Showing 10 of 2127 results
The transverse energy ($E_\mathrm{T}^{\gamma}$) spectra of photons isolated from other particles are measured using proton-proton (pp) and lead-lead (PbPb) collisions at the LHC at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV with integrated luminosities of 27.4 pb$^{-1}$and 404 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ for pp and PbPb data, respectively. The results are presented for photons with 25 $<$ $E_\mathrm{T}^{\gamma}$ $<$ 200 GeV in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ $<$ 1.44, and for different centrality intervals for PbPb collisions. Photon production in PbPb collisions is consistent with that in pp collisions scaled by the number of binary nucleon-nucleon collisions, demonstrating that photons do not interact with the quark-gluon plasma. Therefore, isolated photons can provide information about the initial energy of the associated parton in photon+jet measurements. The results are compared with predictions from the next-to-leading-order JETPHOX generator for different parton distribution functions (PDFs) and nuclear PDFs (nPDFs). The comparisons can help to constrain the nPDFs global fits.
Isolated photon spectra measured as a function of $E_{T}^{\gamma}$ for 0–10%, 10–30%, 30– 50%, 50–100%, and 0–100% PbPb collisions (scaled by $T_{AA}$) at 5.02TeV.
Isolated photon cross section measured as a function of $E_{T}^{\gamma}$ in pp collisions at 5.02TeV.
Nuclear modification factors $R_{AA}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{\gamma}$ measured in the 0–10%, 10–30%, 30–50%, and 50–100% centrality ranges in PbPb.
Nuclear modification factors $R_{AA}$ as a function of $E_{T}^{\gamma}$ measured in the 0–100% centrality ranges in PbPb.
A search for leptoquarks produced singly and in pairs in proton-proton collisions is presented. We consider the leptoquark (LQ) to be a scalar particle of charge -1/3$e$ coupling to a top quark plus a tau lepton ($\mathrm{t}\tau$) or a bottom quark plus a neutrino ($\mathrm{b}\nu$), or a vector particle of charge +2/3$e$, coupling to $\mathrm{t}\nu$ or $\mathrm{b}\tau$. These choices are motivated by models that can explain a series of anomalies observed in the measurement of B meson decays. In this analysis the signatures $\mathrm{t}\tau\nu\mathrm{b}$ and $\mathrm{t}\tau\nu$ are probed, using data recorded by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV and that correspond to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. These signatures have not been previously explored in a dedicated search. The data are found to be in agreement with the standard model prediction. Lower limits at 95% confidence level are set on the LQ mass in the range 0.98-1.73 TeV, depending on the LQ spin and its coupling $\lambda$ to a lepton and a quark, and assuming equal branching fractions for the two LQ decay modes considered. These are the most stringent constraints to date on the existence of leptoquarks in this scenario.
Pair leptoquark (LQ) total selection efficiency, accounting for both the decay branching fraction and the event selection, for events that pass the signal region requirements and any of the top quark or b jet categories defined in the search.
Single scalar leptoquark (LQs) total selection efficiency, accounting for both the decay branching fraction and the event selection, for events that pass the signal region requirements and any of the top quark or b jet categories defined in the search.
Single vector leptoquark (LQv) k = 0 total selection efficiency, accounting for both the decay branching fraction and the event selection, for events that pass the signal region requirements and any of the top quark or b jet categories defined in the search.
Single vector leptoquark (LQv) k = 1 total selection efficiency, accounting for both the decay branching fraction and the event selection, for events that pass the signal region requirements and any of the top quark or b jet categories defined in the search.
An inclusive search for nonresonant signatures of beyond the standard model (SM) phenomena in events with three or more charged leptons, including hadronically decaying $\tau$ leptons, is presented. The analysis is based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016-2018. Events are categorized based on the lepton and b-tagged jet multiplicities and various kinematic variables. Three scenarios of physics beyond the SM are probed, and signal-specific boosted decision trees are used for enhancing sensitivity. No significant deviations from the background expectations are observed. Lower limits are set at 95% confidence level on the mass of type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the range 845-1065 GeV for various decay branching fraction combinations to SM leptons. Doublet and singlet vector-like $\tau$ lepton extensions of the SM are excluded for masses below 1045 GeV and in the mass range 125-150 GeV, respectively. Scalar leptoquarks decaying exclusively to a top quark and a lepton are excluded below 1.12-1.42 TeV, depending on the lepton flavor. For the type-III seesaw as well as the vector-like doublet model, these constraints are the most stringent to date. For the vector-like singlet model, these are the first constraints from the LHC experiments. Detailed results are also presented to facilitate alternative theoretical interpretations.
