Showing 7 of 7 results
Measurements of charged-particle fragmentation functions of jets produced in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions can provide insight into the modification of parton showers in the hot, dense medium created in the collisions. ATLAS has measured jets in $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 2.76$ TeV Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC using a data set recorded in 2011 with an integrated luminosity of 0.14 nb$^{-1}$. Jets were reconstructed using the anti-$k_{t}$ algorithm with distance parameter values $R$ = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4. Distributions of charged-particle transverse momentum and longitudinal momentum fraction are reported for seven bins in collision centrality for $R=0.4$ jets with $p_{{T}}^{\mathrm{jet}}> 100$ GeV. Commensurate minimum $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ values are used for the other radii. Ratios of fragment distributions in each centrality bin to those measured in the most peripheral bin are presented. These ratios show a reduction of fragment yield in central collisions relative to peripheral collisions at intermediate $z$ values, $0.04 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.2$ and an enhancement in fragment yield for $z \lesssim 0.04$. A smaller, less significant enhancement is observed at large $z$ and large $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in central collisions.
Differences of D(Z) distributions in different centralities with respect to peripheral events for R = 0.3 jets. The errors represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Differences of D(Z) distributions in different centralities with respect to peripheral events for R = 0.2 jets. The errors represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(z) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.4 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.3 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
D(pt) distribution for R=0.2 jets.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(z) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.4 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.3 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
Ratio of D(pt) distributions for R=0.2 jets for central to peripheral events.
This paper describes the measurement of elliptic flow of charged particles in lead-lead collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 2.76 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The results are based on an integrated luminosity of approximately 7 ub^-1. Elliptic flow is measured over a wide region in pseudorapidity, |eta| < 2.5, and over a broad range in transverse momentum, 0.5 < p_T < 20 GeV. The elliptic flow parameter v_2 is obtained by correlating individual tracks with the event plane measured using energy deposited in the forward calorimeters. As a function of transverse momentum, v_2(p_T) reaches a maximum at p_T of about 3 GeV, then decreases and becomes weakly dependent on p_T above 7 - 8 GeV. Over the measured pseudorapidity region, v_2 is found to be approximately independent of |eta| for all collision centralities and particle transverse momenta, something not observed in lower energy collisions. The results are discussed in the context of previous measurements at lower collision energies, as well as recent results from the LHC.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and |eta| <1.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and 1< |eta| <2.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and 2< |eta| <2.5.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 2< pT <4 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 4< pT <7 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 9< pT <20 GeV.
Measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV are presented using a data sample corresponding to 0.49 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ integrated luminosity collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2015. The recorded minimum-bias sample is enhanced by triggers for "ultra-central" collisions, providing an opportunity to perform detailed study of flow harmonics in the regime where the initial state is dominated by fluctuations. The anisotropy of the charged-particle azimuthal angle distributions is characterized by the Fourier coefficients, $v_{2}-v_{7}$, which are measured using the two-particle correlation, scalar-product and event-plane methods. The goal of the paper is to provide measurements of the differential as well as integrated flow harmonics $v_{n}$ over wide ranges of the transverse momentum, 0.5 $
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
This paper presents measurements of charged-hadron spectra obtained in $pp$, $p$+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ or $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, and in Xe+Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}=5.44$ TeV. The data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC have total integrated luminosities of 25 pb${}^{-1}$, 28 nb${}^{-1}$, 0.50 nb${}^{-1}$, and 3 $\mu$b${}^{-1}$, respectively. The nuclear modification factors $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ and $R_\text{AA}$ are obtained by comparing the spectra in heavy-ion and $pp$ collisions in a wide range of charged-particle transverse momenta and pseudorapidity. The nuclear modification factor $R_{p\text{Pb}}$ shows a moderate enhancement above unity with a maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 3$ GeV; the enhancement is stronger in the Pb-going direction. The nuclear modification factors in both Pb+Pb and Xe+Xe collisions feature a significant, centrality-dependent suppression. They show a similar distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a local maximum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 2$ GeV and a local minimum at $p_{\mathrm{T}} \approx 7$ GeV. This dependence is more distinguishable in more central collisions. No significant $|\eta|$-dependence is found. A comprehensive comparison with several theoretical predictions is also provided. They typically describe $R_\text{AA}$ better in central collisions and in the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range from about 10 to 100 GeV.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>charged-hadron spectra:</b> <br><i>pp reference:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table1">for p+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table10">for Pb+Pb</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table19">for Xe+Xe</a> <br><i>p+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table2">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table3">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table4">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table5">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table6">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table7">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table8">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table9">0-90%</a> <br><i>Pb+Pb:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table11">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table12">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table13">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table14">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table15">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table16">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table17">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table18">60-80%</a> <br><i>Xe+Xe:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table20">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table21">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table22">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table23">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table24">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table25">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table26">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table27">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (p<sub>T</sub>):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table28">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table29">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table30">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table31">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table32">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table33">40-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table34">60-90%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table35">0-90%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table36">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table37">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table38">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table39">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table40">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table41">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table42">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table43">60-80%</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <a href="?version=1&table=Table44">0-5%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table45">5-10%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table46">10-20%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table47">20-30%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table48">30-40%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table49">40-50%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table50">50-60%</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table51">60-80%</a> </br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br><b>nuclear