Table 1
Data from Tab 8
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t1
Best fit values of $\sigma_i \cdot \mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i \to H\to f$, as obtained from the generic...
Data from Tab 8
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t1
Best fit values of $\sigma_i \cdot \mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i \to H\to f$, as obtained from the generic...
Data from Tab 8, Fig 7
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t2
Best fit values of $\sigma_i \cdot \mathrm{B}^f$ relative to their SM prediction for each specific channel $i \to H\to f$,...
Data from Tab 9, Tab 20
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t3
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV...
Data from Fig 8
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t4
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of...
Data from Tab 21
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t5
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV...
Data from Fig 30
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t6
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of...
Data from Fig 10, Tab 10, Tab 22
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t7
Best fit values of $\kappa_{gZ}= \kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and of the ratios of coupling modifiers, as defined in the most...
Data from Fig12, Tab 11
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t8
Measured global signal strength $\mu$ and its total uncertainty, together with the breakdown of the uncertainty into its four components...
Data from Fig 12, Tab 12
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t9
Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson production processes. The results are shown for the...
Data from Fig 13, Tab 13
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t10
Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson decay channels. The results are shown for the...
Data from Tab 15a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t11
Results of the ten-parameter fit of $\mu_F^f = \mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}^f$ and $\mu_V^f = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}^f$ for each of the five decay channels....
Data from Tab 15b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t12
Results of the six-parameter fit of the global ratio $\mu_V/\mu_F = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}/\mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$ together with $\mu_F^f$ for each of the five...
Data from Fig 15a, Tab 17a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t13
Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that $|\kappa_{V}| \le$ 1, where $\kappa_{V}$ denotes $\kappa_{Z}$ or $\kappa_{W}$, and that $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}...
Data from Fig 15b, Tab 17b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t14
Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that there are no additional BSM contributions to the Higgs boson width, i.e....
Data from Fig 18, Tab 18
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t15
Fit results for the parameterisation assuming the absence of BSM particles in the loops ($\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$=0). The results with their measured...
Data from Fig 20, Tab 19a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t16
Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for up-type versus down-type fermions. The results...
Data from Fig 22, Tab 19b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t17
Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for leptons versus quarks. The results for...
Data from Fig 27
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t18
Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$...
Data from Fig 28
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t19
Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to...
Data from Fig 29
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t20
Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z}...
Data from Fig 34
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t21
Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...
Data from Fig 35
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t22
Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...
Data from Fig 36
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t23
Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...
Data from Fig 17
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t24
ATLAS+CMS combined best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.
Data from Fig 17
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t25
ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.
Data from Fig 17
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t26
CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.
Data from Fig 24, Fig 26a, Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t27
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t28
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t29
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t30
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t31
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t32
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.
Data from Fig 26a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t33
ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.
Data from Fig 26a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t34
CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t35
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t36
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t37
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t38
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t39
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t40
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t41
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t42
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t43
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t44
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.
Loading Data...
Please try again later, or email info@hepdata.net if this error persists.
This table is too large to load automatically.
The table size is MB, which is greater than our threshold of MB.
Loading Data...
Please try again later, or email info@hepdata.net if this error persists.
Your question will be emailed to those involved with the submission. Please mention the relevant table.
Please log in to HEPData to send a question.