Showing 25 of 850 results
A search for long-lived particles decaying into an oppositely charged lepton pair, $\mu\mu$, $ee$, or $e\mu$, is presented using 32.8 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Candidate leptons are required to form a vertex, within the inner tracking volume of ATLAS, displaced from the primary $pp$ interaction region. No lepton pairs with an invariant mass greater than 12 GeV are observed, consistent with the background expectations derived from data. The detection efficiencies for generic resonances with lifetimes ($c\tau$) of 100-1000 mm decaying into a dilepton pair with masses between 0.1-1.0 TeV are presented as a function of $p_T$ and decay radius of the resonances to allow the extraction of upper limits on the cross sections for theoretical models. The result is also interpreted in a supersymmetric model in which the lightest neutralino, produced via squark-antisquark production, decays into $\ell^{+}\ell^{'-}\nu$ ($\ell, \ell^{'} = e$, $\mu$) with a finite lifetime due to the presence of R-parity violating couplings. Cross-section limits are presented for specific squark and neutralino masses. For a 700 GeV squark, neutralinos with masses of 50-500 GeV and mean proper lifetimes corresponding to $c\tau$ values between 1 mm to 6 m are excluded. For a 1.6 TeV squark, $c\tau$ values between 3 mm to 1 m are excluded for 1.3 TeV neutralinos.
Results of a search for new particles decaying into eight or more jets and moderate missing transverse momentum are presented. The analysis uses 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton$-$proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider between 2015 and 2018. The selection rejects events containing isolated electrons or muons, and makes requirements according to the number of $b$-tagged jets and the scalar sum of masses of large-radius jets. The search extends previous analyses both in using a larger dataset and by employing improved jet and missing transverse momentum reconstruction methods which more cleanly separate signal from background processes. No evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model is found. The results are interpreted in the context of supersymmetry-inspired simplified models, significantly extending the limits on the gluino mass in those models. In particular, limits on the gluino mass are set at 2 TeV when the lightest neutralino is nearly massless in a model assuming a two-step cascade decay via the lightest chargino and second-lightest neutralino.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the multi-bin signal regions for the 8 jet regions.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the multi-bin signal regions for the 9 jet regions.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the multi-bin signal regions for the 10 jet regions.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the single-bin signal regions of the analysis.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid with the signal cross section increased by one sigma.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid with the signal cross section decreased by one sigma.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid plus one sigma from experimental systematics.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid minus one sigma from experimental systematics.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid with the signal cross section increased by one sigma.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid with the signal cross section decreased by one sigma.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid plus one sigma from experimental systematics.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid minus one sigma from experimental systematics.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid with the signal cross section increased by one sigma.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid with the signal cross section decreased by one sigma.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid plus one sigma from experimental systematics.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid minus one sigma from experimental systematics.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.
Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.
Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.
$\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ distribution in the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340. Two benchmark signal models are shown along with the background yields. These models, each representing a single mass point, are labelled 'RPV' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{t}}) = (1600, 600) \, \mathrm{GeV}$ and 'two-step' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
$\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ distribution in the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib. Two benchmark signal models are shown along with the background yields. These models, each representing a single mass point, are labelled 'RPV' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{t}}) = (1600, 600) \, \mathrm{GeV}$ and 'two-step' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
$\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ distribution in the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib. Two benchmark signal models are shown along with the background yields. These models, each representing a single mass point, are labelled 'RPV' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{t}}) = (1600, 600) \, \mathrm{GeV}$ and 'two-step' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-8ij50-0ib-MJ500. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-9ij50-0ib-MJ340. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ500. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-10ij50-1ib-MJ500. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-11ij50-0ib. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-8ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-8ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-9ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-9ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-10ij50-1ib-MJ500 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-10ij50-1ib-MJ500 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-11ij50-0ib showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-11ij50-0ib showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
Acceptance for the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.
Efficiency for the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.
The normalisation factors for the dominant backgrounds of the analysis in each of the multi-bin and single-bin regions.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the single-bin validation regions to test the $N_{\mathrm{jet}}$ extraction.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the single-bin validation regions to test the $\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ extrapolation.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the multi-bin validation regions to test the $N_{\mathrm{jet}}$ extraction.
Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the multi-bin validation regions to test the $\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ extrapolation.
The observed Cls from the best expected signal regions for the two-step decay.
The observed Cls from the best expected signal regions for the Gtt decay.
The observed Cls from the best expected signal regions for the RPV decay.
Number of events in each signal region broken down by background type and the number of observed data events.
From left to right; the $95\%$ CL upper limits on the visible cross section (${\langle \epsilon\sigma \rangle}^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events. Next is the $95\%$ CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number of background events. The last two columns show the confidence level for the background only hypothesis ($CL_{b}$) and the dicovery $p$-value along with the Gaussian significance (Z).
Visualisation of the highest jet multiplicity event selected in signal regions targeting long cascade decays of pair-produced gluinos. This event was recorded by ATLAS on 23 October 2016, and contains 16 jets, illustrated by cones. Yellow blocks represent the calorimeter energy measured in noise-suppressed clusters. Of the reconstructed jets, 13 (11) have transverse momenta above 50 GeV (80 GeV), with 3 (2) being b-tagged. The leading jet has a transverse momentum of 507 GeV, and the sum of jet transverse momenta $H_T=2.9$ TeV. A value of 343 GeV is observed for the $E_{T}^{miss}$, whose direction is shown by the dashed red line, producing a significance $S(E_{T}^{miss})=6.4$. The sum of the masses of large-radius jets is evaluated as $M_{J}^{\Sigma}=1070$ GeV.
Visualisation of the highest jet multiplicity event selected in a control region used to make predictions of the background from multijet production. This event was recorded by ATLAS on 18 July 2018, and contains 19 jets, illustrated by cones. Yellow blocks represent the calorimeter energy measured in in noise-suppressed clusters. Of the reconstructed jets, 16 (10) have transverse momenta above 50 GeV (80 GeV). No jets were b-tagged. The leading et has a transverse momentum of 371 GeV, and the sum of jet transverse momenta $H_T=2.2$ TeV. A value of 8 GeV is observed for the $E_{T}^{miss}$, whose direction is shown by the dashed red line, producing a significance $S(E_{T}^{miss})=0.2$. The sum of the masses of large-radius jets is evaluated as $M_{J}^{\Sigma}=767$ GeV.
This paper reports on a search for heavy resonances decaying into $WW$, $ZZ$ or $WZ$ using proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. The data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 $\mathrm{fb^{-1}}$, were recorded with the ATLAS detector from 2015 to 2018 at the Large Hadron Collider. The search is performed for final states in which one $W$ or $Z$ boson decays leptonically, and the other $W$ boson or $Z$ boson decays hadronically. The data are found to be described well by expected backgrounds. Upper bounds on the production cross sections of heavy scalar, vector or tensor resonances are derived in the mass range 300-5000 GeV within the context of Standard Model extensions with warped extra dimensions or including a heavy vector triplet. Production through gluon-gluon fusion, Drell-Yan or vector-boson fusion are considered, depending on the assumed model.
Higgs boson properties are studied in the four-lepton decay channel (where lepton = $e$, $\mu$) using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data recorded at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The inclusive cross-section times branching ratio for $H\to ZZ^*$ decay is measured to be $1.34 \pm 0.12$ pb for a Higgs boson with absolute rapidity below 2.5, in good agreement with the Standard Model prediction of $1.33 \pm 0.08$ pb. Cross-sections times branching ratio are measured for the main Higgs boson production modes in several exclusive phase-space regions. The measurements are interpreted in terms of coupling modifiers and of the tensor structure of Higgs boson interactions using an effective field theory approach. Exclusion limits are set on the CP-even and CP-odd `beyond the Standard Model' couplings of the Higgs boson to vector bosons, gluons and top quarks.
The expected number of SM Higgs boson events with a mass $m_{H}$= 125 GeV for an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV in each reconstructed event signal (115 < $m_{4l}$< 130 GeV) and sideband ($m_{4l}$ in 105-115 GeV or 130-160 GeV for $ZZ^{*}$, 130-350 GeV for $tXX$) category, shown separately for each production bin of the Production Mode Stage. The ggF and $bbH$ yields are shown separately but both contribute to the same (ggF)production bin, and $ZH$ and $WH$ are reported separately but are merged together for the final result. Statistical and systematic uncertainties, including those for total SM cross-section predictions, are added in quadrature. Contributions that are below 0.2% of the total signal in each reconstructed event category are not shown and are replaced by -.
The impact of the dominant systematic uncertainties (in percent) on the cross-sections in production bins of the Production Mode Stage and the Reduced Stage 1.1. Similar sources of systematic uncertainties are grouped together in luminosity (Lumi.),electron/muon reconstruction and identification efficiencies and pile up modelling ($e$, $\mu$, pile up), jet energy scale/resolution and $b$-tagging efficiencies (Jets, flav. tag), uncertainties in reducible background (reducible bkg), theoretical uncertainties in $ZZ^{*}$ background and $tXX$ background, and theoretical uncertainties in the signal due to parton distribution function (PDF), QCD scale (QCD) and parton showering algorithm (Shower). The uncertainties are rounded to the nearest 0.5%, except for the luminosity uncertainty, which is measured to be 1.7% and increases for the $VH$ signal processes due to the simulation-based normalisation of the $VVV$ background. The uncertainties that are below 0.5% are not shown and replaced by -.
The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton invariant mass distribution for the selected Higgs boson candidates, shown for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed tohave a mass $m_{H}$= 125GeV.
The expected (pre-fit) and observed numbers of events for an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV in the signal region 115 < $m_{4l}$< 130 GeV and sideband region $m_{4l}$ in 105-115 GeV or 130-160 GeV (350 GeV for $tXX$-enriched) in each reconstructed event category assuming the SM Higgs boson signal with a mass $m_{H}$= 125 GeV. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are included for the predictions. Expected contributions that are below 0.2% of the total yield in each reconstructed event category are not shown and replaced by -.
The expected and the observed (post-fit) the jet multiplicity distribution after the inclusive event selection for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton transverse momentum distribution for events with zero jets, after the inclusive event selection for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton transverse momentum distribution for events with one jet, after the inclusive event selection for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton transverse momentum distribution for events with at least two jets, after the inclusive event selection for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed (post-fit) the dijet invariant mass distribution for events with at least two jets, after the inclusive event selection for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{ggF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 0$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{ggF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 0$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low category with $NN_{ZZ}$<0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{ZZ}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low category with $NN_{ZZ}$>0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med category with $NN_{ZZ}$<0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{ZZ}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med category with $NN_{ZZ}$>0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-High category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 2$j$ category with $NN_{VH}$<0.2 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{VH}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 2$j$ category with $NN_{VH}$>0.2 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 2$j$-BSM-like category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{ttH}$ output (post-fit) distribution in $ttH$-Had-enriched category with $NN_{tXX}$<0.4 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{tXX}$ output (post-fit) distribution in $ttH$-Had-enriched category with $NN_{tXX}$>0.4 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed $NN_{ttH}$ output (post-fit) distribution in $VH$-Lep-enriched category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed events in the categories where no NN discriminant is used for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected and the observed events in the side bands used to constraint the $ZZ^{*}$ and $tXX$ backgrounds for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV. The SM Higgs boson signal is assumed to have a mass $m_{H}$=125 GeV.
