Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> P X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI+ Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction P BE --> PI- Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> P Xwith an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI+ X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI+ BE --> PI- X with an 8.9 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> P Xwith an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI+ X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 20 to 30 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 30 to 40 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 40 to 50 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 50 to 60 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 60 to 75 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 75 to 90 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 90 to 105 degrees.

Double differential inclusive cross section for the reaction PI- BE --> PI- X with an 8.0 GeV beam and production angle 105 to 125 degrees.

Ratio K+/PI+ in 8.9 GeV proton and PI+ interactions with Beryllium.

Ratio of deuteron to proton production in P BE interactions at 8.9 GeV.

Ratio of deuteron to proton production in PI+ BE interactions at 8.9 GeV.

Ratio of deuteron to proton production in PI- BE interactions at 8.0 GeV.

The measured strange quark helicity distribution as a funxtion of X.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.

Anisotropy parameter $v_2$ as a function of pseudorapidity within the PHENIX central arms using event planes from the BBC and ZDC-SMD, and from the two-particle cumulant method for centrality 20–40%. The results are shown for three $p_T$ bins, which are from top to bottom: 2.0–3.0, 1.2–1.4 and 0.6–0.8 GeV/$c$.

Comparison of the $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} obtained from the S-N and ZDC-BBC-CNT subevents as a function of pT in the 20–60% centrality range.

Charged hadron $v_2${2} for the PHENIX experiment as a function of $p_T$ in centrality 20–60%.

The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.

The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.

The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.

The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.

The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.

The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of Q**2 in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of X in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of ETARAP in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of Q**2 in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of X in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of ETARAP in the laboratoryframe.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the currenthemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of Q**2.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of ETARAP.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of Q**2.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of ETARAP.

Differential cross section DSIG/DX for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Differential cross section DSIG/DY for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 280 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 530 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 950 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 1700 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 3000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 5300 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 9500 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 17000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 30000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.23.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.23.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 19 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 23 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 28 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 19 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 23 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 28 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.