modification factors (y*/eta):</b> <br><i>R<sub>pPb</sub>:</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table52">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table53">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table54">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table55">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table56">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table57">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table58">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table59">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table60">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table61">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table62">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table63">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table64">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table65">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table66">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table67">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table68">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table69">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table70">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table71">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 40-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table72">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table73">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table74">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table75">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 60-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table76">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table77">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table78">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table79">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br> 0-90%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table80">0.66-0.755GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table81">2.95-3.35GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table82">7.65-8.8GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table83">15.1-17.3GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Pb+Pb):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table84">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table85">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table86">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table87">60-95GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table88">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table89">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table90">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table91">60-95GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table92">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table93">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table94">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table95">60-95GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table96">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table97">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table98">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table99">60-95GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table100">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table101">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table102">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table103">60-95GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table104">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table105">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table106">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table107">60-95GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table108">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table109">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table110">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table111">60-95GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table112">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table113">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table114">20-23GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table115">60-95GeV</a> <br><i>R<sub>AA</sub> (Xe+Xe):</i> <br> 0-5%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table116">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table117">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table118">20-23GeV</a> <br> 5-10%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table119">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table120">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table121">20-23GeV</a> <br> 10-20%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table122">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table123">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table124">20-23GeV</a> <br> 20-30%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table125">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table126">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table127">20-23GeV</a> <br> 30-40%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table128">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table129">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table130">20-23GeV</a> <br> 40-50%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table131">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table132">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table133">20-23GeV</a> <br> 50-60%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table134">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table135">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table136">20-23GeV</a> <br> 60-80%: <a href="?version=1&table=Table137">1.7-1.95GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table138">6.7-7.65GeV</a> <a href="?version=1&table=Table139">20-23GeV</a> <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb, divided by 〈TPPB〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Charged-hadron cross-section in pp collisions. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Charged-hadron spectrum in the centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe, divided by 〈TAA〉. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty on momentum bias is negligible at low pT; in such cases, it is omitted in the table below.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-60% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-90% for p+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Pb+Pb. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 0-5% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 5-10% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 10-20% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 20-30% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 30-40% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 40-50% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 50-60% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Nuclear modification factor in centrality interval 60-80% for Xe+Xe. The systematic uncertainties are described in the section 7 of the paper. The total systematic uncertainties are determined by adding the contributions from all relevant sources in quadrature.
Differential measurements of charged particle azimuthal anisotropy are presented for lead-lead collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, based on an integrated luminosity of approximately 8 mb^-1. This anisotropy is characterized via a Fourier expansion of the distribution of charged particles in azimuthal angle (phi), with the coefficients v_n denoting the magnitude of the anisotropy. Significant v_2-v_6 values are obtained as a function of transverse momentum (0.5<pT<20 GeV), pseudorapidity (|eta|<2.5) and centrality using an event plane method. The v_n values for n>=3 are found to vary weakly with both eta and centrality, and their pT dependencies are found to follow an approximate scaling relation, v_n^{1/n}(pT) \propto v_2^{1/2}(pT). A Fourier analysis of the charged particle pair distribution in relative azimuthal angle (Dphi=phi_a-phi_b) is performed to extract the coefficients v_{n,n}=<cos (n Dphi)>. For pairs of charged particles with a large pseudorapidity gap (|Deta=eta_a-eta_b|>2) and one particle with pT<3 GeV, the v_{2,2}-v_{6,6} values are found to factorize as v_{n,n}(pT^a,pT^b) ~ v_n(pT^a)v_n(pT^b) in central and mid-central events. Such factorization suggests that these values of v_{2,2}-v_{6,6} are primarily due to the response of the created matter to the fluctuations in the geometry of the initial state. A detailed study shows that the v_{1,1}(pT^a,pT^b) data are consistent with the combined contributions from a rapidity-even v_1 and global momentum conservation. A two-component fit is used to extract the v_1 contribution. The extracted v_1 is observed to cross zero at pT\sim1.0 GeV, reaches a maximum at 4-5 GeV with a value comparable to that for v_3, and decreases at higher pT.
The EP Resolution Factor vs. Centrality for n values from2 to 6.
The Chi Reolution Factor vs. Centrality for n values from 2 to 6.
The one-dimensional Delta(PHI) correlation function vs Delta(PHI) for |DETARAP| in the range 2 to 5 summed over all n values from 1 to 6.
The Fourier coefficient V_n,n vs. |Delta(ETARAP)| for individual n values.