The expected SM cross section $(\sigma \cdot BR)_{SM}$, the observed value of $(\sigma \cdot BR)$, and their ratio $(\sigma \cdot BR)/(\sigma \cdot BR)_{SM}$ for the inclusive production and for each Production Mode and Reduced Stage-1.1 production bin for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV.
The correlation matrices between the measured cross-sections and the $ZZ$ and $tXX$ normalisation factors for Production Mode Stage.
The correlation matrices between the measured cross-sections and the $ZZ$ and $tXX$ normalisation factors for Reduced Stage 1.1.
Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the (ggF,VBF) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the (ggF,VBF) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the (ggF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the (ggF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the (VBF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the (VBF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the ($gg2H-0j-p_T^H-Low$,$gg2H-0j-p_T^H-High$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the ($gg2H-0j-p_T^H-Low$,$gg2H-0j-p_T^H-High$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the ($\kappa_{V}$vs.$\kappa_{F}$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the ($\kappa_{V}$vs.$\kappa_{F}$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the table.
The expected signal yield ratio for chosen CP-even and CP-odd EFT parameter values together with the corresponding cross-section measurement in each production bin of Reduced Stage 1.1. The parameter values correspond approximately to the expected confidence intervals at the 68% CLs obtained from the statistical interpretation of data.
The expected and observed confidence intervals at 68% and 95% CLs of the SMEFT Wilson coefficients for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. For the coupling with two best fit values, the two values have been splitted in the two different columns 'Two Best-fit value - first' and 'Two Best-fit value - second', and the symbol '-' has been inserted in the missing fields.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{uH}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{uH}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
The best-fit values and the corresponding deviation from the SM prediction obtained from two-dimensional likelihood scans of the CP-odd BSM coupling parameters with 139fb$^{-1}$ data at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. For the coupling with two best fit values, the two values have been splitted in the two different columns 'Two Observed best-fit first/second_POI - first' and 'Two Observed best-fit first/second_POI - second', and the symbol '-' has been inserted in the missing fields.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{\tilde{u}H}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{\tilde{u}H}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Signal acceptance times efficiency, expressed as a percentage, obtained from the ratio of the number of simulated signal events satisfying the event selection criteria in each reconstructed category to the total number of events generated in the phase space specified by a given Production model bin.
Signal acceptance times efficiency, expressed as a percentage, obtained from the ratio of the number of simulated signal events satisfying the event selection criteria in each reconstructed category to the total number of events generated in the phase space specified by a given Reduced Stage-1.1 production bin.
Observed covariance matrix for the different parameters of interest when fitting the for Production Mode Stage.
Observed covariance matrix for the different parameters of interest when fitting the for Reduced Stage 1.1.
The expected SM cross section $(\sigma\cdot BR)_{SM}$, the observed value of $(\sigma\cdot BR)$, and their ratio $(\sigma\cdot BR)/(\sigma\cdot BR)_{SM}$ for the alternate Reduced Stage-1.1 scheme for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV.
The correlation matrices between the measured cross-sections and the ZZ and $tXX$ normalisation factors for alternative Reduced Stage 1.1.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HWB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HWB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}B}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\tilde{W}B}$ versus $c_{H\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. Except for the two fitted Wilson coefficients, all others are set to zero.
Inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections of the Higgs boson are measured in the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ ($\ell = e,\mu$) decay channel. The results are based on proton$-$proton collision data produced at the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector from 2015 to 2018, equivalent to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The inclusive fiducial cross section for the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ process is measured to be $\sigma_\mathrm{fid} = 3.28 \pm 0.32$ fb, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction of $\sigma_\mathrm{fid, SM} = 3.41 \pm 0.18 $ fb. Differential fiducial cross sections are measured for a variety of observables which are sensitive to the production and decay of the Higgs boson. All measurements are in agreement with the Standard Model predictions. The results are used to constrain anomalous Higgs boson interactions with Standard Model particles.
Fractional uncertainties for the inclusive fiducial and total cross sections, and range of systematic uncertainties for the differential measurements. The columns e/$\mu$ and jets represent the experimental uncertainties in lepton and jet reconstruction and identification, respectively. The Z + jets, $t\bar{t}$, tXX (Other Bkg.) column includes uncertainties related to the estimation of these background sources. The $ZZ^{*}$ theory ($ZZ^{*}$ th.) uncertainties include the PDF and scale variations. Signal theory (Sig th.) uncertainties include PDF choice, QCD scale, and shower modelling of the signal. Finally, the column labelled Comp. contains uncertainties related to production mode composition and unfolding bias which affect the response matrices. The uncertainties have been rounded to the nearest 0.5%, except for the luminosity uncertainty which has been measured to be 1.7%.
Expected (pre-fit) and observed number of events in the four decay final states after the event selection, in the mass range 115< $m_{4l}$ < 130 GeV. The sum of the expected number of SM Higgs boson events and the estimated background yields is compared to the data. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are included for the predictions.
The fiducial and total cross sections of Higgs boson production measured in the 4l final state. The fiducial cross sections are given separately for each decay final state, and for same- and different-flavour decays. The inclusive fiducial cross section is measured as the sum of all final states ($\sigma_{sum}$), as well as by combining the per-final state measurements assuming SM $ZZ^{*} \to 4l$ relative branching ratios ($\sigma_{comb}$). For the total cross section ($\sigma_{tot}$), the Higgs boson branching ratio at $m_{H}$= 125 GeV is assumed. The total SM prediction is accurate to N3LO in QCD and NLO EW for the ggF process. The cross sections for all other Higgs boson production modes XH are added. For the fiducial cross section predictions, the SM cross sections are multiplied by the acceptances determined using the NNLOPS sample for ggF. The p-values indicating the compatibility of the measurement and the SM prediction are shown as well. They do not include the systematic uncertainty in the theoretical predictions.
Correlation matrix between the fiducial cross sections for the four individual decay final states and the $ZZ^{*}$ normalisation factor.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum $p_{T}^{4l}$ of the Higgs boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 . Measured value in the last bin is un upper limit at 95% CL.
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum $p_{T}^{4l}$ of the Higgs boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{12}$ of the leading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{12}$ of the leading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{34}$ of the subleading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{34}$ of the subleading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the rapidity $|y_{4l}|$ of the Higgs boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the rapidity $|y_{4l}|$ of the Higgs boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $|\cos\theta^{*}|$ of the leading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $|\cos\theta^{*}|$ of the leading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{1}$ of the anti-lepton from the leading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{1}$ of the anti-lepton from the leading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{2}$ of the anti-lepton from the subleading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{2}$ of the anti-lepton from the subleading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons.
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi_{1}$ of the decay plane of the leading Z boson and the plane formed between its four-momentum and the z-axis. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi_{1}$ of the decay plane of the leading Z boson and the plane formed between its four-momentum and the z-axis.
Differential fiducial cross section for the jet multiplicity $N_{jets}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the jet multiplicity $N_{jets}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the inclusive jet multiplicity $N_{jets}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the number of b-quark initiated jets $N_{b-jets}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the number of b-quark initiated jets $N_{b-jets}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$ in events with at least one jet. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$ in events with at least one jet.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$ in events with at least two jets. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$ in events with at least two jets.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the two highest-pT jets $m_{jj}$ in events with at least two jets. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the two highest-pT jets $m_{jj}$ in events with at least two jets.
Differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in pseudorapidity $\Delta\eta_{jj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in pseudorapidity $\Delta\eta_{jj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in $\phi$ $\Delta\phi_{jj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in $\phi$ $\Delta\phi_{jj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system, in events with at least one jet $p_{T}^{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system, in events with at least one jet $p_{T}^{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus di-jet system, in events with at least two jets $p_{T}^{4ljj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 . Measured value in the last bin is un upper limit at 95% CL.
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus di-jet system, in events with at least two jets $p_{T}^{4ljj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system in events with at least one jet $m_{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system in events with at least one jet $m_{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus di-jet system in events with at least two jets $m_{4ljj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus di-jet system in events with at least two jets $m_{4ljj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $ll\mu\mu$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $llee$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass m12 vs. m34 in $ll\mu\mu$ and $llee$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $|y_{4l}|$ bins. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $|y_{4l}|$ bins.
Differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $N_{jets}$ bins. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $N_{jets}$ bins.
Differential fiducial cross section for transverse momentum of the four lepton system vs. the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for transverse momentum of the four lepton system vs. the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system vs the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$m_{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system vs the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$m_{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton vs the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{l.jet}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton vs the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{lead.jet}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the rapidity of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$|y^{lead.jet}|$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the rapidity of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$|y^{lead.jet}|$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading Z boson mass $m_{12}$ in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading Z boson mass $m_{12}$ in $2e2\mu$ and $2\mu2e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading Z boson mass $m_{12}$ in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section for the subleading Z boson mass $m_{34}$ in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the subleading Z boson mass $m_{34}$ in $2e2\mu$ and $2\mu2e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the subleading Z boson mass $m_{34}$ in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons in $2e2\mu$ and $2\mu2e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $2\mu2e$ and $2e2\mu$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
A search for the $Z\gamma$ decay of the Higgs boson, with $Z$ boson decays into pairs of electrons or muons is presented. The analysis uses proton$-$proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The observed data are consistent with the expected background with a $p$-value of 1.3%. An upper limit at 95% confidence level on the production cross-section times the branching ratio for $pp\to H\to Z\gamma$ is set at 3.6 times the Standard Model prediction while 2.6 times is expected in the presence of the Standard Model Higgs boson. The best-fit value for the signal yield normalised to the Standard Model prediction is $2.0^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$ where the statistical component of the uncertainty is dominant.
The number of data events selected in each category, and in the $Z\gamma$ mass range of 105--160 GeV. In addition, the following numbers are given: the expected number of Higgs boson signal events in an interval around the peak position for a signal of $m_{H}=125.09$ GeV containing 68% of the SM signal ($S_{68}$), the mass resolution quantified by the width of the $S_{68}$ interval ($w_{68}$) defined by the difference between the 84th and the 16th percentile of the signal mass distribution, the background in the $S_{68}$ interval ($B_{68}$) is estimated from fits to the data using the background models described in paper, the observed number of events in the $S_{68}$ interval ($N_{68}$), the expected signal-to-background ratio in the $S_{68}$ window ($S_{68}/B_{68}$), and the expected significance estimate defined as $S_{68}/\sqrt{S_{68}+B_{68}}$. The final row of the table displays the expected number of events for an analysis performed in a single inclusive category.
