$E\frac{dN^3}{dp^3}$ vs. $p_T$, 0% to 20% centrality $Au+Au$. 90% Limit on 18-20 and 20-22 GeV/c bins.

$E\frac{dN^3}{dp^3}$ vs. $p_T$, 20% to 40% centrality $Au+Au$. 90% Limit for 20-22 GeV/c bin.

$E\frac{dN^3}{dp^3}$ vs. $p_T$, 40% to 60% centrality $Au+Au$. 90% Limit for 18-20 GeV/c bin.

$E\frac{dN^3}{dp^3}$ vs. $p_T$, 20% to 60% centrality $Au+Au$. 90% Limit for 18-20 GeV/c bin.

$E\frac{dN^3}{dp^3}$ vs. $p_T$, 60% to 92% centrality $Au+Au$. 90% Limit for 18-20 GeV/c bin.

$E\frac{dN^3}{dp^3}$ vs. $p_T$, 0% to 92% centrality $Au+Au$.

$E\frac{dN^3}{dp^3}$ vs. $p_T$, $p+p$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 0% to 5% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 0% to 10% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 10% to 20% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 0% to 20% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 20% to 40% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 40% to 60% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 20% to 60% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 60% to 92% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$, 0% to 92% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\pi^{0}}$ $R_{AA}$, 0% to 92% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ ${R_{AA}}$, 0% to 92% centrality $Au+Au$.

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$ vs centrality ($p_T>$20 GeV/c).

${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$ vs centrality ($p_T>$5 GeV/c).

Slope ${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$ ($5<p_T<$ 18 GeV/c) vs centrality.

$\chi^{2}/{NDF}$, Prob%, ${\eta}$ $R_{AA}$ ($5<p_T<$ 18 GeV/c) Prob, $R_{AA}$ ($p_T>$ 5 GeV/c) Prob vs centrality

Parameters of the Tsallis fit with parameter $n$ constrained to a fixed linear dependence on mass (for mesons). Cross sections are in $\mu$b for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ and in mb for all other particles.

Constant and linear fits to the Tsallis parameter $T$ of mesons with fixed parameter $n$. The last column (Prob.) gives the probability estimated by the $\chi^2$/$n.d.f.$ of the fit.

Parameters of the Tsallis fit with Eq. 8 in the paper with parameters $n$ and $T$ constrained to have a fixed linear dependence on mass (for mesons). Cross sections are in $\mu$b for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ and in mb for all other particles.

Cross sections in mb and $<p_T>$ in GeV/$c$ of different particles in $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV. PHENIX columns show the values obtained by fits to the experiment spectra with the Tsallis functional form as described in the text. One should state explicitly that these values do not supersede values given in the ”Published” column by the experiments, in their publications listed in the last column, or elsewhere. An additional 9.7% systematic uncertainty should be added to all $d\sigma$/$dy$ values listed in the column “PHENIX” to account for the trigger uncertainties. Values in the column “Published” are also given without these systematic uncertainties. The column “S.M.” is the prediction of the statistical model discussed in the text. The characteristic widths of the particle spectra are $\langle p_T \rangle$ for all species except for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ for which the values given in the Table are $\langle p_T^2 \rangle$. For $\psi^{\prime}$ the integration is done in the $p_T$ regionbelow 5 GeV/$c$. All errors are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Cross sections in mb and $<p_T>$ in GeV/$c$ of different particles in $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV. PHENIX columns show the values obtained by fits to the experiment spectra with the Tsallis functional form as described in the text. One should state explicitly that these values do not supersede values given in the ”Published” column by the experiments, in their publications listed in the last column, or elsewhere. An additional 9.7% systematic uncertainty should be added to all $d\sigma$/$dy$ values listed in the column “PHENIX” to account for the trigger uncertainties. Values in the column “Published” are also given without these systematic uncertainties. The column “S.M.” is the prediction of the statistical model discussed in the text. The characteristic widths of the particle spectra are $\langle p_T \rangle$ for all species except for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ for which the values given in the Table are $\langle p_T^2 \rangle$. For $\psi^{\prime}$ the integration is done in the $p_T$ regionbelow 5 GeV/$c$. All errors are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

$R_{AA}$ for $\phi$ integrated at $p_T$ > 2.2 GeV/$c$ in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions vs. $N_{part}$. The global uncertainty related to the $p$+$p$ reference normalization is shown as a box on the right in the figure from the paper.

$R_{AA}$ for $\phi$ integrated at $p_T$ > 2.2 GeV/$c$ in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions vs. $N_{part}$. The global uncertainty related to the $p$+$p$ reference normalization is shown as a box on the right in the figure from the paper.

