$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\tilde\lambda$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 10 to 15 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\lambda_\vartheta$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\lambda_\varphi$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\lambda_{\vartheta\varphi}$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

$\Upsilon$(nS) polarization parameter $\tilde\lambda$ in the HX frame for $p_T$ of 15 to 35 GeV. The global uncertainties, independent of state and $N_{ch}$ bin, are also indicated.

A summary of benchmark simplified models, the most sensitive $n_{\mathrm{jet}}$ categories, and representative values for the corresponding experimental acceptance times efficiency ($\mathcal{A}\varepsilon$), the dominant systematic uncertainties, the theoretical production cross section ($\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}$), and the expected and observed upper limits on the production cross section, expressed in terms of the signal strength parameter ($\mu$).

Summary of the mass limits obtained for the fourteen classes of simplified models. The limits indicate the strongest observed and expected (in parentheses) mass exclusions in $\tilde{g}$, $\tilde{q}$, $\tilde{b}$, $\tilde{t}$, and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The quoted values have uncertainties of $\pm 25$ and $\pm 10$ GeV for models involving the pair production of, respectively, gluinos and squarks.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Covariance matrix for the SM background estimates obtained using the simplified binning scheme, determined from a simultaneous fit to data in the control regions only (CR-only fit). The uncertainties in the background estimates are correlated in such a way that the covariance is typically positive. Small positive values, as well as the few negative values, are not shown.

Correlation matrix for the SM background estimates obtained using the simplified binning scheme, determined from a simultaneous fit to data in the control regions only (CR-only fit).

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Observed data counts and "post-fit" background expectations based on the result of a combined fit to the signal region and multiple control regions under the SM-only hypothesis for the "monojet" event category. The rows labelled SM "pre-fit' show the background expectations when excluding the signal region from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Observed data counts and "post-fit" background expectations based on the result of a combined fit to the signal region and multiple control regions under the SM-only hypothesis for the "asymmetric" event categories. The rows labelled SM "pre-fit" show the background expectations when excluding the signal region from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Observed data counts and "post-fit" background expectations based on the result of a combined fit to the signal region and multiple control regions under the SM-only hypothesis for the "symmetric" event categories. The rows labelled SM "pre-fit" show the background expectations when excluding the signal region from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Summary of a simplified binning scheme comprising $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ shapes for eight representative event topologies, defined in terms of requirements on $n_{\mathrm{jet}}$ both symmetric and asymmetric categories) and $n_{\mathrm{b}}$. For each topology, event yields are integrated over the full $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ range, $H_{\mathrm{T}} > 200$ GeV, and are categorised according to eight bins in $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ -- $130 < H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} < 200$ GeV, six bins 100 GeV wide in the region $200 < H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} < 800$ GeV, and an open final bin, $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} > 800$ GeV. This categorisation scheme leads to 64 bins that are exclusive, contiguous, and provide complete coverage of the signal region. The corresponding SM background estimates for these 64 bins are obtained using the nominal likelihood model. The $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ template for each topology is determined from simulation and the normalisation for each template is given by an aggregate of estimates from several ($n_{\mathrm{jet}}$, $n_{\mathrm{b}}$, $H_{\mathrm{T}}$) bins, defined according to the nominal binning scheme.

Observed data yields and "CR-only fit" SM background expectations using the simplified binning scheme, as a function of topology and $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The SM backgrounds are determined from a simultaneous fit to data in the control regions. The data yields in the signal region are masked and excluded from the fit. The uncertainties include statistical as well as systematic contributions.

Expected ($\mu_{\mathrm{exp}}$) and observed ($\mu_{\mathrm{obs}}$) upper limits on the production cross section, expressed in terms of the signal strength parameter, obtained using both the nominal and simplified binning schema. Comparable values are obtained from the two schema for these benchmark SUSY models because the signal events typically populate bins at high values of $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ and $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ and so are at or near the limit of the search sensitivity. Larger differences in $\mu$ can be observed for models that populate the core of these distributions.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1qqqq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{q} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2qq model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1bbbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1tttt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T1ttbb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5tttt_DM175 model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{g} } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T5ttcc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ b } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tb model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2cc model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2tt_degen model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the expected exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2_mixed model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ expected exclusion due to experimental uncertainties.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the observed exclusion.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $+1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Upper limit on the cross section in the $(m_{ \tilde{ \mathrm{ t } } }, m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1 })$ plane for the T2bW model. This line is the $-1\sigma $ observed exclusion due to theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

Quadrangular flow (v4) measured with respect to symmetry plane Psi4, estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0), measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum for various centrality classes.

