Abe, K.
Exclusive
[0.0, 1.0]
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 10 of 176 results

Electron-Proton Scattering at High-Momentum Transfer

Berkelman, K. ; Feldman, M. ; Littauer, R.M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev. 130 (1963) 2061-2068, 1963.
Inspire Record 46839 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26788

The elastic electron-proton scattering cross section has been measured at laboratory angles between 90° and 144° and for values of the four-momentum transfer squared between 25 and 45 F−2 (incident electron laboratory energies from 830 to 1360 MeV). Both the scattered electrons and the recoil protons were momentum analyzed and counted in coincidence, making possible background-free measurements down to cross sections of the order of 10−35 cm2/sr. The data are consistent with the Rosenbluth formula, and the resulting form factors tie on well with previous measurements at lower momentum transfer, continuing the established trend.

6 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Experimental Study of Nuclear Shadowing in Low Q**2 Electroproduction

Eickmeyer, J. ; Michalowski, S. ; Mistry, Nari B. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 36 (1976) 289, 1976.
Inspire Record 100313 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.47141

The total cross section for hadron production by inelastic electron scattering at 3.2° from a number of nuclei has been measured at several virtual photon energies at fixed Q2=0.1 (GeV/c)2. The hadronic cross section is measured directly, by detecting at least one hadron in coincidence with the scattered electron. The results show very little shadowing and no detectable energy dependence. These observations contradict vector-meson dominance.

1 data table
Table 1

N(C=N) and N(C=P) are the numbers of the neutrons and protons in nucleus.


Measurement of muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering off electrons.

Faissner, H. ; Fasold, H.G. ; Frenzel, E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 41 (1978) 213-216, 1978.
Inspire Record 135343 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20832

Muon-neutrino and -antineutrino scattering off electrons was detected in a 19-ton Al spark chamber, exposed to the wide-band ν (ν¯) beam from the CERN proton synchrotron. The background was determined experimentally. 11 (10) genuine νμ− (ν¯μ−) e scattering events were found. The respective cross sections are (1.1±0.6)×10−42(Eν/GeV) cm2 and (2.2±1.0)×10−42(Eν/GeV) cm2. The analysis excludes a pure V−A interaction, and makes a pure V or A theory improbable. The data agree well with the Salam-Weinberg model and sin2θW=0.35±0.08.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.


MEASUREMENT OF J / psi PRODUCTION IN 280-GeV/c mu+ IRON INTERACTIONS

The European Muon collaboration Aubert, J.J. ; Bassompierre, G. ; Becks, K.H. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 89 (1980) 267-270, 1980.
Inspire Record 143938 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27264

Virtual photoproduction of J/ ψ mesons has been measured for 280 GeV muon iron interactions in an iron/scintillator calorimeter target. The J/ψ's were identified by their decay into muon pairs. 315 events were observed, about half of which were elastic. The t , Q 2 and v distributions of these elastic events are presented. The v dependence is measured between 40 and 180 Mev and compared with lower energy photoproduction results. The Q 2 dependence is compared with the predictions of the vector dominance model.

4 data tables
Table 1

TPRIME DISTRIBUTION OF ELASTIC J/PSI EVENTS FOR ALL Q2 AND NU WITH 280 GEV MUON BEAM.

Table 2

NORMALIZED Q**2 DISTRIBUTION OF ELASTIC J/PSI EVENTS FOR ALL NU AND T WITH 280 GEV MUON BEAM.

Table 3

EXTRAPOLATION OF Q**2 AND T DEPENDENCE TO CALCULATE D(SIG)/DT AT Q**2=0 AND T=0 FOR ELASTIC J/PSI PHOTOPRODUCTION PER NUCLEON.

More…

INELASTIC ELECTRON PHOTON SCATTERING AT MODERATE FOUR MOMENTUM TRANSFERS

The PLUTO collaboration Berger, Christoph ; Genzel, H. ; Grigull, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 99 (1981) 287-291, 1981.
Inspire Record 155594 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27125

We present new high statistics data on hadron production in photon-photon reactions. The data are analyzed in terms of an electron-photon scattering formalism. The dependence of the total cross section of Q 2 , the four-momentum transfer squared of the scattered electron, and on the mass W of the hadronic system is investigated. The data are compared to predictions from Vector-Meson Dominance and the quark model.