The minimum lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ (GeV) distribution in 3L MisID CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ (GeV) distribution in 3L WZ CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The $\mathrm{DR_{min}}$ distribution in 3L Z$\mathrm{\gamma}$ CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The distribution of $\mathrm{p_{T}^{miss}}$ (GeV) in 2L1T MisID CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The distribution of $\mathrm{M_{T}}$ (GeV) in 3L OnZ CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The distribution of $\mathrm{H_{T}}$ (GeV) in 3L ttZ CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
Distribution of BDT score from the SS-M ($\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$) BDT for the 3L+2L1T CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The 3L+2L1T CR consists of the 3L OnZ, 3L Z$\mathrm{\gamma}$, and 2L1T MisID CRs. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The distribution of visible diboson $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ (GeV) in 4L ZZ CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
Distribution of BDT score from the SS-M ($\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$) BDT for the 4L ZZ CR events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The distribution of $\mathrm{L_{T}}$ in all seven multilepton channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton of $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV in the doublet scenario, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The distribution of $\mathrm{p_{T}^{miss}}$ in all seven multilepton channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermion of $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV in the flavor-democratic scenario, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The distribution of $\mathrm{H_{T}}$ in all seven multilepton channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark of $mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1 TeV coupled to a top quark and a $\tau$ lepton, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The distribution of $\mathrm{M_{OSSF}}$ in channels with at least one light lepton pair (4L, 3L1T, 3L, 2L2T, and 2L1T) for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermion of $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV in the flavor-democratic scenario, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The $\mathrm{N_{b}}$ distribution in 4L, 3L1T, 3L, 2L2T, 2L1T, 1L3T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The invariant mass distribution of the opposite-sign same-flavor ($\mathrm{M_{OSSF}}$) tau lepton pair distribution in 2L2T, 1L3T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The $\mathrm{M_{T}^{12}}$ distribution in 4L, 3L1T, 3L, 2L2T, 2L1T, 1L3T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction.
The $\mathrm{N_{b}}$ distribution in 3L, 2L1T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The $\mathrm{L_{T}}$ distribution in 3L, 2L1T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The $\mathrm{p_{T}^{miss}}$ distribution in 3L, 2L1T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The $\mathrm{H_{T}}$ distribution in 3L, 2L1T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The $\mathrm{M_{OSSF}}$ distribution in 3L, and 2L1T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The invariant mass distribution of the opposite-sign different-flavor ($\mathrm{M_{OSDF}}$) light lepton pair distribution in 3L, and 2L1T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The invariant mass distribution of the opposite-sign same-flavor ($\mathrm{M_{OSSF}}$) tau lepton pair distribution in 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The invariant mass distribution of the opposite-sign different-flavor ($\mathrm{M_{OSDF}}$) light lepton and tau lepton pair distribution in 2L1T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The $\mathrm{M_{T}^{1}}$ distribution in 3L, 2L1T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The $\mathrm{M_{T}^{12}}$ distribution in 3L, 2L1T, and 1L2T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The model independent fundamental table categories for the combined 2016-2018 data set, as defined in Table 1. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The $\mathrm{N_{b}}$ distribution in 4L, 3L1T, 2L2T, and 1L3T events for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The gray band represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties on the SM background predictions.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table in 3L channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table in 2L1T and 1L2T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table in 3L channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table in 2L1T and 1L2T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table in 4L, 3L1T, 2L2T, and 1L3T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table in 4L, 3L1T, 2L2T, and 1L3T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T and 1L2T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T and 1L2T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 4L, 3L1T, 2L2T, and 1L3T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 4L, 3L1T, 2L2T, and 1L3T channels for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L 0B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L 1B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L 2B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T 0B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T 1B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T 2B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 1L2T channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. An example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid. For this category, the signal yield is negligible and is not visible in the figure.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L 0B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L 1B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L 2B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T 0B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T 1B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 2L1T 2B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 1L2T channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. An example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid. For this category, the signal yield is negligible and is not visible in the figure.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 4L 0B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 4L 1B/2B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L1T, 2L2T, and 1L3T channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 4L 0B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 4L 1B/2B channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table in 3L1T, 2L2T, and 1L3T channel for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-L BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-L BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-L BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-M BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-M BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-M BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-H BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 900 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-H BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 900 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-H BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 900 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-L BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-L BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-L BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-M BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-M BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-M BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-H BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 900 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-H BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 900 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The VLL-H BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 900 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 850 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 850 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 850 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 100 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 300 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 550 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 850 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 850 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the scenario with mixing exclusively to $\tau$ lepton for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 850 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 3-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and an electron for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-VL $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 200 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-L $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 400 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-M $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 700 GeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2016 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2017 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The LQ-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT regions for the 4-lepton channels for the 2018 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a $\tau lepton$ for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.2 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95%% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario using the table schemes and the BDT regions of the SS-M and the SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ BDTs. To the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table, and to the right the limits are shown from the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95%% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\mathrm{\tau}$ leptons: doublet model. To the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table, and to the right the limits are shown from the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks: $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ and $\mathrm{\beta=1}$. To the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table, and to the right the limits are shown from the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks: $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ and $\mathrm{\beta=1}$. To the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table, and to the right the limits are shown from the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks: $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ and $\mathrm{\beta=1}$. To the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table, and to the right the limits are shown from the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\mathrm{\tau}$ leptons: singlet model. The limit is shown from the advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table for all masses.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau}}$ scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\tau$ leptons in the doublet scenario using the BDT regions.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\tau$ leptons in the doublet scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\tau$ leptons in the doublet scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\tau$ leptons in the doublet scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\tau$ leptons in the singlet scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\tau$ leptons in the singlet scenario using the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like $\tau$ leptons in the singlet scenario using the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table.
Observed lower limits at 95% CL on the mass of the type-III seesaw fermions in the plane defined by $\mathrm{B_{e}}$ and $\mathrm{B_{\tau}}$, with the constraint that $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}+B_{\tau}=1}$. These limits arise from the SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT when $\mathrm{B_{\tau}\geq0.9}$, and by the SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}+B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT for the other decay branching fraction combinations.
Median Expected lower limits at 95% CL on the mass of the type-III seesaw fermions in the plane defined by $\mathrm{B_{e}}$ and $\mathrm{B_{\tau}}$, with the constraint that $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}+B_{\tau}=1}$. These limits arise from the SS-H $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT when $\mathrm{B_{\tau}\geq0.9}$, and by the SS-H $\mathrm{B_{e}+B_{\mu}+B_{\tau}=1}$ BDT for the other decay branching fraction combinations.
Acceptance times efficiency values for the major SM backgrounds WZ, ZZ, and ttZ in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample. The statistical uncertainty on the acceptance times efficiency values is insignificant with respect to the quoted precision.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the vector-like $\mathrm{\tau}$ lepton model in the doublet scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the vector-like $\mathrm{\tau}$ lepton model in the singlet scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{(B_{e}=B_{\mu}=B_{\tau})}$ scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{(B_{e}=1)}$ scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{(B_{\mu}=1)}$ scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the type-III seesaw fermions in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1)}$ scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\tau}=1}$ scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{e}=1}$ scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Acceptance times efficiency values with statistical uncertainty for the scalar leptoquarks with $\mathrm{\beta=1}$ in the $\mathrm{B_{\mu}=1}$ scenario in the signal regions of all seven multilepton channels. The product is defined as the ratio of the total reconstructed yield in a given channel (after all the corrections and scale factor implementation) to the product of luminosity and the production cross section of the given simulation sample.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for electrons in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for 0.2<dRmin<0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for dRmin>0.4. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for muons in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.2}$ region, arising from the decay of $\tau$ leptons for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.2. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.2. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.2. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 1-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.2. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|<1.1}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.2. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{|\eta|>1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for dRmin>0.2. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}<2}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
Reconstruction efficiency and associated uncertainty maps for 3-prong $\tau_{h}$ in the $\mathrm{1.1<|\eta|<1.6}$ region, arising from the decay of SM gauge bosons (W/Z/h) for $\mathrm{N_{j}>1}$. The lepton efficiency is estimated in a simulated event sample for the ZZ process. For a given input generator-level $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, the efficiency map provides the probability distribution of the reconstructed $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, accounting for reconstruction and identification efficiency, and the $\mathrm{p_{T}}$ resolution. The x-axis and the y-axis represent bins in the reconstructed and generated lepton $\mathrm{p_{T}}$, respectively.