Quadrangular flow (v4) measured with respect to symmetry plane Psi2, estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0), measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum for various centrality classes.

Comparison of the ALICE results on v2, v3 and v4 obtained with the event plane method, measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum, for centrality 30-40%. Note that these results are the same as in Figure 1.

Relative event-by-event elliptic flow fluctuations for unidentified charged particles versus transverse momentum for different centrality classes.

Unidentified charged particle v2, v3, and v4 integrated over the transverse momentum range 10 < pT < 20 GeV as a function of collision centrality.

Elliptic flow (v2) estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0) of charged pion and proton as a function of transverse momentum for 10-50% centrality class compared to results for unidentified charged particles.

Triangular flow (v3) estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0) of charged pion and proton as a function of transverse momentum for 10-50% centrality class compared to results for unidentified charged particles.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 0-5%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 5-10%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 10-20%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 20-30%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 30-40%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 40-50%.

Nuclear modification factor RAA of D0 mesons in the 30-50% centrality class in two 90-degree-wide azimuthal intervals centred on the IN-PLANE and on the OUT-OF-PLANE directions. The correlated, uncorrelated, and anti-correlated contributions to the systematic uncertainty are shown separately.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-5\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 5-10\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-20\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 5-10\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-20\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.

The $v_{2}^{high}$ as a function of $v_{2}^{low}$ results from SP method in PbPb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

The $v_{2}^{high}$ as a function of $v_{2}^{low}$ results from 4-particle cumulant method in PbPb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

The normalised differential cross section of the azmiuthal decorrelation variable DELTA for the GAMMA+2JET sample for the PT of the second jet in the range 25 TO 30 GeV.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 20-30%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 30-40%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-50%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 50-60%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 60-70%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 70-80%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 0-10%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 0-20%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 20-40%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-60%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-80%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 60-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-5%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 5-10%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 10-20%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 20-30%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 30-40%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-50%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 50-60%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 60-70%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 70-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-10%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-20%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 20-40%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-60%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 60-80%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential invariant yield of pion+ and pion- for centrality 80-90%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 0-5%. These data are also available from http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1126966.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential invariant yield of kaon+ and kaon- for centrality 80-90%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 0-5%. These data are also available from http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1126966.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential invariant yield of proton and antiproton for centrality 80-90%.

Centrality dependence of charged particle multiplicity density and mid-rapidity particle yields for pi+, pi-, K+, K-, p, pbar production. The additional normalization uncertainty coming from the centrality definition is {0.5%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 1%, 2%, 2.4%, 3.5%, 5%, 6.7%, +12%/-8.5%} for the 10 centrality bins.

Centrality dependence of mean transverse momentum for pi+, pi-, K+, K-, p, pbar production.

pi-/pi+ ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

K-/K+ ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

PBAR/P ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

p/pi ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

K/pi ratio in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 0-5%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential ratio of proton / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 80-90%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 0-5%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 5-10%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 10-20%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 20-30%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 30-40%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 40-50%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 50-60%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 60-70%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 70-80%.

pT-differential ratio of kaon / pion in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV for centrality 80-90%.

$\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ versus y distribution derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distribution along with pt distributions and particle ratios measured in ALICE. Errors are systematic.

The ratio of the standard deviation of the rapidity distribution of charged particles to that expected from Landau hydrodynamics versus versus $\sqrt{s}$/nucleon-pair. The standard deviation for data for all charged particles is derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distributions measured at various energies and converted to $\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ in a consistent manner. The data from the BRAHMS and PHOBOS experiments derived by the present authors from these experiments $dN/d\eta$ distributions.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Inclusive Jpsi Nuclear Modification Factor (Raa) measured in Lead-Lead collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV as a function of transverse momentum in 2.5 < y < 4 for the centrality range 0%-20%. Data have been collected in 2011 and the integrated luminosity is ~ 70 inverse microbarn.

Inclusive Jpsi Nuclear Modification Factor (Raa) measured in Lead-Lead collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV as a function of rapidity in 0 < pt < 8 GeV/c for the centrality range 0%-90%. Data have been collected in 2011 and the integrated luminosity is ~ 70 inverse microbarn.

The Balance Function as a function of the relative azimutuhal angle of two charged particles for the centrality class 0-5%.

The Balance Function as a function of the relative azimutuhal angle of two charged particles for the centrality class 30-40%.