The Fourier coefficient V_n vs. |Delta(ETARAP)| from the 2PC anaysis for individual n values from 2 to n.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 0 TO 5%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 5 TO 10%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 10 TO 20%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 20 TO 30%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 30 TO 40%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 40 TO 50%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 50 TO 60%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 60 TO 70%.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 1 TO 2 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 2 TO 3 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 3 TO 4 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 4 TO 8 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 8 TO 12 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 12 TO 20 GeV.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 1 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 5 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 5 TO 10 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 10 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 10 TO 20 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 20 TO 30 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 30 TO 40 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 40 TO 50 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 50 TO 60 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 60 TO 70 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 70 TO 80 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 1 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 5 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 5 TO 10 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 10 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 10 TO 20 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 20 TO 30 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 30 TO 40 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 40 TO 50 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 50 TO 60 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 60 TO 70 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 70 TO 80 %.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1} vs pT for different centrality selections, Figure 21.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
Measurements of two-particle correlation functions and the first five azimuthal harmonics, $v_1$ to $v_5$, are presented, using 28 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Significant long-range "ridge-like" correlations are observed for pairs with small relative azimuthal angle ($|\Delta\phi|<\pi/3$) and back-to-back pairs ($|\Delta\phi| > 2\pi/3$) over the transverse momentum range $0.4 < p_{\rm T} < 12$ GeV and in different intervals of event activity. The event activity is defined by either the number of reconstructed tracks or the total transverse energy on the Pb-fragmentation side. The azimuthal structure of such long-range correlations is Fourier decomposed to obtain the harmonics $v_n$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ and event activity. The extracted $v_n$ values for $n=2$ to 5 decrease with $n$. The $v_2$ and $v_3$ values are found to be positive in the measured $p_{\rm T}$ range. The $v_1$ is also measured as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ and is observed to change sign around $p_{\rm T}\approx 1.5$-2.0 GeV and then increase to about 0.1 for $p_{\rm T}>4$ GeV. The $v_2(p_{\rm T})$, $v_3(p_{\rm T})$ and $v_4(p_{\rm T})$ are compared to the $v_n$ coefficients in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} =2.76$ TeV with similar event multiplicities. Reasonable agreement is observed after accounting for the difference in the average $p_{\rm T}$ of particles produced in the two collision systems.
The distributions of $N_{ch}^{rec}$ for MB and MB+HMT after applying an event-by-event weight, errors are statistical.
The distributions of $E_{T}^{Pb}$ [GeV] for MB and MB+HMT after applying an event-by-event weight, errors are statistical.
Per-trigger yield in 2D, $Y$($\Delta\phi$,$\Delta\eta$), for events with $E_{T}^{Pb} <$ 10 GeV and $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 200 and recoil-subtracted per-trigger yield, $Y^{sub}$($\Delta\phi$,$\Delta\eta$) for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 200. Errors are statistical.
$v_{2,2}^{unsub}$ and $v_{2,2}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
$v_{3,3}^{unsub}$ and $v_{3,3}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
$v_{4,4}^{unsub}$ and $v_{4,4}$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ calculated from the 2-D per-trigger yields in figure 4(a) and 4(b), respectively.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
The per-trigger yield distributions $Y^{corr}(\Delta\phi)$ and $Y^{recoil}(\Delta\phi)$ for events with $N_{ch}^{rec} \geq$ 220 in the long-range region $|\Delta\eta| >$ 2.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the near-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
Integrated per-trigger yield, $Y_{int}$, on the away-side as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV.
The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.
The integrated per-trigger yield, Y_{int}, on the near-side, the away-side and their difference and Y_{int} from the recoil as a function of event activity. Errors are statistical.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
The Fourier coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{T}^{a}$ extracted from the correlation functions, before and after the subtraction of the recoil component.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
$v_{2}$, $v_{3}$, $v_{4}$ and $v_{5}$ as a function of $p_T^a$ for 1 $< p_{T}^{b} <$ 3 GeV for different $N_{ch}^{rec}$ intervals.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{2}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
The values of factorization variable $r_{3}$ defined by Eq.(11) before and after the subtraction of the recoil component. Errors are total experimental uncertainties.
Correlations between the elliptic or triangular flow coefficients $v_m$ ($m$=2 or 3) and other flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$=2 to 5) are measured using $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV Pb+Pb collision data collected in 2010 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated lumonisity of 7 $\mu$b$^{-1}$. The $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations are measured in midrapidity as a function of centrality, and, for events within the same centrality interval, as a function of event ellipticity or triangularity defined in a forward rapidity region. For events within the same centrality interval, $v_3$ is found to be anticorrelated with $v_2$ and this anticorrelation is consistent with similar anticorrelations between the corresponding eccentricities $\epsilon_2$ and $\epsilon_3$. On the other hand, it is observed that $v_4$ increases strongly with $v_2$, and $v_5$ increases strongly with both $v_2$ and $v_3$. The trend and strength of the $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations for $n$=4 and 5 are found to disagree with $\epsilon_m$-$\epsilon_n$ correlations predicted by initial-geometry models. Instead, these correlations are found to be consistent with the combined effects of a linear contribution to $v_n$ and a nonlinear term that is a function of $v_2^2$ or of $v_2v_3$, as predicted by hydrodynamic models. A simple two-component fit is used to separate these two contributions. The extracted linear and nonlinear contributions to $v_4$ and $v_5$ are found to be consistent with previously measured event-plane correlations.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.