The SR distributions of the Fundamental $\mathrm{L_{T}+p_{T}^{miss}}$ table for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the type-III seesaw heavy fermions in the flavor-democratic scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\Sigma}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the Fundamental $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like $\tau$ lepton in the doublet scenario for $\mathrm{m_{\tau'}}$ = 1 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
The SR distributions of the Advanced $\mathrm{S_{T}}$ table for the combined 2016-2018 data set. The detailed description of the bin numbers can be found in Tables 3-6 in the paper. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background predictions. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown before fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the scalar leptoquark coupled to a top quark and a muon for $\mathrm{m_{S}}$ = 1.4 TeV, before the fit, is also overlaid.
A search is presented for fractionally charged particles with charge below 1$e$, using their small energy loss in the tracking detector as a key variable to observe a signal. The analyzed data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions collected at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV in 2016-2018 at the CERN LHC. This is the first search at the LHC for new particles with charges between $e/$3 and $e$. Masses up to 640 GeV and charges as low as $e/$3 are excluded at 95% confidence level. These are the most stringent limits to date for the considered Drell-Yan-like production mode.
Signal yields for two charge scenarios considered in the analysis, as well as their associated uncertainties.
Signal yields for two charge scenarios considered in the analysis, as well as their associated uncertainties.
Signal yields for two charge scenarios considered in the analysis, as well as their associated uncertainties.
Signal yields for two charge scenarios considered in the analysis, as well as their associated uncertainties.
Distribution of $N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low dE/dx}}$ in the SR and the CR for the early 2016 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively. The p-value of the fit is 6%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the fit due to the choice of the fitting function and the binomial fit range as explained in low dE/dx the main text. Comparing with respect to the binomial fit starting at $N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low dE/dx}} = 2$, and not $N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low dE/dx}} = 1$, is needed to account for the fact that early 2016 data is more strongly affected low dE/dx by instrumental effects that widen the N hits distribution.
Distribution of $N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low dE/dx}}$ in the SR and the CR for the late 2016 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively. The p-value of the fit is 78%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the fit due to the choice of the fitting function and the binomial fit range as explained in low dE/dx the main text.
Distribution of $N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low dE/dx}}$ in the SR and the CR for the 2017 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively. The p-value of the fit is 65%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the fit due to the choice of the fitting function and the binomial fit range as explained in low dE/dx the main text.
Distribution of $N_{\text{hits}}^{\text{low dE/dx}}$ in the SR and the CR for the 2018 data set, as well as for an FCP signal at a mass of 100 GeV and different charge scenarios. The vertical bars and the shaded area correspond to the statistical uncertainty in the SR and the CR, respectively. The p-value of the fit is 9%. The two lower panels show the ratio of the number of tracks observed in the CR (upper) and SR (lower), and the fit function. The vertical bars correspond to the uncertainty from statistical sources, while the shaded area shows the systematic uncertainty in the fit due to the choice of the fitting function and the binomial fit range as explained in low dE/dx the main text.
Exclusion region (hatched) at 95% CL in the FCP charge-mass plane for the considered signal. The expected exclusion is shown with the associated 1 and 2 standard deviations $\sigma$ bands. Signal points at charges 0.9, 0.8, 2/3, 0.5, and 1/3 e are connected by straight lines to guide the eye. This is a conservative interpolation. Previous exclusions from CMS [Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 092008), JHEP 07 (2013) 122] as well as OPAL [Phys. Lett. B 572 (2003) 8] are given for comparison.
Modifications to the distribution of charged particles with respect to high transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) jets passing through a quark-gluon plasma are explored using the CMS detector. Back-to-back dijets are analyzed in lead-lead and proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV via correlations of charged particles in bins of relative pseudorapidity and angular distance from the leading and subleading jet axes. In comparing the lead-lead and proton-proton collision results, modifications to the charged-particle relative distance distribution and to the momentum distributions around the jet axis are found to depend on the dijet momentum balance $x_j$, which is the ratio between the subleading and leading jet $p_\mathrm{T}$. For events with $x_j$$\approx$ 1, these modifications are observed for both the leading and subleading jets. However, while subleading jets show significant modifications for events with a larger dijet momentum imbalance, much smaller modifications are found for the leading jets in these events.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the leading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The distribution of charged particle yields within $|\Delta\varphi| < 1.0$ correlated with the subleading jets as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The leading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions and a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The subleading jet radial momentum profiles in pp and PbPb collisions as a function of $\Delta r$ for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The ratio between leading jet radial momentum profiles in PbPb and pp collisions as a function of $\Delta r$.