The Balance Function as a function of the relative azimutuhal angle of two charged particles for the centrality class 70-80%.

The centrality dependence of the mean widths of the relative pseudorapidites and relative azimuthal angles for the correlations studied.

The centrality dependence of the relative decrease of the width of the balance function in the relative pseusdorapidity, DEL(ETARAP), and relative azimuthal angle, DEL(PHI).

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross section ratios for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Measured charged jet differential cross section ratios for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity in charged jets.

Average charged particle multiplicity in charged jets.

Average charged particle multiplicity in charged jets.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet.

Average radius containing 80% of the total reconstructed jet transverse momentum.

Average radius containing 80% of the total reconstructed jet transverse momentum.

Average radius containing 80% of the total reconstructed jet transverse momentum.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV without UE subtraction.

Measured charged jet differential cross sections for INEL proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV without UE subtraction.

Average charged particle multiplicity in charged jets without UE subtraction.

Average charged particle multiplicity in charged jets without UE subtraction.

Average charged particle multiplicity in charged jets without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Average transverse momentum density distribution within a charged jet without UE subtraction.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet without UE subtraction.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet without UE subtraction.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet without UE subtraction.

Transverse momentum of particles in charged jet without UE subtraction.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz without UE subtraction.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz without UE subtraction.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz without UE subtraction.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dz without UE subtraction.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi without UE subtraction.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi UE subtracted.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi without UE subtraction.

Charged particle scaled pT spectra dN/dxi without UE subtraction.

The $\gamma$ differential transverse momentum cross-section in an inclusive $\gamma+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq2$ selection for central rapidities $\vert y_{\gamma} \vert > 1.4$.

The Z boson differential transverse momentum cross-section in an inclusive $Z/\gamma^{*}+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq2$ over $Z/\gamma^{*}+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq1$ selection.

The $\gamma$ boson differential transverse momentum cross-section in an inclusive $\gamma+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq2$ over $Z+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq1$ selection for central rapidities $\vert y_{\gamma} \vert < 1.4$.

The Z boson differential transverse momentum over $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ cross-section in an inclusive $Z/\gamma^{*}+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq2$ selection.

The Z boson differential transverse momentum over $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ cross-section in an inclusive $Z/\gamma^{*}+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq3$ selection.

The log (base 10) of the Z boson differential transverse momentum over the leading jet transverse momentum cross-section in an inclusive $Z/\gamma^{*}+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq2$ selection.

The log (base 10) of the Z boson differential transverse momentum over the leading jet transverse momentum cross-section in an inclusive $Z/\gamma^{*}+\mathrm{jets}$, $N_{\mathrm{jets}} \geq3$ selection.

Differential cross-section ratio of Z over $\gamma$ as a function of the total transverse momentum cross-section and for central bosons ($\vert y_{\mathrm{V}}\vert < 1.4$) in an inclusive $ N_{\mathrm{jets}}\geq 1 $ selection.

Differential cross-section ratio of Z over $\gamma$ as a function of the total transverse momentum cross-section and for central bosons ($\vert y_{\mathrm{V}}\vert < 1.4$) in a $ H_{\mathrm{T}}$% > 300 GeV, N_{\mathrm{jets}}\geq 1 $ selection.

Differential cross-section ratio of Z over $\gamma$ as a function of the total transverse momentum cross-section and for central bosons ($\vert y_{\mathrm{V}}\vert < 1.4$) in an inclusive $ N_{\mathrm{jets}}\geq 2 $ selection.

Differential cross-section ratio of Z over $\gamma$ as a function of the total transverse momentum cross-section and for central bosons ($\vert y_{\mathrm{V}}\vert < 1.4$) in an inclusive $ N_{\mathrm{jets}}\geq 3 $ selection.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to inclusive jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dEta distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp leading jets with pT > 120 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 30-50% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to PbPb and pp subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 0-10% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 50-100% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV in 10-30% central events.

Difference PbPb - pp of symmetrized dPhi distributions (projected over |dPhi|<1) of background-subtracted particle yields correlated to leading jets with pT > 120 GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV for tracks with 1 < pT < GeV 0-10% central events.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 50-100% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 30-50% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 10-30% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Total excess correlated yield observed in the PbPb data with respect to the reference measured in pp collisions, shown as a function of track pT in in centrality interval 0-10% for both leading jets with pT >120GeV and subleading jets with pT > 50 GeV.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to leading jets with pT > 120GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dEta charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 10-30%.

Comparison of the widths in PbPb and pp of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 50-100%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 30-50%.