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

DEPENDENCE ON VISIBLE HADRONIC INVARIANT MASS.

Table 3

Data read from graph.


Experimental Limits on the Strength of Weak Neutral Currents in Lepton Pair Production at {PETRA} Energies

The JADE collaboration Bartel, W. ; Cords, D. ; Dittmann, P. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 99 (1981) 281-286, 1981.
Inspire Record 156813 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27121

The processes e + e − → e + e − and μ + μ − have been studied at PETRA using the JADE detector. The data, which were collected at s -values of up to 1300 GeV 2 have been analysed in terms of an electro-weak extension of QED to obtain values for the weak vector and axial vector couplings in the lepton sector. The values obtained agree with the predictions of the standard Salam-Weinberg model and the data are further analysed in terms of this model to obtain the limits 0.10 < sin 2 ϑ w < 0.40 (68% CL). The mass of the neutral weak gauge boson is deduced to be greater than 51 GeV/ c 2 .

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.


First Measurement of the Photon Structure Function F2

The PLUTO collaboration Berger, Christoph ; Genzel, H. ; Grigull, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 107 (1981) 168-172, 1981.
Inspire Record 167681 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.31043

Using data taken at PETRA we present results on deep inelastic electron photon scattering at momentum transfers 1 < Q 2 < 15 GeV 2 . The results are expressed in terms of the photon structure function F 2 and are compared with QCD predictions and “hadronic” models of the photon. The pointlike component of the photon is found to be dominant.

2 data tables
Table 1

Data read from graph.. Data for W < 3.5 in Berger et al. 1981, PL 99B,287 (<a href=http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/scripts/reacsearch.csh/TESTREAC/red+1164> RED = 1164 </a>).

Table 2

PHOTON STRUCTURE FUNCTION. NUMERICAL VALUES OF DATA ON FIGURE SUPPLIED BY W. WAGNER.


MEASUREMENT OF THE POLARIZED TARGET ASYMMETRY ON gamma p ---> pi+ n IN THE THIRD RESONANCE REGION

Fujii, K. ; Hayashii, H. ; Iwata, S. ; et al.
DPNU-28-81, 1981.
Inspire Record 166957 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.34173

None

4 data tables
Table 1

Axis error includes +- 3/3 contribution.

Table 2

Axis error includes +- 3/3 contribution.

Table 3

Axis error includes +- 3/3 contribution.

More…

Production of $\pi^0 \pi^0$ and $\pi^0 \eta$ in Photon - Photon Collisions

Edwards, C. ; Partridge, Richard ; Peck, C. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 110 (1982) 82-86, 1982.
Inspire Record 168793 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30959

We investigate the four-photon final state produced in γγ colissions. In the π 0 π 0 channel we observe f(1270) production with predominantly helicity 2 and measure a partial width Γ γγ 2.9 +0.6 −0.4 ± keV (independent of assumptions on the helicity). We observe A 2 (1310) production in the π 0 η channel and find a partial width Γ γγ = 0.77 ± 0.18 ± 0.27 KeV (assuming helicity 2). We give an upper limit for f ≈ ηη .

3 data tables
Table 1

Data read from graph. Systematic error on M is of order of 2% or less.

Table 2

Data read from graph.

Table 3

No description provided.


THRUST DISTRIBUTIONS AND DECAYS OF THE UPSILON BOUND STATES

Peterson, D. ; Bohringer, T. ; Franzini, P. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 114 (1982) 277-281, 1982.
Inspire Record 181188 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30893

We have studied the topologies of hadronic events in e + e - annihilation data taken in the region of the upsilon resonances with the non-magnetic CUSB detectors at CESR. Using a thrust-like variable we compare the decay of ϒ, ϒ′ and ϒPrime; find for ϒ″ a significant excess of high thrust events, which we interpret as evidence for electric dipole transitions.

5 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…