Correlation matrix of the unfolding uncertainty between the inclusive-jet measurement and the previous dijet measurement. Correlations are given in percent.

Summary of different determinations of $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ at NNLO or higher order, adapted from PDG, see references therein. The red points are included in the PDG world average. The averages from each sub-field are shown as yellow bands and the world average as a blue band. A recent measurement from CMS using jet cross sections and the latest determination from HERAPDF, which are not yet included in the world average, are shown in green. The current determination, assuming half-correlated and half-uncorrelated scale uncertainties, is shown in black.

Value of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu^2)$ as a function of the scale $\mu$. The data points indicate determinations from measurements that were performed close to the indicated scale. The uncertainties represent the full uncertainty of each determination. All depicted results were obtained at least at NNLO. They are based on data from $e^+e^-$, $ep$ and $pp$ collisions, as well as from $\tau$ lepton decays and quarkonium states. The solid blue line shows the PDG world average. Also shown are the $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ values corresponding to each data point.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.

Determinations of $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ in the considered $y_{max}$ ranges.

Determinations of $\alpha_s(Q)$ in the considered $m_3$ ranges.

Covariance matrices for experimental uncertainties.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Inclusive trijet cross section as a function of the jet psuedorapidity in the lab frame for the jet with the highest transverse energy.

Inclusive trijet cross section as a function of the jet psuedorapidity in the lab frame for the jet with the second highest transverse energy.

Inclusive trijet cross section as a function of the jet psuedorapidity in the lab frame for the jet with the third highest transverse energy.

The Inclusive dijet cross section as a function of Q**2 for jets in the Breit frame.

The Inclusive trijet cross section as a function of Q**2 for jets in the Breit frame.

The ratio of the inclusive trijet to dijet cross sections for jets in the Breit frame as a function of Q**2.

Values of the strong coupling constant ALPHAS at the Z mass as determined from this analysis. The second DSYS error here is from the theoretical systematic uncertainty.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level in photoproduction with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level in photoproduction with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level in photoproduction with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level and for electroweak radiative effects in DIS with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level and for electroweak radiative effects in DIS with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level and for electroweak radiative effects in DIS with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level and for electroweak radiative effects in DIS with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level and for electroweak radiative effects in DIS with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5.

Measured mean integrated jet shape corrected to the hadron level and for electroweak radiative effects in DIS with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5.

Measured mean subject multiplicity corrected to the hadron level for photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured mean subject multiplicity corrected to the hadron level for photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured mean subject multiplicity corrected to the hadron level and for photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured mean subject multiplicity corrected to the hadron level and for photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured mean subject multiplicity corrected to the hadron level and for photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured mean subject multiplicity corrected to the hadron level and for photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to their shape.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to their subject multiplicity.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to the combination of shape and subject multiplicity.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet production in DIS with ET(C=JET) > 17 GeV. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to their shape.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DET for inclusive jet photoproduction with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to their shape.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DET for inclusive jet photoproduction with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to their subject multiplicity.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DET for inclusive jet photoproduction with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to the combination of shape and subject multiplicity.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DET for inclusive jet production in DIS with -1 < ETARAP(C=JET) < 2.5. Jets are divided into BROAD and NARROW jets according to their shape.

Measured differential dijet cross section DSIG/DCOS(THETA) in dijet photoproduction with M(C=2JET) > 52 GeV. The data are divided into BROAD-BROAD and NARROW-NARROW jets according to the jet shapes.

Measured differential dijet cross section DSIG/DCOS(THETA) in dijet photoproduction with M(C=2JET) > 52 GeV. The data are divided into BROAD-NARROW jets according to the jet shapes.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DM for dijet photoproduction with ABS(COS(THETA)) < 0.8. The data are divided into BROAD-BROAD and NARROW-NARROW jets according to the jet shapes.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DX(C=GAMMA) for dijet photoproduction. The data are divided into BROAD-BROAD and NARROW-NARROW jets according to the jet shapes.