Difference of the widths in PbPb and pp data of the dPhi charged-particle distributions correlated to subleading jets with pT > 50GeV, as a function of track pT for centrality interval 0-10%.

v2 vs. pt for average D0, D+ and D*+. The first systematic (sys) error is that from the data analysis and the second is from the B feed-down subtraction, as explained in the paper.

Ratio of D*^+ to D^0 meson production cross sections in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT.

Ratio of D_s^+ to D^0 meson production cross sections in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT.

Ratio of D_s^+ to D^+ meson production cross sections in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT.

pT-integrated ratios of D meson production cross sections and the strangeness suppression factor gamma_s in |y| < 0.5. The second systematic uncertainty arises from the branching ratios.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of leading jet shape for peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%) to leading jet shape for pp data.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of leading jet shape for central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%) to leading jet shape for pp data.

Subleading jet shape rho(dR) versus dR for pp data, normalized to unity over the range dR < 0.3.

Subleading jet shape rho(dR) versus dR for peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), normalized to unity over the range dR < 0.3.

Subleading jet shape rho(dR) versus dR for central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), normalized to unity over the range dR < 0.3.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of subleading jet shape for peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%) to subleading jet shape for pp data.

Ratio rho_PbPb(dR)/rho_pp(dR) of subleading jet shape for central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%) to subleading jet shape for pp data.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres in pp data (denoted d, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Difference of the total track transverse momentum distributions (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) between subleading and leading hemispheres in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22. Hemisphere subleading-to-leading difference is denoted dP.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference of transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_p), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), in jet peak transverse momentum distributions, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference, central PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), in jet peak transverse momentum distributions, projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, forunbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum for leading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for subleading jets in peripheral PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum (P = 1/N dSum(pT)/dPhi) for leading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Jet peak (long-range subtracted) distribution of transverse momentum for subleading jets in central PbPb data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in subleading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference, central PbPb minus pp data in leading jet peak transverse momentum distributions (P_PbPb - P_pp), projected into relative azimuth and plotted in the negative direction, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading, in jet peak transverse momentum distributions (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference, peripheral PbPb minus pp, subleading minus leading (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), in jet peak transverse momentum distributions, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres in pp data (dP), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference of long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Double difference of long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in pp data, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in peripheral PbPb data (centrality 50-100%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Difference of the long range track transverse momentum distributions between subleading and leading hemispheres (dP) in central PbPb data (centrality 0-30%), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference of the long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, peripheral PbPb minus pp, projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Double difference of the long range transverse momentum distributions, subleading minus leading, central PbPb minus pp (dP_PbPb - dP_pp), projected into relative azimuth, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum in the long-range correlated distribution, as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum in the long-range correlated distribution, as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference central PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the jet peak distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for balanced dijets with Aj < 0.22.

Integrated transverse momentum difference peripheral PbPb minus pp of the total transverse momentum distributions (subleading minus leading), as a function of track-pT, for unbalanced dijets with Aj > 0.22.

Normalized DPhi(Z, j2) distributions for Njets >= 3.

Normalized DPhi(Z, j3) distributions for Njets >= 3.

Normalized DPhi(j1, j2) distributions for Njets >= 3.

Normalized DPhi(j1, j3) distributions for Njets >= 3.

Normalized DPhi(j2, j3) distributions for Njets >= 3.

Normalized DPhi(Z, j1) distributions for Njets >= 1 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized DPhi(Z, j1) distributions for Njets >= 2 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized DPhi(Z, j1) distributions for Njets >= 3 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized DPhi(Z, j2) distributions for Njets >= 3 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized DPhi(Z, j3) distributions for Njets >= 3 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized DPhi(j1, j2) distributions for Njets >= 3 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized DPhi(j1, j3) distributions for Njets >= 3 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized DPhi(j2, j3) distributions for Njets >= 3 and PT(Z) >= 150 GeV.

Normalized distributions in ln(tauT) for all PT(Z) and Njets >=1.

Normalized distributions in ln(tauT) for PT(Z) > 150 GeV and Njets >=1.

Inclusive relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C}/M(p_{\rm T})$ as a function of $\sqrt{s}$ in pp collisions.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

The second-order Fourier coefficients, $V_{3\Delta}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles, after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, estimated from the 10 $\leq$ $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 20 range.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The triangular flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{3}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The triangular flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{3}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The triangular flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{3}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)/n_{q}$, as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The four-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The four-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The four-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The six-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(6)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(6)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.