Table 1
Data from Tab 8
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t1
Best fit values of $\sigma_i \cdot \mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i \to H\to f$, as obtained from the generic...
Data from Tab 8
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t1
Best fit values of $\sigma_i \cdot \mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i \to H\to f$, as obtained from the generic...
Data from Tab 8, Fig 7
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t2
Best fit values of $\sigma_i \cdot \mathrm{B}^f$ relative to their SM prediction for each specific channel $i \to H\to f$,...
Data from Tab 9, Tab 20
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t3
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV...
Data from Fig 8
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t4
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of...
Data from Tab 21
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t5
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV...
Data from Fig 30
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t6
Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of...
Data from Fig 10, Tab 10, Tab 22
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t7
Best fit values of $\kappa_{gZ}= \kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and of the ratios of coupling modifiers, as defined in the most...
Data from Fig12, Tab 11
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t8
Measured global signal strength $\mu$ and its total uncertainty, together with the breakdown of the uncertainty into its four components...
Data from Fig 12, Tab 12
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t9
Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson production processes. The results are shown for the...
Data from Fig 13, Tab 13
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t10
Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson decay channels. The results are shown for the...
Data from Tab 15a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t11
Results of the ten-parameter fit of $\mu_F^f = \mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}^f$ and $\mu_V^f = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}^f$ for each of the five decay channels....
Data from Tab 15b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t12
Results of the six-parameter fit of the global ratio $\mu_V/\mu_F = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}/\mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$ together with $\mu_F^f$ for each of the five...
Data from Fig 15a, Tab 17a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t13
Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that $|\kappa_{V}| \le$ 1, where $\kappa_{V}$ denotes $\kappa_{Z}$ or $\kappa_{W}$, and that $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}...
Data from Fig 15b, Tab 17b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t14
Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that there are no additional BSM contributions to the Higgs boson width, i.e....
Data from Fig 18, Tab 18
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t15
Fit results for the parameterisation assuming the absence of BSM particles in the loops ($\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$=0). The results with their measured...
Data from Fig 20, Tab 19a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t16
Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for up-type versus down-type fermions. The results...
Data from Fig 22, Tab 19b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t17
Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for leptons versus quarks. The results for...
Data from Fig 27
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t18
Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$...
Data from Fig 28
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t19
Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to...
Data from Fig 29
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t20
Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z}...
Data from Fig 34
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t21
Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...
Data from Fig 35
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t22
Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...
Data from Fig 36
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t23
Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...
Data from Fig 17
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t24
ATLAS+CMS combined best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.
Data from Fig 17
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t25
ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.
Data from Fig 17
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t26
CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.
Data from Fig 24, Fig 26a, Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t27
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t28
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t29
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t30
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t31
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.
Data from Fig 24
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t32
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.
Data from Fig 26a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t33
ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.
Data from Fig 26a
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t34
CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t35
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t36
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t37
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t38
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 26b
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t39
Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t40
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t41
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t42
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t43
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.
Data from Fig 14, Fig 41
10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t44
Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.
Loading Data...
Please try again later, or email info@hepdata.net if this error persists.
Your question will be emailed to those involved with the submission. Please mention the relevant table.
Please log in to HEPData to send a question.