$R_{dA}$ vs. $p_T$ for $\phi$, $\pi^0$, and ($p$+$\bar{p}$) for 0-20% centrality $d$+Au collisions, and $R_{dA}$ vs. $p_T$ for $\phi$, $\pi^0$, and ($p$+$\bar{p}$) for 60-88% peripheral $d$+Au collisions. The global uncertainty of ~ 10% related to the $p$+$p$ reference normalization is not shown.

The 3ΛH (solid squares) and Λ (open circles) yield distributions versus cτ. The solid lines represent the cτ fits. The inset depicts the $\chi^2$ distribution of the best 3ΛH cτ fit. The error bars represent the statistical uncertaintiesonly.

Particle ratios as a function of center-of-mass energy per nucleon-nucleon collision. The 4ΛH/(4He × Λ/p) ratio is corrected for the spin degeneracy factor (38). The error bars represent statistical uncertainties only.

$p_T$ dependence of $v_2$ for charged hadrons for several centrality selections as indicated.

$p_T$ dependence of $v_4$ for charged hadrons for several centrality selections as indicated.

$v_2$ vs. $N_{part}$ and $v_4$ vs. $N_{part}$ for charged hadrons for several $p_T$ selections as indicated.

The ratio ${v_4}/{(v_2)^2}$ vs. $N_{part}$ for the same $p_T$ selections.

Balance functions in pseudorapidity windows -1 < eta < 1 for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c.

Balance functions in pseudorapidity windows -1.3 < eta < 1.3 for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c.

Balance functions observed at five different positions of pseudorapidity windows with |eta_w|=0.8 for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -1 < eta < -0.2.

Balance functions observed at five different positions of pseudorapidity windows with |eta_w|=0.8 for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -0.8 < eta < 0.

Balance functions observed at five different positions of pseudorapidity windows with |eta_w|=0.8 for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -0.4 < eta < 0.4.

Balance functions observed at five different positions of pseudorapidity windows with |eta_w|=0.8 for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and 0 < eta < 0.8.

Balance functions observed at five different positions of pseudorapidity windows with |eta_w|=0.8 for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and 0.2 < eta < 1.

Scaled balance function obtained for various pseudorapidity window widths and positions for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -0.3 < eta < 0.3.

Scaled balance function obtained for various pseudorapidity window widths and positions for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and 0 < eta < 1.

Scaled balance function obtained for various pseudorapidity window widths and positions for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 0.

Scaled balance function obtained for various pseudorapidity window widths and positions for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -0.5 < eta < 0.5.

Scaled balance function obtained for various pseudorapidity window widths and positions for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 1.

Scaled balance function obtained for various pseudorapidity window widths and positions for 0.15 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -1.3 < eta < 1.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.15 < pT < 0.4 GEV/c and -0.3 < eta < 0.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.15 < pT < 0.4 GEV/c and 0 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.15 < pT < 0.4 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 0.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.15 < pT < 0.4 GEV/c and -0.5 < eta < 0.5.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.15 < pT < 0.4 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.15 < pT < 0.4 GEV/c and -1.3 < eta < 1.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.4 < pT < 0.7 GEV/c and -0.3 < eta < 0.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.4 < pT < 0.7 GEV/c and 0 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.4 < pT < 0.7 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 0.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.4 < pT < 0.7 GEV/c and -0.5 < eta < 0.5.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.4 < pT < 0.7 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.4 < pT < 0.7 GEV/c and -1.3 < eta < 1.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.7 < pT < 1 GEV/c and -0.3 < eta < 0.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.7 < pT < 1 GEV/c and 0 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.7 < pT < 1 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 0.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.7 < pT < 1 GEV/c and -0.5 < eta < 0.5.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.7 < pT < 1 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 0.7 < pT < 1 GEV/c and -1.3 < eta < 1.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 1 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -0.3 < eta < 0.3.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 1 < pT < 2 GEV/c and 0 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 1 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 0.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 1 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -0.5 < eta < 0.5.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 1 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -1 < eta < 1.

B_s(d eta) based on B(d eta|eta_w) values measured in different pseudorapidity windows for particles in 1 < pT < 2 GEV/c and -1.3 < eta < 1.3.

The pT dependence of the width of the BF in 60-80% centrality.

The pT dependence of the width of the BF in 30-60% centrality.

The pT dependence of the width of the BF in 10-30% centrality.

The pT dependence of the width of the BF in 0-10% centrality.

The centrality dependence of the width of the BF in 0.15 < pT < 0.4 GEV/c.

The centrality dependence of the width of the BF in 0.4 < pT < 0.7 GEV/c.

The centrality dependence of the width of the BF in 0.7 < pT < 1 GEV/c.

The centrality dependence of the width of the BF in 1 < pT < 2 GEV/c.