Upper limit at 95% confidence level on the signal yield normalised to the Standard Model prediction (signal strength) for $pp \to H \to Z+\gamma$
The best fit value for the signal yield normalised to the Standard Model prediction (signal strength) for $pp \to H \to Z+\gamma$
The observed 95% CL upper limit on $\sigma( p p \rightarrow H) \cdot (H\rightarrow Z \gamma)$
The dynamics of isolated-photon plus two-jet production in $pp$ collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV are studied with the ATLAS detector at the LHC using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$. Cross sections are measured as functions of a variety of observables, including angular correlations and invariant masses of the objects in the final state, $\gamma+jet+jet$. Measurements are also performed in phase-space regions enriched in each of the two underlying physical mechanisms, namely direct and fragmentation processes. The measurements cover the range of photon (jet) transverse momenta from 150 GeV (100 GeV) to 2 TeV. The tree-level plus parton-shower predictions from SHERPA and PYTHIA as well as the next-to-leading-order QCD predictions from SHERPA are compared with the measurements. The next-to-leading-order QCD predictions describe the data adequately in shape and normalisation except for regions of phase space such as those with high values of the invariant mass or rapidity separation of the two jets, where the predictions overestimate the data.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $|y^{\textrm{jet}}|$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the total phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $|y^{\textrm{jet}}|$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the fragmentation-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $|y^{\textrm{jet}}|$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta y^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $\Delta \phi^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
Measured cross sections for isolated-photon plus two-jet production as functions of $m^{\gamma-\textrm{jet}-\textrm{jet}}$ for the direct-enriched phase-space. The predictions from Sherpa NLO are also included.
A search is performed for the electroweak pair production of charginos and associated production of a chargino and neutralino, each of which decays through an $R$-parity-violating coupling into a lepton and a $W$, $Z$, or Higgs boson. The trilepton invariant-mass spectrum is constructed from events with three or more leptons, targeting chargino decays that include an electron or muon and a leptonically decaying $Z$ boson. The analyzed dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data produced by the Large Hadron Collider at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and collected by the ATLAS experiment between 2015 and 2018. The data are found to be consistent with predictions from the Standard Model. The results are interpreted as limits at 95% confidence level on model-independent cross sections for processes beyond the Standard Model. Limits are also set on the production of charginos and neutralinos for a Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with an approximate $B$-$L$ symmetry. Charginos and neutralinos with masses between 100 GeV and 1100 GeV are excluded depending on the assumed decay branching fractions into a lepton (electron, muon, or $\tau$-lepton) plus a boson ($W$, $Z$, or Higgs).
This is the HEPData space for the trilepton resonance wino search, the full resolution figures can be found here https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2018-36/. The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' buttun above where they can then be found in the 'Common Resources' area. A detailed README for how to use the likelihoods is also included in this download. <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Obs.%20data%20vs%20SM%20bkg.%20exp.%20in%20CRs%20and%20VRs">Obs. data vs SM bkg. exp. in CRs and VRs</a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down </a> </ul> <b>Triangle Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$E^{miss}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $E^{miss}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$m^{min}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $m^{min}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR4$\ell$,%20$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR4$\ell$, $E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SRFR,%20$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$%20">N-1 for SRFR, $m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$L_{T}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$L_{T}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Yields%20Table">Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SRFR">Model-Independent Results Table, SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR4$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR3$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR3$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Cutflow%20Table">Cutflow Table</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SRFR">Acceptance by Final State in SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR4$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR3$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR3$\ell$</a> </ul>
This is the HEPData space for the trilepton resonance wino search, the full resolution figures can be found here https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2018-36/. The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' buttun above where they can then be found in the 'Common Resources' area. A detailed README for how to use the likelihoods is also included in this download. <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Obs.%20data%20vs%20SM%20bkg.%20exp.%20in%20CRs%20and%20VRs">Obs. data vs SM bkg. exp. in CRs and VRs</a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down </a> </ul> <b>Triangle Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$E^{miss}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $E^{miss}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$m^{min}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $m^{min}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR4$\ell$,%20$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR4$\ell$, $E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SRFR,%20$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$%20">N-1 for SRFR, $m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$L_{T}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$L_{T}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Yields%20Table">Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SRFR">Model-Independent Results Table, SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR4$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR3$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR3$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Cutflow%20Table">Cutflow Table</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SRFR">Acceptance by Final State in SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR4$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR3$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR3$\ell$</a> </ul>
The observed data and the SM background expectation in the CRs (pre-fit) and VRs (post-fit). The ''Other'' category mostly consists of tW Z, ttW, and tZ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the fractional difference between the observed data and expected yields for the CRs and the significance of the difference for the VRs, computed following the profile likelihood method described in Ref. [arXiv: physics/0702156].
The observed data and the SM background expectation in the CRs (pre-fit) and VRs (post-fit). The ''Other'' category mostly consists of tW Z, ttW, and tZ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the fractional difference between the observed data and expected yields for the CRs and the significance of the difference for the VRs, computed following the profile likelihood method described in Ref. [arXiv: physics/0702156].
The observed yields and post-fit background expectations in SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$, shown inclusively and when the direct lepton from a $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ decay is required to be an electron or muon. The Other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. Uncertainties on the background expectation include combined statistical and systematic uncertainties. The individual uncertainties may be correlated and do not necessarily add in quadrature to equal the total background uncertainty.
The observed yields and post-fit background expectations in SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$, shown inclusively and when the direct lepton from a $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ decay is required to be an electron or muon. The Other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. Uncertainties on the background expectation include combined statistical and systematic uncertainties. The individual uncertainties may be correlated and do not necessarily add in quadrature to equal the total background uncertainty.
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The $m_{Z\ell}$ binning is the same as used in the fit and the yield is normalized to the bin width, with the last bin normalized using a width of 200 GeV. the "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the differences between the observed data and expected yields, computed following the profile likelihood method described in ref.[arxiv: physics/0702156]
$E^{miss}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$E^{miss}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{min}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{min}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ kinematic distribution in the signal regions showing the data and the post-fit background in sr3$\ell$. The fit uses all CR and SRs, and the distributions are shown inclusively in $m_{Z\ell}$. The full event selection for each of the corresponding regions is applied except for the variable shown, where the selection is indicated by a blue arrow. the first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The other category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}W$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Model-independent results where each row targets one $m_{Z\ell}$ bin of one SR and probes scenarios where a generic beyond-the-SM process is assumed to contribute only to that $m_{Z\ell}$ bin. The first two columns refer to the signal region and $m_{Z\ell}$ bin probed, while the third and fourth columns show the observed ($N{obs}$) and expected ($N{exp}$) event yields. The expected yields are obtained using a background-only fit of the CRs, and the errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The fifth and sixth columns show the observed 95% CL upper limit on the visible cross section ($\langle \epsilon \sigma \rangle^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{obs}$), while the seventh column shows the expected 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events ($S^{95}_{exp}$) with the associated $1~\sigma$ uncertainties. The last column provides the discovery $p$-value and significance ($Z$) of any excess of data above background expectation. Events for which the observed yield is less than the expected yield are capped at a $p$-value of 0.5.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to any lepton with equal probability. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to an electron only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a muon only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to $Z$ bosons. grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. curves are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are to a $\tau$-leptons only. the expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. the observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{susy}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. the phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color. the sum of the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fractions to $W$, $Z$, and Higgs bosons is unity for each point, and the branching fractions to $W$ and Higgs bosons are chosen so as to be equal everywhere.
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SRFR. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and post-fit SM background expectation as a function of $m_{Z\ell}$ in SR3$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction
The observed data and pre-fit SM background expectation as a function of $L_{T}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. Only statistical uncertainties on the data and background expecation are shown.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the background prediction
The observed data and pre-fit SM background expectation as a function of $L_{T}$ in SR4$\ell$. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow) events. The "Other" category mostly consists of $tWZ$, $ttW$, and $tZ$ processes. Only statistical uncertainties on the data and background expecation are shown.The bottom panel shows the ratio between the data and the background prediction
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 600 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 800 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons for a mass of 900 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 200 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 300 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 400 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curves for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into $\tau$-leptons for a mass of 500 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95/% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95/% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into any leptons for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into electrons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the observed upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Exclusion curve for the simplified model of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{0}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ pair-production as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ branching fraction to $Z$ and Higgs bosons. Results are shown for the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ into muons only for a mass of 700 GeV. Grey numbers represent the expected upper cross-section limits. The expected 95% CL exclusion (dashed black line) is shown with $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{exp}}$ (yellow band) from systematic and statistical uncertainties on the expected yields. The observed 95% CL exclusion (solid red line) is shown with the $\pm1~\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{SUSY}}$ (dotted red line) from signal cross section uncertainties on the signal models. The phase-space excluded by the search is shown in the shaded color.
Summary of event selections for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 200, 500, and 800 GeV, shown separately for the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1}$ and $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ processes. The yields are normalized to a luminosity of $139 fb^{-1}$, and MC-to-data efficiency weights from triggering and from the reconstruction and identification of individual physics objects are applied at the end. After the initial selections, the yields are separated into SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$ regions, and then further separated into the $e$ and $\mu$ channels. Democratic branching fractions into bosons (W, Z, and Higgs) and leptons ($e$, $\mu$, and $\tau$ are used, with no branching fraction reweighting performed. The generator filters are discussed in detail in Section 3. The computing preselection requires at least two electrons or muons of uncalibrated pT > 9 GeV and |$\eta$| < 2.6.
Summary of event selections for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 200, 500, and 800 GeV, shown separately for the $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1}$ and $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ processes. The yields are normalized to a luminosity of $139 fb^{-1}$, and MC-to-data efficiency weights from triggering and from the reconstruction and identification of individual physics objects are applied at the end. After the initial selections, the yields are separated into SRFR, SR4$\ell$, and SR3$\ell$ regions, and then further separated into the $e$ and $\mu$ channels. Democratic branching fractions into bosons (W, Z, and Higgs) and leptons ($e$, $\mu$, and $\tau$ are used, with no branching fraction reweighting performed. The generator filters are discussed in detail in Section 3. The computing preselection requires at least two electrons or muons of uncalibrated pT > 9 GeV and |$\eta$| < 2.6.
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into any leptons with equal probability
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into electrons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into muons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and branching fraction to Z bosons, and are derived separately when requiring that the charged-lepton decays of $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ are into $\tau$-leptons only
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ truth-level acceptances in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SRFR region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR4$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The combined $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ reconstruction efficiencies in the SR3$\ell$ region for $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ masses of 700 GeV. Results are given as a function of the branching fractions to Z and Higgs bosons
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SRFR region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR4$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
The truth-level acceptances for each decay mode of the generated $\tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{\mp}_{1} + \tilde\chi^{\pm}_{1}\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ signals in the SR3$\ell$ region. Results are given as a function of $\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}/\tilde\chi^{0}_{1}$ mass and the final state boson and lepton combination.
This article presents measurements of the $t$-channel single top-quark ($t$) and top-antiquark ($\bar{t}$) total production cross sections $\sigma(tq)$ and $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, their ratio $R_{t}=\sigma(tq)/\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, and a measurement of the inclusive production cross section $\sigma(tq + \bar{t}q)$ in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV at the LHC. Differential cross sections for the $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ processes are measured as a function of the transverse momentum and the absolute value of the rapidity of $t$ and $\bar{t}$, respectively. The analyzed data set was recorded with the ATLAS detector and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 4.59 fb$^{-1}$. Selected events contain one charged lepton, large missing transverse momentum, and two or three jets. The cross sections are measured by performing a binned maximum-likelihood fit to the output distributions of neural networks. The resulting measurements are $\sigma(tq)= 46\pm 6\; \mathrm{pb}$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)= 23 \pm 4\; \mathrm{pb}$, $R_{t}=2.04\pm 0.18$, and $\sigma(tq + \bar{t}q)= 68 \pm 8\; \mathrm{pb}$, consistent with the Standard Model expectation. The uncertainty on the measured cross sections is dominated by systematic uncertainties, while the uncertainty on $R_{t}$ is mainly statistical. Using the ratio of $\sigma(tq + \bar{t}q)$ to its theoretical prediction, and assuming that the top-quark-related CKM matrix elements obey the relation $|V_{tb}|\gg |V_{ts}|, |V_{td}|$, we determine $|V_{tb}|=1.02 \pm 0.07$.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of PT(TOP).