The ratio between subleading jet radial momentum profiles in PbPb and pp collisions as a function of $\Delta r$.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for leading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Ratios of leading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Ratios of leading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Ratios of leading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Ratios of leading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $0.7 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 1$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $1 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 2$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $2 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 3$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $3 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 4$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 8$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $8 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 12$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in the 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Jet shapes for subleading jets in pp collisions. The results are shown in different dijet momentum balance bins for the charged particle $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ bin $12 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} < 300$ GeV.
Ratios of subleading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 0-10 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Ratios of subleading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 10-30 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Ratios of subleading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 30-50 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Ratios of subleading jet shapes between PbPb and pp collisions. The results from 50-90 % centrality bin in PbPb are compared to pp using several dijet momentum balance selections.
Ratio between unbalanced selection of leading jet shapes to all leading jet shapes in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
Ratio between balanced selection of leading jet shapes to all leading jet shapes in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
Ratio between unbalanced selection of subleading jet shapes to all subleading jet shapes in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
Ratio between balanced selection of subleading jet shapes to all subleading jet shapes in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
Generator-level vs. reconstructed $x_{j}$ values in the analysis $x_{j}$ bins. The plots show the probability to find a generator level $x_{j}$ for a given reconstructed $x_{j}$.
Generator-level vs. reconstructed $x_{j}$ values in the analysis $x_{j}$ bins. The plots show the probability to find a reconstructed $x_{j}$ for a given generator level $x_{j}$.
The differential production cross sections of B+/- mesons are measured via the exclusive decay channels B+/- to J/psi K+/- to mu+ mu- K+/- as a function of transverse momentum in pp and PbPb collisions at a center-of-mass energy sqrt(s[NN]) = 5.02 TeV per nucleon pair with the CMS detector at the LHC. The pp (PbPb) dataset used for this analysis corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 28.0 inverse picobarns (351 inverse microbarns). The measurement is performed in the B+/- meson transverse momentum range of 7 to 50 GeV/c, in the rapidity interval abs(y) < 2.4. In this kinematic range, a strong suppression of the production cross section by about a factor of two is observed in the PbPb system in comparison to the expectation from pp reference data. These results are found to be roughly compatible with theoretical calculations incorporating beauty quark diffusion and energy loss in a quark-gluon plasma.
B meson nuclear modification factor in PbPb
B meson production cross section in pp
B meson production cross section scaled by $\rm{T_{AA}}$ in PbPb
The production of Z bosons is studied in the dimuon and dielectron decay channels in PbPb and pp collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 2.76 TeV, using data collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The PbPb data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 150 inverse microbarns, while the pp data sample collected in 2013 at the same nucleon-nucleon centre-of-mass energy has an integrated luminosity of 5.4 inverse picobarns. The Z boson yield is measured as a function of rapidity, transverse momentum, and collision centrality. The ratio of PbPb to pp yields, scaled by the number of inelastic nucleon-nucleon collisions, is found to be 1.06 +/- 0.05 (stat) +/- 0.08 (syst) in the dimuon channel and 1.02 +/- 0.08 (stat) +/- 0.15 (syst) in the dielectron channel, for centrality-integrated Z boson production. This binary collision scaling is seen to hold in the entire kinematic region studied, as expected for a colourless probe that is unaffected by the hot and dense QCD medium produced in heavy ion collisions.
The measured Z boson production cross section in pp collisions as a function of the Z boson pT for the dimuon decay channel in |y|<2.0.
The measured Z boson production cross section in pp collisions as a function of the Z boson pT for the dielectron decay channel in |y|<1.44.
The measured Z boson production cross section in pp collisions as a function of the Z boson rapidity for the dimuon decay channel.
The measured Z boson production cross section in pp collisions as a function of the Z boson rapidity for the dielectron decay channel.
Event centrality dependence of the $\mbox{Z}\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ yields per MB event in PbPb collisions, divided by the expected average nuclear overlap function, $T_{\rm AA}$. On the horizontal axis, event centrality is depicted as the average number of participating nucleons, $N_{\rm part}$.
Event centrality dependence of the $\mbox{Z}\rightarrow e^{+}e^{-}$ yields per MB event in PbPb collisions, divided by the expected average nuclear overlap function, $T_{\rm AA}$. On the horizontal axis, event centrality is depicted as the average number of participating nucleons, $N_{\rm part}$.
The measured Z boson yields per MB event in PbPb collisions as a function of the Z boson $p_{\rm T}$ for the dimuon decay channel.