Away-side jet widths from a Gaussian fit by $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta in Au+Au collisions.

Away-side $I_{AA}$ for the entire away-side $|\Delta \phi - \pi| < \pi /2$ selection vs. $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta. A point-to-point uncorrelated 6% normalization uncertainty (mainly due to efficiency corrections) applies to all measurements.

Away-side $I_{AA}$ for the entire away-side $|\Delta \phi - \pi| < \pi /2$ selection vs. $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta. A point-to-point uncorrelated 6% normalization uncertainty (mainly due to efficiency corrections) applies to all measurements.

Away-side $I_{AA}$ for a narrow “head” $|\Delta \phi - \pi| < \pi /6$ selection vs. $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta. A point-to-point uncorrelated 6% normalization uncertainty (mainly due to efficiency corrections) applies to all measurements.

Away-side $I_{AA}$ for a narrow “head” $|\Delta \phi - \pi| < \pi /6$ selection vs. $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta. A point-to-point uncorrelated 6% normalization uncertainty (mainly due to efficiency corrections) applies to all measurements.

Supplemental near-side jet widths from a Gaussian fit by $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta in $p+p$ collisions.

Supplemental near-side jet widths from a Gaussian fit by $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta in Au+Au collisions.

Supplemental near-side jet widths from a Gaussian fit by $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta in Au+Au collisions.

Supplemental away-side $I_{AA}$ for $|\Delta \phi - \pi| < \pi /3$ selection vs. $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta. A point-to-point uncorrelated 6% normalization uncertainty (mainly due to efficiency corrections) applies to all measurements.

Supplemental away-side $I_{AA}$ for $|\Delta \phi - \pi| < \pi /3$ selection vs. $h^{\pm}$ partner momentum for various $\pi^0$ trigger momenta. A point-to-point uncorrelated 6% normalization uncertainty (mainly due to efficiency corrections) applies to all measurements.

$p+p$ yield vs $p_T^a$ supplemental tables.

Au+Au yield vs $p_T^a$ supplemental tables.

Au+Au yield vs $p_T^a$ supplemental tables.

Coordinates of the 2-sigma contour plot for the cross section of Drell-Yan pairs (first column) and bottom-antibottom quark pairs (second column).

Coordinates of the 1-sigma contour plot for the cross section of Drell-Yan pairs (first column) and bottom-antibottom quark pairs (second column).

The STAR measurement of the midrapidity Upsilon(1S+2S+3S)cross section times branching ratio into electrons (star).

Evolution of the Upsilon(1S+2S+3S) cross section with center-of-mass energy.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 50-60% Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV using FTPC flow vectors, and that with subtracting the azimuthal correlations in p+p collisions.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 40-50% Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV using FTPC flow vectors, and that with subtracting the azimuthal correlations in p+p collisions.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 30-40% Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV using FTPC flow vectors, and that with subtracting the azimuthal correlations in p+p collisions.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 20-30% Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV using FTPC flow vectors, and that with subtracting the azimuthal correlations in p+p collisions.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 10-20% Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV using FTPC flow vectors, and that with subtracting the azimuthal correlations in p+p collisions.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 0-10% Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV using FTPC flow vectors, and that with subtracting the azimuthal correlations in p+p collisions.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 integrated over pT and eta vs centrality in Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV for the various methods.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 integrated over pT and eta vs centrality in Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV for the various methods.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 50-60% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV. Data tables for 200 GeV are shown in Fig.4.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 40-50% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV using FTPC flow vectors. Data tables for 200 GeV are shown in Fig.4.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 30-40% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV using FTPC flow vectors. Data tables for 200 GeV are shown in Fig.4.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 20-30% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV using FTPC flow vectors. Data tables for 200 GeV are shown in Fig.4.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 10-20% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV using FTPC flow vectors. Data tables for 200 GeV are shown in Fig.4.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 0-10% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV using FTPC flow vectors. Data tables for 200 GeV are shown in Fig.4.

Charged hadron azimuthal anisotropy v2 as a function of pT in 0-60% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV using FTPC flow vectors. Data tables for 200 GeV are shown in Fig.3.

K0S azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 0-60% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

K0S azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 0-20% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

K0S azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 20-60% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

Lambda azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 0-60% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

Lambda azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 0-20% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

Lambda azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 20-60% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

Xi azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 0-60% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

phi azimuthal anisotropy v2 vs pT in 0-60% central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

Background-subtracted charge-independent (AAT ) correlated hadron pair density in 40-80% Au+Au collisions for 3<p(t)⊥<10 GeV/cand 1<p(a)⊥<3 GeV/c. The results are for near-side correlated hadrons within |∆φ1,2|<0.7, and corrected for the 3-particle ∆η-∆η acceptance. Statistical errors at (∆η1,∆η2)∼(0,0)are approximately 0.058 for Au+Au respectively..

Background-subtracted charge-independent (AAT ) correlated hadron pair density in 0-12% Au+Au collisions for 3<p(t)⊥<10 GeV/cand 1<p(a)⊥<3 GeV/c. The results are for near-side correlated hadrons within |∆φ1,2|<0.7, and corrected for the 3-particle ∆η-∆η acceptance. Statistical errors at (∆η1,∆η2)∼(0,0)are approximately 0.084 for Au+Au respectively..

The average correlated hadron pair density per trigger particle as a function of R for all charges in minimum 0-12% Au+Au collision. The average〈ˆP〉for AAT as a function of R = $\sqrt{∆η21+ ∆η22}$. The average density is peaked at R∼0 and decreases with R for all systems. In 0-12% Au+Au collisions, the average denstiy drops more slowly andbecomes approximately constant aboveR>1, indicatingthe presence of the ridge.

The average correlated hadron pair density per trigger particle as a function of R for all charges in minimum 40-80% Au+Au collision. The average〈ˆP〉for AAT as a function of R = $\sqrt{∆η21+ ∆η22}$. The average density is peaked at R∼0 and decreases with R for all systems. For 40-80% Au+Au collisions the average density at R>1 is consistent with zero, indicating no ridge contribution

The average correlated hadron pair density per trigger particle as a function of R for all charges in minimum d+Au collision. The average〈ˆP〉for AAT as a function of R = $\sqrt{∆η21+ ∆η22}$. The average density is peaked at R∼0 and decreases with R for all systems. For d+Au collisions the average density at R>1 is consistent with zero, indicating no ridge contribution

Radial dependence of average 3-particle correlation pair density for 0-12% Au+Au (like-sign triplets) data. The results are shown in Fig. 3(b) Indeed, no jet-like component is apparent in A^±A^±T^±.The A^±A^±T^∓ result contains both jet-like and ridge components.

Radial dependence of average 3-particle correlation pair density for 40-80% Au+Au (like-sign triplets) data. The contribution from other charge combinations, namely A^±A^∓ T^±, are simply the difference between AAT in Fig.3(a) and (A^±A^±T^± + A^±A^± T^∓) in Fig. 3(b). We found this to be equal to twice the A^±A^± T^∓contribution within errors.

Radial dependence of average 3-particle correlation pair density for d+Au (AAT) data. We expect the ridge contributions in the correlated pair density to be the same in all charge combinations. We verified this for large ∆η correlatedpair densities within our current statistics, as can be seen from Fig. 3(b). Therefore the total ridge particle pair density (ˆPrr) can be obtained as four times A^±A^±T^±. The remaining jet-like signal, the sum of jet-like correlated particle pairs (ˆPjj) and cross pairs of a jet-like and a ridge particle (ˆPjr), can then be obtained by subtracting the total ridge from AAT.

for same-sign associated particles (A^\pm A^\pm T^\pm and A^\pm A^\pm T^\mp) in 0-12% Au+Au collisions Systematic uncertainties are shown in the shaded boxes due to background normalization and in the solid curves due to flow.

The R dependence of the average〈ˆPrr〉and〈ˆPjj〉+〈ˆPjr〉in 0-12% Au+Au collisions.The ridge pair density is consistent with a constant 60.14±0.02 (χ2/ndf=5.8/7). Gaussian fits indicate a best fit value σ = 2.1 (χ2/ndf=4.8/6, solid curve) and σ >1.4 (dashed curve) with 84% confidence level. On the otherhand, the jet-like component is narrow with a Gaussianσ=0.34+0.13−0.09(χ2/ndf=0.8/6, dominated by statistical errors), comparing well to those from the correlated single hadron density.

The average correlated hadron pair density per trigger particle in 0-12% Au+Au collisions for the jet-like andridge components as a function of R. The solid curves are Gaussian fits. The dashed curve is a Gaussian fit with a fixed σ=1.4 to the ridge data. The systematic uncertainities on the ridge data are shown in shaded boxes due to background normalization and in open boxes due to flow.

The R dependence of the average in 0-12% Au+Au collisions.for the ridge as a function of ξ within R<1.4. The solid curves are Gaussian fits. To investigate possible structures in the ridge, we show in Fig. 4(b) the average ridge particle pair density as a function of ξ = arctan(∆η2/∆η1) within R<1.4. The data are consistent with a uniform distribution in ξ(χ2/ndf=1.7/7). This suggests that the ridge particles are uncorrelated in ∆η not only with the trigger particle but also between themselves. In other words,the ridge appears to be uniform in ∆η event-by-event.