Predicted and observed events yields for the 2-jet and 3-jet channels considered in this measurement. The multijet background is estimated using data-driven techniques (see Sec. VB); an uncertainty of $50\%$ is applied. All the other expectations are derived using theoretical cross sections and their uncertainties (see Secs. VA and VC in the paper).
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of PT(TOPBAR).
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty on the measured values of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, $R_t$, and $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. The evaluation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\,\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $1.0\,\%$ are marked with "$<1$" in the paper. To provide numerical values for this table in HEPdata, these uncertainties are approximated with $\pm 0.5\,\%$. This approximation is applied to all measurements for the following uncertainties$:$ JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by-jets, JES pileup, $b$-JES, jet vertex fraction, mistag efficiency and $W+\;$jets shape variation. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq)$ the approximation is applied in addition to the following uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $R_t$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES detector, $b$-tagging efficiency, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance and $tq$ scale variations. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(T)).
The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(TBAR)).
Parametrization factors for the $m_{t}$ dependence [see Eq. (4) in the paper] of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar tq)$, and $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$.
The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.
The value of $|V_{tb}|^{2}$ is extracted by dividing the measured value of $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$ by the prediction of the approximate NNLO calculation. The experimental and theoretical uncertainties are added in quadrature.
Event yields for the 2-jet-$\ell^{+}$ and 2-jet-$\ell^{-}$ HPR channels. The expectation for the signal and background yields correspond to the result of the binned maximum-likelihood fit described in Sec. $\mathrm{VI~D}$ in the paper. The uncertainty of the expectations is the normalization uncertainty of each process after the fit, as described in Sec. $\mathrm{VII~F}$ in the paper.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $|y|$ distribution.
Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(\bar t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $|y|$ distribution.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.
Comparison between the measured differential cross sections and the predictions from the NLO calculation using the MSTW2008 PDF set. For each variable and prediction a $\chi^{2}$ value is calculated with HERAfitter using the covariance matrix of each measured spectrum. The theory uncertainties of the predictions are treated as uncorrelated. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is equal to the number of bins in the measured spectrum.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, mistag efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The JES $\eta$ intercalibration uncertainty has a sign switch from the first to the second bin. For the $tq$ generator $+$ parton shower uncertainty a sign switch is denoted with $\mp$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $c-$tagging efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content $:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet energy resolution, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$ tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.
Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.
This paper presents a search for direct electroweak gaugino or gluino pair production with a chargino nearly mass-degenerate with a stable neutralino. It is based on an integrated luminosity of 36.1 $\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The final state of interest is a disappearing track accompanied by at least one jet with high transverse momentum from initial-state radiation or by four jets from the gluino decay chain. The use of short track segments reconstructed from the innermost tracking layers significantly improves the sensitivity to short chargino lifetimes. The results are found to be consistent with Standard Model predictions. Exclusion limits are set at 95% confidence level on the mass of charginos and gluinos for different chargino lifetimes. For a pure wino with a lifetime of about 0.2 ns, chargino masses up to 460 GeV are excluded. For the strong production channel, gluino masses up to 1.65 TeV are excluded assuming a chargino mass of 460 GeV and lifetime of 0.2 ns.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Model dependent upper limits on cross-section (fb) for the electroweak production are shown by grey numbers in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Model dependent upper limits on cross-section (pb) for the electroweak production are shown by grey numbers in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Model dependent upper limits on cross-section (pb) for the electroweak production are shown by grey numbers in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Model dependent upper limits on cross-section (pb) for the electroweak production are shown by grey numbers in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Model dependent upper limits on cross-section (pb) for the electroweak production are shown by grey numbers in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the electroweak channel. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is defined as the probability of an event passing the signal region selection when an electroweak gaugino pair is produced in a pp collision.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the electroweak channel. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is defined as the probability of an event passing the signal region selection when an electroweak gaugino pair is produced in a pp collision.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the electroweak channel. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is defined as the probability of an event passing the signal region selection when an electroweak gaugino pair is produced in a pp collision.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the electroweak channel. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is defined as the probability of an event passing the signal region selection when an electroweak gaugino pair is produced in a pp collision.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the electroweak channel. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is defined as the probability of an event passing the signal region selection when an electroweak gaugino pair is produced in a pp collision.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the strong channel. In white regions, no simulation sample is available. The left-upper triangle region is not allowed kinematically in wino-LSP scenarios. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is calculated relative to events in which the gluinos decay into electroweak gaugino pairs.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the strong channel. In white regions, no simulation sample is available. The left-upper triangle region is not allowed kinematically in wino-LSP scenarios. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is calculated relative to events in which the gluinos decay into electroweak gaugino pairs.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the strong channel. In white regions, no simulation sample is available. The left-upper triangle region is not allowed kinematically in wino-LSP scenarios. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is calculated relative to events in which the gluinos decay into electroweak gaugino pairs.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the strong channel. In white regions, no simulation sample is available. The left-upper triangle region is not allowed kinematically in wino-LSP scenarios. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is calculated relative to events in which the gluinos decay into electroweak gaugino pairs.
Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the strong channel. In white regions, no simulation sample is available. The left-upper triangle region is not allowed kinematically in wino-LSP scenarios. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is calculated relative to events in which the gluinos decay into electroweak gaugino pairs.
The generator-level acceptance after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the electroweak channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The generator-level acceptance after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance for charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).
The generator-level acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos produced in the strong channel as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in direct electroweak production with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in direct electroweak production with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in direct electroweak production with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in direct electroweak production with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in direct electroweak production with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in the strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in the strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in the strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in the strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in the strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few electroweak signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few electroweak signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few electroweak signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few electroweak signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few electroweak signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few strong signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few strong signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few strong signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few strong signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few strong signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.
Systematic uncertainties in the signal event yields at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. The uncertainty in the cross-section of the strong production is large due to the large effect from the PDF uncertainty.
Systematic uncertainties in the signal event yields at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. The uncertainty in the cross-section of the strong production is large due to the large effect from the PDF uncertainty.
Systematic uncertainties in the signal event yields at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. The uncertainty in the cross-section of the strong production is large due to the large effect from the PDF uncertainty.
Systematic uncertainties in the signal event yields at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. The uncertainty in the cross-section of the strong production is large due to the large effect from the PDF uncertainty.
Systematic uncertainties in the signal event yields at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. The uncertainty in the cross-section of the strong production is large due to the large effect from the PDF uncertainty.
Observed events, expected background for null signal, and expected signal yields for two benchmark models: electroweak channel with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) and strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. Also shown are the probability of a background-only experiment being more signal-like than observed ($p_0$) and the upper limit on the model-independent visible cross-section at 95\% CL. The uncertainty in the total background yield is different from the sum of uncertainties in quadrature due to anticorrelation between different backgrounds.
Observed events, expected background for null signal, and expected signal yields for two benchmark models: electroweak channel with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) and strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. Also shown are the probability of a background-only experiment being more signal-like than observed ($p_0$) and the upper limit on the model-independent visible cross-section at 95\% CL. The uncertainty in the total background yield is different from the sum of uncertainties in quadrature due to anti-correlation between different backgrounds.
Observed events, expected background for null signal, and expected signal yields for two benchmark models: electroweak channel with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) and strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. Also shown are the probability of a background-only experiment being more signal-like than observed ($p_0$) and the upper limit on the model-independent visible cross-section at 95\% CL. The uncertainty in the total background yield is different from the sum of uncertainties in quadrature due to anti-correlation between different backgrounds.
Observed events, expected background for null signal, and expected signal yields for two benchmark models: electroweak channel with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) and strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. Also shown are the probability of a background-only experiment being more signal-like than observed ($p_0$) and the upper limit on the model-independent visible cross-section at 95\% CL. The uncertainty in the total background yield is different from the sum of uncertainties in quadrature due to anti-correlation between different backgrounds.
Observed events, expected background for null signal, and expected signal yields for two benchmark models: electroweak channel with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) and strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. Also shown are the probability of a background-only experiment being more signal-like than observed ($p_0$) and the upper limit on the model-independent visible cross-section at 95\% CL. The uncertainty in the total background yield is different from the sum of uncertainties in quadrature due to anti-correlation between different backgrounds.
Effects of systematic uncertainties on the signal exclusion significance at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. Effects of uncertainties on the fake-tracklet background is smaller in the strong channel analysis because the estimated number of the fake-tracket background events is small.
Effects of systematic uncertainties on the signal exclusion significance at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. Effects of uncertainties on the fake-tracklet background is smaller in the strong channel analysis because the estimated number of the fake-tracklet background events is small.
Effects of systematic uncertainties on the signal exclusion significance at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. Effects of uncertainties on the fake-tracklet background is smaller in the strong channel analysis because the estimated number of the fake-tracklet background events is small.
Effects of systematic uncertainties on the signal exclusion significance at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. Effects of uncertainties on the fake-tracklet background is smaller in the strong channel analysis because the estimated number of the fake-tracklet background events is small.
Effects of systematic uncertainties on the signal exclusion significance at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. Effects of uncertainties on the fake-tracklet background is smaller in the strong channel analysis because the estimated number of the fake-tracklet background events is small.
Cross-section upper limits for the strong production, presented in unit of fb. Left-upper triangle region is unphysical because the wino mass is larger than the gluino mass.
Cross-section upper limits for the strong production, presented in unit of fb. Left-upper triangle region is unphysical because the wino mass is larger than the gluino mass.
Cross-section upper limits for the strong production, presented in unit of fb. Left-upper triangle region is unphysical because the wino mass is larger than the gluino mass.
Cross-section upper limits for the strong production, presented in unit of fb. Left-upper triangle region is unphysical because the wino mass is larger than the gluino mass.
Cross-section upper limits for the strong production, presented in unit of fb. Left-upper triangle region is unphysical because the wino mass is larger than the gluino mass.
Results of a search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected in the period 2015-2018 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Compared to previous publications, in addition to an increase of almost a factor of four in the data size, the analysis implements a number of improvements in the signal selection and the background determination leading to enhanced sensitivity. Events are required to have at least one jet with transverse momentum above 150 GeV and no reconstructed leptons ($e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$) or photons. Several signal regions are considered with increasing requirements on the missing transverse momentum starting at 200 GeV. Overall agreement is observed between the number of events in data and the Standard Model predictions. Model-independent 95 % confidence-level limits on visible cross sections for new processes are obtained in the range between 736 fb and 0.3 fb with increasing missing transverse momentum. Results are also translated into improved exclusion limits in models with pair-produced weakly interacting dark-matter candidates, large extra spatial dimensions, supersymmetric particles in several compressed scenarios, axion-like particles, and new scalar particles in dark-energy-inspired models. In addition, the data are translated into bounds on the invisible branching ratio of the Higgs boson.
- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> <b>Post-fit $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distribution:</b> <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR1mu0b">CR1mu0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR1e0b">CR1e0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR1L1b">CR1L1b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR2mu">CR2mu</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR2e">CR2e</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramSR">SR</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li>Dark Matter axial-vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourobsDMA">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourexpDMA">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p2DMA">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m2DMA">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter pseudo-scalar mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourobsDMP">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourexpDMP">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p2DMP">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m2DMP">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourobsDMV">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourexpDMV">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p2DMV">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m2DMV">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourSDneutron">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourSInucleon">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter WIMP annihilation rate: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourID">observed</a> <li>SUSY stop pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsTT_directCC">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expTT_directCC">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_directCC">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_directCC">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY stop pair production (4-body decay): <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsTT_bffN">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expTT_bffN">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_bffN">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_bffN">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY sbottom pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsBB">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1BB">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1BB">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expBB">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1BB">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1BB">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2BB">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2BB">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY squark pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsSS">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1SS">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1SS">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expSS">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1SS">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1SS">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2SS">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2SS">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark energy: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourDE">observed and expected</a> <li>ADD: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourADD">observed and expected</a> <li>Axion-like particles: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourALPs">observed and expected</a> </ul> <b>Impact of systematic uncertainties:</b> <a href="102093?version=1&table=Tablesystimpacts">Table</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of exclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM0">EM0</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM1">EM1</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM2">EM2</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM3">EM3</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM4">EM4</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM5">EM5</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM6">EM6</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM7">EM7</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM8">EM8</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM9">EM9</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM10">EM10</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM11">EM11</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM12">EM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of inclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM0">IM0</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM1">IM1</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM2">IM2</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM3">IM3</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM4">IM4</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM5">IM5</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM6">IM6</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM7">IM7</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM8">IM8</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM9">IM9</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM10">IM10</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM11">IM11</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM12">IM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Cutflows:</b><br/><br/> Signals filtered with a truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ cut at: <ul> <li> <a href="102093?version=1&table=Tablecutflows150GeV">150 GeV</a> <li> <a href="102093?version=1&table=Tablecutflows350GeV">350 GeV</a> </ul>
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu $ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $W \rightarrow e \nu$ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the top control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $Z\rightarrow ee$ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the signal region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.
Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.
A comparison of the inferred limits with the constraints from direct-detection experiments on the spin-dependent WIMP-neutron and WIMP-proton scattering cross section as a function of the WIMP mass, in the context of the simplified model with axial-vector couplings. Limits are shown at 90% CL.
Observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
Expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
2 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
2 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
Observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
Expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
2 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
2 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
Observed exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
Expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)
Observed exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
Expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).
Observed and expected exclusions at $95\%$ CL on the Horndeski dark-energy model for $m_{\phi}=0.1$ GeV and $c_{i\neq 2}=0$, $c_{2}=1$, expressed in terms of the visible cross section as a function of the suppression scale $M_{2}$.
$95\%$ CL observed and expected lower limits on the fundamental Planck scale in $4+n$ dimensions, $M_D$, as a function of the number of extra dimensions $n$, considering nominal LO signal cross sections.
Observed and expected 95$\%$ CL upper limits on the coupling $c_{\stackrel{\sim}{\smash{G}}}$ as a function of the effective scale $f_a$ for ALP mass of 1 MeV. The bands indicate the $\pm 1\sigma$ theory uncertainties in the observed limit and the $\pm 1\sigma$and $\pm 2\sigma$ ranges of the expected limit in the absence of a signal. The 95$\%$ CL limits are computed with no suppression of the events with $\hat{s} > f_a^2$.
Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.
A comparison of the inferred limits with the constraints from direct-detection experiments on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section as a function of the WIMP mass, in the context of the simplified model with vector couplings. Limits are shown at 90% CL.
Inferred 95% CL limits on the WIMP annihilation rate as a function of WIMP mass, for the pseudoscalar mediator model. The annihilation rate is defined as the product of cross section $\sigma$ and relative velocity $v_{rel}$, averaged over the DM velocity distribution ($\langle\sigma v_{rel}\rangle$). Both the $qq$ and $gg$ annihilation channels are considered in the calculation of the annihilation rate
Contribution to the total SR background uncertainty in exclusive bins of the SR, as obtained from the CR-only fit. In the table, the contribution of each source of systematic is shown as the sum in quadrature of the individual contributions represented by the corresponding nuisance parameters.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM0.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM1.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM2.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM3.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM4.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM5.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM6.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM7.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM8.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM9.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM10.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM11.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM12.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM0.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM1.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM2.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM3.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM4.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM5.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM6.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM7.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM8.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM9.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM10.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM11.
Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM12.
Cutflow of several signal benchmarks. A cut on the truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ at 150 GeV is applied.
Cutflow of several signal benchmarks. A cut on the truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ at 350 GeV is applied.
This paper reports on a search for the electroweak diboson ($WW/WZ/ZZ$) production in association with a high-mass dijet system, using data from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. The data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.5 fb$^{-1}$, were recorded with the ATLAS detector in 2015 and 2016 at the Large Hadron Collider. The search is performed in final states in which one boson decays leptonically, and the other boson decays hadronically. The hadronically decaying $W/Z$ boson is reconstructed as either two small-radius jets or one large-radius jet using jet substructure techniques. The electroweak production of $WW/WZ/ZZ$ in association with two jets is measured with an observed (expected) significance of 2.7 (2.5) standard deviations, and the fiducial cross section is measured to be $45.1 \pm 8.6(\mathrm{stat.}) ^{+15.9} _{-14.6} (\mathrm{syst.})$ fb.
Summary of predicted and measured fiducial cross sections for EW $VVjj$ production. The three lepton channels are combined. For the measured fiducial cross sections in the merged and resolved categories, two signal-strength parameters are used in the combined fit, one for the merged category and the other one for the resolved category; while for the measured fiducial cross section in the inclusive fiducial phase space, a single signal-strength parameter is used. For the SM predicted cross section, the error is the theoretical uncertainty (theo.). For the measured cross section, the first error is the statistical uncertainty (stat.), and the second error is the systematic uncertainty (syst.).
Summary of predicted and measured fiducial cross sections for EW $VVjj$ production. in the three lepton channels. The measured values are obtained from a simultaneous fit where each lepton channel has its own signal-strength parameter, and in each lepton channel the same signal-strength parameter is applied to both the merged and resolved categories. For the SM predicted cross section, the error is the theoretical uncertainty (theo.). For the measured cross section, the first error is the statistical uncertainty (stat.), and the second error is the systematic uncertainty (syst.).
This paper reports a measurement of the W+b-jets production cross-section in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV at the LHC. These results are based on data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb-1, collected with the ATLAS detector. Cross-sections are presented as a function of jet multiplicity and of the transverse momentum of the leading b-jet for both the muon and electron decay modes of the W boson. The W+b-jets cross-section, corrected for all known detector effects, is quoted in a limited kinematic range, using jets reconstructed with the anti-k_t clustering algorithm with transverse momentum above 25 GeV and rapidity within +/- 2.1. Combining the muon and electron channels, the fiducial cross-section for W+b-jets is measured to be 7.1 +/- 0.5 (stat) +/- 1.4 (syst) pb, consistent with next-to-leading order QCD calculations within 1.5 standard deviations.
Measured fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-sections for the combination of the electron and muon channels with statistical and systematic uncertainties and breakdown of relative systematic uncertainties per jet multiplicity, and combined across jet bins. Also shown are the cross sections obtained without single-top subtraction.
Breakdown of relative systematic uncertainties per jet multiplicity, and combined across jet bins.
Measured fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section in the 1-jet region with statistical and systematic uncertainties in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$. Also shown are the cross sections obtained without single-top subtraction. UPDATE (04 MAY 2019): units corrected from nb/GeV to fb/GeV.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.
Measured fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section in the 2-jet region with statistical and systematic uncertainties in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$. Also shown are the cross sections obtained without single-top subtraction. UPDATE (04 MAY 2019): units corrected from nb/GeV to fb/GeV.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.
Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.
Multiplicative correction factors for non-perturbative effects and additive corrections for double-parton interactions, derived from the ALPGEN simulation, applied to the MCFM and POWHEG predictions for the comparisons with unfolded results. The non-perturbative uncertainties include the hadronization and underlying event modelling, while the DPI uncertainties are based on the ATLAS measurement of $\sigma_{\rm eff}$.
Multiplicative correction factors for non-perturbative effects and additive corrections for double-parton interactions, derived from the ALPGEN simulation, applied to the MCFM and POWHEG predictions for the comparisons with unfolded results. The non-perturbative uncertainties include the hadronization and underlying event modelling, while the DPI uncertainties are based on the ATLAS measurement of $\sigma_{\rm eff}$.
Theoretical NLO predictions for the $W+b$-jet fiducial cross-section for one lepton flavour calculated with the MCFM program, corrected for non-perturbative effects and DPI contributions.
A search is presented for four-top-quark production using an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Events are selected if they contain a same-sign lepton pair or at least three leptons (electrons or muons). Jet multiplicity, jet flavour and event kinematics are used to separate signal from the background through a multivariate discriminant, and dedicated control regions are used to constrain the dominant backgrounds. The four-top-quark production cross section is measured to be 24$^{+7}_{-6}$ fb. This corresponds to an observed (expected) significance with respect to the background-only hypothesis of 4.3 (2.4) standard deviations and provides evidence for this process.
The results of fitted inclusive ${t\bar{t}t\bar{t}}$ cross-section
The results of the fitted signal strength $\mu$
List of the uncertainties in the signal strength $\mu$, grouped in categories. The quoted values are obtained by repeating the fit, fixing a set of nuisance parameters of the sources corresponding to the considered category, and subtracting in quadrature the resulting uncertainty from the total uncertainty of the nominal fit presented in the last line. The total uncertainty is different from the sum in quadrature of the components due to correlations between nuisance parameters.
Post-fit background and signal yields in the full signal region. The total systematic uncertainty differs from the sum in quadrature of the different uncertainties due to correlations. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair. HF $e$ (HF $\mu$) refers to events with one non-prompt electron (muon) from heavy-flavour hadron decay, LF refers to events with a lepton originating from light-meson decay, and 'Other $t\bar{t}X$' includes events coming from $t\bar{t}WZ$, $t\bar{t}Z$+jets, $t\bar{t}WH$, $t\bar{t}HH$.