Values of ALPHAS determined for the QCD fit of the measured mean PSI value at R = 0.5 as a function of ET(C=JET) in DIS events.

Total jet broadering (BT) distribution corrected for detector acceptance and initial state photon radiation.

Wide jet broadering (BW) distribution corrected for detector acceptance andinitial state photon radiation.

Distribution of the back-to-back energy-energy correlation (EEC) corrected for detector acceptance and initial state photon radiation.

Two dIfferent methods were used to eveluate of ALPHAS (see text).

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DETARAP for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 data sample.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DETARAP for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 data sample.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DETARAP for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined data sample.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DET for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 running period.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DET for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 running period.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DET for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined running period.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DQ**2 for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 data sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DQ**2 for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 data sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DQ**2 for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined data sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DM for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DM for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DM for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined sample.

Mean subjet multiplicity as a function of the YCUT parameter used in defining the jet for the inclusive jet sample with ET 14 to 17 GeV and 17 to 21 GeV.

Mean subjet multiplicity as a function of the YCUT parameter used in defining the jet for the inclusive jet sample with ET 21 to 25 GeV and 25 to 35 GeV.

Mean subjet multiplicity as a function of the YCUT parameter used in defining the jet for the inclusive jet sample with ET 35 to 55 GeV and 55 to 119 GeV.

Measured values of the mean subjet multiplicity at YCUT = 0.01 as a function of Q**2.

Value of ALPHAS at the Z0 mass obtained from the data with ET(C=JET) > 25 GeV.. The second DSYS error is due to the uncertainty in the theory.

The longitudinal structure function FL determined from the present data. The first DSYS error is the combined uncorrelated and correlated systematics. The second DSYS error is due to the uncertainties corrected with the representationsof F2 in the derivative method for Q**2 < 10 GeV**2, and in the QCD extrapolati on method for Q**2 > 10 GeV**2.

The measured values of the derivative DF2/DLN(Q**2), calculated at fixed X bins.

Value of ALPHAS obtained by combining the H1 data with MU P scattering dataof BCDMS at large X.

Distribution of Aplanarity.

Distribution of Oblateness.

Distribution of the C-parameter.

Distribution of Heavy Jet Mass.

Distribution of Sphericity.

Distribution of Total Jet Broadening.

Distribution of Wide Jet Broadening.

Distribution of the Transition value between 2- and 3-jets, Y23.

Weighted mean values of ALPHAS derived from the six event shape distribution using order (alpha**2) +NLLA QCD calculation with x(mu)=1 and the ln(R)-matching scheme. Results are also given evolved to M(Z0). The 187 GeV entry corresponds to the luminosity weighted mean c.m. energy.

Charged particle multiplicity (in percent).

Mean values of the charged particle multiplicity and higher order moments. D is defined as SQRT(MEAN(MULT)-MEAN(MULT))**2. C2 is defined as MEAN(MULT**2)/MEAN(MULT)**2. R2 is defined as MEAN(MULT(MULT-1))/MEAN(MULT)**2.

Measured value of the momentum spectra of charged particles (PTIN) in the event plane.

Measured value of the momentum spectra of charged particles (PTOUT) out of the event plane.

Measured value of the rapidity (YRAP).

Measured value of the fragmentation functions.

Measured valueS of the 1/LN(X) distribution.

Mean values of the momentum parameter.

Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.

Jet Cone Energy Fraction.

1 - Thrust (1-T).

Oblateness O.

C-Parameter C.

Heavy Jet Mass.

Sum of the Jet Masses.

Difference of the Jet Masses.

Wide Jet Broadening BMAX.

Total Jet Broadening BSUM.

Differential 2-Jet Rate E0 Scheme D2(E0).

Differential 2-Jet Rate P0 Scheme D2(P0).

Differential 2-Jet Rate P Scheme D2(P).

Differential 2-Jet Rate Jade Alogrithm D2(Jad).

Differential 2-Jet Rate Durham Alogrithm D2(Dur).

Differential 2-Jet Rate Geneva Alogrithm D2(Gen).

