) WIMP models. The impact of the +-1sigma theoretical uncertainty on the observed limits and the expected +-1sigma range of limits in the absence of a signal are also given.

95% CL observed and expected limits on the nucleon-WIMP scattering cross-section for spin-independent (D5) WIMP models. The impact of the +-1sigma theoretical uncertainty on the observed limits and the expected +-1sigma range of limits in the absence of a signal are also given.

95% CL observed and expected limits on the nucleon-WIMP scattering cross-section for spin-dependent (D8) WIMP models. The impact of the +-1sigma theoretical uncertainty on the observed limits and the expected +-1sigma range of limits in the absence of a signal are also given.

95% CL observed and expected limits on the nucleon-WIMP scattering cross-section for spin-dependent (D9) WIMP models. The impact of the +-1sigma theoretical uncertainty on the observed limits and the expected +-1sigma range of limits in the absence of a signal are also given.

Distribution of the missing ET for data and the SM expectation in the one-lepton plus 2 jet channel.

Observed 95 PCT exclusion limit in the M(gluino), M(sbottom) plane obtained with the zero-lepton channel data.

Expected 95 PCT exclusion limit in the M(gluino), M(sbottom) plane obtained with the zero-lepton channel data.

Observed and expected 95 PCT CL upper limits on the gluino-mediated and stop pair production cross section as a function of the gluino mass for a stop mass od 180 GeV, for the one-lepton analysis.

Observed and expected 95 PCT CL upper limits on the gluino-mediated and stop pair production cross section as a function of the gluino mass for a stop mass od 210 GeV, for the one-lepton analysis.

Observed 95 PCT CL exclusion limits from the zero-lepton analysis on the MSUGRA/CMSSM scenario with tan(beta) = 40, A0 = 0 and MU > 0.

Expected 95 PCT CL exclusion limits from the zero-lepton analysis on the MSUGRA/CMSSM scenario with tan(beta) = 40, A0 = 0 and MU > 0.

Observed 95 PCT CL exclusion limits from the one-lepton analysis on the MSUGRA/CMSSM scenario with tan(beta) = 40, A0 = 0 and MU > 0.

Expected 95 PCT CL exclusion limits from the one-lepton analysis on the MSUGRA/CMSSM scenario with tan(beta) = 40, A0 = 0 and MU > 0.

Observed 95 PCT CL exclusion limits from the combined zero and one-lepton analyses on the MSUGRA/CMSSM scenario with tan(beta) = 40, A0 = 0 and MU > 0.

Expected 95 PCT CL exclusion limits from the combined zero and one-lepton analyses on the MSUGRA/CMSSM scenario with tan(beta) = 40, A0 = 0 and MU > 0.

95 PCT confidence lower limits to M(1/2).

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 0.8 to 6.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 6.8 to 12.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 12.8 to 18.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 18.8 to 24.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 24.8 to 30.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 30.8 to 36.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 36.8 to 42.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 42.8 to 48.8.

The observed 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) over the tan(beta) region 48.8 to 51.2.

The observed and expected 95% CL limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta).

The acceptance, efficiency and their product in the Lambda-Tan(Beta)-plane for M_mess=250 TeV, N_5=3 and C_grav=1.

The relative systematic uncertainty from the selection, theoretical and statistical uncertainities and their combined values.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible and production cross sections in the Lambda-Tan(Beta) plane for stau and slepton NLSP production in the minimal GMSB model.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2 after splitting and filtering.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2 after splitting and filtering.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2 after splitting and filtering.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2 after splitting and filtering.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the mass of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d12) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d12) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d12) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d12) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d23) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d23) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d23) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the the splitting scale variable sqrt(d23) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(12) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(12) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(12) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(12) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of Cambridge-Aachen jets with R=1.2.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(21) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(21) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(21) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(21) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

Normalised cross-section as a function of the N-subjettiness ratio variable tau(32) of anti-kT jets with R=1.0.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour (-1$\sigma$) for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The observed 95% CL exclusion contour for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.1 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour (+1$\sigma$) for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.1 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour (-1$\sigma$) for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.1 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.1 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The observed 95% CL exclusion contour for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ =1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour ($+1\sigma$) for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ =1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour ($-1\sigma$) for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ =1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ =1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The observed 95% CL exclusion contour for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving for a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.01 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour ($+1\sigma$) for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving for a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.01 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour ($-1\sigma$) for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving for a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.01 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The expected 95% CL exclusion contour for a simplified model of dark-matter production involving for a vector operator with couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.1, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0.01 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$ and the mediator mass $m_{\mathrm{med}}$. The plane under the limit curve is excluded.

The 90% CL exclusion limit on the $\chi$-proton scattering cross section in a simplifed model of dark-matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$.

The 90% CL exclusion limit on the $\chi$-nucleon scattering cross section in a simplifed model of dark-matter production involving a vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25, $g_{\chi}$ = 1 and $g_{l}$ = 0 as a function of the dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$.

The observed and expected 95% CL limits on M* for a dimension-7 operator EFT model with a contact interaction of type $\gamma\gamma\chi\chi$ as a function of dark-matter mass $m_{\chi}$.

The observed and expected limit at 95% CL on the production cross section of a $Z\gamma$ resonance as a function of its mass.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on signal strength $\mu$, the ratio of the experimental limit to the predicted signal cross section, for a simplified model of dark matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$ = 0.25 and $g_{\chi}$ = 1 as a function of the DM and the mediator particle masses. The bound on $\mu$ only applies for choices of couplings that yield the same kinematic distributions as the benchmark model.

Acceptance, in %, for a simplified model of dark matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$= 0.25 and $g_{\chi}$ = 1 for various $m_{\chi}$ and $m_{\textrm{med}}$ values. It is constant as a function of $m_{\chi}$ for a fixed $m_{\textrm{med}}$ in the region $m_{\textrm{med}}>2m_{\chi}$.

Fiducial reconstruction efficiencies in the three inclusive signal regions for a simplified model of dark matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_{q}$= 0.25 and $g_{\chi}$ = 1 for various $m_{\chi}$ and $m_{\textrm{med}}$ values. It is constant as a function of $m_{\chi}$ for a fixed $m_{\textrm{med}}$ in the region $m_{\textrm{med}}>2m_{\chi}$.