Ranking of the nuisance parameters included in the fit according to their impact on the signal strength $\mu$. Only the 20 most highly ranked nuisance parameters are shown in the thumbnail figure. The empty blue rectangles correspond to the pre-fit impact on $\mu$ and the filled blue ones to the post-fit impact on $\mu$, both referring to the upper $x$-axis scale. The impact of each nuisance parameter, $\Delta\mu$, is computed by comparing the nominal best-fit value of $\mu$ with the result of the fit when fixing the nuisance parameter to its best-fit value, $\hat{\theta}$, shifted by its pre-fit (post-fit) uncertainties $\pm \Delta\theta$ ($\pm \Delta\hat{\theta}$). The black points show the pulls of the parameter relative to their nominal values, $\theta_0$. The nominal value for all parameters is $\theta_0 = 0$. The pulls of the most impactful parameters and their relative post-fit errors, $\Delta\hat{\theta}/\Delta\theta$, are referenced to the lower $x$-axis scale. In the table, POI means Parameter of Interest.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the 'HF e' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the 'HF mu' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the $m_{ee}^{PV}$ variable in the 'Conv.' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the $\Sigma p_{T}^{l}$ variable in the 'ttW' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the 'HF e' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the 'HF mu' control region. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the $m_{ee}^{PV}$ variable in the 'Conv.' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the $\Sigma p_{T}^{l}$ variable in the in 'ttW' control region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction before the fit ('Pre-Fit') for the BDT score in the signal region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
Comparison between data and prediction after the fit ('Post-Fit') for the BDT score in the signal region. The first and last bins contain underflow and overflow events, respectively. Q mis-id refers to the charge misassignment background. Mat. Conv. and Low $m_{\gamma^*}$ refer respectively to events with one non-prompt electron originating from photon conversion in the detector material and to events with a virtual photon leading to an $e^+e^-$ pair.
The Standard Model of particle physics encapsulates our current best understanding of physics at the smallest scales. A fundamental axiom of this theory is the universality of the couplings of the different generations of leptons to the electroweak gauge bosons. The measurement of the ratio of the rate of decay of $W$ bosons to $\tau$-leptons and muons, $R(\tau/\mu) = B(W \to \tau \nu_\tau)/B(W \to \mu \nu_\mu)$, constitutes an important test of this axiom. A measurement of this quantity with a novel technique using di-leptonic $t\bar{t}$ events is presented based on 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of data recorded with the ATLAS detector in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. Muons originating from $W$ bosons and those originating from an intermediate $\tau$-lepton are distinguished using the lifetime of the $\tau$-lepton, through the muon transverse impact parameter, and differences in the muon transverse momentum spectra. The value of $R(\tau/\mu)$ is found to be $0.992 \pm 0.013 [\pm 0.007 (stat) \pm 0.011 (syst)]$ and is in agreement with the hypothesis of universal lepton couplings as postulated in the Standard Model. This is the most precise measurement of this ratio, and the only such measurement from the Large Hadron Collider, to date.
The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $5<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<10$ GeV selection in the $e-\mu$ channel.
The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $5<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<10$ GeV selection in the $\mu-\mu$ channel.
The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $10<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<20$ GeV selection in the $e-\mu$ channel.
The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $10<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<20$ GeV selection in the $\mu-\mu$ channel.
The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $20<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<250$ GeV selection in the $e-\mu$ channel.
The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $20<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<250$ GeV selection in the $\mu-\mu$ channel.
The measurement of the ratio of the rate of decay of W bosons to τ-leptons and muons, $R(\tau/\mu)=B(W\rightarrow\tau\nu_\tau)/B(W\rightarrow \mu\nu_\mu)$.
A search for Higgs boson pair production via vector-boson fusion (VBF) in the $b\bar{b}b\bar{b}$ final state is carried out with the ATLAS experiment using 126 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data delivered at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV by the Large Hadron Collider. This search is sensitive to VBF production of additional heavy bosons that may decay into Higgs boson pairs, and in a non-resonant topology it can constrain the quartic coupling between the Higgs bosons and vector bosons. No significant excess relative to the Standard Model expectation is observed, and limits on the production cross-section are set at the 95 % confidence level for a heavy scalar resonance in the context of an extended Higgs sector, and for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production. Interpretation in terms of the coupling between a Higgs boson pair and two vector bosons is also provided: coupling values normalised to the Standard Model expectation of $\kappa_{2V} < -0.43$ and $\kappa_{2V} > 2.56$ are excluded at the 95 % confidence level in data.
Acceptance x efficiency versus $\kappa_{2V}$ for non-resonant signal of $HH$.
Acceptance x efficiency versus $\kappa_{2V}$ for non-resonant signal of $HH$.
Acceptance x efficiency versus $\kappa_{2V}$ for non-resonant signal of $HH$.
Acceptance x efficiency versus $\kappa_{2V}$ for non-resonant signal of $HH$.
Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both narrow and broad resonance $X$ to $HH$.
Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both narrow and broad resonance $X$ to $HH$.
Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both narrow and broad resonance $X$ to $HH$.
Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both narrow and broad resonance $X$ to $HH$.
Post-fit mass distribution of the $HH$ candidates in the signal region. The expected background is shown after the profile-likelihood fit to data with the background-only hypothesis; the narrow-width resonant signal at 800 GeV and the non-resonant signal at $\kappa_{2V}$ = 3 are overlaid, both normalised to the corresponding observed upper limits on the cross-section.
Post-fit mass distribution of the $HH$ candidates in the signal region. The expected background is shown after the profile-likelihood fit to data with the background-only hypothesis; the narrow-width resonant signal at 800 GeV and the non-resonant signal at $\kappa_{2V}$ = 3 are overlaid, both normalised to the corresponding observed upper limits on the cross-section.
Post-fit mass distribution of the $HH$ candidates in the signal region. The expected background is shown after the profile-likelihood fit to data with the background-only hypothesis; the narrow-width resonant signal at 800 GeV and the non-resonant signal at $\kappa_{2V}$ = 3 are overlaid, both normalised to the corresponding observed upper limits on the cross-section.
Post-fit mass distribution of the $HH$ candidates in the signal region. The expected background is shown after the profile-likelihood fit to data with the background-only hypothesis; the narrow-width resonant signal at 800 GeV and the non-resonant signal at $\kappa_{2V}$ = 3 are overlaid, both normalised to the corresponding observed upper limits on the cross-section.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of narrow resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of narrow resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of narrow resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section of narrow resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of broad resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of broad resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of broad resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section of broad resonance $X$ to $HH$ as a function of the mass $m_{X}$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of non-resonant $HH$ production via VBF as a function of the di-vector-boson-di-Higgs-boson coupling modifier $\kappa_{2V}$. The theory prediction of the cross-section as a function of $\kappa_{2V}$ is also shown. The minimum theory cross-section is 1.37 fb at $\kappa_{2V}=1.17$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of non-resonant $HH$ production via VBF as a function of the di-vector-boson-di-Higgs-boson coupling modifier $\kappa_{2V}$. The theory prediction of the cross-section as a function of $\kappa_{2V}$ is also shown. The minimum theory cross-section is 1.37 fb at $\kappa_{2V}=1.17$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of non-resonant $HH$ production via VBF as a function of the di-vector-boson-di-Higgs-boson coupling modifier $\kappa_{2V}$. The theory prediction of the cross-section as a function of $\kappa_{2V}$ is also shown. The minimum theory cross-section is 1.37 fb at $\kappa_{2V}=1.17$.
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-sections of non-resonant $HH$ production via VBF as a function of the di-vector-boson-di-Higgs-boson coupling modifier $\kappa_{2V}$. The theory prediction of the cross-section as a function of $\kappa_{2V}$ is also shown. The minimum theory cross-section is 1.37 fb at $\kappa_{2V}=1.17$.
A search for charged Higgs bosons decaying into $W^\pm W^\pm$ or $W^\pm Z$ bosons is performed, involving experimental signatures with two leptons of the same charge, or three or four leptons with a variety of charge combinations, missing transverse momentum and jets. A data sample of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider between 2015 and 2018 is used. The data correspond to a total integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The search is guided by a type-II seesaw model that extends the scalar sector of the Standard Model with a scalar triplet, leading to a phenomenology that includes doubly and singly charged Higgs bosons. Two scenarios are explored, corresponding to the pair production of doubly charged $H^{\pm\pm}$ bosons, or the associated production of a doubly charged $H^{\pm\pm}$ boson and a singly charged $H^\pm$ boson. No significant deviations from the Standard Model predictions are observed. $H^{\pm\pm}$ bosons are excluded at 95% confidence level up to 350 GeV and 230 GeV for the pair and associated production modes, respectively.
A search for the supersymmetric partners of quarks and gluons (squarks and gluinos) in final states containing jets and missing transverse momentum, but no electrons or muons, is presented. The data used in this search were recorded by the ATLAS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The results are interpreted in the context of various $R$-parity-conserving models where squarks and gluinos are produced in pairs or in association and a neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle. An exclusion limit at the 95% confidence level on the mass of the gluino is set at 2.30 TeV for a simplified model containing only a gluino and the lightest neutralino, assuming the latter is massless. For a simplified model involving the strong production of mass-degenerate first- and second-generation squarks, squark masses below 1.85 TeV are excluded if the lightest neutralino is massless. These limits extend substantially beyond the region of supersymmetric parameter space excluded previously by similar searches with the ATLAS detector.