Differential 2-Jet Rate Cambridge Alogrithm D2(Cam).

Energy Energy Correlation EEC.

Energy Energy Correlation EEC.

Energy Energy Correlation EEC.

Energy Energy Correlation EEC.

Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.

Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.

Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.

Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.

Jet Cone Energy Fraction.

Jet Cone Energy Fraction.

Jet Cone Energy Fraction.

Jet Cone Energy Fraction.

1 - Thrust (1-T).

Moments of the Oblateness distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the Heavy Jet Mass (MH**2/EVIS**2) distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the Light Jet Mass (ML**2/EVIS**2) distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the Jet Mass Differences (MDIFF**2/EVIS**2) distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the Wide Jet Broadening (BMAX) distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the Small Jet Broadening (BMIN) distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the the Total Jet Broadening (BSUM) distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the Jet Broadening Difference (BDIFF) distributions at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Moments of the C-parameter (C-PARAM) distributionss at cm energies 133, 161, 172 and 183 GeV.

Distributions of (1-THRUST) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of (1-THRUST) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of Thrust Major (MAJOR) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of Thrust Major (MAJOR) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of Thrust Minor (MINOR) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of Thrust Minor (MINOR) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of Oblateness at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of Oblateness at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of Sphericity at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of Sphericity at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of Planarity at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of Planarity at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of Aplanarity at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of Aplanarity at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the Heavy Jet Masses (MH**2/EVIS**2) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the Heavy Jet Masses (MH**2/EVIS**2) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the Light Jet Masses (ML**2/EVIS**2) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the Light Jet Masses (ML**2/EVIS**2) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the Jet Mass Differences (MDIFF**2/EVIS**2) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the Jet Mass Differences (MDIFF**2/EVIS**2) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the Wide Jet Broadening (BMAX) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the Wide Jet Broadening (BMAX) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the Small Jet Broadening (BMIN) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the Small Jet Broadening (BMIN) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the Total Jet Broadening (BSUM) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the Total Jet Broadening (BSUM) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the Jet Broadening Difference (BDIFF) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the Jet Broadening Difference (BDIFF) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the C-parameter (C-PARAM) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the C-parameter (C-PARAM) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Distributions of the D-parameter (D-PARAM) at cm energies 133, 161 and 172 GeV.

Distribution of the D-parameter (D-PARAM) at cm energy 183 GeV.

Three different schemes are used for evaluation of ALPHAS: (C=ALPHAS2) second alphas_s order, (C=NLLA) and (C=ALPHAS2+NLLA). See text of the paper for details. The second systematic (DSYS) error is the scale error.

ALPHAS from the higher energies extrapolated to the Z0 mass. The second systematic (DSYS) error is the scale error.

Measured value of the logarithmic energy slope of the inverse coupling constant.

The value of alpha/s at extrapolated to the Z0 mass.. The first systematic (DSYS) errors is due to the experimental procedures, the second is from the theoretical assumptions made in the determination.

First moment of G1 for the world data set (Q**2=5GeV**2) and for the SMC data set (Q**2=10GeV**2).

Integrals of the nonsinglet (NS) structure function. SMC + E143 data.

Integrals of the nonsinglet (NS) structure function. SMC data only.

ALPHA_S(M_Z) estimated as free parameter of the fit.

ALPHAS from the fits to the event shape variables.

Second systematic error (DSYS) is from the theory.

ALPHAS from the fits to the event shape variables.

Second systematic error (DSYS) is from the theory.

The measured ALPHAS values evolved to the MZ scale. The quoted errors are experimental only.

Two theoretical schemes are used: NLLjet MC, and resummed analytic formulas. The variable used for the evalution of alphas are given in C = ...

No description provided.

The first error contains statistics and the experimental systematic errors combined and the systematic error (DSYS) is the error due to uncertainties in the theory.

The measured values of ALPHAS evolved to the MZ scale. The quoted errors are experimental only. The SQRT(S) values > 90 GeV are taken from L3 Collaboration publications: PL 284B 471, PL 371B 137, PL 404B 390.