The measured Z boson yields per MB event in PbPb collisions as a function of the Z boson $p_{\rm T}$ for the dielectron decay channel.
The measured Z boson yields per MB event in PbPb collisions as a function of the Z boson rapidity for the dimuon decay channel.
The measured Z boson yields per MB event in PbPb collisions as a function of the Z boson rapidity for the dielectron decay channel.
The measured Z boson yields per MB event in PbPb collisions as a function of the Z boson rapidity for the combined leptonic decay channel.
The measured Z boson yields per MB event in PbPb collisions as a function of the Z boson $p_{\rm T}$ for the combined leptonic decay channel.
Event centrality dependence of the $\mbox{Z}\rightarrow l^{+}l^{-}$ yields per MB event in PbPb collisions, divided by the expected average nuclear overlap function, $T_{\rm AA}$. On the horizontal axis, event centrality is depicted as the average number of participating nucleons, $N_{\rm part}$.
The measured Z boson production cross section in pp collisions as a function of the Z boson rapidity for the combined leptonic decay channel.
The measured Z boson production cross section in pp collisions as a function of the Z boson pT for the combined leptonic decay channel in |y|<1.44.
The production of jets associated to bottom quarks is measured for the first time in PbPb collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 2.76 TeV per nucleon pair. Jet spectra are reported in the transverse momentum (pt) range of 80-250 GeV, and within pseudorapidity abs(eta < 2). The nuclear modification factor (R[AA]) calculated from these spectra shows a strong suppression in the b-jet yield in PbPb collisions relative to the yield observed in pp collisions at the same energy. The suppression persists to the largest values of pt studied, and is centrality dependent. The R[AA] is about 0.4 in the most central events, similar to previous observations for inclusive jets. This implies that jet quenching does not have a strong dependence on parton mass and flavor in the jet pt range studied.
The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 0-100% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.
The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 0-10% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.
The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 10-30% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.
The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 30-50% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.
The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 50-100% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.
The b-jet cross section as a function of pT in pp collisions.
The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 0-100%.
The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of centrality for 80 < jet pT < 90 GeV/c.
The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function centrality for 80 < jet pT < 90 GeV/c.
The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 0-10%.
The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 10-30%.
The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 30-50%.
The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 50-100%.
A systematic study of the factorization of long-range azimuthal two-particle correlations into a product of single-particle anisotropies is presented as a function of pt and eta of both particles, and as a function of the particle multiplicity in PbPb and pPb collisions. The data were taken with the CMS detector for PbPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 2.76 TeV and pPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 5.02 TeV, covering a very wide range of multiplicity. Factorization is observed to be broken as a function of both particle pt and eta. When measured with particles of different pt, the magnitude of the factorization breakdown for the second Fourier harmonic reaches 20% for very central PbPb collisions but decreases rapidly as the multiplicity decreases. The data are consistent with viscous hydrodynamic predictions, which suggest that the effect of factorization breaking is mainly sensitive to the initial-state conditions rather than to the transport properties (e.g., shear viscosity) of the medium. The factorization breakdown is also computed with particles of different eta. The effect is found to be weakest for mid-central PbPb events but becomes larger for more central or peripheral PbPb collisions, and also for very high-multiplicity pPb collisions. The eta-dependent factorization data provide new insights to the longitudinal evolution of the medium formed in heavy ion collisions.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of event multiplicity in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of event multiplicity in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta_b$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta_b$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta_b$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta_b$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta_b$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta_b$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $120<=N_{trk}^{offline}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $150<=N_{trk}^{offline}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $185<=N_{trk}^{offline}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $220<=N_{trk}^{offline}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_2$ as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_3$ as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_4$ as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_2$ as a function of event multiplicity in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
A search for the central exclusive production of top quark-antiquark pairs ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) is performed for the first time using proton-tagged events in proton-proton collisions at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 29.4 fb$^{-1}$. The $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ decay products are reconstructed using the central CMS detector, while forward protons are measured in the CMS-TOTEM precision proton spectrometer. An observed (expected) upper bound on the production cross section of 0.59 (1.14) pb is set at 95% confidence level, for collisions of protons with fractional momentum losses between 2 and 20%.
Expected and observed 95% confidence level (CL) upper limits for the cross section of $\mathrm{pp} \rightarrow \mathrm{p t \bar{t} p}$, for the dilepton and $\ell+$jets channels separately and combined. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% intervals, respectively, for the expected upper limit.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.