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGd1 score distributions in signal regions GGd1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGd1 score distributions in signal regions GGd1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGo1 score distributions in signal regions GGo1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGo1 score distributions in signal regions GGo1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with direct decays.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with direct decays.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with direct decays
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with direct decays
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60~GeV and exclusio limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60~GeV and exclusio limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks for SS direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks for SS direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting gluinos for GG direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting gluinos for GG direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks and gluinos in models with one-step decay. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks and gluinos in models with one-step decay. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with one-step decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with one-step decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with direct decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with direct decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Single- and double-differential cross-section measurements are presented for the production of top-quark pairs, in the lepton + jets channel at particle and parton level. Two topologies, resolved and boosted, are considered and the results are presented as a function of several kinematic variables characterising the top and $t\bar{t}$ system and jet multiplicities. The study was performed using data from $pp$ collisions at centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected in 2015 and 2016 by the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC), corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $36~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. Due to the large $t\bar{t}$ cross-section at the LHC, such measurements allow a detailed study of the properties of top-quark production and decay, enabling precision tests of several Monte Carlo generators and fixed-order Standard Model predictions. Overall, there is good agreement between the theoretical predictions and the data.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 400.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 550.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 400.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 550.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 400.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 550.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 550.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 200.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 400.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 550.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 550.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 200.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 400.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 550.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 60.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 120.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 60.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 60.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 120.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 60.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 120.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 200.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 300.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 60.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 120.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 60.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 60.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 60.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 120.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $p_{T}^{t,had}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t,had}$ < 60.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ $\geq$ 7.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in $N^{jets}$ = 6.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ $\geq$ 7.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ $\geq$ 7.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ $\geq$ 7.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 6.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 4.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 5.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 4.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 5.5 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 6.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 7.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 6.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 7.5 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 4.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 5.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 3.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 4.5 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 4.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 5.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$ vs $N^{jets}$ in 4.5 < $N^{jets}$ < 5.5 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in $N^{jets}$ = 6.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 6.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 6.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ $\geq$ 7.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 6.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ $\geq$ 7.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ $\geq$ 7.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ vs $N^{jets}$ in $N^{jets}$ = 5.0 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\chi_{tt}$ vs $N^{jets}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in $N^{jets}$ = 4.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 1.4 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 1.4 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.5 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 0.4 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.8 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.4 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.8 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.4 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.8 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.4 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.8 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.4 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.8 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.4 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.4 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.8 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.2 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.8 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.2 at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 30.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 30.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 190.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 190.0 GeV at particle level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the resolved topology.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\chi_{tt}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\chi_{tt}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t}|$ < 0.75 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 0.75 < $|y^{t}|$ < 1.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $|y^{t}|$ in 1.5 < $|y^{t}|$ < 2.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 80.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 80.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 180.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 180.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 330.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 330.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 800.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 GeV < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 325.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 500.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 500.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 700.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 700.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1000.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2000.0 GeV at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.5 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.1 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.1 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.7 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.7 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.5 at parton level in the resolved topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}|$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi_{tt}$ at parton level in the resolved topology.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $y^{t}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $y^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the resolved topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,1}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,2}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $|p_{out}^{t,lep}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,lep}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|p_{out}^{t,lep}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $|p_{out}^{t,lep}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative differential cross-section as a function of $N^{subjets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $N^{subjets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $N^{subjets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix of the Absolute differential cross-section as function of $N^{subjets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Total cross-section at particle level in the boosted topology. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 1.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $|y^{t,had}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t,had}|$ < 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 490.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1160.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 490.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1160.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 490.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1160.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 490.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1160.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 490.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1160.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 490.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1160.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 490.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1160.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $m^{t\bar{t}}$ in 1160.0 GeV < $m^{t\bar{t}}$ < 3000.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 780.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2500.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 780.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2500.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 780.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2500.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 780.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2500.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 350.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 780.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 780.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2500.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 780.0 GeV < $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 2500.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 0.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 40.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 40.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 150.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ in 150.0 GeV < $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ < 1000.0 GeV at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 . Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.0 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 0.65 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 0.65 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 1.3 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ in 1.3 < $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ < 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 3.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.5. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.5 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.5. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.5 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.5 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Relative double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 and the Relative double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ at particle level in the boosted topology in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text. The measured differential cross-section is compared with the prediction obtained with the Powheg+Pythia8 Monte Carlo generator.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 0.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ = 1.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Covariance matrix between the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 and the Absolute double-differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $N^{extra jets}$ in $N^{extra jets}$ $\geq$ 2.0 at particle level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the boosted topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $p_{T}^{t,had}$ at particle level in the boosted topology.
Statistical correlation matrix between the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ and the absolute differential cross-section as function of $|y^{t,had}|$ at particle level in the boosted topology.
Covariance matrix of the Relative differential cross-section as function of $m^{t\bar{t}}$ at parton level in the boosted topology, accounting for the statistical and systematic uncertainties.
The results of a search for direct pair production of top squarks and for dark matter in events with two opposite-charge leptons (electrons or muons), jets and missing transverse momentum are reported, using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider during Run 2 (2015-2018). This search considers the pair production of top squarks and is sensitive across a wide range of mass differences between the top squark and the lightest neutralino. Additionally, spin-0 mediator dark-matter models are considered, in which the mediator is produced in association with a pair of top quarks. The mediator subsequently decays to a pair of dark-matter particles. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background, and limits are set at 95% confidence level. The results exclude top squark masses up to about 1 TeV, and masses of the lightest neutralino up to about 500 GeV. Limits on dark-matter production are set for scalar (pseudoscalar) mediator masses up to about 250 (300) GeV.
Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference dark-matter signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference dark-matter signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Four-body selection. (a) distributions of $E_{T}^{miss}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Small\,\Delta m}$ and (b) distribution of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Large\,\Delta m}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panel indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Four-body selection. (a) distributions of $E_{T}^{miss}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Small\,\Delta m}$ and (b) distribution of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ in $SR^{4-body}_{Large\,\Delta m}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panel indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the Observed limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100\% branching ratio, in the (a) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ and (b) $m(\tilde{t}_1)$--$\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limits and their $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the mediator mass for a DM particle mass of $m(\chi)=1$ GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}Z}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}, DF}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}, SF}$ and $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t} Z}$. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Three-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{2-body}}_{t\bar{t}Z}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{VR(1)}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$ and $\mathrm{VR(2)}^{\mathrm{3-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Four-body selection. Background fit results for $\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$,$\mathrm{CR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{VV}$, $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{t\bar{t}}$, $VR^{4-body}_{VV}$ and $\mathrm{VR}^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{VV,lll}$. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for the different-flavour leptons binned SRs. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for the same-flavour leptons binned SRs. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Three-body selection. Observed event yields and background fit results for the three-body selection SRs. The ''Others'' category contains contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Entries marked `--' indicate a negligible background contribution (less than 0.001 events). The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Four-body selection. Observed event yields and background fit results for SR$^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{\mathrm{Small}\,\Delta m}$ and SR$^{\mathrm{4-body}}_{\mathrm{Large}\,\Delta m}$. The ''Others'' category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. The individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up in quadrature to the total background uncertainty.
Exclusion limits contours (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio in $\tilde{t}_1--\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ masses planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The exclusion limits contours for the two-body, three-body and four-body selections are respectively shown in blue, green and red.
Exclusion limits contours (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio in $\tilde{t}_1--\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ masses planes. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The exclusion limits contours for the two-body, three-body and four-body selections are respectively shown in blue, green and red.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm 1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty. The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty.The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limit contour (95% CL) for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with 100% branching ratio, in $\tilde{t}_1$--$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ masses plane. The dashed lines and the shaded bands are the expected limit and its $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty.The thick solid lines are the observed limits for the central value of the signal cross-section. The expected and observed limits do not include the effect of the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section. The dotted lines show the effect on the observed limit when varying the signal cross-section by $\pm1\sigma$ of the theoretical uncertainty. The observed (a) and expected (b) CLs values are respectively shown.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Exclusion limits for (a) $t\bar{t} + \phi $ scalar and (b) $t\bar{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models as a function of the DM particle mass for a mediator mass of 10 GeV. The limits are calculated at 95% CL and are expressed in terms of the ratio of the excluded cross-section to the nominal cross-section for a coupling assumption of $g = g_q = g_{\chi} = 1$. The solid (dashed) lines shows the observed (expected) exclusion limits.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection efficiency (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection efficiency (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection Efficiency (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection Efficiency (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta\ m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ t \tilde{t} +\phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + \phi$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-DF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-DF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-DF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-DF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-DF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) SR-SF$^{2-body}_{[110,120)}$, (b) SR-SF1$^{2-body}_{[120,140)}$, (c) SR-SF2$^{2-body}_{[140,160)}$, (d) SR-SF3$^{2-body}_{[160,180)}$, (e) SR-SF4$^{2-body}_{[180,220)}$, (f) SR-SF5$^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $t \tilde{t} + a$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection acceptance (a) $SR^{2-body}_{[110,\infty)}$ , (b) $SR^{2-body}_{[120,\infty)}$ , (c) $SR^{2-body}_{[140,\infty)}$ , (d) $SR^{2-body}_{[160,\infty)}$ , (e) $SR^{2-body}_{[180,\infty)}$ , (f) $SR^{2-body}_{[200,\infty)}$ , (g) $SR^{2-body}_{[220,\infty)}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Three-body selection acceptance (a) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (b) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{t}$, (c) SR-DF$^{3-body}_{W}$, (d) SR-SF$^{3-body}_{W}$ for a simplified model assuming $ \tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection acceptance (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Four-body selection acceptance (a) SR$^{4-body}_{Small \Delta m}$ , (b) $SR^{4-body}_{Large \Delta m}$ for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the observed upper limits on the signal strenght for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Three-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal strenght for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Four-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal strenght for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for (a) a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, (b) for $t\tilde{t} + a $ pseudoscalar models, (c) for $t\tilde{t} + \phi $ scalar models. In Figure (a), the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Three-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Four-body selection The numbers indicate the upper limits on the signal cross-section for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production. For comparison, the red line corresponds to the observed limit.
Two-body selection. Background fit results for the $inclusive$ SRs. The Others category contains the contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Note that the individual uncertainties can be correlated, and do not necessarily add up quadratically to the total background uncertainty.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t^{(*)}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=600~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=400~ GeV$ in the SRs for the two-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the scalar signal model $t\bar{t} + \phi $ with $m(\phi)=150~ GeV$ and $m(\chi)=1~ GeV$ in the SRs for the two-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the pseudoscalar signal model $t\bar{t} + a $ with $m(a)=150~ GeV$ and $m(\chi)=1~ GeV$ in the SRs for the two-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=385~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=400~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=430~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow bW\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=550~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=460~ GeV$ in the SRs for the three-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=400~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=380~ GeV$ in the SRs for the four-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=460~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=415~ GeV$ in the SRs for the four-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Cut flow for the simplified signal model $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b l \nu \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with $m(\tilde{t}_1)=400~ GeV$ and $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=320~ GeV$ in the SRs for the four-body selection. The number of events is normalized to the cross-section and to an integrated luminosity of $139~fb^{-1}$.
Detailed measurements of $t$-channel single top-quark production are presented. They use 20.2 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the ATLAS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV at the LHC. Total, fiducial and differential cross-sections are measured for both top-quark and top-antiquark production. The fiducial cross-section is measured with a precision of 5.8 % (top quark) and 7.8 % (top antiquark), respectively. The total cross-sections are measured to be $\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}(tq) = 56.7^{+4.3}_{-3.8}\;$pb for top-quark production and $\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}(\bar{t}q) = 32.9^{+3.0}_{-2.7}\;$pb for top-antiquark production, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction. In addition, the ratio of top-quark to top-antiquark production cross-sections is determined to be $R_t=1.72 \pm 0.09$, with an improved relative precision of 4.9 % since several systematic uncertainties cancel in the ratio. The differential cross-sections as a function of the transverse momentum and rapidity of both the top quark and the top antiquark are measured at both the parton and particle levels. The transverse momentum and rapidity differential cross-sections of the accompanying jet from the $t$-channel scattering are measured at particle level. All measurements are compared to various Monte Carlo predictions as well as to fixed-order QCD calculations where available.
Predicted and observed event yields for the signal region (SR). The multijet background prediction is obtained from a binned maximum-likelihood fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution. All the other predictions are derived using theoretical cross-sections, given for the backgrounds in Sect. 6 and for the signal in Sect. 1. The quoted uncertainties are in the predicted cross-sections or in the number of multijet events, in case of the multijet process.
Predicted and observed event yields for the signal region (SR). The multijet background prediction is obtained from a binned maximum-likelihood fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution. All the other predictions are derived using theoretical cross-sections, given for the backgrounds in Sect. 6 and for the signal in Sect. 1. The quoted uncertainties are in the predicted cross-sections or in the number of multijet events, in case of the multijet process.
Definition of the fiducial phase space.
Definition of the fiducial phase space.
The seven input variables to the NN ordered by their discriminating power. The jet that is not $b$-tagged is referred to as $\textit{untagged}~$jet.
The seven input variables to the NN ordered by their discriminating power. The jet that is not $b$-tagged is referred to as $\textit{untagged}~$jet.