Tmajor distribution.

Tminor distribution.

Oblateness distribution.

Sphericity distribution.

Aplanarity distribution.

C-parameter distribution.

Heavy Jet Mass distribution.

Total Jet Broadening distribution.

Wide Jet Broadening distribution.

The mean of the event shape distributions.

The width of the event shape distributions.

The skewness of the event shape distributions.

Jet rates using the JADE E0 scheme as a function of ycut (the cut-off parameter).

Jet rates using the Durham Scheme as a function of ycut (the cut-off parameter).

Jet rates using the Cone algorithm as a function of the cone size R. Minimum jet energy is fixed at 7 GeV.

Jet rates using the Cone algorithm as a function of the minimum jet energy. The cone size is fixed at 0.7 radians.

Differential two jet rate using the Durham jet finding algorithm.

PTIN distribution.

PTOUT distribution.

Rapidity distribution of charged particles.

Fragmentation function.

The ln(1/xe) distribution.

Multiplicity distribution of charged particles.

Tminor distribution.

Oblateness distribution.

Sphericity distribution.

Aplanarity distribution.

C-parameter distribution.

Thrust distribution.

Heavy Jet Mass distribution.

Total Jet Broadening distribution.

Wide Jet Broadening distribution.

Jet rates using the JADE E0 scheme as a function of ycut (the cut-off parameter).

Jet rates using the Durham Scheme as a function of ycut (the cut-off parameter).

Jet rates using the Cone algorithm as a function of the cone size R. Minimum jet energy is fixed at 7 GeV.

Jet rates using the Cone algorithm as a function of the minimum jet energy.The cone size is fixed at 0.7 radians.

Differential two jet rate using the Durham jet finding algorithm.

Fragmentation function.

The ln(1/xe) distribution.

Multiplicity distribution of charged particles.

Rapidity distribution of charged particles.

PTIN distribution.

PTOUT distribution.

Using the Durham scheme for jet clustering.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the E scheme.

D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the E0 scheme.

D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the P scheme.

D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the P0 scheme.

D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the D scheme.

D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the G scheme.

No description provided.

No description provided.

JCEF is the jet cone energy fraction.

ALPHAS from the AEEC O(ALPHAS**2) measurement.

ALPHAS from the EEC O(ALPHAS**2 + resummed) measurement.

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.8 pct.. Acollinearity required to be <15 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.5 pct.. Acollinearity required to be <15 degrees.

Results from 1992 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.5 pct.. Acollinearity required to be <15 degrees.

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.9 pct.. Acollinearity required to be <14.3 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.7 pct.. Acollinearity required to be <14.3 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.7 pct.. Acollinearity required to be <14.3 degrees.

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.4 pct.. Efficiency corrected cross section for both leptons inside the angular range 44 to 136 degrees with an acollinearity cut of < 25 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.3 pct.. Efficiency corrected cross section for both leptons inside the angular range 44 to 136 degrees with an acollinearity cut of < 25 degrees.

Results from 1992 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.3 pct.. Efficiency corrected cross section for both leptons inside the angular range 44 to 136 degrees with an acollinearity cut of < 25 degrees.

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.5 pct.. s-channel contribution to the cross section extrapolated to the full solid angle (no acollinearity cut).

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.4 pct.. s-channel contribution to the cross section extrapolated to the full solid angle (no acollinearity cut).

Results from 1992 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.4 pct.. s-channel contribution to the cross section extrapolated to the full solid angle (no acollinearity cut).

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.005.. Acollinearity required to be <15 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.002.. Acollinearity required to be <15 degrees.

Results from 1992 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.002.. Acollinearity required to be <15 degrees.

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.005.. Acollinearity required to be <14.3 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.005.. Acollinearity required to be <14.3 degrees.

Results from 1992 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.003.. Acollinearity required to be <14.3 degrees.

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.004.. Both leptons inside the angle range 44 to 136 degrees with acollinearity cut of <25 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.004.. Both leptons inside the angle range 44 to 136 degrees with acollinearity cut of <25 degrees.