Event yields for the different processes estimated with the fit to the $O_\mathrm{NN}$ distribution compared to the numbers of observed events. Only the statistical uncertainties are quoted. The $Z,VV+\mathrm{jets}$ contributions and the multijet background are fixed in the fit; therefore no uncertainty is quoted for these processes.
Event yields for the different processes estimated with the fit to the $O_\mathrm{NN}$ distribution compared to the numbers of observed events. Only the statistical uncertainties are quoted. The $Z,VV+\mathrm{jets}$ contributions and the multijet background are fixed in the fit; therefore no uncertainty is quoted for these processes.
Detailed list of the contribution from each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty in the measured values of $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(tq)$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(\bar tq)$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5\%$ are marked with ‘<0.5’.
Detailed list of the contribution from each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty in the measured values of $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(tq)$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(\bar tq)$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5\%$ are marked with ‘<0.5’.
Significant contributions to the total relative uncertainty in the measured value of $R_{t}$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3~\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5~\%$ are not shown.
Significant contributions to the total relative uncertainty in the measured value of $R_{t}$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3~\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5~\%$ are not shown.
Slopes $a$ of the mass dependence of the measured cross$-$sections.
Slopes $a$ of the mass dependence of the measured cross$-$sections.
Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.
Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.
Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the second neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN2}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.
Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the second neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN2}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.
Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Migration matrix for $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Migration matrix for $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Migration matrix for $|y(t)|$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Migration matrix for $|y(t)|$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.
Uncertainties in the normalisations of the different backgrounds for all processes, as derived from the total cross-section measurement.
Uncertainties in the normalisations of the different backgrounds for all processes, as derived from the total cross-section measurement.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.
Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events(at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.
Fiducial acceptance $A_{\mathrm{fid}}$ for different $t$-channel single top-quark MC samples. $^{\mathrm{(a)}}$ Calculation taken from AcerMC $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$. $^{\mathrm{(b)}}$ Calculation taken from $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize OWHEG}}$-$\mathrm{B{\scriptsize OX}}$ $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$.
Fiducial acceptance $A_{\mathrm{fid}}$ for different $t$-channel single top-antiquark MC samples. $^{\mathrm{(a)}}$ Calculation taken from AcerMC $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$. $^{\mathrm{(b)}}$ Calculation taken from $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize OWHEG}}$-$\mathrm{B{\scriptsize OX}}$ $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\left( \dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left( \dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $ tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $ tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Uncertainties for the absolute differential $ \bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$.
Uncertainties for the normalised differential $ \bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.
Measurements of the Standard Model Higgs boson decaying into a $b\bar{b}$ pair and produced in association with a $W$ or $Z$ boson decaying into leptons, using proton-proton collision data collected between 2015 and 2018 by the ATLAS detector, are presented. The measurements use collisions produced by the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = $13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The production of a Higgs boson in association with a $W$ or $Z$ boson is established with observed (expected) significances of 4.0 (4.1) and 5.3 (5.1) standard deviations, respectively. Cross-sections of associated production of a Higgs boson decaying into bottom quark pairs with an electroweak gauge boson, $W$ or $Z$, decaying into leptons are measured as a function of the gauge boson transverse momentum in kinematic fiducial volumes. The cross-section measurements are all consistent with the Standard Model expectations, and the total uncertainties vary from 30% in the high gauge boson transverse momentum regions to 85% in the low regions. Limits are subsequently set on the parameters of an effective Lagrangian sensitive to modifications of the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes as well as the Higgs boson decay into $b\bar{b}$.
Best-fit values and uncertainties for $VH, V\rightarrow\mathrm{leptons}$ for the cross-section times the $H\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ branching fraction, in the reduced stage-1.2 simplififed template cross-sections (STXS) scheme. The SM predictions for each region is also shown. They are obtained from the samples of simulated events scaled to the inclusive cross-sections calculated at NNLO(QCD)+NLO(EW) accuracy for the $qq\rightarrow WH$ and $qq\rightarrow ZH$ processes, and at NLO+NLL accuracy for the $gg\rightarrow ZH$ process. The contributions to the total uncertainty in the measurements from statistical (Stat.) or systematic uncertainties in the signal modelling (Th. sig.), background modelling (Th. bkg.) and in experimental performance (Exp.) are given separately. All leptonic decays of the $V$ bosons (including those to $\tau$ leptons, $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$) are considered.
Best-fit values and uncertainties for $VH, V\rightarrow\mathrm{leptons}$ for the cross-section times the $H\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ branching fraction, in the reduced stage-1.2 simplififed template cross-sections (STXS) scheme. The SM predictions for each region is also shown. They are obtained from the samples of simulated events scaled to the inclusive cross-sections calculated at NNLO(QCD)+NLO(EW) accuracy for the $qq\rightarrow WH$ and $qq\rightarrow ZH$ processes, and at NLO+NLL accuracy for the $gg\rightarrow ZH$ process. The contributions to the total uncertainty in the measurements from statistical (Stat.) or systematic uncertainties in the signal modelling (Th. sig.), background modelling (Th. bkg.) and in experimental performance (Exp.) are given separately. All leptonic decays of the $V$ bosons (including those to $\tau$ leptons, $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$) are considered.
Observed correlations between the measured reduced stage-1.2 simplified template $VH, H \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ cross-sections (STXS), including both the statistical and systematic uncertainties. All leptonic decays of the $V$ bosons (including those to $\tau$ leptons, $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$) are considered.
Observed correlations between the measured reduced stage-1.2 simplified template $VH, H \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ cross-sections (STXS), including both the statistical and systematic uncertainties. All leptonic decays of the $V$ bosons (including those to $\tau$ leptons, $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$) are considered.
Linear combination of Wilson coefficients corresponding to SMEFT operators in the Warsaw basis for which this analysis provides orthogonal constraints (eigenvectors). Eigenvalues are shown for each eigenvector, which provides a measure of the experimental sensitivity to that linear combination. The modifications to the $qq\rightarrow ZH$ and $qq\rightarrow WH$ processes due to SMEFT operators are computed at LO, and changes to the $gg\rightarrow ZH$ process are neglected.
Linear combination of Wilson coefficients corresponding to SMEFT operators in the Warsaw basis for which this analysis provides orthogonal constraints (eigenvectors). Eigenvalues are shown for each eigenvector, which provides a measure of the experimental sensitivity to that linear combination. The modifications to the $qq\rightarrow ZH$ and $qq\rightarrow WH$ processes due to SMEFT operators are computed at LO, and changes to the $gg\rightarrow ZH$ process are neglected.
A search for heavy resonances decaying into a pair of $Z$ bosons leading to $\ell^+\ell^-\ell'^+\ell'^-$ and $\ell^+\ell^-\nu\bar\nu$ final states, where $\ell$ stands for either an electron or a muon, is presented. The search uses proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected from 2015 to 2018 that corresponds to the full integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider. Different mass ranges spanning 200 GeV to 2000 GeV for the hypothetical resonances are considered, depending on the final state and model. In the absence of a significant observed excess, the results are interpreted as upper limits on the production cross section of a spin-0 or spin-2 resonance. The upper limits for the spin-0 resonance are translated to exclusion contours in the context of Type-I and Type-II two-Higgs-doublet models, and the limits for the spin-2 resonance are used to constrain the Randall--Sundrum model with an extra dimension giving rise to spin-2 graviton excitations.
A search for heavy neutral Higgs bosons is performed using the LHC Run 2 data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector. The search for heavy resonances is performed over the mass range 0.2-2.5 TeV for the $\tau^+\tau^-$ decay with at least one $\tau$-lepton decaying into final states with hadrons. The data are in good agreement with the background prediction of the Standard Model. In the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, values of $\tan\beta>8$ and $\tan\beta>21$ are excluded at the 95% confidence level for neutral Higgs boson masses of 1.0 TeV and 1.5 TeV, respectively, where $\tan\beta$ is the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-veto category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 400, 1000 and 1500 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 6, 12 and 25 respectively in the mh125 scenario are also provided. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 1000 and 1500 GeV is scaled by 100 in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the gluon-gluon fusion Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the Higgs boson mass.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the gluon-gluon fusion Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the Higgs boson mass.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the gluon-gluon fusion Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the Higgs boson mass.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the gluon-gluon fusion Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the Higgs boson mass.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the b-associated Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the boson mass.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the b-associated Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the boson mass.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the b-associated Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the boson mass.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the b-associated Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the boson mass.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered for the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. No theoretical uncertainty is considered when computing these limits.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by gluon-gluon fusion as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by gluon-gluon fusion as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by gluon-gluon fusion as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by gluon-gluon fusion as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by b-associated production as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by b-associated production as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by b-associated production as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Acceptance times efficiency for a scalar boson produced by b-associated production as a function of the scalar boson mass.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Expected 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Expected 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Expected 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Expected 95% CL upper limits on the scalar boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the scalar boson mass and the fraction of the b-associated production. The limits are calculated from a statistical combination of the 1l1tau_h and 2tau_h channels.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 250 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 250 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 250 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 250 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 300 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 300 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 300 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 300 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 350 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 350 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 350 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 350 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 400 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 400 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 400 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 400 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 600 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 600 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 600 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 600 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 700 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 700 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 700 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 700 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 800 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 800 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 800 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 800 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Observed two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 250 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 250 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 250 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 300 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 300 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 300 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 350 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 350 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 350 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 400 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 400 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 400 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 600 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 600 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 600 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 700 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 700 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 700 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 800 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 800 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 800 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1200 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 1500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2000 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
Expected two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the scalar boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively. The value of $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ for 2500 GeV signal mass point is shown in the HEPData table.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the hMSSM scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the hMSSM scenario is 0.8 and the highest value of mass is 2 TeV. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\chi})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(\widetilde{\tau})$ scenario is 0.5. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The range of $\tan\beta$ shown in the paper figure and the HEPData is from 1 to 60. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The observed 95% CL upper limits with one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 1.0. The highest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 20.0. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 1.0. The highest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 20.0. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 1.0. The highest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 20.0. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus one sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 1.0. The highest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 20.0. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with plus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 1.0. The highest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 20.0. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
The expected 95% CL upper limits with minus two sigma on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{A}$ in the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario. The lowest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 1.0. The highest value of $\tan\beta$ considered by the $M_{h}^{125}(alignment)$ scenario is 20.0. The points in the region which is called "Not applicable" in the paper figure are kept in the HEPData table. Linear connection is applied in the range of signal mass points from 400 to 1000 GeV in the paper figure. The theoretical uncertainty of signal cross section is considered.
A search for pair production of scalar leptoquarks, each decaying into either an electron or a muon and a top quark, is presented. This is the first leptoquark search using ATLAS data to investigate top-philic cross-generational couplings that could provide explanations for recently observed anomalies in $B$ meson decays. This analysis targets high leptoquark masses which cause the decay products of each resultant top quark to be contained within a single high-$p_{\mathrm{T}}$ large-radius jet. The full Run 2 dataset is exploited, consisting of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV from 2015 to 2018 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. In the absence of any significant deviation from the background expectation, lower limits on the leptoquark masses are set at 1480 GeV and 1470 GeV for the electron and muon channel, respectively.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.