Results from 1992 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.002.. Both leptons inside the angle range 44 to 136 degrees with acollinearity cut of <25 degrees.

Results from 1990 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.005.. s-channel contribution extrapolated to full solid angle.. Acollinearity cut of <25 degrees.

Results from 1991 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.005.. s-channel contribution extrapolated to full solid angle.. Acollinearity cut of <25 degrees.

Results from 1992 data. Additional systematic uncertainty of 0.003.. s-channel contribution extrapolated to full solid angle.. Acollinearity cut of <25 degrees.

Determination of the effective vector and axial-vector coupling constants of the neutral current to charged leptons, the effective electroweak mixing angle, and the strong coupling constant.

Measured 3 jet production rate as a function of R, the jet cone radius, for a fixed value of the minimum jet energy, EPSILON, of 7 GeV.

Measured 4 jet production rate as a function of EPSILON, the minimum energy of a jet for a fixed cone radius R = 0.7 radians.

Measured 4 jet production rate as a function of R, the jet cone radius, for a fixed value of the minimum jet energy, EPSILON, of 7 GeV.

ALP_S(M(Z0)) determined from measurements of the differential 2-jet rates as a function of the minimum jet energy, EPSILON, at a fixed cone half angle of 0.7 radians.. Errors contain both experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

ALP_S(M(Z0)) determined from measurements of the differential 2-jet rates as a function of the cone half angle, R, at a fixed minimum jet energy of 7 GeV.. Errors contain both experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

Measurement of the integral jet energy profile psi(R1) defined as the fraction of the energy of the jet lying within the smaller cone half angle R1. R is the full cone half angle. Both cones have the same axis and date is corrected to the hadron level. The second systematic error is due to the uncertainty associated with varying treatments of overlapping cones.

Measurement of the integral jet energy profile psi(R1) defined as the fraction of the energy of the jet lying within the smaller cone half angle R1. R is the full cone half angle. Both cones have the same axis and date is corrected to the hadron level. The second systematic error is due to the uncertainty associated with varying treatments of overlapping cones.

Measurement of the differential jet energy profile PHI(R1), defined as (PSI(R1+DELTA(R1))-PSI(R1))/(DELTA(R1)/R), as a function of the energy of the jet lying within the smaller cone half angle R1. R is the full cone half angle. Both cones have the same axis and data is corrected to the hadron level. The second systematic error is due to the uncertainty associated with varying treatments of overlapping cones.

Measurement of the differential jet energy profile PHI(R1), defined as (PSI(R1+DELTA(R1))-PSI(R1))/(DELTA(R1)/R), as a function of the energy of the jet lying within the smaller cone half angle R1. R is the full cone half angle. Both cones have the same axis and data is corrected to the hadron level. The second systematic error is due to the uncertainty associated with varying treatments of overlapping cones.

Measurement of the integral jet energy profile psi(R1) defined as the fraction of the energy of the jet lying within the smaller cone half angle R1. R is the full cone half angle. Both cones have the same axis and date is corrected to the hadron level. The second systematic error is due to the uncertainty associated with varying treatments of overlapping cones.. Algorithm modified to emulate exactly the CDF procedure, ie. defining the cone in the (eta - phi) metric, demanding |eta| < 0.7 and measuring the energy flow in terms of ET.

Measurement of the differential jet energy profile PHI(R1), defined as (PSI(R1+DELTA(R1))-PSI(R1))/(DELTA(R1)/R), as a function of the energy of the jet lying within the smaller cone half angle R1. R is the full cone half angle. Both cones have the same axis and data is corrected to the hadron level. The second systematic error is due to the uncertainty associated with varying treatments of overlapping cones.. Algorithm modified to emulate exactly the CDF procedure, ie. defining the cone in the (eta - phi) metric, demanding |eta| < 0.7 and measuring the energy flow in terms of ET.

Energy flow per unit solid angle for inclusive sample of events. Errors include statistical and systematic experimental uncertainties.

Energy flow per unit solid angle for two jet events. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties.